Red Dreams
Full Member
such a cynic mate.Not clicking that. I know a Rickroll when I see one.
such a cynic mate.Not clicking that. I know a Rickroll when I see one.
So that prick McCarthy is planning on switching a number of hardcore Trump defenders onto the House Intelligence Committee for the public hearings.
They really are shameless bastards.
Why is that shocking?
being sarci mate.Why is that shocking?
I really am being slow as feck this week..being sarci mate.
What a prickTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
At this point he will say and do anything to get re-elected. He called Trump a bigot in 2015 when it was politically expedient to do so, and is now ok with pivoting into a role of being his political **** if it means he can stay in the Senate for another six years.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Latest GOP approach, bury head in sand and pretend nothing happened.What a prick
No surprise, they're going to fill the committee with grandstanders. They don't expect to make any salient points or be able to genuinely argue Trump's case but they will provide Fox News and the other right wing rabbles with all the bollocks they need to be able to actually cover the impeachment proceedings.
And push the nihilistic view of politics that it's all a mess and no side is better.No surprise, they're going to fill the committee with grandstanders. They don't expect to make any salient points or be able to genuinely argue Trump's case but they will provide Fox News and the other right wing rabbles with all the bollocks they need to be able to actually cover the impeachment proceedings.
That really isn’t true. Don’t let extreme bipartisanship fool you.It surely does feel like two countries forcefully switched together at this point.
Extreme bi-partisanship ? Not sure we've seen that since 1787.That really isn’t true. Don’t let extreme bipartisanship fool you.
...it’s more like half a dozen.
Partisanship.Extreme bi-partisanship ? Not sure we've seen that since 1787.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If Dems win, isn't this basically violating the constitution? Couldn't they try him for some sort of espionage crime?This is the same clown who went on a virtue signaling rampage when NSC privacy issues were leaked. Suddenly whistle blowers are a threat.
I wish his neighbor had put him to pasture.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Huh? Whistleblower protection isn’t constitutionally protected, it’s just a law.If Dems win, isn't this basically violating the constitution? Couldn't they try him for some sort of espionage crime?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Oh my bad, the 6th amendment doesn't apply to whistleblowers I had confused it in my head as protection for them. Still, he could and should be persecuted under the full extent of the law should he out a whistleblower if there is any grounds for legal proceedings.Huh? Whistleblower protection isn’t constitutionally protected, it’s just a law.
He understands how his voters and republicans work. That is all that matters to win an election and be absolved of all his crimes.He either doesn't understand the way government works or he doesn't care.
Absolutely, but given Barr runs the DoJ I'd say there's basically zero chance of it happening.Oh my bad, the 6th amendment doesn't apply to whistleblowers I had confused it in my head as protection for them. Still, he could and should be persecuted under the full extent of the law should he out a whistleblower if there is any grounds for legal proceedings.
I don’t care for Libertarians and their loopy philosophy but Rand Paul is pretty much a fake ‘Paul’.This is the same clown who went on a virtue signaling rampage when NSC privacy issues were leaked. Suddenly whistle blowers are a threat.
I wish his neighbor had put him to pasture.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Congress has officially subpoenaed President Donald Trump’s acting chief of staff, Politico reported Thursday.
“House impeachment investigators have subpoenaed acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, demanding that he testify about his knowledge of President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold military aid to Ukraine,” Politico reported.
“Mulvaney had already signaled he would likely refuse lawmakers’ demands to testify, and the White House has issued a blanket order against cooperating with the impeachment probe,” Politico noted.
At an October 17th press conference, Mulvaney admitted Trump had a quid pro quo with Ukraine and told reporters to “get over it.”
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This is the same clown who went on a virtue signaling rampage when NSC privacy issues were leaked. Suddenly whistle blowers are a threat.
I wish his neighbor had put him to pasture.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I don’t care for Libertarians and their loopy philosophy but Rand Paul is pretty much a fake ‘Paul’.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date