Onana has not worked out. We need a new keeper.

JB7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
8,868
Thread is about Onana being poor. If you look at my OP DDG wasn’t even mentioned.
Have any of those posts that you have quoted from the fifth page of a thread quoted you or even responded directly to you?
 

Remember the geese

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
7,176
Location
Northampton
Unpopular opinion, but I still have faith in him. He isn't a world class shot stopper and that first goal tonight is inexcusable. However, if we grow as a team he should expect to have a lot less to do. He is very good on the ball and did actually make a few decent stops tonight in addition to dealing well with a few crosses.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,067
In the rush to sign a ‘modern keeper’ we forget we are a team that is poor in possession, doesn’t control games and concedes multiple good quality chances every game.

other teams that play with this type of keeper dont expose them like we do.

whoops.
 

Jack-C20

Full Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2016
Messages
2,900
I don’t think he’s the best shop stopper around but I think he’s just going through a rough patch. Once we start controlling games more and playing to his strengths he’ll be fine.

Wasn’t DDG pretty crap in his first year?
 

Thom Merrilin

Full Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
785
In the rush to sign a ‘modern keeper’ we forget we are a team that is poor in possession, doesn’t control games and concedes multiple good quality chances every game.

other teams that play with this type of keeper dont expose them like we do.

whoops.
How would you evolve us into a team that can play that way then? I think it's a bit like did the chicken or the egg come first, you need a gk like Onana to control games and you need to control games in order to accommodate a gk like Onana.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,067
How would you evolve us into a team that can play that way then? I think it's a bit like did the chicken or the egg come first, you need a gk like Onana to control games and you need to control games in order to accommodate a gk like Onana.
nah. Onana definitely wasn't the missing. Piece. We couldn't play in the way that justified this type of keeper last season
 

fallengt

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
5,613
Thought he mad some good saves but OP maybe right. United didn't need to pay 50m for goal keeper
 

Gloccamora

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
75
I don't understand how goal looks so much wider when he is in our goal.
 

Thom Merrilin

Full Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
785
nah. Onana definitely wasn't the missing. Piece. We couldn't play in the way that justified this type of keeper last season
I didn't mean to imply that Onana is the missing piece by any means. We've already improved at playing from the back this season compared to last. Surely you have to start somewhere?

Put it this way, swap Ederson and Onana and I bet Onana would fit right in at City while we'd all be complaining that Ederson can't save anything.
 

JB7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
8,868
nah. Onana definitely wasn't the missing. Piece. We couldn't play in the way that justified this type of keeper last season
We couldn't, you're right. But we have purchased players with a view to playing the game in the opponents half of the pitch this season far more than we did, or could have done last season. We saw in the very early games the idea was for Martinez to step into midfield to support Casemiro (we were even setting up for that from goal-kicks, whereas last season Martinez was taking the goal-kicks) and Mount & Bruno to play high, with the full backs coming inside and the wingers staying high and wide. We obviously didn't have our centre forward which was a large part of the problem and didn't fix the balance during pre-season, hence the Wolves game where the were able to run through us at will. The Spurs game it was working more in the first half but we didn't take our chances or get given a blatant penalty & the game turned when they did take their chance. Forest was a freak game as they scored two very early goals and defended deep for the entire game so we didn't really have any press to play through and we played a much tighter, slower paced game at Arsenal. We've gone away from the very early blueprint since missing players who were critical to that plan and while it wasn't really working, it also wasn't *not* working as we did at least win the games against Wolves & Forest and should have been well ahead at Spurs but for missed chances. Hopefully once one or two players are back we can get back to the plan, I'm specifically looking at Varane and Mount, but Amrabat and Antony come into it as well.
 

CloneMC16

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Messages
4,565
Thread is about Onana being poor. If you look at my OP DDG wasn’t even mentioned.
I know, but other people mentioned De Gea. I was just responding to them.

In regards to the OP, I still have faith in Onana. It has only been 6 games, and practically the entire team is playing poorly. If he continues to let in a tonne of goals all season, I will happily say he's not good enough. Still, we're going to concede a lot of goals if we keep letting teams have multiple shots on target every game. This shouldn't be happening.
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,644
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
These issues were mentioned by a few of us when we signed him. But apparently he was the missing link to suddenly seeing ETHs true plans being born.

I'll be honest, I don't even think he's that good with his feet. The last two games alone he's passed the ball along the ground straight to the opposition and his longer passes are mostly straight to a defender of the opposition. There were cheaper alternatives mentioned at the time, such as Raya or Sanchez, and I'm now wondering if they're not only cheaper but better at the whole passing the ball shtick too.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,016
I don’t think he’s the best shop stopper around but I think he’s just going through a rough patch. Once we start controlling games more and playing to his strengths he’ll be fine.

Wasn’t DDG pretty crap in his first year?
First year and his final five.
 

CloneMC16

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Messages
4,565

Ole'sattheWheel

Full Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
969
There was a period under Ole/Rangnick when Maguire made a ‘sorry we’re shite, we let you down, it won’t happen again’ speech to the media every week. I’m sure there was a thread about how tiresome it became on here. ‘Stuff your words to the media lads, how about you do your talking on the pitch, capische?!’
There's a difference between "we're shit as a team and it's not good enough" and "I fecked up and it's completely my fault we lost"
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,976
De Gea has let plenty of shots in like that.
Onana has never played at this level - Premiership I mean. Italian league is a lot slower and poorer than a lot of our teams. Its a learning curve and at least he realises it and has the guts to come out in public with it. If hes still the same in 2 months time thats when you worry.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
Still early days to judge. But he has the kind of start which is 2nd only to Taibi, who was probably the worst ever start in history of the club.
 

Mercurial

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
2,377
How would you evolve us into a team that can play that way then? I think it's a bit like did the chicken or the egg come first, you need a gk like Onana to control games and you need to control games in order to accommodate a gk like Onana.
A goalkeeper like Onana is the cherry on top a functioning team and not the other way around, (other way around = too high concession). You need a chicken to lay an egg and you need the chicken to roost the egg. The egg isn't immaculate conception and will rot. The chicken evolved from som other proto chicken. A good team evolves from a lesser good team by evolving so many individual aspects, and keeper is just one of those many needs. Arguably many good teams compensate just as well with a good ball playing and fast CB.
 

Thom Merrilin

Full Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
785
A goalkeeper like Onana is the cherry on top a functioning team and not the other way around, (other way around = too high concession). You need a chicken to lay an egg and you need the chicken to roost the egg. The egg isn't immaculate conception and will rot. The chicken evolved from som other proto chicken. A good team evolves from a lesser good team by evolving so many individual aspects, and keeper is just one of those many needs. Arguably many good teams compensate just as well with a good ball playing and fast CB.
I can't disagree too much. Sensible post. To stick with that chicken and egg analogy though, evolution comes in great leaps followed by long periods of slow progression. I was wondering whether Onana could be a part of our great leap forward into being a ball playing team. Before we signed Onana we brought in Martinez, Eriksen, Antony, and Malacia who we all thought would help guide us towards being comfortable on possession don't forget.

It's not insane to think it was a good time to progress even further by bringing in a ball playing gk.
 

FriedClams

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Messages
3,689
One issue with him is teams are just letting him have it, and getting themselves organized to stop passing between the lines. Everyone respects how good he is on the ball and don’t bother trying to aggressively press him.
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,904
I don’t think he’s the best ____________ around but I think he’s just going through a rough patch. Once we start controlling games more and playing to his strengths he’ll be fine.

Wasn’t DDG pretty crap in his first year?
This applies to most of our signings over the past decade.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
35,035
Do people need a reminder of De Gea making a similar mistake away to WBA in first league game.

Would have been interesting to see if we had gone for him if the takeover was sorted. My first choice was always Maignan but with our restricted budget that was never gonna happen.

I saw a poster mention Raya/Sanchez but don't think we had any intention of going for them over Onana,that maybe a mistake but I guess we will just have to see on that one.
 

Mercurial

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
2,377
I can't disagree too much. Sensible post. To stick with that chicken and egg analogy though, evolution comes in great leaps followed by long periods of slow progression. I was wondering whether Onana could be a part of our great leap forward into being a ball playing team. Before we signed Onana we brought in Martinez, Eriksen, Antony, and Malacia who we all thought would help guide us towards being comfortable on possession don't forget.

It's not insane to think it was a good time to progress even further by bringing in a ball playing gk.
ETH probably 110% believes this. Many here have however called for a more skilled and fast CB for a very long time, and that would in hindsight have been more sensible investment towards the squad's evolution. More and more ETH is the stubborn purist like Pep but without the experience and without the Pep tailored recruitment department behind him.
 

RuudtheRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 25, 2020
Messages
289
I'd give him more than 5 games before I judge how good he is. He definitely isn't as good a shot stopper as De Gea is (or was) and watching him, I think he sticks to his line too much in 1 v 1 situations. Today he made a bad error on the 1st goal but not much he could have done on the rest. In terms of his distribution he is light years ahead of De Gea, at least we can pass the ball out from the back far more comfortably.
 

Thom Merrilin

Full Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
785
ETH probably 110% believes this. Many here have however called for a more skilled and fast CB for a very long time, and that would in hindsight have been more sensible investment towards the squad's evolution. More and more ETH is the stubborn purist like Pep but without the experience and without the Pep tailored recruitment department behind him.
I think the verdict on Martinez is that hes been an undeniable success. Or were you talking about Lindelof? What would you have done then? I said this at the start of last season as well but if we're ever going to challenge City Arsenal and Liverpool, we need to make these changes. Those changes will have growing pains. Just look at how many duds Pep signed trying to get it right at City. Now I think about it, all those clubs had growing pains to varying degrees.
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,787
Wasn’t DDG pretty crap in his first year?
Not really, I think it was overblown a lot. His first competitive match was a horror-show (letting in 2 saveable long-range shots vs City in the Shield - not as bad as today, but not good). But the run of games after that was excellent - reflex saves, 1v1s, and the famous RvP penalty save.

It could have got much worse - because of that first game, teams decided that his weakness is long shots rather than strength on crosses, which they figured out later. So (IIRC) Spurs and others early that season peppered him with shots and got absolutely nothing from it.


The save from RvP's volley at 1:18 is probably the best one (check the replay angle), but I remember the Stoke game (2:05-3:01) that made me a believer.
 

The_Midfielder

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
3,653
A goalkeeper like Onana is the cherry on top a functioning team and not the other way around, (other way around = too high concession). You need a chicken to lay an egg and you need the chicken to roost the egg. The egg isn't immaculate conception and will rot. The chicken evolved from som other proto chicken. A good team evolves from a lesser good team by evolving so many individual aspects, and keeper is just one of those many needs. Arguably many good teams compensate just as well with a good ball playing and fast CB.
Wait.maybe we should have got Arsenals goalie ..
But if you watched the game today.. you will realize he made some smart passes to casemiro , midfield beating the Bayern press.. With de gea, once they start pressing , he would have kicked it long ..
We will ship some goals with this keeper .. but this is the way to go forward .
 

Huddsred

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 27, 2022
Messages
243
I'm not having Onona. His first memorable action as a United keeper was to stick the knife in Maguire, who needs his confidence building up, not bringing down. He needs to get his own house in order before he starts digging out other players because as it stands now he's just a laughing stock.
 
Last edited:

Remember the geese

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
7,176
Location
Northampton
I dislike Onona. His first memorable action as a United keeper was to dig out Maguire. Well he needs to get his own house in order before he starts digging out other players.
Nothing wrong with digging Maguire or any other player out. Just like there's nothing wrong with a player digging Onana out.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,404
Onana made several world-class saves even yesterday. As for the blunder - it sucked, but de Gea had plenty of those, on a regular basis, as well.

So emotions aside, this thread gets the only thing right - replacing de Gea should not have been a priority - but gets everything (title included) wrong
 

Huddsred

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 27, 2022
Messages
243
Nothing wrong with digging Maguire or any other player out. Just like there's nothing wrong with a player digging Onana out.
If you're going to make a point of very publicly digging out one of your teammates you better make sure you've got your own game in order, something that Onana clearly hasn't
 

Cnaiür urs Skiötha

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
2,992
Compared to de Gea I always have a queasy feeling whenever the opposition is in or around our box.

On the other hand I think that oppositions realize that our GK now is quite comfortable with his feet and primitive pressing is not that successful. Right now it does not help us going forward that much but there is hope once the starting 11 has settled in (whoever this will be in the end) we will get profit out of that.