Gianni Infantino loses the plot (WC 2002 Edition)

FrankFoot

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2022
Messages
1,377
Location
Chile / Czech Republic
Supports
Neutral
Europe has no right to dictate to other people how to bend their culture to allow some silly world cup. You destroyed the world with two World Wars. We are still reeling from the devastating effects of those wars and you are concerned about flying rainbow flags and drinking alcohol in a very strict Muslim nation. You call it a world cup but when it goes to the Middle East, arms in the air. The hypocrisy of the west is perpetuated by its citizens and it's very sad to see.
Europe was the most affected by the WW 2, as more than 90% of the deaths came from Soviet Union, Germany, and UK.
 

Flying_Heckfish

Full Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
4,905
Location
Hand in Glove
This thread is a car crash.

How can anyone be for this farce, on so many levels.. Masks have slipped big time. So many strawmans e.g. Alcohol sales. They wouldn't have won the bid, if they had said "no booze" on the ticket, no matter how much they bribed.

Where's our summer world cup with aircon stadiums?

Infantino is full of it.
 

Flying_Heckfish

Full Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
4,905
Location
Hand in Glove
Europe has no right to dictate to other people how to bend their culture to allow some silly world cup. You destroyed the world with two World Wars. We are still reeling from the devastating effects of those wars and you are concerned about flying rainbow flags and drinking alcohol in a very strict Muslim nation. You call it a world cup but when it goes to the Middle East, arms in the air. The hypocrisy of the west is perpetuated by its citizens and it's very sad to see.
Newbs system is going well
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,653
Most of Europe is trying to put things right. FIFA has done bugger all about racism, homophobia etc. They pay lip service but when an incident happens they do next to nothing.
Except there is a difference here. Trying to stop migrants coming to Europe to have a better life has many of its own negatives, especially in the way that they are barred being dangerous and inhumane. But I’m not sure how a policy to control immigration has anything to do with humility of human rights abuses to migrants? However, can’t really compare it to what Qatar is doing. Allowing them in, promise of a better life, taking passports, offering horrific living conditions and working conditions, and all the while reaping the financial and developmental rewards of their hard work. Both might be bad but let’s not assume they’re the same.
Without even going into historical events, it's quite likely that Fortress Europe has killed much more than Qatar.

https://www.iom.int/news/more-5000-deaths-recorded-european-migration-routes-2021-iom
 

weetee

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2021
Messages
3,748
Supports
no-one in particular
Europe has no right to dictate to other people how to bend their culture to allow some silly world cup. You destroyed the world with two World Wars. We are still reeling from the devastating effects of those wars and you are concerned about flying rainbow flags and drinking alcohol in a very strict Muslim nation. You call it a world cup but when it goes to the Middle East, arms in the air. The hypocrisy of the west is perpetuated by its citizens and it's very sad to see.
You do understand that the rainbow flags are just symbols for a specific minority, one which happens to get discriminated and downright killed in certain countries? So it's not really about "waving flags while drinkin' booze". And why would someone whose ancestors were eventually involved in setting the world on fire not interested in peacefully making the world a better place for others to live in? Strange concept if you ask me. None of us posters here were directly involved in the WW1 or WW2 nor the colonization era so why should we shut up again? And it's not about being high and mighty, there are strong discussions about how to run our countries and where things go wrong all the time. Every single day.
 

Flying_Heckfish

Full Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
4,905
Location
Hand in Glove
You do understand that the rainbow flags are just symbols for a specific minority, one which happens to get discriminated and downright killed in certain countries? So it's not really about "waving flags while drinkin' booze". And why would someone whose ancestors were eventually involved in setting the world on fire not interested in peacefully making the world a better place for others to live in? Strange concept if you ask me. None of us posters here were directly involved in the WW1 or WW2 nor the colonization era so why should we shut up again? And it's not about being high and mighty, there are strong discussions about how to run our countries and where things go wrong all the time. Every single day.
It'll be lost on them, I'm afraid
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,653
In order to host a world cup?
No.
Qatar relies on S/SE Asian and African indentured labour to maintain their standard of living. Europe exports its death to its armed and walled borders.
I just get annoyed when people say "trying to put things right" for a continent which ruled and exploited the world for 2 centuries, profited from it, and is now "putting things right" by ... pulling up the ladder.
 

FrankFoot

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2022
Messages
1,377
Location
Chile / Czech Republic
Supports
Neutral
You say are voted in by the people. Blair was a Tory in disguise. The Tories mostly get in because of apathy. The voting turnouts here are atrocious. People moan and groan but do not vote to change anything. You will always have problems when a country is run by ex-public schoolboys detached from reality.
Sorry, but you can't say Tony Blair was a Tory just because he did bad stuff.

He was Labour all along, and decided to invade the Middle East along with USA, and he was heavily supported back then... not much different with Democrat Barack Obama bombing kids in Syria/Libya and Clinton doing a mess in Yugoslavia, both receiving heavy support from the american population.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crappycraperson

Flying_Heckfish

Full Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
4,905
Location
Hand in Glove
No.
Qatar relies on S/SE Asian and African indentured labour to maintain their standard of living. Europe exports its death to its armed and walled borders.
I just get annoyed when people say "trying to put things right" for a continent which ruled and exploited the world for 2 centuries, profited from it, and is now "putting things right" by ... pulling up the ladder.
That's a different conversation for a different thread, mate. There's two different (big) issues there... Let's not conflate the two.
 

Grande

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
6,316
Location
The Land of Do-What-You-Will
I obviously don't agree with what's going on in Qatar, but I just don't see the same outrage in the USA hosting in 4 years time. Is that not hypocrisy?
I am against slavery, but I’m more against the wrong people being against slavery. It has to be the right people criticizing it, otherwise I rather prefer the slaves to remain enslaved.
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,003
Supports
Real Madrid
Nasser Al Khater was complaining as recently as one month ago that people were being "unfair" on Qatar and that the idea that alcohol would be restricted was a "misconception."

You are disrespectful if you think the Qataris are going to do a thing they swear they won't do. But if they end up doing it, you are disrespectful to complain because they have the right to do whatever they want.
 

FrankFoot

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2022
Messages
1,377
Location
Chile / Czech Republic
Supports
Neutral

phelans shorts

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
27,217
Location
Gaz. Is a Mewling Quim.
No.
Qatar relies on S/SE Asian and African indentured labour to maintain their standard of living. Europe exports its death to its armed and walled borders.
I just get annoyed when people say "trying to put things right" for a continent which ruled and exploited the world for 2 centuries, profited from it, and is now "putting things right" by ... pulling up the ladder.
So countries should be allowed to brutally enslave and kill people until they get their infrastructure right? Just to be clear
 

Flying_Heckfish

Full Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
4,905
Location
Hand in Glove
I obviously don't agree with what's going on in Qatar, but I just don't see the same outrage in the USA hosting in 4 years time. Is that not hypocrisy?
Sorry. How are the USA, specifically, hypocritical here? Spell it out for us.

I have my reservations about the US political system but I need more information .
 

Koldbeer2021

Full Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2021
Messages
156
Supports
West Ham
In order to host a world cup?
The west of course has done bad things in the past, but that can not excuse what Qatar are doing today. I cannot be held responsible for what my ancestors may have done, but I can damn well hold the Qatar powers that be to account for their actions TODAY.

Infantino seems to have forgotten that two wrongs do not make a right. He needs to try and stop defending the utterly indefensible.

What Qatar has done is basically gone back to Ancient Egypt and the building of the pyramids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sizzling sausages

FrankFoot

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2022
Messages
1,377
Location
Chile / Czech Republic
Supports
Neutral
I am against slavery, but I’m more against the wrong people being against slavery. It has to be the right people criticizing it, otherwise I rather prefer the slaves to remain enslaved.
They hate slavery, but according to their flawed logic only micronesians, irish, lithuanians,samoans, and very other few should complain about slavery, cause if your ethnicity was involved in slavery centuries ago, then you can't complain about slavery in modern times.

That also means arabs can't complain about slavery either, they probably traded more slaves than anybody.
 
Last edited:

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,653
Those migrants die mostly in the sea after traffickers (which are mostly turkish) put them on route without any protection, and only care about profits.
Yes...as any Economics 101 student can tell you, when you make something illegal or put a lot of regulations, all you do is incentivise illegal (dangerous, unregulated) activity. There's a whole chain of treaties and walls which are the reason why these smugglers are in business.
 

FrankFoot

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2022
Messages
1,377
Location
Chile / Czech Republic
Supports
Neutral
The west of course has done bad things in the past, but that can not excuse what Qatar are doing today. I cannot be held responsible for what my ancestors may have done, but I can damn well hold the Qatar powers that be to account for their actions TODAY.

Infantino seems to have forgotten that two wrongs do not make a right. He needs to try and stop defending the utterly indefensible.

What Qatar has done is basically gone back to Ancient Egypt and the building of the pyramids.
Infantino, the former ginger, doesn't care about anybody, he is a just a rich official protecting the people who pay him a lot of money.

If he has to compare getting bullied in high school(for being a ginger) to migrants dying while building stadiums, he will...and he literally did.
Worshipping money can make people say stupid stuff, so they can keep the money grab.

That bald fecker isn't different than Blatter after all.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,528
micronesians, irish, lithuanians,samoans,
'Fraid not.

They've got some skeletons in their closet too.

I'm sure we can find something to pin on the others there as well.

Fact is that conquest and enslavement of "foreign" people (ranging from tiny tribes to large nations) is something you'll find throughout history in every nook and cranny of the world.
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,653
So how is saying “lads, maybe don’t with the whole slavery thing” pulling up the ladder then?
As I said, my problem is with those minimising European wrongs when criticising others.

I think Qatar and many other ME states deserve all this criticism. I also think this world cup is the safest and least consequential way to criticise them. Because of oil, they get no meaningful pushback on labour rights or war crimes or women's rights or LGBT rights or ....

It's a very very selective condemnation (only Qatar, not the rest, only for the World Cup, not for anything else) of long-standing practices of countries that are mostly in the west's orbit!
 

moses

Can't We Just Be Nice?
Staff
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
43,220
Location
I have no idea either, yet.
Europe has no right to dictate to other people how to bend their culture to allow some silly world cup. You destroyed the world with two World Wars. We are still reeling from the devastating effects of those wars and you are concerned about flying rainbow flags and drinking alcohol in a very strict Muslim nation. You call it a world cup but when it goes to the Middle East, arms in the air. The hypocrisy of the west is perpetuated by its citizens and it's very sad to see.
I didn't.

And quite frankly I'm getting bored of these polemic whataboutisms. Nobody can give a toss about something because of what happened 100 years ago. It's the logic of a drunk. And not even a drunk that has any decent logic when they are sober. It's lazy and nonsensical. And quite a bit racist too.
 

FrankFoot

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2022
Messages
1,377
Location
Chile / Czech Republic
Supports
Neutral
'Fraid not.

They've got some skeletons in their closet too.

I'm sure we can find something to pin on the others there as well.

Fact is that conquest and enslavement of "foreign" people (ranging from tiny tribes to large nations) is something you'll find throughout history in every nook and cranny of the world.
Yeah, I'm sure about that.

I think nobody is free of something wrong done by ancestors, the standards of what's wrong and not is completely different now.
Centuries ago slavery was legal, and "conquer and take" was the most common foreign policy.

In North America the native tribes themselves were killing each other(including children and women) for territory before the brits arrived.
 

Koldbeer2021

Full Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2021
Messages
156
Supports
West Ham
'Fraid not.

They've got some skeletons in their closet too.

I'm sure we can find something to pin on the others there as well.

Fact is that conquest and enslavement of "foreign" people (ranging from tiny tribes to large nations) is something you'll find throughout history in every nook and cranny of the world.
Also Lithuania have had slavery in the past, slavery was done away with 1588 offically, but serfdom more or less is the same thing and that lasted until 1861.
Honestly your not going to find many, if any (perhaps those micro nations in pacific are the exception) countries that have not had a hand in slavery at some point.
 

moses

Can't We Just Be Nice?
Staff
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
43,220
Location
I have no idea either, yet.
They hate slavery, but according to their flawed logic only micronesians, irish, lithuanians,samoans, and very other few should complain about slavery, cause if your ethnicity was involved in slavery centuries ago, then you can't complain about slavery in modern times.

That also means arabs can't complain about slavery either, they probably traded more slaves than anybody probably.
Terrible shit went on here, like really awful abuse of the power dynamic terror.

But way back we did quite a bit of piracy and slavery too. This is not about progress and inclusivity, not some crass nationalistic game of moral Top Trumps.
 

phelans shorts

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
27,217
Location
Gaz. Is a Mewling Quim.
As I said, my problem is with those minimising European wrongs when criticising others.

I think Qatar and many other ME states deserve all this criticism. I also think this world cup is the safest and least consequential way to criticise them. Because of oil, they get no meaningful pushback on labour rights or war crimes or women's rights or LGBT rights or ....

It's a very very selective condemnation (only Qatar, not the rest, only for the World Cup, not for anything else) of long-standing practices of countries that are mostly in the west's orbit!
Europe have a horrific history, there’s no way around it, and many governments over here are jumping into bed with the likes of Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia etc… who continue to use the horrific practices that has built much of Europe, that’s absolutely true. At the same time however, many Europeans also protest the behaviour of their own governments in doing so, so I’m really not sure what point you’re trying to make in pretending this is only a World Cup thing.

The likes of China, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar etc etc etc do get condemnation, all the time. They RIGHTLY get condemnation, just as Europe’s history RIGHTLY gets condemned. Just as the USA rightly faces condemnation on women’s rights, on racism, on ongoing imperialism.

None of this explains your “pulling the ladder up” comment mind, which very strongly implies that they should be able to do what Europe used to to catch up which, just no.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
As I said, my problem is with those minimising European wrongs when criticising others.

I think Qatar and many other ME states deserve all this criticism. I also think this world cup is the safest and least consequential way to criticise them. Because of oil, they get no meaningful pushback on labour rights or war crimes or women's rights or LGBT rights or ....

It's a very very selective condemnation (only Qatar, not the rest, only for the World Cup, not for anything else) of long-standing practices of countries that are mostly in the west's orbit!
With regards to the bolded, the poster almost immediately stated this

I realised after I posted the comment I was badly wrong.
And I'm not sure why you've quoted the second, he was talking about Brexit.

As for the selective condemnation, that's the entire point. It's because they're hosting the World Cup, thus the global spotlight. So all in all I'm very confused by your post and what you're trying to say (even if I agree with your comments regarding Europe).
 

moses

Can't We Just Be Nice?
Staff
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
43,220
Location
I have no idea either, yet.
As I said, my problem is with those minimising European wrongs when criticising others.

I think Qatar and many other ME states deserve all this criticism. I also think this world cup is the safest and least consequential way to criticise them. Because of oil, they get no meaningful pushback on labour rights or war crimes or women's rights or LGBT rights or ....

It's a very very selective condemnation (only Qatar, not the rest, only for the World Cup, not for anything else) of long-standing practices of countries that are mostly in the west's orbit!
Europe's history is an continuum of atrocity. Well documented. All history is. My question is what have the European horrors, much documented in academia, documentary, fiction and film, got to do with a conversation about human rights issues in Qatar? The only debate should be if it's happening or not surely? Anything else is just mitigation or obfuscation?
 

FrankFoot

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2022
Messages
1,377
Location
Chile / Czech Republic
Supports
Neutral
Also Lithuania have had slavery in the past, slavery was done away with 1588 offically, but serfdom more or less is the same thing and that lasted until 1861.
Honestly your not going to find many, if any (perhaps those micro nations in pacific are the exception) countries that have not had a hand in slavery at some point.
Well, basically serfdom has always being a thing since society started to get organized and we were not cavemen anymore, and that won't change cause someone has to be in charge of a country/territory anyways, the difference is that now is called modern slavery labour with a piss poor wage.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
These aren't "Random examples". Open a history book for once in your life for crying out loud. Read up on Julius Caesar, Cyrus the Great, Ataxerxes, Alexander, read up on Harald Hardraada, Harold 2, read any one of a thousand different monarchs behaviours in antiquity and then really, REALLY think about what you're saying. Are we going to find all their ancestors and "demand reparations"? Is that really a worthwhile use of our time? The perpetrators are dead and - AND - we can't apply our morality to ancient civilizations because that morality didn't even -exist- at that point. Slavery was legal hundreds of years ago.

Or if you want to be angry at something (because clearly you do need something to blame) then perhaps the people holding an estimated 8 million slaves in India could be a start? https://m.timesofindia.com/india/does-india-have-8-million-slaves/amp_articleshow/90986262.cms

Or (back on topic in a roundabout way) we can hold up those perpetrating human rights abuses in Qatar or wherever else we find it to light.
We can't do anything about the past but we can absolutely hold people to account for what they're doing in the world today, instead of pretending it's all someone else's fault.
Has nothing to do with finding the dead perpetrators. The US and UK still exist as entities. You just fundamentally grasp how reparations work and who might be responsible for them. We can definitely do something about the past. Reparations have been paid before to various groups.

And yes, it's worth our while to financially right the wrongs of the past. Go ask the descendants of those victims.
 

moses

Can't We Just Be Nice?
Staff
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
43,220
Location
I have no idea either, yet.
I don’t like to be rude but the idiocy of some of the posts in this thread are just astounding. What these people fail to understand is that the very people from the west who are calling out the issues in Qatar would and do call out those issues around the world and in particular in their own countries too. So it’s not hypocrisy at all. But the difference is that at least there is a platform to do so. An opportunity, albeit not perfect, to vote. The people of Qatar and the migrant workers who are impacted by the issues there have no such platform, no such rights. So it’s particularly sickening when their plight is reduced to insignificant and unimportant because those who wish to call Qatar out are from countries with their own problems, especially when they do so on platforms which is available in those countries whilst the neglected migrants who can’t voice their concerns anywhere for a whole host of reasons whose issues are instead downplayed to try and achieve some kind of moral victory. And yet, somehow, I’m hypocritical.
Yep.

The idea that you should mind your own business is nonsense too, most of the great revolutions in the world were led by outsiders. The French Revolution was born in the universities and the dining halls of the rich, not the fields. Was Robespierre a hypocrite? The early revolutionaries in Ireland were the educated protestants, not the downtrodden catholics.