g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

Club Ownership | INEOS responsible for the football side

Stinkypete

Full Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
158
Considering EtH snubbed his advice and was one of the reasons he never got a job at Man Utd he was meant to have, if this is true I'd say its bad news for EtH.
Considering that any consultancy option was put in place during negotiations by Woodward and Judge to help Murtough as sporting director, I don't think Ten Hag got a say.
 

Prophet_of_Doom

Full Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
1,167
Location
Scanning the horizon from Senlac Hill
Considering that any consultancy option was put in place during negotiations by Woodward and Judge to help Murtough as sporting director, I don't think Ten Hag got a say.
Always hard to tell fact from fiction where the media are concerned, but pretty much every single mainstream printed media stated that Ten Hag was the one who didn't want Rangnick involved with the club anymore and, indeed, refused to take advice (or even a meeting) with Rangnick. So yes, if the United hierarchy are now taking advice from Rangnick, I'd say that really is the final nail in the coffin for ETH.
 

redcarpet

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 27, 2023
Messages
16
We don't actually know this though, it's just assumed because our sales weren't great. If there's a shred of evidence to back this up, I would genuinely like to see it.
It's not a stretch considering Woodward (therefore the Glazers) believed in renewing contracts of sellable players to retain value.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,117
It's not a stretch considering Woodward (therefore the Glazers) believed in renewing contracts of sellable players to retain value.
That doesn’t really have any correlation to what’s being discussed and isn’t unique to United.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,558
We don't actually know this though, it's just assumed because our sales weren't great. If there's a shred of evidence to back this up, I would genuinely like to see it.
Reportedly this is the case and its been reported a few times
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,558
Always hard to tell fact from fiction where the media are concerned, but pretty much every single mainstream printed media stated that Ten Hag was the one who didn't want Rangnick involved with the club anymore and, indeed, refused to take advice (or even a meeting) with Rangnick. So yes, if the United hierarchy are now taking advice from Rangnick, I'd say that really is the final nail in the coffin for ETH.
Was not ETH and he wouldn’t have had a say. Rangnick didn’t have a good relationship with Rashford and the club wanted not only to keep him but tie him down long term. Its more likely it was a club decision to keep supposedly important players onside. (obviously my opinion) Rangnick was also unpopular with the fans.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,117
Going a year or and more back now but you can try googling it.
I have before and found nothing. Not trying to defend the incompetence of the Glazer’s but this seems to be something the fan base lapped up as a fact when there’s no credible source saying it.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,558
I have before and found nothing. Not trying to defend the incompetence of the Glazer’s but this seems to be something the fan base lapped up as a fact when there’s no credible source saying it.
Nope I read it more than once
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,558
Where is your evidence for this (because there was plenty of accusations in the press that it was all ETH)?
There are plenty of accusations in the press about many things. Its my opinion
 

Stinkypete

Full Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
158
There are plenty of accusations in the press about many things. Its my opinion
I completely agree with this opinion. Rangnick staying on at consultancy was a Murtough level decision to make because it was Murtough that would have been using his services as a consultant. He wasn't going to be an assistant to Ten Hag.
 

Cela shomana

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 23, 2018
Messages
55
It quite obvious they have made up their mind if to keep Ten Hag or not. i think he is as good as gone
 

Remember the geese

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
7,211
Location
Northampton
I'm sure in one of the interviews from last week, Ratcliffe briefly stated that they were going to speak/put something out there this week. Think it had to do with their plans surrounding the stadium. Will be interesting.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,432
Share price is gradually falling down to the levels it was before the takeover news.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,117
They haven’t backed him or given him their full support which is telling.
Why would they do either? Perfect scenario for them is what’s happening now - they get a chance to assess the actual club/structure and have a manager in place who they probably view as expendable if he doesn’t get us into the CL.
 

MJay

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 8, 2023
Messages
45
Always hard to tell fact from fiction where the media are concerned, but pretty much every single mainstream printed media stated that Ten Hag was the one who didn't want Rangnick involved with the club anymore and, indeed, refused to take advice (or even a meeting) with Rangnick. So yes, if the United hierarchy are now taking advice from Rangnick, I'd say that really is the final nail in the coffin for ETH.
Huh? He had a two hour phone call with Rangnick to discuss his findings and opinions during his tenure. Erik was in Amsterdam and Rangnick was back in Germany hence the meeting on call rather than in person. If you type "phone call with Rangnick ten Hag" on Google, the first thing that pops up is:

"But Telegraph Sport understands that the pair spoke for around two hours on the phone after Rangnick had returned to Germany and Ten Hag to Amsterdam. Rangnick has claimed that United's squad require the equivalent of open heart surgery and had been keen to present his findings to Ten Hag."

Brailsford or anyone meeting with Rangnick has absolutely nothing to do with Eriks position as manager, nor does it give a hint, a whisper, an indication. Simply and absolutely nothing.
 

ROFLUTION

Full Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
7,688
Location
Denmark
They haven’t backed him or given him their full support which is telling.
Mix of what we can't do within FFP rules probably too - Who in the winter window would you get to back EtH?

I can't think of any players that are available that would make any significant difference to be honest.
 

Prophet_of_Doom

Full Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
1,167
Location
Scanning the horizon from Senlac Hill
Huh? He had a two hour phone call with Rangnick to discuss his findings and opinions during his tenure. Erik was in Amsterdam and Rangnick was back in Germany hence the meeting on call rather than in person. If you type "phone call with Rangnick ten Hag" on Google, the first thing that pops up is:

"But Telegraph Sport understands that the pair spoke for around two hours on the phone after Rangnick had returned to Germany and Ten Hag to Amsterdam. Rangnick has claimed that United's squad require the equivalent of open heart surgery and had been keen to present his findings to Ten Hag."

Brailsford or anyone meeting with Rangnick has absolutely nothing to do with Eriks position as manager, nor does it give a hint, a whisper, an indication. Simply and absolutely nothing.
Always two sides to every story. The press consensus was that the phone call was a snub from Ten Hag (as Rangnick had wanted to meet with ETH who refused).

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/story/_/id/37629549/ten-hag-role-rangnick-exit

Everyone can make up their own mind.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,820
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
It quite obvious they have made up their mind if to keep Ten Hag or not. i think he is as good as gone
I think Ratcliffe’s first mistake was his wishywashy answer on whether ten Hag has a future or not. Maybe too honest. The manager needs to have absolute authority amongst the squad and that authority comes from above him. Even if it’s not true and the plan is to replace him at the end of the season regardless of how well he does, you come out strongly backing him and make it clear to the players that it’s their future they are playing for, not his. That gives you the best chance of them keeping their levels up and getting top 4 plus cup runs.
 

redNATION

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
1,393
Location
Near the Tannhäuser Gate
Why would they do either? Perfect scenario for them is what’s happening now - they get a chance to assess the actual club/structure and have a manager in place who they probably view as expendable if he doesn’t get us into the CL.
They’re not going to get a true reflection of the state of management and playing staff given the inherent uncertainty the sale has caused.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,275
Location
Where the grass is greener.
Top 4 and an FA Cup win, playing like we have all season, with the signings he's encouraged, doesn't count as a good season anymore. It would be papering over the massive massive cracks.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,820
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Yeah the season is a write off if ten Hag isn’t going to be backed. Rashford has already checked out because he wants a manager that will indulge him.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,117
They’re not going to get a true reflection of the state of management and playing staff given the inherent uncertainty the sale has caused.
Yes but if the option is either do as they have - non committal whilst doing a deep dive into the club and drawing up their plan - or try and hire someone to come it o what they already think is a mess. The first option is definitely better.

The reality is there are a tonne of coaches who could probably do ok for us, there aren’t really that many coaches (I’d argue there aren’t any at all) who can consistently challenge if there’s dross recruitment. I don’t think Ineos have finalised what they want to see on the pitch though so that also makes it hard to find a manager.
 

MonkeysMagic

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
1,930
Location
Euclidean space
We'll be able to put 'winning the FA cup' to bed tomorrow! And based on the previous 7 months performance, we are not winning all our remaining games so in my eyes top 5 is done as well. Amy other reasons to keep ETH?
 

JinnerJamie

Small ginger
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
11,834
Location
The Kings Town of Hull
I think the Derby is a free hit for him, if he survives Forrest. The acid test have to be the games like Fulham were we are expected to win. Everton at OT will be the game in we’re his fate will be sealed.
 

TrebleChamp99

Supports Liverpool
Joined
Dec 27, 2021
Messages
1,102
I think the Derby is a free hit for him, if he survives Forrest. The acid test have to be the games like Fulham were we are expected to win. Everton at OT will be the game in we’re his fate will be sealed.
I dont think INEOS are operating like that, I think they will already know and it looks like they will remove him from post.

The clearest indication will be if talks of a new contract happen, the public statements from INEOS do not sound good but were not used to how these guys operate yet. That could be as committal they get.
 

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,198
Yeah the season is a write off if ten Hag isn’t going to be backed. Rashford has already checked out because he wants a manager that will indulge him.
Getting rid of Rashford would be my priority, personally. The advice I'd give would be, if Rashford can bail on ETH, who is to say he won't bail on the manager INEOS chooses.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,390
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
I think the Derby is a free hit for him, if he survives Forrest. The acid test have to be the games like Fulham were we are expected to win. Everton at OT will be the game in we’re his fate will be sealed.
I don't. We get hammered again like the 7-0 against Liverpool and it will destroy our season and be the end of him.