2024 U.S. Elections

Mike Smalling

Full Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2018
Messages
11,031
Hmm.... Let's assume Biden is going to do how you suggest. He definitely will win 60k to 80k more votes. However, wouldn't he lose a lot of Jewish voters, whose numbers are much, much higher.

Looks a loose loose situation for Biden
A lot of Jews in the US are strongly opposed to what Israel is currently doing. They are no fans of Netanyahu either. Of course, there are also more Orthodox and conservative Jews, but it is not one group that is pro-Israel by definition.
 

Rob

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
3,229
Supports
Liverpool
Haley will almost certainly fall in line, but i happen to think a good portion of her voters won't vote for Trump anyway.
For me, the question was more if she’d outright endorce him, but I suppose Mike’s post below answers that.

She has literally signed a pledge to support Trump if he is the nominee, and raised her hand at the first GOP debate to show she would support him even if he was convicted.
As above, I wasn’t expecting her to get behind Biden but more not ask her supporters to vote for Trump.

But it’s not that surprising, I guess.
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,005
Supports
Real Madrid
Why do folk always try to play down and belittle the opinions of their opponents? At least have the common courtesy to state their case clearly and appropriately - They happen to disagree on some of their foreign policies think that Biden is aiding and abetting the genocide of the Palestinian people.
January 6th was Donald Trump disagreeing with my preferred policies on the transfer of power.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,635
Location
London
Of course that Haley would support Trump, same as most Republicans will. Maybe Mitt is the only big-name Republican who won’t endorse Trump, and he is retiring.

Same how Bernie endorsed Clinton even after having a nasty primary fight, same how the squad will endorse Biden, and same how well, pretty much every Democrat who has a big-name is going to endorse a semi-demented president.

The point is that voters do not blindly follow what their preferred choice endorses. The important point is how many of Haley voters will not vote for Trump, and my feeling is not too many. However, I expect the majority of independents not voting for Trump, cause he is a big child wannabe dictator with a God complex. Unfortunately, the Dems shots themselves in the foot by picking someone who is as unpopular as Trump, and whom dependent on the time of day, might not even know his name.

Which will likely make this election go down to the wire. If either party chose someone else (that is too late for Dems cause no one has really that big recognition at this stage), they would have destroyed the opponent. I think that Haley easily crushes Biden. I think that someone who would have won the Dem primaries (let’s say Newsom or Whitmer) would have destroyed Trump. Like usual both parties trying to out stupid each other.

It kinda sucks considering how much is at stake. Another Trump presidency could be catastrophic.
 

ManUtd1999

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
3,532
Haley will eventually endorse Trump. The question is: what kind of endorsement it would be? Sandres-like from 2016 or a strong one?

I actually hope that she surprises people on Super Tuesday and stays in the race, just so that swing voters hear from her the kind of things that she started saying about Trump in recent weeks.

I also would love to see a Haley-or-Bust movement disrupting the GOP convention.

As for Michigan: the polls suggested a +60 or so margin for T. He got +41. In his worst day, Biden received 81%. In his best day, Trump got 68%. The reality doesn’t seem as good for Trump as the polls suggest.
 
Last edited:

4bars

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Messages
4,921
Supports
Barcelona
That’s not true, economy is one of the most important issues to the electorate, and has been one of the main complaints about Biden
Oh, i 100%. Maybe i worded my sentence wrong. When i said that never mattered less i meant that culture war caused that economics matters less than before

Lets say that 20 years ago economics mattered 80% vs 20% others (many specifics) and now 60% economics 40% the rest with a big chunk being culture wars

So being economics lower than ever but being very important nevertheless. And obviosuly i pulled that % from my ass, just as an example of my point
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,635
Location
London
Haley will eventually endorse Trump. The question is: what kind of endorsement it would be? Sandres-like from 2016 or a strong one?

I actually hope that she surprises people on Super Tuesday and stays in the race, just so that swing voters hear from her the kind of things that she started saying about Trump in recent weeks.

I also would love to see a Haley-or-Bust movement disrupting the GOP convention.

As for Michigan: the polls suggested a +60 or so margin for T. He got +41. In his worst day, Biden received 81%. In his best day, Trump got 68%. The reality doesn’t seem as good for Trump as the polls suggest.
Trump run against a strong candidate. Biden run against ‘uncommitted’. Obviously Biden was going to do better percentage-wise.
 

Morty_

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
2,944
Supports
Real Madrid
Trump run against a strong candidate. Biden run against ‘uncommitted’. Obviously Biden was going to do better percentage-wise.
I think the point is the polls overestimate Trump be rather big margins, i wouldn't be surprised if that's also the case for the general election.
 

4bars

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Messages
4,921
Supports
Barcelona
I think the point is the polls overestimate Trump be rather big margins, i wouldn't be surprised if that's also the case for the general election.
Hopefully it is, but not for this margins. in the end, the majority of haley supporters will vote for Trump or wont vote as they will not vote for Biden, so basically uncommitted.

I think that the % of voters with drop a lot compared with 2024
 

Morty_

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
2,944
Supports
Real Madrid
Hopefully it is, but not for this margins. in the end, the majority of haley supporters will vote for Trump or wont vote as they will not vote for Biden, so basically uncommitted.

I think that the % of voters with drop a lot compared with 2024
Actually, didn't something like 40% of Haley supporters either stay home or vote for Biden?

Sure, not the majority, but that could be really bad for Trump, though of course, you expect some of them to come "home" in November.
 

4bars

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Messages
4,921
Supports
Barcelona
Actually, didn't something like 40% of Haley supporters either stay home or vote for Biden?

Sure, not the majority, but that could be really bad for Trump, though of course, you expect some of them to come "home" in November.
I think it was 25% said they would not vote for trump. I might be wrong

But is clear that they Trump and Biden seems very weak candidates so far
 

Morty_

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
2,944
Supports
Real Madrid

Some of the worst numbers i have seen for Biden, Trump +6 in PA? Find that hard to believe though.

Nevada one is definitely weird, as it has Trump leading big with hispanics, and Biden somehow leads with white voters.
 

Dr. StrangeHate

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
5,501

Some of the worst numbers i have seen for Biden, Trump +6 in PA? Find that hard to believe though.

Nevada one is definitely weird, as it has Trump leading big with hispanics, and Biden somehow leads with white voters.
Surely Trump has lost more support since the Jan 6 stuff. I don't get these numbers at all considering how republicans and Trump have been underperforming in actual elections.
 

Ekkie Thump

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
3,892
Supports
Leeds United

Full disclosure:
The candidates' names are listed in ballot order, and because McClanahan [McKlanahan shurely] drew a low number his name appears first.
but still...
 

reelworld

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2001
Messages
8,763
Location
Mexico City, Mexico
A lot of Jews in the US are strongly opposed to what Israel is currently doing. They are no fans of Netanyahu either. Of course, there are also more Orthodox and conservative Jews, but it is not one group that is pro-Israel by definition.
The pro-Israel votes in US are coming from the white Liberal/Christians, which is a lot more than just the Jews and the Muslims voters
 

RedDevilQuebecois

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
8,121
Anyone here from New Jersey? I only follow the primary polls on 538 for the Senate seat in play and it looks like Rep. Andy Kim is going to win the primary if the numbers stand. But what is the talk on the ground looking like?

I personally like the guy ever since I read about him from how he served with the State Department, then worked on the NSC under President Obama, then got elected as a U.S. House Representative and then was part of that viral moment where he cleaned up the mess after the January 6 attack. I hope he will win the primary and then be elected as a US Senator.
 

Morty_

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
2,944
Supports
Real Madrid
Surely Trump has lost more support since the Jan 6 stuff. I don't get these numbers at all considering how republicans and Trump have been underperforming in actual elections.
For what its worth, Morning consult had Trump winning the michigan primaries by 79%, the actual result was under 69%.

I think they will be off by more than just a few points this election.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,241
Location
Hollywood CA
Some interesting polling from Harry Enten this morning. Turns out Biden's deficit with Trump is among centrist independents and not lefties. Also, the so called uncommitted campaign is roughly in sync from uncommitteds in 2012, which means its likely not a factor.

 

Morty_

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
2,944
Supports
Real Madrid
Schiff keeps leading the California primary polls, i don't really see the point, when you have someone younger and likely more progressive in the race(Katie Porter), but its their business, i suppose.

I wonder where Barbara Lee's support goes, if she drops out, is she arguably spoiling the race for Porter?
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,241
Location
Hollywood CA
Schiff keeps leading the California primary polls, i don't really see the point, when you have someone younger and likely more progressive in the race(Katie Porter), but its their business, i suppose.

I wonder where Barbara Lee's support goes, if she drops out, is she arguably spoiling the race for Porter?
Schiff is more of the establishment guy so I would expect him to come out ahead. Porter, despite being good social media fodder at Congressional hearings, doesn't seem to have the gravitas to move up.
 

Morty_

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
2,944
Supports
Real Madrid
Schiff is more of the establishment guy so I would expect him to come out ahead. Porter, despite being good social media fodder at Congressional hearings, doesn't seem to have the gravitas to move up.
Guess he just have more name recognition and all, and i'm sure he will be an okay senator, but since this is a deep blue state, going with the younger, more progressive option just seem smarter, oh well.

Lee has zero chance of winning, and needs to drop out already though.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,241
Location
Hollywood CA
Guess he just have more name recognition and all, and i'm sure he will be an okay senator, but since this is a deep blue state, going with the younger, more progressive option just seem smarter, oh well.

Lee has zero chance of winning, and needs to drop out already though.
If there were a palatable progressive option, I'm sure they would get more consideration. The trouble with Lee and Porter is they don't resonate outside the left wing bubble. They aren't telegenic, nor do they animate with or appeal to centrist independents that typically decide a lot of elections.
 

Morty_

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
2,944
Supports
Real Madrid
If there were a palatable progressive option, I'm sure they would get more consideration. The trouble with Lee and Porter is they don't resonate outside the left wing bubble. They aren't telegenic, nor do they animate with or appeal to centrist independents that typically decide a lot of elections.
But there is one, Porter is a solid option, she is not a candidate without appeal, her winning elections in a swing-district in the house is a testament to that, is it not?
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,241
Location
Hollywood CA
But there is one, Porter is a solid option, she is not a candidate without appeal, her winning elections in a swing-district in the house is a testament to that, is it not?
By palatable I mean her general demeanor of how she communicates. She comes off as abrasive and fixated on one thing (consumer protection issues).
 

Morty_

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
2,944
Supports
Real Madrid
Some interesting polling from Harry Enten this morning. Turns out Biden's deficit with Trump is among centrist independents and not lefties. Also, the so called uncommitted campaign is roughly in sync from uncommitteds in 2012, which means its likely not a factor.

Has Trump gained anything since 2020? Nothing within the actual primary results, at least, indicates so.

Biden might have lost independent voters to third parties, or sitting home, i think is more likely, that would still be trouble though.

Interesting point, i don't think "moderate" dems or centrists are the ones that cares too much about gaza, so if he is losing voters, its probably for other reasons.
 
Last edited:

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,241
Location
Hollywood CA
Has Trump gained anything since 2020? Nothing within the actual primary results, at least, indicates so.

Biden might have lost independent voters to third parties, or sitting home, i think is more likely, that would still be trouble though.

Interesting though, i don't think "moderate" dems or centrists are the ones that cares too much about gaza, so if he is losing voters, its probably for other reasons.
Foreign policy in general is barely on the radar for a vast majority of Americans. Its all about the economy, inflation, the border, and the cost of healthcare. Whoever wins those will win in Nov.
 

Morty_

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
2,944
Supports
Real Madrid
Foreign policy in general is barely on the radar for a vast majority of Americans. Its all about the economy, inflation, the border, and the cost of healthcare. Whoever wins those will win in Nov.
Saw a recent poll, that didn't have healthcare very high up on the list of concerns for voters, guess they think ACA is "settled" now, but it is most definitely not.

Dems can never win on the border or economy, for various reasons, but this one they have won on before, and can do so again, they should shout out every day that Trump and GOP are coming for healthcare again, which they are, Trump still promises to overturn ACA.

Healthcare, abortion, democracy, and to some extent, economy, are the issues dems should run on, they should not waste much time on the border.
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,005
Supports
Real Madrid
Also, the so called uncommitted campaign is roughly in sync from uncommitteds in 2012, which means its likely not a factor.
The uncommitted campaign of 2012 was meant to register displeasure with Obama. In the general election of 2012, Obama got 2,564,569 votes in Michigan. This was a decrease of 308,010 votes compared to 2008, and a 3.19 percentage drop in vote share (from 57.4 to 54.21).

If we accept that the uncommitted campaign of 2024 is roughly in sync with the uncommitted campaign of 2012 then it stands to reason that its effects will be roughly in sync too. That would be a serious problem, since Biden won Michigan by 154,188 votes and 2.78 percentage points.

However I do not think that the campaigns are roughly in sync because the vote totals in the two primaries are wildly different.
 
Last edited:

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,241
Location
Hollywood CA
The uncommitted campaign of 2012 was meant to register displeasure with Obama. In the general election of 2012, Obama got 2,564,569 votes in Michigan. This was a decrease of 308,010 votes compared to 2008, and a 3.19 percentage drop in vote share (from 57.4 to 54.21).

If we accept that the uncommitted campaign of 2024 is roughly in sync with the uncommitted campaign of 2024 then it stands to reason that its effects will be roughly in sync too. That would be a serious problem, since Biden won Michigan by 154,188 votes and 2.78 percentage points, which are both lower than the drops Obama saw from 2008 to 2012.

However I do not think that the campaigns are roughly in sync because the vote totals in the two primaries are wildly different.
We can't say it was due to a displeasure in Obama or simply because Romney was viewed as a stronger candidate than McCain for Michigan voters. Romney's family has a long history in the state where his father ran a prominent automaker in the 50s and was later the state's Governor. Romney was therefore always going to outperform McCain there. The fact that the uncommitted numbers have barely budged from then to now is suggestive that Biden's issue isn't among left leaning Palestine supporters, but rather among centrist independents who prioritize the border, inflation, and the general state of the economy and cost of living.
 

Beans

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2019
Messages
3,514
Location
Midwest, USA
Supports
Neutral
Saw a recent poll, that didn't have healthcare very high up on the list of concerns for voters, guess they think ACA is "settled" now, but it is most definitely not.

Dems can never win on the border or economy, for various reasons, but this one they have won on before, and can do so again, they should shout out every day that Trump and GOP are coming for healthcare again, which they are, Trump still promises to overturn ACA.

Healthcare, abortion, democracy, and to some extent, economy, are the issues dems should run on, they should not waste much time on the border.
Clinton won on the economy. “It’s the economy, stupid,” became a famous James Carville quote.
 

Morty_

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
2,944
Supports
Real Madrid
Clinton won on the economy. “It’s the economy, stupid,” became a famous James Carville quote.
Voters trust republicans on the economy, regardless of the facts, so what do they know?

Anyway, in the mid-terms, clearly it wasn't the top issue, otherwise, dems would have been swept.
 

Dr. StrangeHate

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
5,501
Some interesting polling from Harry Enten this morning. Turns out Biden's deficit with Trump is among centrist independents and not lefties. Also, the so called uncommitted campaign is roughly in sync from uncommitteds in 2012, which means its likely not a factor.

Does every election since 2012 have the same number of uncommitted? Very strange if true.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,241
Location
Hollywood CA
Does every election since 2012 have the same number of uncommitted? Very strange if true.
At this stage (8-9 months out) a lot of people simply haven't made up their minds or else haven't taken the time to commit one way or another, which is why one shouldn't take too much stock in the uncommitted thing. Many won't vote for Biden in the end because Michigan has a huge Arab-American population, but its unclear whether among the many issues voters actually care about, if it will make a meaningful difference in the end.
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,005
Supports
Real Madrid
We can't say it was due to a displeasure in Obama or simply because Romney was viewed as a stronger candidate than McCain for Michigan voters. Romney's family has a long history in the state where his father ran a prominent automaker in the 50s and was later the state's Governor. Romney was therefore always going to outperform McCain there.
We can probably discard this explanation because Romney did not particularly outperform McCain in Michigan. He got 70,851 more votes and +3.7%. That is in line with his improvements in nearby states such as Wisconsin ( +3.6% ) and Illinois ( + 3.9% ).