Is there even a debate on this? It's by far our most successful period, and we played great football to go with it whilst also being solid as a rock defensively.Arguably the greatest period in the clubs history - another CL win would have meant there isn't even any argument but sadly it wasn't to be
To be fair, if Fergie had invested the Ronaldo money better (Ribery) we probably would have hit 7 on the bounce too.Imagine if Ronaldo never left.
Likely 7 straight league titles til Fergie's retirement.
Why couldn't he have been British haha.
Yeah, should have signed Robben and Sneijder as part of the deal. Without that we missed 2 league titles by 1 point and GD. Man was a genius.To be fair, if Fergie had invested the Ronaldo money better (Ribery) we probably would have hit 7 on the bounce too.
As far Ollie is concern, this is all nonsense. Pep is the best ever. Period.06/07 - Premier League winners, FA Cup runners up, Champions League semi-finalists.
07/08 - Premier League winners, Champions League winners
08/09 - Premier League winners, Champions League runners up, League Cup winners, FA Cup semi-finalists
09/10 - Premier League runners up, League Cup winners
10/11 - Premier League winners, Champions League runners up, FA Cup semi-finalists
This was an incredible run, however you look at it.
This season, City have been touted as the best team ever seen in the Premier League. Of course this was largely when they looked like they were on their way to a quadruple winning, invincible, record points breaking season. Now here we are, with the only thing they're aiming for now being the points total. The league and the league cup is a decent haul, and very good if they break the points record, but it's not quite "best ever side" levels.
I'm pretty certain no other English side, at least in the Premier League/Champions League era, can boast such a run, and I'm not sure there are many across Europe's other top leagues who can boast a similar run of league dominance, while consistently reaching the late stages of the Champions League, as well as going deep in their domestic cups.
This doesn't even include a further league win in 12/13 either.
It's hard to criticise Fergie all things considered, but that was a truly awful window for us.Yeah, should have signed Robben and Sneijder as part of the deal. Without that we missed 2 league titles by 1 point and GD. Man was a genius.
What a load of rubbish - sides still have to be beaten - Real Madrid run in 2016 Roma, Wolfsburg, Man City, Atletico - hardly full off big names nobody remembers the route.Beating Premier League champions and the next years winner in the Quarter finals wasn't a "decent side"?
Yeah, tbf to Fergie, he did what he had to, to win the league and he did it so consistently.It's hard to criticise Fergie all things considered, but that was a truly awful window for us.
Even before that, if there was a proper refereeing in the semi-final, I think we could have won pretty easily against Chelsea.We could've won in 09 had we converted one of the 3/4 chances we had in the first 10 mins, once Barca settled into the game, we had no chance.
In 11 we were not that special, but when we went into HT at 1-1 I really expected SAF to change the shape or tactic to try to keep it at 1-1 and maybe nick a goal or go into extra time and even pens.
Agree that the exit to Bayern was more painful than the two finals, even the exit to Madrid was hard to take because we matched them and would've won if RvP was more clinical.
Such fine margins, really goes to show how difficult it is to win the UCL.
Actually very similar to Liverpools run this year, we beat Chelsea in the quarters and got Schalke in the semi's. They have faced City in the quarters and possibly Roma in the semi's.Beating Premier League champions and the next years winner in the Quarter finals wasnt a "decent side"?
Depends if you prefer Domestic or Euro success - we had back to back doubles and a treble in the '94 to '99 which is still unprecedented, tended to struggle a bit in Europe though but alot of that was due to the foreigner ruleIs there even a debate on this? It's by far our most successful period, and we played great football to go with it whilst also being solid as a rock defensively.
Ultimately he was responsible for those players, whether it was nurturing their development and graduation to the senior squad, or simply signing them.I get the praise. But no mention of any players throughout that era?
Like SAF ran on the pitch and literally scored the winner in all those ties?
They were incredible but people here talk about them as if there's nothing you could have done when it was hardly the case. Chelsea in 2009 and Arsenal in 2011 were incredibly close to knocking them out, both teams were worse than United in the same year.Barca 09 and particularly 11 were otherworldly
Absolutely, that period is the best the club has ever been in Europe, just our luck that we ran into the best club side ever at the peak of their powers. 2010 was a missed opportunity, very careless loss to Bayern, even without Ronaldo that was still a very good Utd team with a solid defensive unit and Rooney at his peak. 2011 was unexpected to get to the final, Barca that year were as close to unbeatable as any team I have seen, especially with that years Utd who had dropped off badly. Rome was more frustrating, Utd could have won that game, just under performed badly and not picking Scholes despite his poor form was a mistake against their pressing.I've been discussing relative records of clubs and managers with a work colleague this morning. He's a Real fan, so discussing European cups with him is a bit like turning up to a gunfight with a water pistol, but we agreed Fergie should have had another CL or two and that Pep's recent record in that competition is becoming the strongest argument against his candidacy as a genuine GOAT-tier manager.
Fergie is very safely a GOAT (as I imagine Pep will be when he finishes) but though I'm receptive to many of the arguments in this thread and others; Barca 09 and particularly 11 were otherworldly, CL has a larger luck factor than leagues, Fergie had more on his plate staying at the top in PL than other coaches had in their respective leagues, we still had a great record between 06-11 etc. I can't shake the conclusion this Fergie side should have had more than one CL to show for its class.
In fact since SAF left, all teams (bar City in 2014/15) haven't even made the top 4 the season after winning the league, something Chelsea look set to continue this season.Yep, and to really put that into perspective, nobody has successfully defended their title since.
Yes otherworldly is hyperbolic and it's also fair to point out that it's hardly reasonable to enter a competition then complain you didn't win because someone was better than you. However Barca 09-11≈ are widely considered to be the most talented and complete set of players ever assembled by a club, almost a freak class graduating together along with quality external additions, and though as you say I would rather focus on what United could have done in those finals among fellow United fans and other sympathetic ears I'm not above a collective shrug and holding up of hands to that Barca team.They were incredible but people here talk about them as if there's nothing you could have done when it was hardly the case. Chelsea in 2009 and Arsenal in 2011 were incredibly close to knocking them out, both teams were worse than United in the same year.
I think by 2011 United weren't as good and Barcelona were better but Fergie got it wrong for the 2009 final imo. That one shouldn't have been as easy as it was at least.
It's a painful collection for sure, not to mention adding failures in the 90s due variously to tactical naivety (for me Queiroz deserves credit for our improvement in Europe in the 00s) and the foreign quota rule.Absolutely, that period is the best the club has ever been in Europe, just our luck that we ran into the best club side ever at the peak of their powers. 2010 was a missed opportunity, very careless loss to Bayern, even without Ronaldo that was still a very good Utd team with a solid defensive unit and Rooney at his peak. 2011 was unexpected to get to the final, Barca that year were as close to unbeatable as any team I have seen, especially with that years Utd who had dropped off badly. Rome was more frustrating, Utd could have won that game, just under performed badly and not picking Scholes despite his poor form was a mistake against their pressing.
CL was rarely kind to Utd, Dortmund still rankles me to this day, Utd with no exaggeration could have scored 15 goals over the tie, they got a deflected shot in both games, it was a nightmare loss. Monaco was terrible with an injury crisis killing that season, the first loss to Real in 2000 was a shambles, better team, should have won the tournament that year Barthez against the Galacticos in 03 was giving them the tie, another host of chances spurned in those 2 games. Leverkusen another disaster. Milan in 06/07, defensive injuries and fatigue in a small squad killed them at the end of that season.
I don't worry too much about the 94 team, even without the foreigner rule I doubt they are winning the CL at the time. Weak squad outside the first 12/13(though to be fair that was true for most teams then) and defensively Parker, Bruce and Pallister was a problem at that level. Utd were used to being able to counter against teams who did not value the ball, in Europe some of the tactical naivety was exposed.It's a painful collection for sure, not to mention adding failures in the 90s due variously to tactical naivety (for me Queiroz deserves credit for our improvement in Europe in the 00s) and the foreign quota rule.
The one that sticks out for me was 2010. I was in Castleford filming a documentary for my final project and sat with my brother in absolute horror as we threw it away to Olic and Robben. We still occasionally do Robben's daft face and hand gesture celebration after he scored that goal; we can look back now and laugh but at the time it was horrific.
I was desperate for RVN to go by that point. Didn't matter how many goals he could score, he was restricting the overall attacking potential of the side, making Utd predictable and stifling the growth of Rooney and Ronaldo. Not hating on RVN, his first 2 1/2 years he was brilliant for Utd but injuries slowed him down and Utd needed to get back to spreading the goals and attacking variations.Side stacked with quality.
I honestly didn't see it coming given Man. United's league level between 03-06 and also selling RVN during that summer.
Man. United could win games different ways during that period. Side with Rooney, Ronaldo, Berbatov and Owen as forward options could win by 4/5 but pretty sure in 08-09 you also had a long period of 1-0 wins so at the back Rio-Vidic were rocks and Evra and Van Der Sar were also great.
Formula worked well in europ of course, 3 champions league finals in 4 seasons.
No, they really wouldn't be.Bit in bold I question. Points are undeniable. Beat Chelsea 95 and they are the best ever Prem team. But as they should be for the most expensive on all metrics.
Also added VDS in 2005 summer and Vidic + Evra in 2005 winter. They were huge additions for the team.I think it was more who'd take over the goalscoring mantle.
Rooney could score close to 20 of course but he'd already been there two seasons and Man. United hadn't seriously challenge for the league in either year.
Ronaldo at the time wasn't the goalscoring monster he is now and Saha was regularly crocked. OGS also started getting lots of injuries around that time and had to retire soon after.
Ronaldo-Rooney-Saha for first half of that season worked brilliantly. Think Giggs and Scholes also came back and had brilliant seasons after struggling the previous 18 months.
Utd had so much movement with that set up. Rooney, Ronaldo and Giggs behind the striker, constantly interchanging, not tied down to staying on the wing trying to feed RVN. Remember that Roma game, even with Smith instead of Saha, Giggs played as 10, LW and a RW at points of that game, it was fantastically fluid line up and RVN was too one dimensional to allow it to blossom.I think it was more who'd take over the goalscoring mantle.
Rooney could score close to 20 of course but he'd already been there two seasons and Man. United hadn't seriously challenge for the league in either year.
Ronaldo at the time wasn't the goalscoring monster he is now and Saha was regularly crocked. OGS also started getting lots of injuries around that time and had to retire soon after.
Ronaldo-Rooney-Saha for first half of that season worked brilliantly. Think Giggs and Scholes also came back and had brilliant seasons after struggling the previous 18 months.
Great days when Fergie could buy three relatively cheap, unfancied/under the radar players and sort three positions for years.Also added VDS in 2005 summer and Vidic + Evra in 2005 winter. They were huge additions for the team.
Carrick was added in 2006 summer too. Such a brilliant year to sort out next 5-6 years.
Why not? I particularly like the detail of commentator 1's interruption to comment on Shaw.Personally I reckon we would've won one of those finals (09 or 11) if Ronaldo stayed, the difference between a great team (e.g. invincibles, current man city, chelsea 04/05) and a legendary team (madrid late 50s, milan late 80s, man united late 00s, barca early 10s), is the really great teams have that one, ballon d'or level player or better yet GOAT tier player (Messi, Ronaldo, Pele, Maradona) who takes them to a truly unstoppable level. These players carry teams which without them would be about as good as the 'great' teams I mentioned (milan side had multiple ballon dor winners). Potentially man city could get here if someone there turned into a ballon dor level player, someone like Sane. I mean its totally possible United could hit this level in a few years, say players live up to their big potential.
Lets imagine with our optimistic crystal ball (let the dream begin): ZZZZZZzzzzzzz.......
"Commentator 1: Ahem, today is the big day, the champions league final 2022, man united vs bayern, a rematch of a famous game over 20 years ago now.
Commentator 2: Okay today with our starting lineups man united will line up in a 4-3-3:
In goal David De Gea, hes been the worlds best for a number of years now.
And the defence, the brick wall eric bailly partners axel tuanzebe, the classy young centre half.
Commentator 1: What a top player Bailly is, for me hes the very best, I mean its no wonder he was picked in the world XI this year.
Commentator 2: Mmmm, yes, moving on, in fullback, luke shaw is on the left. And...
Commentator 1 (interrupts): To think only a few years many thought he was done at United, what fools we were, now he well and truly established as one of the best left backs the premier league has to offer.
Commentator 2: Anyway, at right back, Timothy Fosu-Mensah, the powerful dutch fullback.
And in midfield, the dynamic brazilian, fabinho, solidifying the centre of the park, and ahead of him, Paul Pogba, the key driving force of this man united outfit. Next to him, Milinkovic-Savic, the powerful serbian with an eye for goal.
Commentator 1: He certainly showed us that last week when he scored the 2nd consecutive premier league for Man United at Anfield with that late winner.
Commentator 2: Now with the front 3, at right wing, Tahith Chong, the young academy graduate who took the premier league by storm last year, winning the pfa young player of the year. And in the middle, Romelu Lukaku, the captain of this United team, he'll be looking to lead this United outfit to glory through his goals tonight.
And last but not least, Anthony Martial, the man everyone will be watching.
Commentator 1: Well of course, he is the favourite to win this year's ballon d'or award."
Ah, we can hope.