So you'd go for a front 4 that are known for:
- losing the ball
- doing feck all after losing the ball
- having 0 physicality
This is not fifa mate.
Sancho's pressing was never an issue at Bayern and Greenwood should be a relatively strong player as he becomes a man. You're right that there's not a ton of strength, but that's not uncommon among sides that focus more on speed. I would guess that once Cavani and Ronaldo leave we might look for a more typical 9 as an option, especially if Greenwood is seen as a wide forward type. But we spent big on Amad too, and we're not going to be title contenders anytime soon so building towards a pacy, pressing front group that pins teams back due to their pace makes sense, even if we do have trouble breaking down teams (though the bigger issue there might be fullbacks and a midfield and managing).
If you take a step back, Sancho, Rashford and Greenwood are the highly rated players they are for a reason, and the sooner the club realizes the problem is that we can be pinned back by Wolves for an entire half at home the better, and that means getting a RB a CB and 2 midfielders who can really play the ball, as well as a system, philosophy and manager that prizes those things.
Are you confident that our lack of pace up top isn't allowing teams to push up and partly causing our issues controlling play? I'm not.
Could argue that Bruno in the front 3 makes sense because he's the kind of energetic AM type that Liverpool and City have had success with up there, but either way it won't matter until we have a real midfield and a defence comfortable on the ball.