Jesse Lingard

Status
Not open for further replies.

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
So he wants more playing time yet had the chance to move this year for more playing time but didn’t do so. :confused:
Makes no sense. Did he think he would roll up for pre-season and suddenly become a starter. Surely the signing of Sancho and Ronaldo will further limit his opportunities.
Forwards
Ronaldo
Cavani
Rashford
Martial
Greenwood
Sancho

Attacking Mid
Bruno
Pogba
VDB
 

flappyjay

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
5,935
If Jesse wants to run his contract down, it is fine. However, for the love of God, do not offer him a new one. Let him move elsewhere and play regularly, while we move on and improve our squad.
Especially with all these kids coming through added to the fact that the likes of Andreas are still to come back from loan. We should be letting Jesse, Jones, Axel/Bailly, Matic and Juan go.
 

Can7onA

Full Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2008
Messages
1,298
Didn't he reject West Ham because he wanted to fight for his place at United.

Then a couple of days later he rejects a contract because of playing time.

Jeeez, get out the club you waste of skin.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Don't see the issue in him running down his contract. Let's hope for a good last season for him here and then goodbye.
See I can’t understand posts like this it benefits no one for JLingz to sit on the bench and pick up a paycheque not even him, he’s going to cost the club however amount of millions in wages plus whatever selling on fee he has and adds another year to his own stumbling career, totally pointless. It looks to me Jesse only is interested in a big signing on fee to end his career.
 

flappyjay

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
5,935
He should have been sold in the summer, even for 10m and not holding out for 25-30m like I'm imagining we were.

Take 2.5/-5m in January and let him move then instead of free in the summer with whoever he ends up signing a pre-contract with.

He'll likely end up back at West Ham or somewhere like Everton or Newcastle.
He is the one who rejected westham
 

the_cliff

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
5,603
On a free Jesse will have more than just West Ham after him. He'll have teams in England, Italy and Spain after him and he'll do well wherever he goes, unfortunately the club should have at least got 20 m for him. If we sold Jesse we could've got a DM this summer. I don't blame Ole for this tbh as this seems to be a problem regardless of manager. Whoever is in charge of renewals/selling players needs to be sacked asap.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
So many posters throwing their toys out of the pram saying we should have sold him, he didn’t want to go to West Ham, you can’t sell a player if they refuse a move.

If he wants to be a Cnut and leave on a free then let him. In no world should Ole be guaranteeing Lingard playing time, he’s consistently anonymous for United. Save his wages and put it towards a Pogba renewal.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
29,955
Location
Austria
See I can’t understand posts like this it benefits no one for JLingz to sit on the bench and pick up a paycheque not even him, he’s going to cost the club however amount of millions in wages plus whatever selling on fee he has and adds another year to his own stumbling career, totally pointless. It looks to me Jesse only is interested in a big signing on fee to end his career.
Even if that was the case, so be it. It's our club that decides to hand out contracts like absolute madmen so why shouldn't he fulfil his. I'm pretty indifferent about it. The only thing that would annoy me a tad is if we renew him again.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
We shouldn't have been giving Jesse hope unfortunately.

We keep saying the door is open for him and he can fight for his place. In reality we should have said you'll be playing very little and it's best to move on.

I don't blame Jesse for wanting to stay and try to give it another go, but the club should really be stronger in these situations. Now he's stuck in limbo, the club won't be able to sell him for a good fee like they could have this summer.
 

the_cliff

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
5,603
Apparently turned down westham.
Yes, he turned down West Ham, West Ham isn't the only club in the world. It's not just this instance it's a problem we've had for a long time and there have been no signs of that changing. If Jesse played for Chelsea he'd be on his way to Roma for 35 Million. We're gonna let him go for free. If people don't see this as a recurring problem idk what to say. It's not sustainable to let our players go for free and expect the club to spend 100+ mill every summer. Chelsea just broke their transfer fee record but still ended up with a negative net spend and people will say Chelsea are ruining football.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,086
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Sad thing is he’s 29 soon and should be trying to make the most of whatever playing career he has left, if he was anyway serious about football he’d have pushed for a move a couple of seasons ago and at the very least this summer. I think it’s become abundantly clear it’s all about JLingz the brand and not football with him.
Eugh, not another. This narrative is just nonsense. Complete nonsense. He doesn’t have a brand if he doesn’t play football does he? He doesn’t make the England squad if he doesn’t play football does he? If you know anything about our players you couldn’t say that lingard has given up on football
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,086
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I am so annoyed that he didn't leave, especially after Ronaldo's arrival.

Strange that he rejected WH after that half season there.
Why is it strange? Does every loanee join the club they played for briefly on loan? I must have missed that rule
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Even if that was the case, so be it. It's our club that decides to hand out contracts like absolute madmen so why shouldn't he fulfil his. I'm pretty indifferent about it. The only thing that would annoy me a tad is if we renew him again.
I’d be very surprised if there wasn’t some kind of pre agreement with West Ham and he’ll sign at the end of the season. If I’m correct he’s a massive twat..
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,909
Location
Wales
Makes perfect sense.

He WANTS to play for United. He will see how it goes this season. I don’t see it going well for him but that’s his choice.

There’ll be more clubs interested than just West Ham when he’s on free too next summer.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Eugh, not another. This narrative is just nonsense. Complete nonsense. He doesn’t have a brand if he doesn’t play football does he? He doesn’t make the England squad if he doesn’t play football does he? If you know anything about our players you couldn’t say that lingard has given up on football
That’s nonsense he’s trying to milk whatever out of his brand as possible. If he was serious about football he’d be trying for a move years ago but no he happy to sit on the bench at United he’s even done it this summer again, what are you watching exactly?
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,909
Location
Wales
I’d be very surprised if there wasn’t some kind of pre agreement with West Ham and he’ll sign at the end of the season. If I’m correct he’s a massive twat..
Because he wants to play at the club he loves for as long as he can? fecking hell, the state on this place on times.

He’ll leave next summer when he doesn’t get the playing time he wants this season, don’t blame him the way ‘fans’ treat him.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Because he wants to play at the club he loves for as long as he can? fecking hell, the state on this place on times.
By not signing a contract? Your reasoning doesn’t add up at all..
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,086
Location
Dublin, Ireland
That’s nonsense he’s trying to milk whatever out of his brand as possible. If he was serious about football he’d be trying for a move years ago but no he happy to sit on the bench at United he’s even done it this summer again, what are you watching exactly?
You need to stop reading internet myths and read some facts
 

devips

Full Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
1,233
Ha ha ha ha! It's so funny! You don't want to extend Lingard's contract. Great!

Now when he himself has refused the contract, you should be very happy, no?

But you morons seem pissed off! So funny indeed!
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,909
Location
Wales
By not signing a contract? Your reasoning doesn’t add up at all..
He wants to stay at the club he loves but probably knows it’s his last season. Really not rocket science.

Maybe he’s been promised playing time behind closed doors and wants to see it play out? What a twat he is for playing on the contract the club gave him.
 

flappyjay

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
5,935
Yes, he turned down West Ham, West Ham isn't the only club in the world. It's not just this instance it's a problem we've had for a long time and there have been no signs of that changing. If Jesse played for Chelsea he'd be on his way to Roma for 35 Million. We're gonna let him go for free. If people don't see this as a recurring problem idk what to say. It's not sustainable to let our players go for free and expect the club to spend 100+ mill every summer. Chelsea just broke their transfer fee record but still ended up with a negative net spend and people will say Chelsea are ruining football.
Chelsea literally had a hard time getting rid of Zouma because he only wanted to stay in London. Players can only be sold to where they want to go.
 

georgipep

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
2,474
Location
Not far enough
Exactly. Look how long we kept Darmian and Rojo hanging around. Nobody will get close to matching the wages we give these players and give us big fees. However, we don't learn.
It's an accounting thing. It's better to keep the asset on our books instead of writing off a loss.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
He wants to stay at the club he loves but probably knows it’s his last season. Really not rocket science.

Maybe he’s been promised playing time behind closed doors and wants to see it play out? What a twat he is for playing on the contract the club gave him.
If he knows it’s his last season why didn’t he leave in the summer?

He’s happy to get 100k a week and a signing on fee that’s why.
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
He's doing what Pogba is doing. Refusing a renewal in the last year of his contract.

The difference is that I think Pogba wants to go to either Real or PSG for a massive signing bonus next summer. With Martial's future also uncertain and VDB continuing to underwhelm, Lingard is probably staying because he wants to prove he's good enough to be second choice at LW or 10.

Of the four players whose futures are up in the air (Pogba, Lingard, Martial and VDB), Lingard is the only one who's going to be willing to sit on the bench every week. Any squad that wants to win things needs that type of player in their ranks.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,042
Because we can only afford one mega transfer in Sancho. Rice is quoted to be 100 right? You trade in with Lingard you still have at least 75 million pounds to pay. Where do we get that extra money? Risk of not signing Varane?

No way.

We fixed the wing spots and center back spot this season, which is our glaring weaknesses last season. We can't have it all.
Of course we could not have spent another 75 million. But if we had sold VdB (who I rate, but Ole does not) as well that brings us down to 50m. Perhaps sell Fred for 25m and that brings us down to a new net 25m spend to bring in Rice (overrated IMO, but is unquestionably is an upgrade on Fred) which would have been worth it to address the hole at CDM.

We’re suddenly in a position where we can think about winning trophies now. Sales of Jesse, Donny and Fred — none of whom will be instrumental to whatever success might have this season — would have allowed us to bring in Rice to complete the first team.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
He's doing what Pogba is doing. Refusing a renewal in the last year of his contract.

The difference is that I think Pogba wants to go to either Real or PSG for a massive signing bonus next summer. With Martial's future also uncertain and VDB continuing to underwhelm, Lingard is probably staying because he wants to prove he's good enough to be second choice at LW or 10.

Of the four players whose futures are up in the air (Pogba, Lingard, Martial and VDB), Lingard is the only one who's going to be willing to sit on the bench every week. Any squad that wants to win things needs that type of player in their ranks.
See I have nothing wrong with this if that’s the case we need to have squad players as well as first teamers but to not sign a contract just doesn’t add up..
 

redshaw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
9,709
Probably wants to keep his 100k a week. If a club has to pay 25m they probably offer him less wages to what most of their squad is on. Maybe West Ham's contract was 60k a week.

I doubt he's going to get some big signing on fee but it will give the clubs interested in Jesse room to pay him around 100k if they get him on a free.

United though in hindsight should've lowered the price to either allow better contracts or other clubs to come in if Jesse simply doesn't want West Ham. I suspect Jesse just wants his wages to continue at a new club.
 

Ikon

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jun 29, 2017
Messages
2,416
Didn't he reject West Ham because he wanted to fight for his place at United.

Then a couple of days later he rejects a contract because of playing time.
I had to laugh when I saw the report that Lingard had rejected a contract, he has played United like a fiddle.
All so predictable too...:lol::lol:
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,086
Location
Dublin, Ireland
He's doing what Pogba is doing. Refusing a renewal in the last year of his contract.

The difference is that I think Pogba wants to go to either Real or PSG for a massive signing bonus next summer. With Martial's future also uncertain and VDB continuing to underwhelm, Lingard is probably staying because he wants to prove he's good enough to be second choice at LW or 10.

Of the four players whose futures are up in the air (Pogba, Lingard, Martial and VDB), Lingard is the only one who's going to be willing to sit on the bench every week. Any squad that wants to win things needs that type of player in their ranks.
Don’t speak sense. Apparently there’s an unwritten rule that players that aren’t in current vogue MUST leave so we can get another shiny thing
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
19,277
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
He is the one who rejected westham
So to reject a contract with the reason you want first team football is laughable when you had the chance to move for it. Can't stand players like this, money is important than playing time. The fact he is picked by England when not starting games for his club and someone like Greenwood isn't is more of a joke.
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
19,277
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
He's doing what Pogba is doing. Refusing a renewal in the last year of his contract.

The difference is that I think Pogba wants to go to either Real or PSG for a massive signing bonus next summer. With Martial's future also uncertain and VDB continuing to underwhelm, Lingard is probably staying because he wants to prove he's good enough to be second choice at LW or 10.

Of the four players whose futures are up in the air (Pogba, Lingard, Martial and VDB), Lingard is the only one who's going to be willing to sit on the bench every week. Any squad that wants to win things needs that type of player in their ranks.
But he has rejected the contract offer saying he wants first team football so the above is not the case.
 

Wade3

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
2,729
He's doing what Pogba is doing. Refusing a renewal in the last year of his contract.

The difference is that I think Pogba wants to go to either Real or PSG for a massive signing bonus next summer. With Martial's future also uncertain and VDB continuing to underwhelm, Lingard is probably staying because he wants to prove he's good enough to be second choice at LW or 10.

Of the four players whose futures are up in the air (Pogba, Lingard, Martial and VDB), Lingard is the only one who's going to be willing to sit on the bench every week. Any squad that wants to win things needs that type of player in their ranks.
Except he doesn't seem to be fine with sitting on the bench every week, at least according to recent reports?

If that is the case and OGS doesn't have much of a use for him this season, I would've sold him. His value after his impressive stint at West Ham was probably as high as it has ever been.
 

Green Arrow

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 9, 2020
Messages
384
Location
Formally of Chorlton
I had to laugh when I saw the report that Lingard had rejected a contract, he has played United like a fiddle.
All so predictable too...:lol::lol:
I don't blame him for doing that, he must have seen what they did to Bailly and thought "I'm not getting into that situation". For Utd to offer him a new contract assurances must have been given to him that he will be part of the first team.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,284
Location
Croatia
Strange we even offered him a contract since he's been barely used last season and I dont think he'll be used more this season given how many options upfront we have now. I really dont understand whats the purpose anymore. He isnt playing, isnt good enough, yet we insist on keeping him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.