Best player to clone and make an XI

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,442
Location
The stable
Which player could clone 10 times to make an XI that would be able to compete with these best.

A player like Messi would be too short for defence whereas Ronaldo might just be versatile enough.

An all rounder like prime Yaya You're might be quite good.

Prime Roy Keane would be a bastard to play against
 

Chipper

Adulterer.
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
5,686
Ruud Gullit usually wins this debate.

Obligitary John O'Shea mention.
 

_00_deathscar

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 13, 2016
Messages
227
Supports
Liverpool
Gerrard, Rooney - although chances you'll also have lots of red cards.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,746
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Peak Rooney for me without any question.


Rooney

Rooney - Rooney - Rooney - Rooney
Rooney
Rooney - Rooney
Rooney ------------------- Rooney
Rooney

Bench: Rooney, Rooney, Rooney, Rooney, Rooney, Rooney, Rooney​
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,442
Location
The stable
Peak Rooney for me without any question.


Rooney

Rooney - Rooney - Rooney - Rooney
Rooney
Rooney - Rooney
Rooney ------------------- Rooney
Rooney

Bench: Rooney, Rooney, Rooney, Rooney, Rooney, Rooney, Rooney​
Rooney Rooney Rooney Rooney Rooney

Aaaaahhhhh

Do ya, do ya, do ya, do ya know what you're doing to me
 

Jibberjabber

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
22
Supports
Liverpool
We all dream of a team of Carraghers, a team of Carraghers, a team of Carraghers...
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
I would still take Messi. Although too much quality on freekicks and probably not enough movement without the ball for the magical passes to himself to work.
 

Le Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2017
Messages
1,441
11 Zidanes would produce some mind boggling stuff.
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2014
Messages
290
A team of Messi’s, playing 2009-11 style, hardcore, Tiki Taka would be a nightmare to play against. 90 percent possession, pressing all over the pitch. Lots of, clinical, one touch passing and movement. With his coordination he would recover the ball effortlessly as well anytime the opposition made any kind of mistake in possession.
 
Last edited:

meamth

New Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2017
Messages
5,946
Location
Malaysia
How do you take the ball from 11 physically peak Messi? The one that can dribble 4-5 players easily.
 

Mr Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
4,026
Location
Australia
11 Lingards.

On a more serious note, Harry Kane would be a good shout, he's genuinely good to outstanding at almost everything. Can even play in goal!
 

Albin Johansson

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 7, 2017
Messages
111
John O'shea. The man could keep a clean sheet as GK vs spurs, act as a stand-in RB/CB/LB in a title winning united side, dominate a midfield with Darron fecking Gibson, nutmeg Figo and lob it over Lehman any day of the week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jippy

Bratt

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
9,734
Location
Norway
I would’ve gone for 11 Manuel Neuers.
I think they would do pretty well.
 

FrankDrebin

Don't call me Shirley
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20,502
Location
Police Squad
Supports
USA Manchester Red Socks
11 Lingard's would be a funny watch.
They'll be constantly on the move while avoiding contact with the ball.
 

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
22,862
Location
Inside right
Yeah, I did this thread a while back: Gullit or Di Stefano, but Gullit was consensus, iirc.
 

ariveded

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
243
James Milner, an all-rounder who can defend, attack, pass and run all game long...
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,036
Location
Moscow
Gullit, Di Stefano, Pelé, Cruyff, Matthäus. Xavi if we’re talking about the suffocating possession approach.

If I’d be forced to choose, I’d go with Gullit. I don’t think that Matthäus would be a brilliant striker and I’m not entire comfortable with the rest as center backs. Gullit, though :drool:
 

Gopher Brown

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
4,549
A team of Jesse Lingards would be very difficult to watch as they would all just make runs off the ball and leave the ball behind all the time. Kick offs would take forever.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,534
Gullit, Di Stefano, Pelé, Cruyff, Matthäus. Xavi if we’re talking about the suffocating possession approach.

If I’d be forced to choose, I’d go with Gullit. I don’t think that Matthäus would be a brilliant striker and I’m not entire comfortable with the rest as center backs. Gullit, though :drool:
Beckenbauer started out as an attacker (outside left) with a more than decent shot on him. He went on to play as a central midfielder who posed a considerable goal threat (scored four goals for West Germany in the '66 World Cup), and then settled as the greatest allround defender of all time.

A defence of four (or five, if you want to park the old bus) Beckenbauers is scary enough - but you can add a midfield section of world class Beckenbauers to that. And then a couple of - well - probably pretty decent attackers (wingers).

11 Gullits would mean an insane attacking force, sure - but they'd be clearly behind the Beckenbauers in central midfield, and vastly (to say the least - Gullit was a decent-ish sweeper or whatever you want to call it in his older days, but hardly a world beater) inferior at the back.
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,077
Location
?
I think peak Rooney is the best all rounder, he was the first name that came to my mind anyway. He’s obviously a top striker, grafts our wide, had the engine and passing range to play midfield, and was known as a decent keeper as well. I can’t see past him tbh.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,534
Sárosi is another obvious candidate to mention, of course, if we're talking about versatile players.
 

Globule

signature/tagline creator extraordinaire
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
4,760
A player like Messi would be too short for defence whereas Ronaldo might just be versatile enough.
I do quite like the idea of seeing 9 childish Ronaldos simultaneously throwing their hands in the air when one Ronaldo dares pass the ball to another Ronaldo that isn't them.
 

Botim

Full Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2017
Messages
663
Supports
Royal Antwerp FC
Weird to see people mentioning a Messi XI. All you need to do to score against that team, is a corner. Or a long throw. Or a lob from anywhere on the pitch.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,036
Location
Moscow
Beckenbauer started out as an attacker (outside left) with a more than decent shot on him. He went on to play as a central midfielder who posed a considerable goal threat (scored four goals for West Germany in the '66 World Cup), and then settled as the greatest allround defender of all time.

A defence of four (or five, if you want to park the old bus) Beckenbauers is scary enough - but you can add a midfield section of world class Beckenbauers to that. And then a couple of - well - probably pretty decent attackers (wingers).

11 Gullits would mean an insane attacking force, sure - but they'd be clearly behind the Beckenbauers in central midfield, and vastly (to say the least - Gullit was a decent-ish sweeper or whatever you want to call it in his older days, but hardly a world beater) inferior at the back.
Somehow missed Der Kaiser, although I kept him in mind. Obviously he’d be a brilliant choice, quite possibly the best. The sight of 5-6 Gullits running at your defence is fecking scary though! The sheer physicality of that team.
 

Globule

signature/tagline creator extraordinaire
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
4,760
Weird to see people mentioning a Messi XI. All you need to do to score against that team, is a corner. Or a long throw. Or a lob from anywhere on the pitch.
All while winning possession and keeping possession long enough not to concede.