g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

Mason Mount's Misfortune

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
We definitely are weaker with Mount in midfield than Eriksen.

Even if that's mostly down to the suicidal system, we still look weaker.

Eriksen was obviously poor off the ball but at least he sat back, could take the ball off the defence, turn and pass it forward. Now we've just got dead space in the middle of the pitch that no one can pass into.
Weaker yet have three more points than the same period as last season??
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,797
Weaker yet have three more points than the same period as last season??
Holy shit you're right. Because we beat Wolves 1-0 in a game we were appalling in and deserved to lose by 3 or 4 goals.

At this rate of improvement we should finish the season on 132 points.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,006
No he wasn't. First year at most.
Except he was. From stats alone 3 seasons ago he had 12 goals and assists and then he followed up with 21 goals and assists.

Objectively speaking that's decent enough, and then superb. That's before we consider his best assets which is off the ball work, retaining possession and positional intelligence.

He was also among the highest in chance creation. You can try your best to rewrite history but you can't.
 

Offside

Euro 2016 sweepstake winner
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
26,799
Location
London
Better these injuries happen now than later in the season. For us though it seems they just happen at all times. Wonder when our 1 game will be where we have our strongest XI.
 

el3mel

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,736
Location
Egypt
Except he was. From stats alone 3 seasons ago he had 12 goals and assists and then he followed up with 21 goals and assists.

Objectively speaking that's decent enough, and then superb. That's before we consider his best assets which is off the ball work, retaining possession and positional intelligence.

He was also among the highest in chance creation. You can try your best to rewrite history but you can't.
"Stats". Unfortunately people actually watch games rather than tracking stats on websites.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,790
It's hard to care about him being injured. It's hard to care about this season at all with the Glazers still here. Feels like we're treading water.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,006
"Stats". Unfortunately people actually watch games rather than tracking stats on websites.
Oh trust me, we've alll seen his games. I specifically said even if we just look at stats the output justifies successful season logic.

The eye test just makes your evaluation that much more questionable.
 

Newtonius

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Messages
540
Not really. Bruno and Rashford are getting more I think.
No they aren't that's criticism for their perceived weaknesses or attitude, Mount was being written off before he had even kicked a ball, two games in he might as well be on a plane to rwanda.
 

Leethal

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
799
No they aren't that's criticism for their perceived weaknesses or attitude, Mount was being written off before he had even kicked a ball, two games in he might as well be on a plane to rwanda.
How much is it to Rwanda, anyway? Surely a whip-around can be organised?
 

Trex

Full Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2019
Messages
3,045
Location
Nigeria
We're trying to press teams higher up, I know it hasn't fully clicked yet but first half vs Spurs was the blueprint. Do we switch system because Eriksen can't do it, maybe bring in Hannibal?
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,797
How so? It's factually correct,
It's also factually correct that in the same two fixtures last season, both only around 3 months ago, we dominated one, drew the other and scored 2 goals in each. And since then both of those teams have been in major flux, lost their key players and have new managers.

How many points and goals conceded do you think we'd be on right now if we'd started this season against Brighton and Brentford?
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,797
Except he was. From stats alone 3 seasons ago he had 12 goals and assists and then he followed up with 21 goals and assists.

Objectively speaking that's decent enough, and then superb. That's before we consider his best assets which is off the ball work, retaining possession and positional intelligence.
One might have to question the positional intelligence of a creative midfielder if he keeps averaging 18 passes in an entire game of football.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,006
One might have to question the positional intelligence of a creative midfielder if he keeps averaging 18 passes in an entire game of football.
Not at all - if he's adding value to the system then you don't hang your hat on isolated stats like these.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,428
Location
Flagg
We're trying to press teams higher up, I know it hasn't fully clicked yet but first half vs Spurs was the blueprint. Do we switch system because Eriksen can't do it, maybe bring in Hannibal?
It wasn't a great blueprint if we can only do it for half a game, during which we score 0 goals and the opposition hit the post twice.

I remain extremely unconvinced. At the moment its up there with pretending Roy Keane was a centreback and Alan Smith a midfielder.
 

Nobby style

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Messages
6,279
Location
Tooting Colombia to Tooting Bec and back again
It wasn't a great blueprint if we can only do it for half a game, during which we score 0 goals and the opposition hit the post twice.

I remain extremely unconvinced. At the moment its up there with pretending Roy Keane was a centreback and Alan Smith a midfielder.
It's the second match, Jesus, give it time. We've seen a glimpse.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,006
Have to keep our eyes out for when he starts to add value
And maybe until then don't make premature evaluations. Because he's not performing any more poorly for us than any of his peers bar Onana.
 

Trex

Full Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2019
Messages
3,045
Location
Nigeria
It wasn't a great blueprint if we can only do it for half a game, during which we score 0 goals and the opposition hit the post twice.

I remain extremely unconvinced.
We score zero goals but Bruno miss a sitter, Rashord was through on goal and we should have had a penalty. Like I said it hasn't fully clicked but we were the better side that half. The idea would be to do it for the entire game which will come. Have some faith bro/sis!!
 

Ole'sgunnarwin

Full Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2021
Messages
1,691
Ah he'll be useless. Part of the post Fergie curse, dreadful owners, awful managers, terrible players, bad luck etc
 

Wing Attack Plan R

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Messages
10,729
Location
El Pueblo de la Reyna de los Angeles
this is quite funny, him being a poor signing because he’s not good enough has been rebuked with “he was brilliant the seasons before being injured all last season”, and now “he’s a poor signing because he’s injury prone” is being rebuked with “he was fit for most of last season”….when he was largely rubbish
There are people here who just want to be moany cnuts about everything. They saw someone in YouTube bitch and moan, so they think that’s how discussion works.
 

Superunknown

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
8,429
I've only just caught up on this. Thought he was just out for two games, but seen the updates. How annoying.

Can't remember Fred spending too much time on the sidelines. So, we've moved him on and replaced him with Mount, who now isn't available. Can't help but think we've downgraded...

At least this will give us an excuse to get more signings.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,428
Location
Flagg
It's the second match, Jesus, give it time. We've seen a glimpse.
Its the second match of the manager's second season. Its an odd time to suddenly throw a new system at the players based on 1 signing (who is now injured anyway). Especially when said signing is being asked to play a role he literally never played at his former club and has shown little to no evidence he is suited to.

Its firmly under the category of "completely bonkers" until proven otherwise, which I highly suspect it wont be.

We score zero goals but Bruno miss a sitter, Rashord was through on goal and we should have had a penalty. Like I said it hasn't fully clicked but we were the better side that half. The idea would be to do it for the entire game which will come. Have some faith bro/sis!!
How do you know it will come? 45 minutes of looking just about ok and 135 of looking a complete and utter shambles might not be enough to fully condemn something as a crazy idea, but its certainly not enough to indicate it isn't crazy.


I would feel a lot more comfortable if we still had Fred and didn't have Mount, and that's nothing against Mount, but he very obviously doesn't pay the same position as Fred, and we needed Fred 56 times last season. There were very few games we were crying out for a second no10...but we did need to emergency loan another midfielder when Eriksen got injured.
 

Trex

Full Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2019
Messages
3,045
Location
Nigeria
Its the second match of the manager's second season. Its an odd time to suddenly throw a new system at the players based on 1 signing (who is now injured anyway). Especially when said signing is being asked to play a role he literally never played at his former club and has shown little to no evidence he is suited to.

Its firmly under the category of "completely bonkers" until proven otherwise, which I highly suspect it wont be.



How do you know it will come? 45 minutes of looking just about ok and 135 of looking a complete and utter shambles might not be enough to fully condemn something as a crazy idea, but its certainly not enough to indicate it isn't crazy.


I would feel a lot more comfortable if we still had Fred and didn't have Mount, and that's nothing against Mount, but he very obviously doesn't pay the same position as Fred, and we needed Fred 56 times last season. There were very few games we were crying out for a second no10...but we did need to emergency loan another midfielder when Eriksen got injured.
Fred and Mount actually play the same role within this system. The system isn't new either, you should rewatch our fixtures with Barca especially when Fred was on the pitch. We played with similar set up a lot after Eriksen injury last season. Football is about doing the basics right, if we do the basic things within the idea of the manager for 90 mins every week things will be alright
 

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,572

Four four two did a video on what we at least seem to be trying to do. I'm not sure any of the players coming in for Mount will be able to replicate his role, Fred was probably the best fit.
I’m baffled we’ve sold Fred.
 

The Irish Connection

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
2,386
Well, Mount doesn't even get on the ball enough to do that.

He made 21 passes against Wolves and 14 against Spurs. Fred averaged 53 passes a game per 90 last season.
I think it’s obvious that we need Amrabat. Someone to keep the ball and knit the defence to the attack. He is in the top 10% for passes made I believe, the opposite to what Mount has provided so far, and similar to what Eriksen can offer.
Youd hope that he has more stamina than Eriksen too, which is I guess why Ten Hag wanted Mount.
Once again, I would blame the ownership situation on the lack of transfer movement. If the Glazers were gone we’d have undoubtedly had a much better transfer window.

The hope of course is still that we can get Amrabat in before deadline.
 

TrustInJanuzaj

'Liverpool are a proper club'
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
10,858
Maybe Missing Much Maligned Mason Mount Means More Magical Memories Made Medially Mainoo Moreover Malacia.
 

Abraxas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
6,093
With half of those being to the other team.
To be honest I'd rather a player gets on the ball and does something, even if it doesn't materialise into anything decent (not that Fred was always bad). Getting involved and being proactive in the game is a prerequisite for good performance levels for a United midfielder.

So in my opinion I think just kind of hiding and not getting on the ball is worse because we don't even know if he'd be any good if he was getting it more often. All we know is he's putting in a VDB impression which has no prospect of going anywhere good until he firstly makes himself available in the game.
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
It's also factually correct that in the same two fixtures last season, both only around 3 months ago, we dominated one, drew the other and scored 2 goals in each. And since then both of those teams have been in major flux, lost their key players and have new managers.

How many points and goals conceded do you think we'd be on right now if we'd started this season against Brighton and Brentford?
Difficult to answer that last question as that'd be hypothetical but I'd imagine we'd be on three or four points, which would have been a massive improvement on last season's start also.

As starts go, we have had a better start than last season despite apparently being weaker, seems a bit of a contradictory statement.
 

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,909
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
Mount will always be up against it simply because many did not want him here in the first instance. He is not the type of player akin to the type of football we fans wanted to play under ETH especially since he chased De Jong. Mount's signing is the final nail in the coffin against our dreams of playing a controlling style of football.
 

Abraxas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
6,093
Difficult to answer that last question as that'd be hypothetical but I'd imagine we'd be on three or four points, which would have been a massive improvement on last season's start also.

As starts go, we have had a better start than last season despite apparently being weaker, seems a bit of a contradictory statement.
Why is last season's start so important? The baseline performance is what we achieved over the season. I don't find the opening 2 games to be very compelling as an argument, if there was a 2 game trophy for that maybe it would be, but if there was we wouldn't be winning it on points or performance levels. I don't see a high player churn within the XI's we've fielded for me to want to go back to Erik ten Hag's first two competitive fixtures as a Man Utd manager and directly compare them to this season. It seems very artificial to put forward that argument.

What should be expected is that taking our average level of performance from last season, you'd hope for signs of improvement early on based on learnings from last season, preseason training time, and signings because it is supposed to be progressive development expanding on what we are building. That's fairly straight forward and intuitive and basically the point of management, incremental improvement at the least. Sometimes it doesn't happen early in a season, but let's call that for what it is, it has been pretty poor and so far Mason Mount in exchange for Eriksen hasn't yielded anything good.

The worry being that there isn't much to fall back on. It would be nice to think we could point to Mason Mount's great recent form for club or country. Or for his history of solid performances in the role we're playing him. But we can't do that, we basically have to go for these hopeful notions of "he'll improve" etc. It's good you are concentrating on two games because honestly that is about the one saving grace with Mount at the moment because the logic behind it looks very strange.
 

Wing Attack Plan R

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Messages
10,729
Location
El Pueblo de la Reyna de los Angeles
To be honest I'd rather a player gets on the ball and does something, even if it doesn't materialise into anything decent (not that Fred was always bad). Getting involved and being proactive in the game is a prerequisite for good performance levels for a United midfielder.

So in my opinion I think just kind of hiding and not getting on the ball is worse because we don't even know if he'd be any good if he was getting it more often. All we know is he's putting in a VDB impression which has no prospect of going anywhere good until he firstly makes himself available in the game.
Dude, he created 3 chances in the last game, it's not his fault we can't finish a ham sandwich. Fred is/was nowhere near good enough for United. Mount is not experiencing his best form, but if (and maybe that's a big IF) he gets back to his form 2 seasons ago, he will be far better for us than Fred. I do not share the Fred-love that many on here do. I never rated him, never wanted to see him play, and on the few occasions when he made it through a match without something braindead and calamitous happening, I only felt exhausted.