Horizon scandal - now dramatised as Mr Bates vs The Post Office

christinaa

Gossip Girl
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
11,570
Supports
There's only one United!
Seems that Paula Vennells returned her CBE back.
 

buchansleftleg

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Messages
3,728
Location
Dublin, formerly Manchester
It sounds like this was part of a standard support script to me.
Yes, what was truly ridiculous is that Fujitsu gave it's lowest level support people access to the system to try and bug fix but this access was unmonitored and untraceable and included the ability to actually process transactions. This access was via a common login which potentially hundreds of past employees could have had access to.

Fujitsu people and Senior people at the Post Office fraud team swore on oath in court multiple times that such "remote access" was only via secure token and was monitored and severely restricted in scope. In reality this info was bascally open access for Fujitsu staff past and present.

What is also telling is that countless Judges tried to direct jury's against convicting the posties...pointing out that Royal Mail had failed to provide any evidence of the defendants making any monetary gain from this suspected fraudulent activity. No evidence of additional accounts or lavish spending, indeed many of them had ploughed in personal funds to try and cover these "shortfalls".

So these cases would probably have failed if they had been presented to a magistrate, who would have required similar levels of proof. The fact that Royal mail pursued criminal cases meant they could get away with these spurious claims of the "reliability" of Horizon evidence as uninformed Jury's would just accept the evidence of a senior Royal Mail "technical expert".

This pursuing of people through the courts - built into peoples bonus packages and performance plans - is where Royal Mail really lost the plot, given they all knew they went for the cheap (dogshit) version of an accounting package.

The "Pubco's" (big pub chain owners) have for years been harassing Pub Managers with dodgy "metered" beer systems that provide false data and make out that pub managers have been literally siphoning off profits. They have largely got away with it (apart from a few Private Eye articles) because they use this to intimidate / change ownership of the pub, but they have not been stupid enough to take this through the courts because they know their "evidence" won't stand up to scrutiny.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,292
Fujitsu were responsible for many of the Government systems I have used in the Civil Service. If we had to report an error, it cost the Government significant money to have it fixed. It was in their interests for it not to work properly. They should check the bank accounts of anybody responsible for handing out these contracts.
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,844
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
The investigator on today is a piece of work.

Still insists the post master was guilty and is pissed off he's being bothered about it
 

langster

Captain Stink mouth, so soppy few pints very wow!
Scout
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
21,597
Location
My brain can't get pregnant!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-68079300

Another day another revelation.

Documents showing Post Office top bosses secretly decided in April 2014 to sack forensic accountants who had found bugs in their IT system have been obtained by the BBC.

The irony and stupidity of sacking forensic accountants only to be stupid enough to keep the documents showing that decision. :lol: :lol:

I shouldn't laugh because the amount of lives lost and destroyed is despicable. I know everyone wanted compensation and the truth to come out, but to me that's not even close to being enough. Enough of the innocent served jail time, now those guilty need to as well.
 

cafecillos

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
1,433
The investigator on today is a piece of work.

Still insists the post master was guilty and is pissed off he's being bothered about it
Just seen that. What a fecking cnut, I hope he lives to regret being such a cnut.
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,997
The irony and stupidity of sacking forensic accountants only to be stupid enough to keep the documents showing that decision. :lol: :lol:

I shouldn't laugh because the amount of lives lost and destroyed is despicable. I know everyone wanted compensation and the truth to come out, but to me that's not even close to being enough. Enough of the innocent served jail time, now those guilty need to as well.
And they should serve 10 times as long.
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,844
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
Just seen that. What a fecking cnut, I hope he lives to regret being such a cnut.
Jason Beer's withering put downs are fantastic. 'hopefully we can improve upon it now the dog walking and carol services are out of the way' :lol:

Some of the post office investigators have been horrible, but the worst people so far have been the lawyers involved in the Lee Castleton case
 

Wilt

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
6,764
Post Office enquiry ….bosses in arse protection mode, deny all knowledge seems to be the trend.

Far too late for apologies, prison is what they deserve.
 

cafecillos

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
1,433
All about this is just plain infuriating. Several people should go to prison for fairly long sentences for knowingly destroying so many lives.
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,844
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
Complete car crash stuff today.

Solicitor advising the post office not to look into issues until after a case in case they have to disclose the problem harming their defence.

Also hilarious use of 'top bantz' by Jason Beer KC to put down this prick
 

F-Red

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
10,922
Location
Cheshire
Complete car crash stuff today.

Solicitor advising the post office not to look into issues until after a case in case they have to disclose the problem harming their defence.

Also hilarious use of 'top bantz' by Jason Beer KC to put down this prick
Even more worrying is that he's still head of legal at the Post Office.
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,844
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
What did he do/say?
From memory he messaged a colleague who had talked shit about SPMs saying 'you're the only person more cynical than me' they responded with 'I'll take it as a badge of honour ' and he responded 'as intended '

Jason Beer asked what that exchange meant, he was struggling, got pressed, 'were you mocking SPMs', more struggling, 'was it just banter?' 'top bantz?'
 

langster

Captain Stink mouth, so soppy few pints very wow!
Scout
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
21,597
Location
My brain can't get pregnant!
From memory he messaged a colleague who had talked shit about SPMs saying 'you're the only person more cynical than me' they responded with 'I'll take it as a badge of honour ' and he responded 'as intended '

Jason Beer asked what that exchange meant, he was struggling, got pressed, 'were you mocking SPMs', more struggling, 'was it just banter?' 'top bantz?'

Ahhh, thank you.
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,844
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
Susan Crichton was a much more sympathetic person than I anticipated.

After so many PO witnesses making me feel like a stroke is coming on it was weird.
 

CraftySoAndSo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2021
Messages
1,054
Angela Van Den Bogerd might be one of the worst people alive today.

Contemptible prick
Watching her during the inquiry the amount of deflecting she did reminded me of the narcissist's prayer, "That didn't happen, and if it did it wasn't that bad, and if it was it's not a big deal, and if it was it's not my/post office's fault and if it was I/we didn't mean it and if I did you deserved it."

Ok she may have not said that last part but wouldn't surprise me if she at least thought it. Let's face it you generally don't get to the type of positions she got to in organisations like that by having a conscience.

Does anyone know when Paula Vennells is supposed to appear at the inquiry?
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,844
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
Watching her during the inquiry the amount of deflecting she did reminded me of the narcissist's prayer, "That didn't happen, and if it did it wasn't that bad, and if it was it's not a big deal, and if it was it's not my/post office's fault and if it was I/we didn't mean it and if I did you deserved it."

Ok she may have not said that last part but wouldn't surprise me if she at least thought it. Let's face it you generally don't get to the type of positions she got to in organisations like that by having a conscience.

Does anyone know when Paula Vennells is supposed to appear at the inquiry?
at one point in her testimony she does say that in her experience 'some' SPMs were guilty of theft 'before Horizon', and we know Paula Vennells told MPs that the cause of the issue is 'temptation' so I guess its probably their thinking that some of what happened was deserved, even if they are aware enough not to say it in the current political landscape, unlike that Barrister who went after Lee Castleton who actually blamed him for signing off the accounts, or the Scottish dude who told the inquiry to stop bothering him because it was 'so long ago and the guy did it'.

Paula Vennells is up 22-24th May