Haven't seen much of Amrabat. Is he actually United quality, or is he just another player we're targeting because he played in the Dutch league at one point?
I know we need midfielders, but the last thing I want is more future deadwood.
My concern as well. And I think, it makes sense to differentiate that even a good player like Amrabat can become deadwood if he isn't needed. People have to consider that ETH brought in Casemiro, he brought in Mount and he played them in the recently en vogue way of two free 8s. Such a formation doesn't have a DLP player - at least as long this DLP isn't a defensive rock on top.
If that is the case, it makes more sense to bring in somebody who resembles Casemiro and his skillset. Obviously it sounds great to have a DLP player in our team, but you can't (shouldn't) just window shop for stuff that might be nice to have. Because if that is the assignment, lets bring in a wingback for the right side as well. A traditional winger isn't available, go get him, a huge target man striker would be great, a smaller busy Striker like Rooney would be awesome. A tricky winger who beats his man for fun would be great to have...
We can only field 11 players and those have to have a plan how they want to play. If certain roles aren't in that plan, you shouldn't prioritize players for that. I know, the setting is great, player would like to come, is decently priced. But the assignment isn't just bring in players, we have to bring in the right ones. And lets not act as if teams would just play like they do now against us when we add Amrabat - if he is the only one capable of progressing the play, they will crowd him out as well. Our current issues aren't a sole midfield issue - the whole team isn't working properly.
I'd rather go for the painful process of adjusting for ETHs plan then than to just switch and move sideways for a year...