DP Draft - R1: Pat Mustard vs Pnut

Who will win the match?


  • Total voters
    19
  • Poll closed .

GodShaveTheQueen

We mean it man, we love our queen!
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Messages
6,434

-----------------------------------PAT MUSTARD--------------------------------------------------------------------------------P-NUT---------------------------------------

PAT MUSTARD TACTICS




Formation: 4-4-2
Philosophy: "I'm looking forward to seeing some sexy football" Ruud Gullit

There were safer lineups for me to field here in terms of winning votes, but in light of our respective injury lists I couldn't resist giving Gullit his draft debut (I think) in the libero role. Harms has produced some wonderful videos recently demonstrating his abilities there, and having watched bits and pieces of competitive matches vs Spain and Ireland I was highly impressed with the influence Gullit wielded from that position. Sumptuous long-range passing, some seemingly effortless bursts through the lines from unpromising starting positions for a mere mortal, and he seemed to have an instinct for snuffing out danger in defensive phases on top of his ridiculous athletic advantages. Obviously I can't make any remotely sweeping statements about his defensive game without even watching those matches in their entirety, and in the interests of full disclosure he conceded a penalty against Ireland, but...Gullit. As soon as the idea entered my head I was always going to take the gamble here.

Aside from simply wanting to field Gullit in that position, with Voronin on the injury list Beckenbauer and Falcao are clearly the most compelling midfield duo available to me, and the more obvious Kaiser deputy Maxime Bossis is also unavailable. Pnut's casualties also factored into my decision. With Crespo and Batistuta both ruled out, Cruyff looks like he'll cut an isolated figure up front, compounded by the lack of either a Stoichkov-esque goalscoring wide attacker or a specialist penalty box threat from midfield in the Robson or Lampard mould offering regular support. Clearly, a lineup containing the likes of Cruyff, Figo, Beckham and Gerson will still pose a substantial threat, but I feel that it won't be coherent or sustained enough to put an unmanageable burden on our defence.

More broadly:

- We're fairly confident in our defence's ability to cope with the tasks at hand. Pnut's wing duos are excellent, but Pavoni and McGrain are both strong, resolute defenders, and Luis Enrique is a great fit for tracking Facchetti and preventing him from running rampant. Counterintuitively, perhaps, we're quite happy to funnel the opposition's attacks into the wide areas anyway, as we're highly confident in Gullit and Samuel's ability to deal with any deliveries into the box.

- A 4-4-2 with two expansive B2B midfielders AND an attacking libero is risky and cavalier, there's no denying that. The risk is mitigated by the intelligence of the key players: Beckenbauer is about as tactically perfect as it gets to cover for Gullit's forward incursions (and there's no way that I'm playing Gullit there and trying to downplay the importance of those libero tendencies), and Falcao himself has performed admirably when he played as the deepest midfielder. All four of our midfielders, including Beckenbauer probably, are more famous for their attacking abilities than their out-of-possession work, but every one of them will defend diligently.

- More importantly, any defensive vulnerabilities are more than made up for by the sheer creativity and range of goal threats in our team. Don't really need to elaborate on the likes of Kaiser and Falcao, but I would like to highlight the left flank of Pavoni and Brady, and the quality of delivery they'll provide for Spencer.

P-NUT TACTICS


Schmichel in net brings that dominance of anything coming into the box from out wide.

A back 3 of Puyol, Santamaria and Gamarra provide the pace to cover out wide when the wing backs need assistance, accompanied by the obvious leadership skills their trophy hauls indicate.

Wing backs of Carlos Alberto and Facchetti are hard to top no matter who you have in those positions.

Central midfield is patrolled by Schweinsteiger and Gerson. Both defensively solid and provide that solid block in front of the back 3. Box to box skills prevent us from becoming too defensively minded.

Beckham and Figo out wide, ideally Figo would be on the right, but on the left of a 343 he can use his dribbling and play making skills cutting inside and linking sublimely with the other attackers and midfielders. Beckham being on the right allows Alberto to bomb on even more, knowing he's got a grafter in front of him.

Cruyff ties the whole thing together, creator and chief he's tasked with running the game, giving the CBs no one to mark at times, before darting in behind during link plays. Hell drop deep, drift wide and basically do as he pleases.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,028
Location
Moscow
Pat's juggernaut is simply too good to beat with this ill-fitted attacking unit — and it's not even a very coherent counter-attacking side that can soak up the pressure and take its one chance. Gullit would have a nice game as a sweeper here as Pat will certainly have the most of possession & Gullit's intelligence (and obvious athletic capabilities) would be a great fit for Cruyff.

It's harsh on P-Nut as he suffered terribly from the injury crisis, but Pat has a drool-worthy midfield, brilliant front two and more than a competent defense with Gullit having all the tools to shine in a, perhaps, slightly unexpected role. To be fair I'm surprised that P-Nut was even able to field a competitive unit — and that he did — after losing Batigol, his replacement & Giggs.
 

Edgar Allan Pillow

Ero-Sennin
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
41,430
Location
┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬
Not that I recall much from earlier research, but Gullit was hugely influential to the game even as a sweeper but his expansive and flamboyant style wasn't really considered astute defensively, usually needing someone to cover for his attacking instincts. I don't recall him being disciplined, position wise or in player marking.

Not all this was Gullit's fault as Chelsea and Hoddle weren't suited to tactically adjust and get the best of Gullit, as libero role in itself was quite new to EPL.

Really hard to judge his performance there. Kudos to Pat for jumping into the deep end!

Also, with two expansive players ahead of him, Gullit's libero feels superfluous to Pat's team and potentially a move that might backfire.

Disclaimer: this is just initial impression based on old research I did. Will watch a bit more to make my mind.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,795
Pat's juggernaut is simply too good to beat with this ill-fitted attacking unit — and it's not even a very coherent counter-attacking side that can soak up the pressure and take its one chance. Gullit would have a nice game as a sweeper here as Pat will certainly have the most of possession & Gullit's intelligence (and obvious athletic capabilities) would be a great fit for Cruyff.

It's harsh on P-Nut as he suffered terribly from the injury crisis, but Pat has a drool-worthy midfield, brilliant front two and more than a competent defense with Gullit having all the tools to shine in a, perhaps, slightly unexpected role. To be fair I'm surprised that P-Nut was even able to field a competitive unit — and that he did — after losing Batigol, his replacement & Giggs.
Reading this post echoed my exact thoughts after reading the op and seeing the two teams
 

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,645
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
Yeah I got completely shafted with the injuries, was looking to build a 442 similar to Pats but with Cruyff playing off Batigol and releasing some of the creative burden of the midfield.

Without the attacking threat it had to be a shut up shop with a solid back 5 and midfield in front.
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,335
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers
Perfect storm of bad luck for PNut, both in terms of injuries and how Pat is set up to withstand what attacking threat remains. Both teams drafted really well I thought.
 

Lord SInister

Full Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2015
Messages
2,967
Location
where grasses are green and girls are pretty
without a natural striker and running wing forwards, I am finding it difficult to see how will P-Nut's team function when on offense. Neither Beckham nor Figo were those sorts of players, who can benefit from the creativity of Cruyff.
Unless if he plays as operates solely as a center forward, which I cannot see through the tactics.

This injuries have fcuked up Pnut.

My only issue with Pat's team is Guiltt in centerback, as good and versatile as he was, I do not think he is right person against peak Cruyff who will turn him inside out as soon as he sense it.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,622
Nice formation template there P-Nut. I might using it.

Anyway, I'd be fecked too if losing two strikers.
 

GodShaveTheQueen

We mean it man, we love our queen!
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Messages
6,434
Sorry @P-Nut , didn't expect the injuries to screw up someone this bad.

Without any injuries, I don't think Pat wins this against that juggernaut.

Pat earns my respect for playing Gullit the way he is though. Pretty sure he won't do this in the next round if he wins, but just doing the unusual when the opportunity presents itself is brilliant. Credits to @harms as well, great to see a compilation lead to a novel approach in a draft game.
 

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,645
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
Sorry @P-Nut , didn't expect the injuries to screw up someone this bad.

Without any injuries, I don't think Pat wins this against that juggernaut.

Pat earns my respect for playing Gullit the way he is though. Pretty sure he won't do this in the next round if he wins, but just doing the unusual when the opportunity presents itself is brilliant. Credits to @harms as well, great to see a compilation lead to a novel approach in a draft game.
Yeah luck was off, Pats side was always going to be tough so it's no big deal, I much prefer the drafting part of these drafts nowadays anyway :lol: