Xavi Simons

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,643
Location
Cooper Station
I’d love us to sign him so much. Hope it’s true that we’re interested

 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,311
Location
...
Huge talent, although will attract the ‘too small for the PL’ brigade no doubt. Great ball carrier and finisher too.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
He'd be Bruno's understudy would he? I'm not familiar, at all.
 

L1nk

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
5,117
I’d love us to sign him so much. Hope it’s true that we’re interested

We're 'interested' in the way that we're 'interested' in virtually every player that gets tweeted about on a daily basis that will amount to nothing is the likeliest scenario
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,517
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
We're 'interested' in the way that we're 'interested' in virtually every player that gets tweeted about on a daily basis that will amount to nothing is the likeliest scenario
Eredivise and Dutch though, absolute shoe-in we'd be interested.
 

L1nk

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
5,117
Yea, because we never actually sign footballers, only other teams do. Christ.
Did I say that? No. But you can't sit there and say we operate just like any other big team in the market, because we don't
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,311
Location
...
Did I say that? No. But you can't sit there and say we operate just like any other big team in the market, because we don't
You have no idea how we/other teams actually ‘operate’. All you can see is that they sign players and we sign players, and they miss targets as do we. The rest is a combination of fan and media gossiping and complaining.

What have United done differently to say, Bayern Munich so far this summer? Interested in a striker, interested in a midfielder, linked with several, backed away from deals due to cost and have had players choose other teams. They will of course eventually sign some players this summer, as will we.

The amount of posters who consistently seem to feel they have any idea of how to ‘run a football club’ is staggering.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,165
“The final decision is ONLY up to the player.”

Yeah, no shit, Romano
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,330
Location
France
Buy back clause but left PSG on a free

Sounds plausible
It's actually true. It was a deal between all parties, PSG didn't want to let him go and the player didn't want to leave permanently, the initial idea was a loan but PSV wanted to make money out of it, so all parties agreed on Simons leaving on a free while PSG would get a buy option.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Definitely talented, his numbers in the eredivise are impressive. 19G (joint top scorer) and 8 A in 34 games.
 

aeh1991

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 13, 2022
Messages
929
Wouldn't it make more sense to get him for cheap and find a more balanced player instead of spending 60m on Mount? Or if not, maybe get him alongside Mount?
 

K Stand Knut

Full Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
5,240
Location
Stretford End
It's actually true. It was a deal between all parties, PSG didn't want to let him go and the player didn't want to leave permanently, the initial idea was a loan but PSV wanted to make money out of it, so all parties agreed on Simons leaving on a free while PSG would get a buy option.
That’s one of the worst business deals I’ve ever heard!

Are you sure United didn’t negotiate it?
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,330
Location
France
That’s one of the worst business deals I’ve ever heard!

Are you sure United didn’t negotiate it?
How is it a bad deal? Everyone got what they wanted, the player got the loan situation that he wanted, as did PSG(who also gave themselves one more year to convince the player to extend) and PSV are either paid 6m for a loan or keep the player.
 

K Stand Knut

Full Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
5,240
Location
Stretford End
How is it a bad deal? Everyone got what they wanted, the player got the loan situation that he wanted, as did PSG(who also gave themselves one more year to convince the player to extend) and PSV are either paid 6m for a loan or keep the player.
Because PSV are getting £6m for a player who is probably worth at least 5 times that.

Yes they might have got a player for a season who was brilliant but they have signed him on a free transfer. They had no need to agree to any future fee if he was on a free!

Unless I’ve misunderstood it and PSG agreed to release him on a free on the basis of this fee being inserted but it still feels ridiculous and a bit pointless

EDIT - just checked and Simons contract ran out in June/July 2022 so signed on a free transfer for PSV being out of contract so would have had absolutely zero obligation to PSG for a future transfer fee
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,330
Location
France
Because PSV are getting £6m for a player who is probably worth at least 5 times that.

Yes they might have got a player for a season who was brilliant but they have signed him on a free transfer. They had no need to agree to any future fee if he was on a free!

Unless I’ve misunderstood it and PSG agreed to release him on a free on the basis of this fee being inserted but it still feels ridiculous and a bit pointless
PSV weren't getting the player without that clause, the player requested it. They had every need to agree on that clause with the player if they wanted him.
 

R0nald0

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
823
Location
Under a rug on top of a mountain under the stars.
Because PSV are getting £6m for a player who is probably worth at least 5 times that.

Yes they might have got a player for a season who was brilliant but they have signed him on a free transfer. They had no need to agree to any future fee if he was on a free!

Unless I’ve misunderstood it and PSG agreed to release him on a free on the basis of this fee being inserted but it still feels ridiculous and a bit pointless

EDIT - just checked and Simons contract ran out in June/July 2022 so signed on a free transfer for PSV being out of contract so would have had absolutely zero obligation to PSG for a future transfer fee
Completely agree, this deal benefits nobody but PSG!
 

K Stand Knut

Full Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
5,240
Location
Stretford End
PSV weren't getting the player without that clause, the player requested it. They had every need to agree on that clause with the player if they wanted him.
Then I did misunderstand. Apologies. Thought it was being insinuated that they agreed the fee with PSG not the player.

I still think that £6m is far too low to agree to, albeit I kind of understand why
 

Andersons Dietician

Full Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
13,295
Surely if you’re PSG you want to activate that clause. His market worth must be around 30-40mil possibly more. I read people saying it’s up to Xavi what happens but even if PSG lie their ass off say he’ll get first team minutes then sell his ass in January.
 

Telsim

Full Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2021
Messages
5,008
Would be a brilliant signing, which means it's not happening.
 

Nickosaur

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
11,897
Would be an amazing signing. Just doesn't make much sense, he'll want to go somewhere he is guaranteed to start week in week out (and rightly so).
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,486
Made a mistake leaving PSV so early and made a bigger mistake going back to PSG