Recent content by Kaivalya

Maybe it's a controversial opinion but if Haaland costs 100m and will only guarantee the length of one contract (ala Pogba) I'd rather sign Kane for 130m. Better attitude, more complete and a genuine leader and team player .

I feel we have better players at no 9 that will improve even if we sign a Sancho or a Grealish type to replace Pogba.

United need to fix the right hand side and manage Pogba's situation before we sign Haaland. I get Lukaku vibes from Haaland anyway. Good striker and would get goals but he's not fixing this team alone and definitely shouldn't be signed before we can feel confident hed do well. I'd rather not...

He's not all that good. This is most likely his agent putting his name up to drum up interest or a better contract.

No wonder his agent and every Portuguese news outlet was working overtime to get him a move.

I would love to get Ajer from Celtic.

Manchester United chief Ed Woodward has given the green light for a £125million double Bundesliga swoop for crack Bayer Leverkusen midfielder Kai Havertz and striker Thomas Muller. *United dispatched their top scouts to Germany on Saturday to watch 20-year-old German international Havertz in...

"He's hit it too well." Also calling everyone 'Lad'

You must have some misconception. There is no third party ownership here. They've basically agreed to pay 57m for hi.

Juventus are a weird club.

It means theres room for more investment.

It is a fact though that United have spent only 70m net after finishing 6th while City spent 60m on Rodri, some 10m on Angelino and another 25+Danilo on Cancelo. How can you defend this low net spend?

Its because Chelsea and Liverpool sell better. City are miles ahead in net spend. Arsenal have spent some 150m this summer too.

It's still a higher net spend than United across two seasons.

You say Spurs can't compete with United, but they've spent close to 200m this summer without selling anyone major yet.