Just to take issue with the tweet you posted.
Tweet says: "She has no investigative powers or abilities"
Report says [pg7 (24)]:
Seems like they have investigative abilities.
Tweet implies that because the team had no investigative mandate it doesn't have the power to verify. This is untrue, and the difference is explained in the report:
[Pg8 (25)]: "
The account you quoted wants to imply that Pramila Patten is somehow corrupt or underhand; she is described as attempting to "bury", she "finally admits", the report itself merits "scare quotes". The reality is that the report is very upfront about the difficulties it faced, the scope of its remit and the limitations of its conclusions.
It doesn't strike me as particularly useful only to laud those UN investigations and conclusions that point to Israeli culpability. We know that what happened on October 7th was monstrous in its own right and the report does a good job of explaining why it finds reasonable grounds to believe sexual violence took place. It makes no claims, nor presents any conclusions beyond its self stated, limited remit.