Do we need a Lukaku backup to win the league?

freeurmind

weak willed
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
5,883
I'd put in a cheeky bid for Costa. He is clearly not wanted at Chelsea, has a relationship with Mourinho and the thought of having to defend against him and Lukaku at the same time would terrify most defences. Probably unlikely Chelsea would accept the bid but given the fact that no one else seems to be interested and Atletico have the transfer ban, its worth a punt.
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,616
Location
DownUnder
Martial should be up top when lukaku need a rest. Rashford for all his tricks lacks in close control and composure of finish. Martial is much better in one on ones and control which will ensure finishing off chances than rashford. They should be able to support lukaku.
Martial hasn't the ability to lead the line. He's a wide forward or at the very minimum needs a partner. He's at his best with the ball at his feet running at teams, leading the line, he'd need to play with his back to goal. That's just not his game.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
We will have Zlatan back anyway so I don't think it'll be a problem.
 

Mindhunter

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
3,633
What about back up to that back up? Things can get nasty if those three are injured or tired with games coming thick and fast. :(
If that's the quality of your jokes then I really hope you have good tickling skills.
 

Mindhunter

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
3,633
As I just said in another thread, you would do well to sign a proven goalscorer as a back up to Lukaku. He'll net you a shitload of goals, but if he gets a serious longlasting injury, I don't see Rashford or Martial as reliable back ups even if they're both talented. As for Zlatan, he could come back with a bang, but there's also a chance that he won't be the same player after an injury so serious, which often seems to the case, when players have been away for so long.
That's the worry I have as well. Martial is a special player and I really want him to do well but simply put he doesn't instill a lot of confidence in me. He isn't someone who is dynamic enough to break through games where we struggled to score goals last season and given our injury record for the last 4-5 years I am not too confident that we will have Lukaku available for the entirety of the season (I really hope I am wrong though).
 

Saf94

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
690
I'm more worried about not having a Matic back up. We have other midfielders but no one who does what he does and his importance to this team is probably going to be close to Scholes levels (in terms of how much we would miss him if he's out)
 

Android1974

Incredibly anal about player positions in lineups
Joined
May 24, 2016
Messages
8,133
Yeah, I think Mourinho will risk it with Rashford and Martial as backups to Lukaku, and then with the addition of Ibrahimović in January.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,479
Rashford is his back-up, he did fine last year after Zlatan's injury.

Surprised so many seem to think Zlatan resigning in January is a certainty. Personally i don't think he will want to play second fiddle to Lukaku.
 

TimScoreboard

Full Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
339
Location
South Wales
Supports
Palermo
The lad needs to be prepared to play, and play, and play... We saw how Jose treated the old fella last season, so Lukaku needs to have a good supply of boot to hand, because he's going to need them.
When he doesn't play, my guess is we'll go to Marcus, as we did last season. The lad seems to get bigger by the week and is gaining experience; so he should be more than capable of the lone role when asked, again this season.
Anthony will again be 3rd choice through the middle for me
 

Edgar Allan Pillow

Ero-Sennin
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
41,439
Location
┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬
We have Martial, Rashford and Zlatan will join in January. What more do you want?
We've had them last season with not much consistency. OP's point I presume is that a traditional Big CF makes the difference and so backup Lukaku type player.

I'm OK with Rashford playing that role, but yeah...wouldn't hinder if we can get someone on the cheap.
 

iam_kramer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2014
Messages
610
Location
Madrid
I'm not sure we need to go out and buy another striker as such. I remember seeing a post mentioning how Lukaku rarely misses games, he seems to always be a reliable part of the starting eleven. Now, obviously he's not immune to injuries but, that's a good sign.

We also have Martial and Rashford as others have said, Rashford has a habit of missing quite a few chances, I really hope it doesn't continue into the season, but we saw one in particular against West Ham and one against Real Madrid. Martial is cold in front of goal, nerveless, but I think he's better from out wide. I'm often torn between the two and which player should play.

As for Zlatan, I'm indifferent as to whether he comes back in January, it would be a boost to the team if we're in a position of challenging on a couple of fronts, but I wouldn't cry any rivers if he went elsewhere.

I'd also like to add that the last game we managed two goals from the striker, one from a CM and another from a winger. That share of goals looks healthy, hopefully the other players start chipping in and not criminally missing chances.
 

Minimalist

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
15,091
Zlatan coming back sorts this out for the business end of the season. You're not going to get many good strikers wanting to sit on the bench all season.
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,341
Yes, we're really desperate and we'd be buggered without him. I've thought really hard about it and I we should try and get at least two of Marcus Rashford, Anthony Martial or Zlatan Ibrahimovic (who I hear will be available on a free in January). Their mixture of pace, skill and power would really make us threatening when Lukaku is unavailable.
 

davidmichael

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
3,424
If we can't score goals with Lukaku, Rashford, Martial, Mkhitaryan, Mata, Pogba, Lingard and Zlatan returning in January whilst there's also a strong chance we'll sign a winger/wide forward before the deadline then we have to seriously look at the tactics rather than the personnel as that should be bucket loads of goals right there.
 

Theonas

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Messages
4,800
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
If we can't score goals with Lukaku, Rashford, Martial, Mkhitaryan, Mata, Pogba, Lingard and Zlatan returning in January whilst there's also a strong chance we'll sign a winger/wide forward before the deadline then we have to seriously look at the tactics rather than the personnel as that should be bucket loads of goals right there.
Exactly! Teams have been and are scoring more with far less. If we can't score enough with what we have, the problems most definitely lie deeper than any individual shortcomings.
 

Laurentiu amt

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
511
Well, if Rashford, Mata, Miki and Pogs start chipping in the goals, we don't need a backup striker. If every attacking player scores 5-10 goals/season and if lukaku gets 20-30, we're in a good spot.
 

Sereques

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
5,873
Location
MD, USA
We've had them last season with not much consistency. OP's point I presume is that a traditional Big CF makes the difference and so backup Lukaku type player.

I'm OK with Rashford playing that role, but yeah...wouldn't hinder if we can get someone on the cheap.
Again we have Zlatan who joins the group in 4 months. Like seriously, what do you guys want?
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
We can adapt. Once Zlatan comes back we'll have great options but we can adapt. If you need a target man, Fellaini holding up and laying it off to Martial or rashford facing the defenders from deeper. There's no point thinking negative.