Erik ten Hag - Manchester United manager / awaiting clarity from the club over his position

Should ETH be kept on or fired by INEOS


  • Total voters
    2,032
  • Poll closed .

erikcred

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2022
Messages
1,972
ETH can’t bench everybody and I’d wonder how much that would really help to be honest.

There’s so many issues at the club and players , that on its own is a good explanation as to why things aren’t working out, that aren’t down to tactics or coaching or ETH being a major reason for the awful form.

But an interesting one seldom discussed is the amount of games United played last season. I think I read we played more games then pool did the season before when they goto all the cup finals.

And last season Pool started the season with the following Before the wc

P14 W6 D4 L4

Two of their defeats were to Leeds and Forrest.

Now last season United played more games than pool and had a World Cup mid season and yet we don’t get any consideration allowed when pool themselves had a terrible start to last season.

“Klopp deserves benefit” doesn’t actually matter, if a squad is knackered because of games played, then it’s not the managers fault.

And you add all the other sh*te that ETH is managing (that Klopp didn’t last season) and I’d argue people are taking the piss and not really factoring in all the things that are working against ETH and our team this season.
Probably seldom discussed because it's not true. We had no cup replays, Europa league has at most 2 more games per team than CL and by getting knocked out in the quarter-final, we didn't play at least 3 games.
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
Probably seldom discussed because it's not true. We had no cup replays, Europa league has at most 2 more games per team than CL and by getting knocked out in the quarter-final, we didn't play at least 3 games.
Liverpool in 2021-2022 played 63 games. Last season we played 62 games. The issue with last season is the World Cup in between, that for a team we lack depth in certain positions like DM and CF, it had been stamina taxing.
 

erikcred

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2022
Messages
1,972
Can you imagine a manager, literally any other manager Zidane or Pep or Ancelotti say "if you can't handle pressure you shouldn't play for United. It's eat or be eaten in the Premier League" - and think anyone would bat an eye lid? No.

But some posters, especially that one, just wait for the manager to breathe and try to feck him over :lol:
Sure, I can imagine that.

If they themselves are under pressure from their team serving up dross match after match all season with very little strategy on the pitch, they should use a bit more self awareness, that's all.

I personally don't care what he says to the press if the football is good. But under the current circumstances, trying to argue what he said here is a normal thing to say for a top coach like the three you named to say is just silly.

I mean, dude hasn't been doing much eating in the PL himself and this season, has been eaten by Palace and almost eaten by Wolves and Brentford at home.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,487
Sure, I can imagine that.

If they themselves are under pressure from their team serving up dross match after match all season with very little strategy on the pitch, they should use a bit more self awareness, that's all.

I personally don't care what he says to the press if the football is good. But under the current circumstances, trying to argue what he said here is a normal thing to say for a top coach like the three you named to say is just silly.

I mean, dude hasn't been doing much eating in the PL himself and this season, has been eaten by Palace and almost eaten by Wolves and Brentford at home.
Thats his point though.

The question asked (if I recall correctly) is do the players feel pressure to perform and I don't think ten hag put a foot wrong with his answer.
 

gaffs

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
12,950
Location
Moscow 08, Rome 09, London 11
It's an era thing in my view. Ferguson and Mourinho also had far better collection of talents at their disposal in your scenario, players who were willing to run through walls to win. Their players had high football IQ and played as a cohesive unit with little to zero self doubts.
Who got them running through walls? Fergie and Jose did.

All players have it within them. Every player at United has shown levels of brilliance either at United or for previous clubs.

It is about extracting that.
 

alexthelion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
3,668
I wish I shared your confidence. Onana is a pretty average keeper who was available on a free last summer. Reya is a better keeper and it seems we didnt even look at him. Half the team are his signings and most are poor. We are already seeing plenty of stories he has lost the dressing room, some mentioning his constant criticism. Cant see this helps
:lol:
 

gaffs

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
12,950
Location
Moscow 08, Rome 09, London 11
Tottenham as example especially when you even mentioned it's only 8 game is as knee jerking as it gets. Tottenham was eliminated from Carabao Cup early. They're not playing in Europe at all this season. They're very much fresher than a host of other teams having to take other competitions serious. Conte's complaint partially about their squad depth as his ambition is to push for other competitions. Last season, after 8 games, they're only 3 points off their current point tally. Sure they had tougher fixture list this season, and it has been impressive. However, the league is never a sprint. It's a marathon, so let's wait until the end of the season. Let's see how "history of Tottenham" change or simply continue. One thing for sure, Tottenham is never known for being resilient under pressure.

ETH did quite decently in his first season, and the pressure here is a different beast to Tottenham.
After 8 games, yeah. ETH has already had a full season with us and achieved 3rd and a trophy, so this Spurs comparison is just becoming stupid.
Not saying Spurs are going to win the league, but my point was in response to a previous poster who said United had a bunch of "low football IQ types".
Point was, many would say the same about Spurs for most of last season, yet a new guy comes in and completely turns that team around, all be it is early days.
To me, that shows the players are capable, they just that the wrong man leading them.
 

gaffs

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
12,950
Location
Moscow 08, Rome 09, London 11
I wish I shared your confidence. Onana is a pretty average keeper who was available on a free last summer. Reya is a better keeper and it seems we didnt even look at him. Half the team are his signings and most are poor. We are already seeing plenty of stories he has lost the dressing room, some mentioning his constant criticism. Cant see this helps
Not heard that.
 

Tyrion

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
5,250
Location
Ireland
Well we could have signed antony for much cheaper though had we gotten him in June itself. The board were idiots to waste one month chasing fdj and then panicking with antony signing.
That's why I give him a break on the transfers. Its not his fault the club always pays double the value of the player. It happened before him and it'll happen after. For greedy bastards, the Glazers don't really keep track of where their money goes.
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
7,240
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
Ten Hag's already said that we're playing transition football this season and I'd like to see us get back to basics defensively. Especially for away games, like I'd mentioned.

Nothing I've seen of Mount at Chelsea and United suggests that he is a good dribbler or even ball carrier. In fact he's probably on par with Bruno based on this quick google result: https://www.planetfootball.com/quic...-manchester-united-chelsea-comparison-2021-22

Amrabat has already shown to be more press resistant than Mount and also more suitable defensively and in the build-up - yet another reason why I find the Mount signing extremely befuddling and that we didn't sign a Gavi/Pedri/De Jong type CM. Amrabat was always supposed to be a squad rotation player. I hope Mainoo comes good.
That's the problem though, we AREN'T playing transition football really. It's sort of a hybrid of trying to high press/control games and also be a transition team.


I mean simply watching games of Mount you can see he's better technically in tight spaces. That being said yes I agree that Mount was a pretty pointless signing considering what we really needed. But if you want to play with a double pivot of Amrabat and Case then you have to change how we press to something closer to last years version in a deeper block. With how poor our midfield has mostly looked this year I'm pretty confident Mainoo will make a difference even if he isn't a world beater. We simply need more athleticism and drive, it's why Hannibal has gotten so much more run.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,530
I don't have an issue with criticizing players in public but the guy keeps on blaming everything and everyone to absolve himself from the blame despite being shit at his job as well. Maybe acknowledge the fact you shoulder responsibility for our crap form.
He says he's responsible right here in the pre-match one (4:23 if the auto-start doesn't work)


Problem is people pick and choose one line without any context and fit it into whatever they already thought.
Let's see if you can acknowledge you were wrong.
 

el3mel

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,736
Location
Egypt
You are wrong, he should just blame himself. Players should not be questioned, they are mentally weak so we have to protect them. Let us keep on protecting the players and just put everything on the manager and keep sacking them.
Complete opposite to what was said during the previous managers tenure when people were against criticizing players in public and wanted the manager to shoulder responsibility instead of "throwing players under the bus", but it's alright. We are used to the hypocrisy for Ten Hag. He's treated different than our other managers because he's our "savior".
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,250
Location
Canada
Complete opposite to what was said during the previous managers tenure when people were against criticizing players in public and wanted the manager to shoulder responsibility instead of "throwing players under the bus", but it's alright. We are used to the hypocrisy for Ten Hag. He's treated different than our other managers because he's our "savior".
And this still holds true. You don't throw the players under the bus like Jose did but the big issue with your posts like many of your posts is he hardly threw anyone under the bus. The only two supposed "rift" he has had till now is with Ronaldo and Sancho. Funnily in both of them he never criticised either of them publicly so not sure where this "throwing the players under the bus" thing is coming. He has time and time in the media has used the term "We" and has outrightly asked the "team" to improve the intensity. He has also taken the blame on himself on multiple occasions.

You blame him for his tactics, fine. You blame for our poor show, fine. You can blame for team selection, fine, hey even blame for his signings being poor but let us not make up things here just because you don't rate him. What next, blame him for our poor structure.

He hasn't thrown anyone under the bus or criticized any player openly. And asking for improvement is not criticizing, if a manager can't even do that then we may as well not have any manager and just have players run the show.
 

ArmaDino

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 21, 2023
Messages
258
What are you trying to say? That ETH is not at fault for the club paying 90m on a player he wanted and trained for 2 years? Yeah Murtough and the other wanker are at fault but so is ETH, he had the best insight of his value and ability and he ok'ed it. Ultimately he should have known that buying a former player of his, will always be on him more than on anyone else.
He is not. He specifically informed the club that he wanted Antony at the beginning of the summer.According to reports, we were scouting Antony from his Brazilian days, so it wasn't like our scouting department needed to run a background check on him.

We could have bought him around the same fee we bought Martinez, but instead good old Murtough and Arnold decided to dilly dally and ended up at the start of august with 1 right winger out(Greenwood) and 1 right winger still not fully adapting(Sancho). Not his fault those 2 clowns in their desire to impress the fans missed out on our No.1 target in De Jong, instead of stopping the pursuit and moving on to plan, but also found themselves in a similar situation with Antony, who unlike De Jong was willing to come over, hence we had to pay an arm and a leg for him.

Nobody is saying Arnold and Murtough are not at fault, they are most culpable of blindly following ETH, that is because they are a bunch of football nobodies and need to be sacked. But there is no excuse for training some crap player like Antony for 2 years and deciding that he is the player that will improve my team in the PL at Manchester United and is worth 90m of my club's budget.
Please, don't absolve the primary culprits of their responsibilities. If a CEO needs to blindly follow someone from the middle management, he needs to be fired on the spot, period. Same thing goes for Murtough. They are both hired to represent and work for Manchester United, but not to be ETH's errand boys. And unless ETH's last name is Glazer, nobody should blindly follow him and pander to any of his wishes if this goes against the club's interests.

There have been plenty of instances where the CEOs/DoFs went against their manager's desires for the betterment of the club. The 2 most famous ones are Florentino Perez not willing to sign Pogba even when Zidane wanted him on numerous occassions(right call!). The famous Edwards and him declining to sign Brandt and signing Salah instead to Klopp's displeasure.

It's funny how other football clubs can do this, but not Man Utd apparently. In the eyes of the fans, our managers are elevated to status of demi-gods who require sacrifices in form of only the players they desire. And if they don't get them, then we are damned to eternal mediocrity. Except when we do, and managers fail only for our fans to realize that the so called demi-god who everyone including the club hierarchy had to worship is just a mere mortal of a man.

As far as Antony goes, I've already addressed his price tag above, but he is clearly not crap. Overpriced? Sure. Saying he is crap, when we are clearly a much better team with him in the starting XI.
 

astracrazy

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
1,524
I wish I shared your confidence. Onana is a pretty average keeper who was available on a free last summer. Reya is a better keeper and it seems we didnt even look at him. Half the team are his signings and most are poor. We are already seeing plenty of stories he has lost the dressing room, some mentioning his constant criticism. Cant see this helps
Is that not a bit of BS on your behalf? Can you post some sources? Literally not heard that once.

I don't have an issue with criticizing players in public but the guy keeps on blaming everything and everyone to absolve himself from the blame despite being shit at his job as well. Maybe acknowledge the fact you shoulder responsibility for our crap form.
Complete opposite to what was said during the previous managers tenure when people were against criticizing players in public and wanted the manager to shoulder responsibility instead of "throwing players under the bus", but it's alright. We are used to the hypocrisy for Ten Hag. He's treated different than our other managers because he's our "savior".
He says he's responsible right here in the pre-match one (4:23 if the auto-start doesn't work)


Problem is people pick and choose one line without any context and fit it into whatever they already thought.
@el3mel Still not prepared to admit you were wrong then? Or are you ignoring it on purpose....
 

Baneofthegame

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2019
Messages
3,066
He is not. He specifically informed the club that he wanted Antony at the beginning of the summer.According to reports, we were scouting Antony from his Brazilian days, so it wasn't like our scouting department needed to run a background check on him.

We could have bought him around the same fee we bought Martinez, but instead good old Murtough and Arnold decided to dilly dally and ended up at the start of august with 1 right winger out(Greenwood) and 1 right winger still not fully adapting(Sancho). Not his fault those 2 clowns in their desire to impress the fans missed out on our No.1 target in De Jong, instead of stopping the pursuit and moving on to plan, but also found themselves in a similar situation with Antony, who unlike De Jong was willing to come over, hence we had to pay an arm and a leg for him.


Please, don't absolve the primary culprits of their responsibilities. If a CEO needs to blindly follow someone from the middle management, he needs to be fired on the spot, period. Same thing goes for Murtough. They are both hired to represent and work for Manchester United, but not to be ETH's errand boys. And unless ETH's last name is Glazer, nobody should blindly follow him and pander to any of his wishes if this goes against the club's interests.

There have been plenty of instances where the CEOs/DoFs went against their manager's desires for the betterment of the club. The 2 most famous ones are Florentino Perez not willing to sign Pogba even when Zidane wanted him on numerous occassions(right call!). The famous Edwards and him declining to sign Brandt and signing Salah instead to Klopp's displeasure.

It's funny how other football clubs can do this, but not Man Utd apparently. In the eyes of the fans, our managers are elevated to status of demi-gods who require sacrifices in form of only the players they desire. And if they don't get them, then we are damned to eternal mediocrity. Except when we do, and managers fail only for our fans to realize that the so called demi-god who everyone including the club hierarchy had to worship is just a mere mortal of a man.

As far as Antony goes, I've already addressed his price tag above, but he is clearly not crap. Overpriced? Sure. Saying he is crap, when we are clearly a much better team with him in the starting XI.
Great post, if I could like it I would.

Is that not a bit of BS on your behalf? Can you post some sources? Literally not heard that once.





@el3mel Still not prepared to admit you were wrong then? Or are you ignoring it on purpose....
Not sure why people seem to quote the Onana thing over and over when he signed for inter on a free the January before ETH even joined.
 

The side netting

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 23, 2023
Messages
19
I feel a bit sorry for Ten Hag at the moment. Coming into a club like United is like opening up a 1000 piece jigsaw for the first time. You turn all the pieces over to see what its about, lay them out neatly to find what you want, what clicks into place, what doesn't, then plan to build it properly.

This year, the 2nd year, should have been about keeping the foundations of the jigsaw he built and adding more pieces to it. But it's like he's entered the room to find a tornado has gone through it, to find some bits have tipped back over, some have gone missing and he's now dealing with holes all over it and filling them in with pieces that don't fit. If he had hair, he'd be tearing it out and shouting like most of us would.

I don't think he's even had a chance to play the first 11 he really wants to play, nowhere near it. I think his ideal lineup would be this.

Onana
AWB - Varane - Martinez - Shaw
Casemiro - Amrabat
Anthony - Bruno/Mount - Rash/Garn
Hojlund

You would then have Martial, Erikson, Pellistri, Region, Hannibal on the bench along with either Garnacho, Mount, Bruno, Rashford (depending on who he picked)

But he's not been anywhere near having that luxury to select, instead he's been papering over cracks since the start of the season.

And there's really no use sacking him because the next manager is still left with the same jigsaw puzzle.
 

Kostov

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2017
Messages
9,516
Location
Skopje, Macedonia
He is not. He specifically informed the club that he wanted Antony at the beginning of the summer.According to reports, we were scouting Antony from his Brazilian days, so it wasn't like our scouting department needed to run a background check on him.
They definitely needed to, and there were reports that United scouts were against signing him but ETH insisted on him regardless.
We could have bought him around the same fee we bought Martinez, but instead good old Murtough and Arnold decided to dilly dally and ended up at the start of august with 1 right winger out(Greenwood) and 1 right winger still not fully adapting(Sancho). Not his fault those 2 clowns in their desire to impress the fans missed out on our No.1 target in De Jong, instead of stopping the pursuit and moving on to plan, but also found themselves in a similar situation with Antony, who unlike De Jong was willing to come over, hence we had to pay an arm and a leg for him.
No we couldn't that absolute rewriting of history, Ajax were very clear that they didn't want to sell Antony after loosing, Martinez, Gravenberch, Mazraoui and only stupid fee would get him. And I am not even trying to defend Murtough and Arnold, they are shit at their job, but you try to make it as ETH didn't work at Ajax and didn't know their transfer plans and way of conducting business, and that is without even going into the actual quality of the said player. Antony is not even a 50m player never mind what we have paid. And the less talk about De Jong the better. Now in hindsight we pretty much know how much ETH's agency and his son have had an influence in our transfer policy, De Jong was also one of Ten Haag's target's and he wasted the whole summer chasing him, by all account and reports, ETH was the one insisting the pursuit to last as long as it did, and he should have known better, De Jong didn't want to come from the start. Not sure how can you use that as a beating stone for the two clowns above him, but not for ETH.

Please, don't absolve the primary culprits of their responsibilities. If a CEO needs to blindly follow someone from the middle management, he needs to be fired on the spot, period. Same thing goes for Murtough. They are both hired to represent and work for Manchester United, but not to be ETH's errand boys. And unless ETH's last name is Glazer, nobody should blindly follow him and pander to any of his wishes if this goes against the club's interests.
As I said I don't even want to defend nor I absolve them of any blame, but you have a serious misinterpretation of how this club is run. The CEO of the club is obviously not in charge of the football thing, but in that department is the biggest stupidity and that is, he follows whoever is the manager blindly. Murtough is just a puppet. Now that we have established that they are incompetent, when you get to ETH and his decisions on transfer targets and his ability to veto any transfer, you get to his part of the blame. And it's massive.


There have been plenty of instances where the CEOs/DoFs went against their manager's desires for the betterment of the club. The 2 most famous ones are Florentino Perez not willing to sign Pogba even when Zidane wanted him on numerous occassions(right call!). The famous Edwards and him declining to sign Brandt and signing Salah instead to Klopp's displeasure.

It's funny how other football clubs can do this, but not Man Utd apparently. In the eyes of the fans, our managers are elevated to status of demi-gods who require sacrifices in form of only the players they desire. And if they don't get them, then we are damned to eternal mediocrity. Except when we do, and managers fail only for our fans to realize that the so called demi-god who everyone including the club hierarchy had to worship is just a mere mortal of a man.
A mare mortal can not be a United manager, only the most exceptional managers can do it. A mare mortal can go and splash 300m on absolute dross, because the hierarchy allows it, but you as a fan can not expect for him to succeed. He can't.
As far as Antony goes, I've already addressed his price tag above, but he is clearly not crap. Overpriced? Sure. Saying he is crap, when we are clearly a much better team with him in the starting XI.
He is absolutely average, and a total dud. We look like a proper team because without him we play without a RM. You can take someone like Armand Traore or Remdond, and he will do the same or even better,
 

Ubik

Nothing happens until something moves!
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
19,085
This agency stuff really has taken on a life of its own with a section of fans, huh.
 

Cnaiür urs Skiötha

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
3,000
There were rumors that when he was interviewed he promised to get the best out of our "star" players whereas others like Pochettino mentioned they need a big budget to build their own team. I feel as if this is haunting ten Hag as on the one hand he feels he is forced to use the expensive players and is not allowed to cash in on some of them but on the other hand he would like to get in players with a different profile to deliver the kind of football he has in his mind.

So caught in this situation he tries different things but the balance just is not there. While players like Maguire, McTominay, Dalot, Lindelöf and some others might not be the problem they are not the solution either. Looking at the bigger picture they should just not be part of a top team. Others like Rashford and Bruno are inconsistent and probably not suited for ten Hag who wants to play a modern style similar to the other top teams with less focus on the individual players and more on the team as a unit works over 90 minutes. Casemiro, Varane, Eriksen seem to be beyond their peak and declining (although still often showing their class). His own signings are injury prone and/or still did not have the impact he hoped for. Also potentially solid players like Shaw, AWB or Martial are not reliable as they also tend to get easily injured.
On top of that we got problems off the pitch.

A real mess. In case a new owner comes in he needs to be totally blunt and try to get green light to start more or less from scratch. No matter on which wages or how long the contracts are or who sells the most shirts he should get the right players in and get rid of most others. Someone like Rangnick would be a big help getting this major overhaul done.
 

tob

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
1,087
Every top team from the past decade has used inverted wingers.

This idea that it's hampering us is nonsensical.

Antony would be even more useless on the left.
What makes you so sure that Antony would be useless on the left?

Other teams might have more success with inverted wingers, but that doesn’t mean it has to work for us as well. Especially when we’re also trying to play with inverted fullbacks, and two attacking central midfielders. There is too much play going in central, and not enough out wide, going outside of the fullback.
 

Pronewbie

Peep
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
6,750
Location
In front of My Computer
That's the problem though, we AREN'T playing transition football really. It's sort of a hybrid of trying to high press/control games and also be a transition team.


I mean simply watching games of Mount you can see he's better technically in tight spaces. That being said yes I agree that Mount was a pretty pointless signing considering what we really needed. But if you want to play with a double pivot of Amrabat and Case then you have to change how we press to something closer to last years version in a deeper block. With how poor our midfield has mostly looked this year I'm pretty confident Mainoo will make a difference even if he isn't a world beater. We simply need more athleticism and drive, it's why Hannibal has gotten so much more run.
Well Mount may be slightly better technically in tight spaces 1. when he actually shows for the ball 2. but he hardly producing anything at the same time. I mean, we could try dropping Bruno for Mount but my view is that we'd be better off with Bruno's overall game. I still can't see them working together in midfield and we now see 1 getting shafted out wide.

Re playing a higher block - Ironically, I think with Casemiro and Amrabat we can defend higher up the pitch since we'll have more defensively astute midfielders who can anticipate and snuff out attacks as we saw with just Casemiro's introduction last season. Whenever Cas came on as a substitute last season we were immediately able to defend 5 - 10 yards higher up the pitch. Amrabat as the left sided DM/CM also potentially covers for our LW's defensive fragilities and I reckon he's got the engine for such a role. But yes, we can talk all we want about personnel but the big concern also is that this season's preparation and actual team setup/tactics hasn't worked.
 

CM

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
7,458
I don't even think it's necessarily about the mentality of the players. Some of them might need to apply themselves more, but Ten Hag doesn't seem to understand the strengths and weaknesses of even his key players. He's asking Casemiro to push up when he's playing an already isolated role and his legs are going. The defence is hotchpotch due to the injuries and there's no protection in front of them to help them out.

The best managers hide the flaws of their players and team but the way we've set up this season has only exposed ours. The signings Ten Hag has made don't make sense either if this is the style of play he wants to adopt. This team shouldn't be anywhere near as bad as it is.
 

MrMarcello

In a well-ordered universe...
Joined
Dec 26, 2000
Messages
52,970
Location
On a pale blue dot in space
Who got them running through walls? Fergie and Jose did.

All players have it within them. Every player at United has shown levels of brilliance either at United or for previous clubs.

It is about extracting that.
A manager must have the players who desire to do so. If they're lazy and entitled no amount of coaching, encouragement, or punishment will change their mode. They are set in their ways just like everyone else.

And if the manager is stubborn or limited that too can further negate the situation.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,417
I don't think its mentality.

Mentality is overplayed. Most players now are dedicated professionals who give it their all in games. I rarely see a team and think they lack character.

What I see is a lack of talent.

If you want to apply pressure all game its simple. You have to look after the ball, you have to move off the ball and the final pass has to be good.

None of that is to do with mentality. It's ball playing talent.
 

USREDEVIL

Full Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Messages
5,011
Location
California U.S.A.
I don't think its mentality.

Mentality is overplayed. Most players now are dedicated professionals who give it their all in games. I rarely see a team and think they lack character.

What I see is a lack of talent.

If you want to apply pressure all game its simple. You have to look after the ball, you have to move off the ball and the final pass has to be good.

None of that is to do with mentality. It's ball playing talent.
I tend to agree. It's more about lacking a technical ability to accurately pass, being confident on the ball, moving into good spaces to open up passes, being quick enough. Once that falls apart heads start to drop but saying it's mentality is putting the cart before the horse imo. Every player on the pitch wants to win from under 8's to professionals. The only thing i do agree is some of them (sancho probably) may not be training hard enough.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,417
I tend to agree. It's more about lacking a technical ability to accurately pass, being confident on the ball, moving into good spaces to open up passes, being quick enough. Once that falls apart heads start to drop but saying it's mentality is putting the cart before the horse imo. Every player on the pitch wants to win from under 8's to professionals. The only thing i do agree is some of them (sancho probably) may not be training hard enough.
Yeah definitely you get the odd player who can't be bothered but on the whole most players, most teams you see, there's no vast gap in mentality. Some guys are just better at football than others.

I always think its harsh on footballers who just have middling careers to suggest they lack character or mentality. Only seems to be the best players who get annointed with this incredible psychological ability.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,982
Supports
Hannover 96
Yeah definitely you get the odd player who can't be bothered but on the whole most players, most teams you see, there's no vast gap in mentality. Some guys are just better at football than others.

I always think its harsh on footballers who just have middling careers to suggest they lack character or mentality. Only seems to be the best players who get annointed with this incredible psychological ability.
Funny how different perception can be, but might also be due to the different countries we live in. Here in Germany it is often discussed like a professional player either is talented or a "mentality player" and only the absolute best have both. Looking at how often "having the right mentality" is seen as a reason why a team wasn't relegated etc I really don't see this lack of mentality attributed to mediocre players, surely not more often than a lack of talent.
 

fallengt

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
5,619
I don't think its mentality.

Mentality is overplayed. Most players now are dedicated professionals who give it their all in games. I rarely see a team and think they lack character.

What I see is a lack of talent.

If you want to apply pressure all game its simple. You have to look after the ball, you have to move off the ball and the final pass has to be good.

None of that is to do with mentality. It's ball playing talent.
how do you figure out that? when our players rarely challenge for headers nor second ball for awhile now. Only time they did was under Mourinho because it was United's plan A
Ole did talk about player's mentality thing so it's a trend.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,417
Funny how different perception can be, but might also be due to the different countries we live in. Here in Germany it is often discussed like a professional player either is talented or a "mentality player" and only the absolute best have both. Looking at how often "having the right mentality" is seen as a reason why a team wasn't relegated etc I really don't see this lack of mentality attributed to mediocre players, surely not more often than a lack of talent.
I rarely see the mentality of players who've had aversge careers praised. Do you?

But there's no reason why not. I'm sure there are players up and down the leagues incredibly strong who just lack the actual ability.

For instance, constant praise for Messi and Ronaldo re their longevity. How incredible their character must be.

Ashley Young still playing in the Premier League at 38. Barely a word.

It's just perception. We just assume the most talented players have the best strength of character but not sure its true.
 

giggs-beckham

Clueless
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
7,033
I don't think its mentality.

Mentality is overplayed. Most players now are dedicated professionals who give it their all in games. I rarely see a team and think they lack character.

What I see is a lack of talent.

If you want to apply pressure all game its simple. You have to look after the ball, you have to move off the ball and the final pass has to be good.

None of that is to do with mentality. It's ball playing talent.
And coaching
 

gantherbale

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 17, 2021
Messages
32
Well Mount may be slightly better technically in tight spaces 1. when he actually shows for the ball 2. but he hardly 192.168.100.1 192.168.1.1 producing anything at the same time. I mean, we could try dropping Bruno for Mount but my view is that we'd be better off with Bruno's overall game. I still can't see them working together in midfield and we now see 1 getting shafted out wide.

Re playing a higher block - Ironically, I think with Casemiro and Amrabat we can defend higher up the pitch since we'll have more defensively astute midfielders who can anticipate and snuff out attacks as we saw with just Casemiro's introduction last season. Whenever Cas came on as a substitute last season we were immediately able to defend 5 - 10 yards higher up the pitch. Amrabat as the left sided DM/CM also potentially covers for our LW's defensive fragilities and I reckon he's got the engine for such a role. But yes, we can talk all we want about personnel but the big concern also is that this season's preparation and actual team setup/tactics hasn't worked.
the worst deal that we got in years !
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,417
how do you figure out that? when our players rarely challenge for headers nor second ball for awhile now. Only time they did was under Mourinho because it was United's plan A
Ole did talk about player's mentality thing so it's a trend.
You could pick out moments for all teams where a challenge isn't made but on the whole the effort is there.

We win the ball in the final third more than any other team don't we? Can't do that if there's a lazy mentality.

Problem is what we do with it once we have possession. That's talent and coaching.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
32,156
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
I don't think its mentality.

Mentality is overplayed. Most players now are dedicated professionals who give it their all in games. I rarely see a team and think they lack character.

What I see is a lack of talent.

If you want to apply pressure all game its simple. You have to look after the ball, you have to move off the ball and the final pass has to be good.

None of that is to do with mentality. It's ball playing talent.
Talent isn't a tangible metric, what exactly is talent? A combination of measurable metrics we call 'talent' to simplify, and that includes mentality.

They're scared to try stuff because they're scared of getting scrutinized by the fans, media and probably the manager. It's a fundamental mentality issue.