New Jose Interview with Telegraph

ScholesyTheWise

Full Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2022
Messages
1,077
He signed Lindelof and Dalot which got me thinking. Who did he sign that he did not play as much as you would expect?
LVG had Depay, although he did play him a lot initially.
Ole had Donny.
Sanchez & Mkhitaryan?
Wasn't Mkhitaryan ostracized at some stage? they didn't speak to each other or something to that effect?
 

BorisManUtd

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
3,877
He's no doubt talking about Martial and Shaw being unprofessional under him but wonder if he counts Rashford in that category? You'd think not as Rashford back then was actually trying and was still young player with big potential.
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,714
But it's all connected... No idea what Mourinho believes, not sure i care, but Perisic have been quoted quite a few times saying that he was flattered by the interest but he wanted to stay.

In hindsight it's obvious that we should have sold Shaw, Martial and most likely Rashford when their stock was at their highest, doesn't mean it was obvious at that specific time. 1,5 season into Ole's reign and it looked like it would've been madness to sell either of them. Good luck to whoever suggesting last summer that we should've sold Rashford. The lack in support of getting rid of young talented players also coincided with Mourinho gradually losing the plot

We didn't show a lack of intent, we were unsure of Mourinho's future and rightly so, therefore the willingness to spend insane amounts wasn't there. Mourinho signed Bailly and Lindelof for a combined fee of over £60mill, since they were dodgy as hell he wanted the latest shiny toy which happened to be Harry Maguire, who had spent two seasons at Leicester and was available for £12mill the season we signed Bailly. We entertained the idea and held talks with Leicester, but the fee they wanted was even more bonkers than what we ended up paying a year later. This was also after we spent the odd £30'ish mill on Sanchez and made him one of the highest paid players in the league, his best performance being the piano video.

Again, Mourinho will say whatever suits his own agenda and his agenda is obvious, just as he consistently tries to rewrite the past in terms of Salah and De Bruyne and what made them leave Chelsea.

The entire concept is either way daft, not even Guardiola gets every single player he wants the club to sign
I think there's a little bit of saying what suits yourself here too. This is a Perisic quote:


“It was an amazing thing for me when Jose called me. It was difficult to say no to him. In fact, I really, really wanted to join him and play for United. It was a dream of mine to play in all the big leagues. But it didn’t happen. It was painful for me. But I don’t want to go into the details. I only found out myself the real reasons two years later.”

I've no great love for mourinho, and tire of his revisionism, but my point is simple. He wanted rid of shaw and martial in particular, and wanted to replace them with willian and perisic. Now you say hindsight says we should have sold them, but Mourinho would turn around, in this case, and say, No, foresight said we should have sold them. He was right, and now he's looking from 7 years on and they're still there. It's completely reasonable to point at that as a problem in the club- certain players staying, and when he was manager, not being allowed to get rid of them.

I still feel like you're overstating the issue here. In this case, he is correct in what he is saying. It doesnt mean he isnt wrong about lots of other things
 

Dec9003

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
9,031
Probably sounds mad but I’d have him as an interim until after the final.
 

BorisManUtd

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
3,877
I won a Europa League final with long balls from Sergio Romero to Marouane Fellaini. Ajax pressing, but pressing oxygen because the ball was not there. Ball to Fellaini’s chest. Play from there. Two-nil. Bring the cup home. Three titles. Disaster of a season.
Mourinho from 10 years ago would not be counting Community Shield as a trophy.
 

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
582
I think there's a little bit of saying what suits yourself here too. This is a Perisic quote:


“It was an amazing thing for me when Jose called me. It was difficult to say no to him. In fact, I really, really wanted to join him and play for United. It was a dream of mine to play in all the big leagues. But it didn’t happen. It was painful for me. But I don’t want to go into the details. I only found out myself the real reasons two years later.”

I've no great love for mourinho, and tire of his revisionism, but my point is simple. He wanted rid of shaw and martial in particular, and wanted to replace them with willian and perisic. Now you say hindsight says we should have sold them, but Mourinho would turn around, in this case, and say, No, foresight said we should have sold them. He was right, and now he's looking from 7 years on and they're still there. It's completely reasonable to point at that as a problem in the club- certain players staying, and when he was manager, not being allowed to get rid of them.

I still feel like you're overstating the issue here. In this case, he is correct in what he is saying. It doesnt mean he isnt wrong about lots of other things
Foresight :lol: Shaw and Martial are fecked injury wise, neither of them can cope with the physical levels required, that wasn’t the case when Mourinho wanted them out and it’s obvious that both are quality players, which they have shown over time since Mourinho got sacked.

And no, it’s in no way reasonable. Again, Mourinho was fully backed until he started to completely lose the plot, which coincides with him wanting to get rid of said players. Managers in downward spirals rarely get their wishes forfilled, especially not related to young players, add his history with young players at Chelsea and it’s hardly a shock that the club didn’t go out of it’s way to get rid of the same players that were an integral part of qualifying for the CL and finishing second under Ole.
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,714
Foresight :lol: Shaw and Martial are fecked injury wise, neither of them can cope with the physical levels required, that wasn’t the case when Mourinho wanted them out and it’s obvious that both are quality players, which they have shown over time since Mourinho got sacked.

And no, it’s in no way reasonable. Again, Mourinho was fully backed until he started to completely lose the plot, which coincides with him wanting to get rid of said players. Managers in downward spirals rarely get their wishes forfilled, especially not related to young players, add his history with young players at Chelsea and it’s hardly a shock that the club didn’t go out of it’s way to get rid of the same players that were an integral part of qualifying for the CL and finishing second under Ole.
You seem to just want to keep arguing for the sake of it. Can i suggest taking a night off and then read through our exchange when you're not so wound up about mourinho. We're living in a parallel universe if you think shaws fitness and physique wasn't a potential problem by the time mourinho first season ended. He played about 32 games in 3.5 years, at a key development stage and his weight was a meme. You're just bending over backwards to argue against some point I'm not even making.
 

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
26,677
Supports
Real Madrid
Mourinho's problem isn't tactics. It's outdated training methods, lack of trust in new sports science and technology(or more accurately, he puts more trust in his guts than what the data says about a player's fitness) and a style of man management that doesn't work with the new generations. Roma loved him, the players were all still very much on his side, and his third season was still a disaster, because there only so many times players can take being called shite by the manager before they lose all confidence

Literally all De Rossi did to change their fortunes, by his own admission, was treat them with basic decency, tell them they were great players and show them respect and confidence in them
 

BorisManUtd

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
3,877
Mourinho's problem isn't tactics. It's outdated training methods, lack of trust in new sports science and technology(or more accurately, he puts more trust in his guts than what the data says about a player's fitness) and a style of man management that doesn't work with the new generations. Roma loved him, the players were all still very much on his side, and his third season was still a disaster, because there only so many times players can take being called shite by the manager before they lose all confidence

Literally all De Rossi did to change their fortunes, by his own admission, was treat them with basic decency, tell them they were great players and show them respect and confidence in them
Yeah his style of managing players seems to be good motivator for a while but it breaks apart after (usually) 2 seasons. And as you say with new generations it often doesn't work even that long.
 

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
582
You seem to just want to keep arguing for the sake of it. Can i suggest taking a night off and then read through our exchange when you're not so wound up about mourinho. We're living in a parallel universe if you think shaws fitness and physique wasn't a potential problem by the time mourinho first season ended. He played about 32 games in 3.5 years, at a key development stage and his weight was a meme. You're just bending over backwards to argue against some point I'm not even making.
Aaaah memes, the universal truthsayer. Shaw had just returned from a horrible leg break, he literally made his comeback after Mourinho had taken over. He was what, 21 at the time? It's hardly new that you're likely to struggle with niggling injuries and setbacks after returning from a leg break, not to mention the mental side of it. He played 40 matches in the first full season after Mourinho got sacked, 33 the following season, 47 the season after
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,714
Aaaah memes, the universal truthsayer. Shaw had just returned from a horrible leg break, he literally made his comeback after Mourinho had taken over. He was what, 21 at the time? It's hardly new that you're likely to struggle with niggling injuries and setbacks after returning from a leg break, not to mention the mental side of it. He played 40 matches in the first full season after Mourinho got sacked, 33 the following season, 47 the season after
Im a huge luke shaw fan. If you're pretending that there wasn't serious doubts about his weight and fitness for a long time you have your own reasons to do. I find it weird, but you do you. Ive made a simple point and you've got very worked up arguing something else. Im done now
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,358
Location
Salford
How is it misleading? It's true.
It's true yes. But you could easily write 'From Jose Mourinho to Erik Ten Hag, nobody has bettered Ole Gunnar Solskjaer's 2nd place finish' too.

It's just a shit way to write it when someone else has matched it. And unnecessary, because Mourinho is by far our most successful manager in the post-Ferguson era. They could have done better.
 

OsloRed

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
222
Location
Norway
It's true yes. But you could easily write 'From Jose Mourinho to Erik Ten Hag, nobody has bettered Ole Gunnar Solskjaer's 2nd place finish' too.

It's just a shit way to write it when someone else has matched it. And unnecessary, because Mourinho is by far our most successful manager in the post-Ferguson era. They could have done better.
You could. Would be weird since it is about Mourinho. I think it is a completely fair way to write it. Using the phrase "hasn't been bettered" implies that it has been matched, so in my mind it conveys the situation quite well. Say that Oles highest league finish had been third, I would think they'd use "hasn't been matched" instead as it would reflect better on Jose.

But English isn't my first language, so I might not catch all nuances tbf.
 

Taribo's Gap

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2023
Messages
440
I'm still holding out hope that he can somehow have one last CL run as a big F you to all of his detractors. Things have become too boring these days.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,358
Location
Salford
You could. Would be weird since it is about Mourinho. I think it is a completely fair way to write it. Using the phrase "hasn't been bettered" implies that it has been matched, so in my mind it conveys the situation quite well. Say that Oles highest league finish had been third, I would think they'd use "hasn't been matched" instead as it would reflect better on Jose.

But English isn't my first language, so I might not catch all nuances tbf.
If other people are fine with the wording then fine by me. I also didn't mean to make a big point of it, just a lot of people keep replying to my original message.

Mourinho's won more trophies in one season here than all the other managers have won combined in the entire post-Fergie period. So personally I'd have put something like that. And it's much more impressive. But to each their own.
 

OsloRed

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
222
Location
Norway
If other people are fine with the wording then fine by me. I also didn't mean to make a big point of it, just a lot of people keep replying to my original message.

Mourinho's won more trophies in one season here than all the other managers have won combined in the entire post-Fergie period. So personally I'd have put something like that. And it's much more impressive. But to each their own.
I agree, that would've been a much better quote. I also agree that a few too many picked up on your original message, and I didn't mean to add to it. For me it's hard to stay away from language discussions, I am a linguist by trade and bored at work. I'll stop pestering you!
 

Gene Loblaw

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 10, 2023
Messages
82
Supports
Arsenal
he's washed as a manager. He'd be a decent director of football though. He can identify talent and knows when to extend a contract and when to get rid.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,358
Location
Salford
I agree, that would've been a much better quote. I also agree that a few too many picked up on your original message, and I didn't mean to add to it. For me it's hard to stay away from language discussions, I am a linguist by trade and bored at work. I'll stop pestering you!
Really no trouble. I think we're pretty much on the same page anyway overall
 

BorisManUtd

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
3,877
I mean..this happened 8 years ago so maybe he would?
Yes but did he make a big deal out of it back then? I remember he dedicated it to van Gaal as him winning the Fa Cup enabled us to play Community Shield vs Leicester City. Not sure he called it a title back then as he does now in interviews.
 

kaiser1

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
2,066
Supports
Bayern Munich
I honestly believe that the reason why Real Madrid have been so successful in the CL in the last ten years is that they didnt buy into this "new football" crap.

Pressing has been around for a long time but is very risky when you play sides who your players are not vastly superior to as you are leaving space at the back by defending in the attacking third.

Thats why you see conservative sides continue to do better at the biggest stage - CL, WC and the likes.

I also do not see any evidence that this "new football" improves one's fortunes in domestic leagues. You will beat teams with higher scorelines when things go well, but domestic leagues are almost exclusively won by teams with most expensive squads. I have seen no evidence of the "new football" elevating sides in terms of league finishes.

So, no, I dont think the game has passed him by I think he did not buy into the hype and rightly so.
Maybe different tactics work for league and knockout competitions. Cos the new football crap seem to win leagues more often
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,293
Mourinho's won more trophies in one season here than all the other managers have won combined in the entire post-Fergie period
No, he won the same amount, two. Or three if we’re counting Community Shields.
 

justsomebloke

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Messages
5,962
Mourinho's problem isn't tactics. It's outdated training methods, lack of trust in new sports science and technology(or more accurately, he puts more trust in his guts than what the data says about a player's fitness) and a style of man management that doesn't work with the new generations. Roma loved him, the players were all still very much on his side, and his third season was still a disaster, because there only so many times players can take being called shite by the manager before they lose all confidence

Literally all De Rossi did to change their fortunes, by his own admission, was treat them with basic decency, tell them they were great players and show them respect and confidence in them
And Ole got the same effect from the same method when he was interim. I agree with all of this, but I also consider his tactics a problem - or rather, his style of play, or better still his whole basic approach to football. I don't want success on his terms, any more than I want to get rich by robbing people - it's just not worth it.