So... Was it a red? (Casemiro / Hughes Royal Rumble)

Was it a red?

  • Red

    Votes: 409 33.5%
  • Yellow

    Votes: 415 34.0%
  • No card

    Votes: 270 22.1%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 69 5.6%
  • Can you repeat the question?

    Votes: 59 4.8%

  • Total voters
    1,222

Baneofthegame

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2019
Messages
3,038
For me you run the risk of getting a red card when your hands are high regardless, so no complaints from me.

Ayew should of also seen red in my opinion.
 

Rusholme Ruffian

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2017
Messages
3,121
Location
Cooking MCs like a pound of bacon
I have quoted that rule multiple times in the thread already myself :D . The confusion you have is you're working on a definition of strike which doesn't match what the referees use. It's intentional contact with another player when not challenging for the ball. That's it, that's all strike means in that context.
yeah, you quoted it, but substituted 'intentional contact' for 'strikes', which makes a big difference. Is there somewhere that details exactly what this referees definition of 'strike' is?
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
35,141
Should we risk the appeal,tempted to say no but do worry about him missing 3 league games particularly Leeds away
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,074
Location
Austria
Jordan Ayew has Fred round the neck. No card??



Eriksen out for the rest of the season. No card given for this?


Martinez elbowed in the eye. No card given for this?
Makes me fecking furious. The state of the PL refs these days. Just imagine the whining from Klopp if that happened to his players. We are way too nice as a club to the FA. This is outrageous
 

Rusholme Ruffian

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2017
Messages
3,121
Location
Cooking MCs like a pound of bacon
Should we risk the appeal,tempted to say no but do worry about him missing 3 league games particularly Leeds away
Well I can't see how they could argue it is a frivolous appeal given that lots of pundits are saying it wasn't a red card. Chris Waddle on 5 Live said something like it was the worst decision he's seen all season. Even getting it reduced to 1 or 2 would be better than nothing.

EDIT - he actually said it was one of the worst decisions he'd ever seen!
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
35,141
Well I can't see how they could argue it is a frivolous appeal given that lots of pundits are saying it wasn't a red card. Chris Waddle on 5 Live said something like it was the worst decision he's seen all season. Even getting it reduced to 1 or 2 would be better than nothing.
Then you have ABU prats like Agbonlahor saying he should be arrested,good god talk about extreme hate of us coming back
 

Sviken

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,450
If that's a red, a lot of Palace players should have been sent off, as well.

Well I can't see how they could argue it is a frivolous appeal given that lots of pundits are saying it wasn't a red card. Chris Waddle on 5 Live said something like it was the worst decision he's seen all season. Even getting it reduced to 1 or 2 would be better than nothing.

EDIT - he actually said it was one of the worst decisions he'd ever seen!
Tbf, even though Mariner was looking to feck us and this was perhaps the worst refereeing performance I have seen, I can't blame him entirely for this. He was given the worst possible angle of the VAR check and it was like half a second long. From the other angles it's quite clear that Casemiro is not malicious or aggressive towards Hughes but simply trying to calm him down
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,942
Jordan Ayew has Fred round the neck. No card??



Eriksen out for the rest of the season. No card given for this?


Martinez elbowed in the eye. No card given for this?
it’s disgusting and blatant now
 

Coxy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2006
Messages
3,226
Location
Derby
I voted yes originally - then I watched the footage from behind - and completely changed my mind.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,971
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Jordan Ayew has Fred round the neck. No card??



Eriksen out for the rest of the season. No card given for this?


Martinez elbowed in the eye. No card given for this?
I said this in the match day thread. One hand around the throat = absolutely fine. Two hands and just holding = red card. Fecking appalling refereeing and VAR getting involved for the sake of getting involved, they were determined to send someone off.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,971
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
It's a red, he was stupid for putting his hands around another player's throat. Anyone arguing against it either doesn't understand the rules or is letting their bias get the best of them.

Wise up, chill out, he'll be rested for the more important fixtures coming up.
What are the rules? Would love to hear the official letter of the law on this.
 

NFM

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
339
VIOLENT CONDUCT: Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made. In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

He never strikes his head or face, he grabs his kit, then puts his hand on his shoulder and then takes it off, all in less than a few seconds
The test is how the media are covering this. They are using words like 'grabbed his throat' etc, to try to paint a picture of excessive force or brutality. Neither of which are a true description. He held his collar to calm him down.
ETH correctly said that many players should have been dismissed if Casemiro was guilty. Total inconsistency and very dubious decision.
I wonder why so many comments on here support a poor ref.
 

Scandi Red

Hates Music.
Joined
Sep 25, 2022
Messages
4,816
Everyone wants to be choked by Casemiro. The red card was out of jealousy.
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,351
The test is how the media are covering this. They are using words like 'grabbed his throat' etc, to try to paint a picture of excessive force or brutality. Neither of which are a true description. He held his collar to calm him down.
ETH correctly said that many players should have been dismissed if Casemiro was guilty. Total inconsistency and very dubious decision.
I wonder why so many comments on here support a poor ref.
We've already been through this extensively in this thread. It's simply not true.

Arguments of force are what they are, but his hands are around Hughes' throat. His collar is ruffed up because it's between his neck and Casemiro's hands. That's beyond doubt.
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,333
Location
NYC
The test is how the media are covering this. They are using words like 'grabbed his throat' etc, to try to paint a picture of excessive force or brutality. Neither of which are a true description. He held his collar to calm him down.
ETH correctly said that many players should have been dismissed if Casemiro was guilty. Total inconsistency and very dubious decision.
I wonder why so many comments on here support a poor ref.
Sky sports said it like “put his hands round Hughes’ neck”. They are not sure as well.
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,351
Everyone wants to be choked by Casemiro. The red card was out of jealousy.
I'm sure when they were hugging after he was whispering "harder next time" in his ear. Sadly that doesn't change the outcome.
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,729
Location
The Mathews Bridge
Yes, dumb to put your hands around his neck. Will Hughes is scrawny, could have restrained him by his shoulders, and it wouldn't be a red.

The annoying things is, I'm sure we'll see another player with hands around an opponents neck in the coming weeks, and it won't be a red. I hope this sets a precedent that this is aways a red, but that never seems to be the way.
 

Cpt Negative

Full Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
3,303
Thought it was a clear red initially, seen the fan angles and it’s something of nothing and even Hughes wasn’t arsed.

No point appealing though. FA will back their refs.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
35,141
Jordan Ayew has Fred round the neck. No card??



Eriksen out for the rest of the season. No card given for this?


Martinez elbowed in the eye. No card given for this?
Yeah fully expect Ayew's hands on Fred's throat to be swept under carpet on MOTD
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,708
I can't see that video I'm afraid.

Xhaka was sent off for holding someone by the throat not too long ago though if you're looking for examples.
Yeah. Your example is just misleading, mate. He got sent off on SECOND yellow card for AGRESSIVELY puting his hand on someone's neck. Ckk.. ck...
I agreed with yellow, but it's not straight red.

 
Last edited:

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
35,141
Thought it was a clear red initially, seen the fan angles and it’s something of nothing and even Hughes wasn’t arsed.

No point appealing though. FA will back their refs.
Oh yeah they will back Marriner to hilt
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,507
Location
Manchester
I have quoted that rule multiple times in the thread already myself :D . The confusion you have is you're working on a definition of strike which doesn't match what the referees use. It's intentional contact with another player when not challenging for the ball. That's it, that's all strike means in that context.
yeah, you quoted it, but substituted 'intentional contact' for 'strikes', which makes a big difference. Is there somewhere that details exactly what this referees definition of 'strike' is?
What’s the correct definition then and did you change it Dion?!

I’m confused now
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,351
Yeah. Your example is just misleading, mate. He got sent off on SECOND yellow card. Ckk.. ck...
I agreed with yellow, but it's not straight red.

Again, I can't see your example from the UK, but I'm talking about the Burnley one. He was sent off because of a VAR intervention where his yellow was rescinded and he was given a red instead.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/55204250

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/gra...&verein=11&liga=&wettbewerb=&pos=&trainer_id=

You can see he missed 3 games here, 2 league games and a game in the cup vs City.
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,351
What’s the correct definition then and did you change it Dion?!

I’m confused now
They're literally the same thing, people just misunderstood what the interpretation of strike is in a football context hence the clarification.
 

georgipep

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
2,475
Location
Not far enough
41% think it a red card. This place is laughable!
Dude, it was a definite red. Yes, Ayew should've also got sent off. Yes, the ref should've reacted much better to Schlupp's shove of Antony.
But, Casemiro's aggression towards Hughes, regardless if he got him on the neck or shirt, is a definite red card.
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
We've already been through this extensively in this thread. It's simply not true.

Arguments of force are what they are, but his hands are around Hughes' throat. His collar is ruffed up because it's between his neck and Casemiro's hands. That's beyond doubt.
This is too definitive. His hands are not “around his throat”. If you look at Hughes you can tell that he does not feel attacked, he is trying to get past Case and afterwards he doesn’t give it another thought.
 

Dempsey19

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
3,200
Location
Cork City
You always run the risk of a straight red card if you put your hands to someone's neck/face. Even if they make a meal out of it the refs seem to go with a red for raising your hands.

No complaints from me, just hope it doesn't feck us over against Leeds and Leicester.
 

Semper Fudge

Apt Tagline
Joined
May 3, 2021
Messages
3,874
Jordan Ayew has Fred round the neck. No card??



Eriksen out for the rest of the season. No card given for this?


Martinez elbowed in the eye. No card given for this?
Shite refereeing and inconsistency =/= Casemiro shouldn't have been sent off. This is basic stuff.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,708
Again, I can't see your example from the UK, but I'm talking about the Burnley one. He was sent off because of a VAR intervention where his yellow was rescinded and he was given a red instead.
Ok.. on second review, you're right, mate. That's a valid example. Shite for us, but they're consistent.
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,333
Location
NYC
Dude, it was a definite red. Yes, Ayew should've also got sent off. Yes, the ref should've reacted much better to Schlupp's shove of Antony.
But, Casemiro's aggression towards Hughes, regardless if he got him on the neck or shirt, is a definite red card.
Sorry. Just believe that nonsense, please. Casemiro basically tried to de-escalate by holding Hughes. If watching all available views, you still believe it a red, no one can help.
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,351
This is too definitive. His hands are not “around his throat”. If you look at Hughes you can tell that he does not feel attacked, he is trying to get past Case and afterwards he doesn’t give it another thought.
His hands are literally around his throat. This isn't an argument. It's where his hands were.

You can make whatever argument you like about how threatened Hughes felt or how much force was applied, I'll probably agree with it, but all that matters was was it negligible or not? Given it was a (successful) attempt to prevent Hughes from moving freely it obviously was not.
That's why it's a red.
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
VIOLENT CONDUCT: Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made. In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.

He never strikes his head or face, he grabs his kit, then puts his hand on his shoulder and then takes it off, all in less than a few seconds
Yes, clearly there is room for interpretation but my opinion is that Case’s actions do it meet that definition of violent conduct. If they did, then surely there’s several other players there that should have gone as well. He was, imo, far from the most aggressive in that whole melee.
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,351
Ok.. on second review, you're right, mate. That's a valid example. Shite for us, but they're consistent.
Yep, it is inconsistent and that's part of the reason I'm annoyed about it all. Ayew literally does the same thing and gets away with it, that's what I want them to get on the same page about. If Ayew goes off it's 10 v 10 and that match isn't nearly as awkward as it should have been and I doubt anyone would be as upset about the Casemiro decision.
 

Eplel

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2016
Messages
1,989
For me it's not a card at all. He's not attacking anyone, he's trying to hold the Palace player back from getting into the scuffle.

The referee got it awfully wrong, and I don't even thing he did it by mistake.