It changes as home grown over 21 players are loaned out, non home grown players are loaned out too.Home grown u21 players are exempt. So I don't think it changes that much.
Can't believe Batshuayi is still a Chelsea player. Looked up a few more of those, some of them have just been on 5 or 6 consecutive loans and are now in their mid/late 20s. From Chelsea's perspective, what is the point?It changes as home grown over 21 players are loaned out, non home grown players are loaned out too.
For example Chelsea have these players who are 21 and above out on loan.
Baxter
Gilmour
Castillo
Cumming
Gallagher
Michy
Kenedy
Emerson
Miazga
Baba
Bakayoko
Drinkwater
Sterling
Ampadu
Cumming
Then that’s the next thing to ban. About time they made a move like this.I imagine we will see a lot more transfers with buy back clauses.
"nothing worse"?Great move for football. Nothing worse than seeing the likes of Chelsea and City stockpile youngsters and not giving them a chance.
You currently have 22 apparently of which 9 are from your first team squad."maximum of 6 players in on loan"? Who has more than 6 players in on loan?
It all adds up to a very nice profit and the players wages are covered by the loan club. Those older players are probably worth quite a bit more loaned out every season than if they are just put on the market outright and if one of them really hits form it can mean huge profit. Chelsea were very smart to take advantage of that loophole while it existed. They will just sell on the cheap now with low buy backs/high sell on % and keeping first option but their loaning for profit gig is up more or lessCan't believe Batshuayi is still a Chelsea player. Looked up a few more of those, some of them have just been on 5 or 6 consecutive loans and are now in their mid/late 20s. From Chelsea's perspective, what is the point?
They're loaned out, not loaned in.You currently have 22 apparently of which 9 are from your first team squad.
City have 3-4 teams around the world, they can still do whatever they want. Recently they posted revenue higher than United (this is not an exaggeration, just Google it). They are pretty much untouchable.Great move for football. Nothing worse than seeing the likes of Chelsea and City stockpile youngsters and not giving them a chance.
Very common in lower leagues I believe to have a large amount of loaned in playersThey're loaned out, not loaned in.
More than likely I think there will just be a lot of selling with buyback clauses.Big clubs will just start bankrolling smaller clubs through different channels and giving them players for a few years. It’ll end up being circumvented in some way
Ffs can't believe some of those are still Chelsea players whyIt changes as home grown over 21 players are loaned out, non home grown players are loaned out too.
For example Chelsea have these players who are 21 and above out on loan.
Baxter
Gilmour
Castillo
Cumming
Gallagher
Michy
Kenedy
Emerson
Miazga
Baba
Bakayoko
Drinkwater
Sterling
Ampadu
Cumming
Those are players that were signed for the first team and weren't good enough and Chelsea have since been unable to sell them. They'll just be released when their contracts run out, or in the event they have a great loan, could be sold for a fee.You currently have 22 apparently of which 9 are from your first team squad.
True. Sugar daddy clubs being one."nothing worse"?
There are at least one or two things worse.
Leech owners are far worse than sugar daddy owners!True. Sugar daddy clubs being one.
True true. MotherfeckersLeech owners are far worse than sugar daddy owners!
The loan wouldn’t be signed off I’d imagine, it’s hard to hide and then admit later like some financial things are.What's the penalty/punishment, though.
I mean for Chelsea until they clear the excess. I vote for a three point deduction per.The loan wouldn’t be signed off I’d imagine, it’s hard to hide and then admit later like some financial things are.
That sounds about right!I mean for Chelsea until they clear the excess. I vote for a three point deduction per.
Chelsea don't have any excess according to these rules. Currently 21 players out on loan, 15 are either under 21 or homegrown, 6 are older and non-homegrown.I mean for Chelsea until they clear the excess. I vote for a three point deduction per.
My guess is that no premiership clubs are currently non/compliant. But frankly even if Chelsea were they could easily let a few players from that list leave on a free when their contracts run down without affecting the team or the loan for profit system at all.Chelsea don't have any excess according to these rules. Currently 21 players out on loan, 15 are either under 21 or homegrown, 6 are older and non-homegrown.
We already meet the requirements this season I think.I mean for Chelsea until they clear the excess. I vote for a three point deduction per.
What's with the 'current' list someone posted with like seventeen names on it?We already meet the requirements this season I think.