20 - 30 million and we are lucky in my opinion.
20 - 30 million and we are lucky in my opinion. Gigantic loss which I don't put on ETH as he played for him previously. Someone should have overruled the transfer and set the bar for the fee much lower.
I do love a bit of ridiculous hyperbole in the morning.Everyone single person involved in this transfer should be sacked on the spot.
Amazingly managed to upstage the Maguire transfer - remarkable achievement.
Would take £20m.
Obviously an exaggeration - but Murtough is clearly unfit for purpose based on this deal alone.I do love a bit of ridiculous hyperbole in the morning.
He was bought for £86m 2 years ago at the end of the season and got a 5 year contract, that means he has a value to us of £51.6m meaning if we sell him for less than that we will be damaging our FFP, it will actually become tighter so there is no way to sell him yet - The most sensible option is to send him on a loan.
I'd argue Bebe is actually better.Bebe level of ability but with superstar transfer fee. Can't think of a bigger fail.
20 - 30 million and we are lucky in my opinion. Gigantic loss which I don't put on ETH as he played for him previously. Someone should have overruled the transfer and set the bar for the fee much lower.
How do we know he’s sulking?Doesn’t matter what the fee is, he absolutely has to leave in the summer to set a marker by the new owners. You can’t just leave him sulking around the place because he cost too much. Clear messages have to be sent to everyone that it doesn’t matter how much you cost or how much you earn, if you’re shit and you don’t perform you’re gone and you’re gone fast. Raise the standards.
Because he won’t be playing? Why would he be happy with that?How do we know he’s sulking?
He was bought for £86m 2 years ago at the end of the season and got a 5 year contract, that means he has a value to us of £51.6m meaning if we sell him for less than that we will be damaging our FFP, it will actually become tighter so there is no way to sell him yet - The most sensible option is to send him on a loan.
It has a direct impact on what we can spend in the summer. The moment we sell him any difference between the current book value and the fee we receive become profit/loss, so if we get rid for £30m, that’s a £15m hole in our FFP account for the year, or a £50-60m signing.Not really. If he has a book value of 51m but is of no use on the pitch, then it would make sense for us to reduce that book value to 31m instead of 51m by getting some money back. Keeping him doesn’t save us money, he remains on the books.
Not really. If he has a book value of 51m but is of no use on the pitch, then it would make sense for us to reduce that book value to 31m instead of 51m by getting some money back. Keeping him doesn’t save us money, he remains on the books.
Good point, but maybe not quite as much as that? There's the saved wages to put against it, and also some of the 86m were add-ons, the criteria for which might not all have been met. Although I'm not sure how that is handled for book value purposes.
Of courseif the 86 had add ons we can write that down but it wouldn't have been much, pretty sure only 5 or so is add ons annoyingly. The saved wages do count for something, think it's around £10m a year which definitely helps us.
Is he really on £10 million a year?
That's crazy considering
Unless he get's a Saudi offer, no other club is paying him £10 million a year so it's going to be close to impossible to get rid of him.
The secret plot is exposed... it was all a ploy to strengthen Nice. Hope they can live with the disappointing truth...Half the squad is going to be off to France for the 24/25 season.
Gonna have to get creative and shift them over to the Nice books.
Lindelof and Antony would do well in France tbf.
United's scout rated him as a 20/25 million player.