Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,307
Nukes nukes nukes. Is that the buzz word in Russia these days?

Do children also get a school lesson on how amazing nuclear weapons are now?
Truly becoming the North Korea of superpowers at this point. What a shame.
 

Rajma

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
8,580
Location
Lithuania
And this could well be a direct follow-up to the re-taking of Makariv. It remains to be confirmed, but this would be huge if it's true.

It might become a genuine headache for Ukraine, the touted number of POWs would be a logistical nightmare at times like these:

What can they do, realistically, if it comes to it?
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,029
Location
Moscow
The length of the term is pretty relative given that Putin can release him whenever he wants to modulate public opinion. He released the likes of Pussy Riot and Khodorkovsky early back in 2013/14. Not that we're dealing with "that" Putin anymore at this point, so it may require a change in government for an early Navalny release.
He didn’t try to murder them beforehand though. But yeah, the numbers are irrelevant — he’ll stay behind bars for as long as Putin’s at power.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,238
Location
Hollywood CA
Further evidence that interviewing these Baghdad Bob clowns is pointless



At one point about 1:30 into video two - Peskov has to almost hold back from laughing at the absurdity of what he's about to say, losing his original train of thought in the process.
 

Simbo

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
5,228
It might become a genuine headache for Ukraine, the touted number of POWs would be a logistical nightmare at times like these:

What can they do, realistically, if it comes to it?
Ship them West, roads are clear, plenty of room, plenty of people willing to watch over them I'm sure. Wouldn't be a big issue I don't think.
 

RedDevilQuebecois

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
8,121
Ship them West, roads are clear, plenty of room, plenty of people willing to watch over them I'm sure. Wouldn't be a big issue I don't think.
I cannot tell about the legality of such action. I don't think it would be completely legal according to war conventions (I might be wrong, but I think it's ambiguous), but it would be an interesting tit-for-tat reaction to the forced displacement of Ukrainian civilians into camps in Russia. Besides, a number of German POWs were transferred to Canada (then a part of the Empire) during WW2 as Britain could not keep all of them. I'm sure plenty of NATO intelligence officers would like to know more details about the status of the Russian army from the horse's mouth.
 

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,423
Location
South Carolina
I cannot tell about the legality of such action. I don't think it would be completely legal according to war conventions (I might be wrong, but I think it's ambiguous), but it would be an interesting tit-for-tat reaction to the forced displacement of Ukrainian civilians into camps in Russia. Besides, a number of German POWs were transferred to Canada during WW2 as Britain could not keep all of them. I'm sure plenty of NATO intelligence officers would like to know more details about the status of the Russian army from the horse's mouth.
I don’t know that he meant “west” as it Western Europe, as opposed to just western Ukraine.
 

RedDevilQuebecois

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
8,121
I don’t know that he meant “west” as it Western Europe, as opposed to just western Ukraine.
Perhaps, but one would also have to wonder what that scenario would look like in Western Ukraine since most resources are already deployed into defending the region and hosting internally displaced civilians.
 

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,423
Location
South Carolina
Perhaps, but one would also have to wonder what that scenario would look like in Western Ukraine since most resources are already deployed into defending the region and hosting internally displaced civilians.
Well, didn’t the release a lot of prisoners on the condition that they’d fight the Russians?
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
The BBC reports:

"A ferocious two-day struggle for control of the farming town of Voznesensk and its strategically important bridge was one of the most decisive battles of the war in Ukraine so far.

Victory would have enabled Russian forces to sweep further west along the Black Sea coast towards the huge port of Odesa and a major nuclear power plant.

Instead, Ukrainian troops, supported by an eclectic army of local volunteers, delivered a crushing blow to Russian plans, first by blowing up the bridge and then by driving the invading army back, up to 100km, to the east.

"It's hard to explain how we did it. It's thanks to the fighting spirit of our local people and to the Ukrainian army", said Voznesensk's 32-year-old mayor, Yevheni Velichko.

As on so many frontlines in Ukraine, British-supplied anti-tank missiles proved crucial in turning the tide against Russian armour in Voznesensk, leaving the town littered with up to 30 tanks, armoured cars and even a helicopter.

"It's only thanks to these weapons that we were able to beat our enemy here", said Mr Velichko."
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
If those Russian troops NW of Kyiv are indeed surrounded, cut-off from re-supply and are captured/surrendered, then any remaining Russian ambitions to encircle or capture the capital are totally gone.

Indeed, in that event it wouldn't surprise me if the Russians to the NE of Kyiv head into retreat mode.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
It might become a genuine headache for Ukraine, the touted number of POWs would be a logistical nightmare at times like these:

What can they do, realistically, if it comes to it?
Can’t they strip them of their weapons and hand them back over? I’m sure the Russian problem of sending so many vehicles over to take them all back could be crushing for them.
 

Simbo

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
5,228
I cannot tell about the legality of such action. I don't think it would be completely legal according to war conventions (I might be wrong, but I think it's ambiguous), but it would be an interesting tit-for-tat reaction to the forced displacement of Ukrainian civilians into camps in Russia. Besides, a number of German POWs were transferred to Canada (then a part of the Empire) during WW2 as Britain could not keep all of them. I'm sure plenty of NATO intelligence officers would like to know more details about the status of the Russian army from the horse's mouth.
Yeh I meant western Ukraine, its a massive country mostly untouched by the war, wouldn't take much effort in the scheme of things to set up camps or house 20k or so pow's I don't think. There will be prisons they could make available maybe, warehouses, stadiums to convert, etc. Most industry has shut down, there's a massive manpool available to guard, watch over, feed them, etc.
 

MTF

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,243
Location
New York City
If those Russian troops NW of Kyiv are indeed surrounded, cut-off from re-supply and are captured/surrendered, then any remaining Russian ambitions to encircle or capture the capital are totally gone.

Indeed, in that event it wouldn't surprise me if the Russians to the NE of Kyiv head into retreat mode.
It's a big 'if' at this point, let's wait and see if it becomes confirmed and if so that the Ukrainians are able to hold vs counter-attacks to re-link the Russian units. But also as far as the forces east of the river, they don't necessarily have to retreat as the Dnieper river is uncrossable until you get up to Belarus. So their right flak would still be protected.
 

calodo2003

Flaming Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
41,818
Location
Florida
The BBC reports:

"A ferocious two-day struggle for control of the farming town of Voznesensk and its strategically important bridge was one of the most decisive battles of the war in Ukraine so far.

Victory would have enabled Russian forces to sweep further west along the Black Sea coast towards the huge port of Odesa and a major nuclear power plant.

Instead, Ukrainian troops, supported by an eclectic army of local volunteers, delivered a crushing blow to Russian plans, first by blowing up the bridge and then by driving the invading army back, up to 100km, to the east.

"It's hard to explain how we did it. It's thanks to the fighting spirit of our local people and to the Ukrainian army", said Voznesensk's 32-year-old mayor, Yevheni Velichko.

As on so many frontlines in Ukraine, British-supplied anti-tank missiles proved crucial in turning the tide against Russian armour in Voznesensk, leaving the town littered with up to 30 tanks, armoured cars and even a helicopter.

"It's only thanks to these weapons that we were able to beat our enemy here", said Mr Velichko."
Great to hear the weapons are so impactful.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,707
Location
Krakow
Can’t they strip them of their weapons and hand them back over? I’m sure the Russian problem of sending so many vehicles over to take them all back could be crushing for them.
Surely they would just be given new weapons and return to fight.
 

McGrathsipan

Dawn’s less famous husband
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
24,699
Location
Dublin
I don't know if Russian programmers are really employable in europe. Most company will probably be suspicious...
My first thought also. Wouldn't let a Russian near anything unfortunately. Many will be upstanding people however there may be one bad egg etc etc
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
The BBC reports:

"Russian forces are continuing to face logistical problems such as a lack of correct equipment, which is leading to frostbite among soldiers, a US senior defence official has said."
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Surely they would just be given new weapons and return to fight.
I’m not sure how many weapons they have at hand? They seem to be struggling to supply them as it is. Never mind having that much armoury snatched away with their capture anyway.
Maybe they could be used in negotiations with Russia but I don’t think it’s the problem for Ukraine as it’s made out to be.
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
Yeh I meant western Ukraine, its a massive country mostly untouched by the war, wouldn't take much effort in the scheme of things to set up camps or house 20k or so pow's I don't think. There will be prisons they could make available maybe, warehouses, stadiums to convert, etc. Most industry has shut down, there's a massive manpool available to guard, watch over, feed them, etc.
Give them all mobile phones so that they can call back home to their families and friends and tell them the reality of what's going on.
 

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,423
Location
South Carolina
Can’t they strip them of their weapons and hand them back over? I’m sure the Russian problem of sending so many vehicles over to take them all back could be crushing for them.
Would seem to defeat the purpose of taking prisoners if you’re gonna let them go back into the fight.
 

Sir Matt

Blue Devil
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
18,327
Location
LUHG
It might become a genuine headache for Ukraine, the touted number of POWs would be a logistical nightmare at times like these:

What can they do, realistically, if it comes to it?
Put them all in a hospital and paint "children" on the roof. Russia will take care of them in a day or two.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Would seem to defeat the purpose of taking prisoners if you’re gonna let them go back into the fight.
Oh if it were on a more forgiven situation for Russia I wouldn’t even think about it but these soldiers seem abandoned by Russian incompetence as it is. I just can’t see how they take back 8k people in a terrain that’s stopping Russia supplying them in the first place. I dont think it’s as easy as resupplying them as soon as they’re given back. I’m probably miles off but how do Russia even feed them when they’re apparently starving already? Minus all the armoury and vehicles?
I can’t see how that isn’t a logistic nightmare
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,277
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
If the reports are to be believed it seems to me that Ukraine are out thinking Russia and using decent strategy and tactics to fight Russia back.

Allowing Russia to over extend and now they launch a counter offensive to cut off a large section of the Russian northern offensive. An army that seems ill prepared, rationed with low ammo in unfamiliar lands. They could very easily capture a host of Russian troops and use that as leverage. If Russia abandons those troops then not only does it cause bad morale across the military but it could provide a headache for Putin domestically. Could become a key moment in the war.
 

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,423
Location
South Carolina
If the reports are to be believed it seems to me that Ukraine are out thinking Russia and using decent strategy and tactics to fight Russia back.

Allowing Russia to over extend and now they launch a counter offensive to cut off a large section of the Russian northern offensive. An army that seems ill prepared, rationed with low ammo in unfamiliar lands. They could very easily capture a host of Russian troops and use that as leverage. If Russia abandons those troops then not only does it cause bad morale across the military but it could provide a headache for Putin domestically. Could become a key moment in the war.
You'd think someone in the Russian high command would have read a history book about the Great Patriotic War at some point, but alas, thankfully, they’ve apparently not.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,238
Location
Hollywood CA
Increasingly believe a chemical attack is in the cards, especially if Putin feels he's beginning to lose.

 

Sir Matt

Blue Devil
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
18,327
Location
LUHG

Wouldn't be surprised if some NATO spooks aren't working on exfiltrating some of the equipment Russia is losing.