They did, but if that facilitated the signing of a good player, don't see the issue. Jury is out I guess, but so far, I like what I've seen.Think Hojlund signed with that agency and then joined us too. They'll have made a killing on that one.
They did, but if that facilitated the signing of a good player, don't see the issue. Jury is out I guess, but so far, I like what I've seen.Think Hojlund signed with that agency and then joined us too. They'll have made a killing on that one.
We didn’t lose this game because of takeover talks, we didn’t go down 0-2 to Forest in the first few minutes because of that, our inconsistent play since March or so is not because of these talks. These are just excuses.I think people are completely overlooking how big of a negative impact the takeover talk is having over the club.
That's an incredibly reductive way of looking at it. We lost this game because both the squad composition and mindset of the players is not right. Both these things are affected by the uncertainty of the ownership. The former because no-one at senior level knowing what the financial situation will be over the next 5 years means that decisions have to be made moment to moment in a piecemeal fashion rather than with a long term view.We didn’t lose this game because of takeover talks, we didn’t go down 0-2 to Forest in the first few minutes because of that, our inconsistent play since March or so is not because of these talks. These are just excuses.
Imagine there is a talk about takeover for the next couple of years. So, should these players continue to lose? I had changes in my management, but never anything like this. The President of our university quit after 30 years or so, then the Provost stepped down after a decade. Well, we all continued to do our jobs.
I dare say the pressure and scrutiny that come with your job isn’t exactly comparable with being a Utd player. And they aren’t excuses, look at us when Fergie announced his retirement the first time before reversing it, the drop and subsequent uplift in form are well documented.We didn’t lose this game because of takeover talks, we didn’t go down 0-2 to Forest in the first few minutes because of that, our inconsistent play since March or so is not because of these talks. These are just excuses.
Imagine there is a talk about takeover for the next couple of years. So, should these players continue to lose? I had changes in my management, but never anything like this. The President of our university quit after 30 years or so, then the Provost stepped down after a decade. Well, we all continued to do our jobs.
That is a great point. I've thought about how easy the players here have it and have had it for years, but if a takeover happens - especially Qatari (leaving aside other considerations) then their security at the club is likely gone.I think people are completely overlooking how big of a negative impact the takeover talk is having over the club. Just think of your own job, it’s inevitable that the focus and effort level, as well as the mood in the workplace would fluctuate or even plummet with mooted change of ownership. Despite how much they earn and how professional they are supposed to be, players are human at the end of day and they will be consciously or subconsciously affected by all the chatters and uncertainty surrounding the club, and I dare say that it’s quite impossible for any coach to get 100% of the response he wants in those circumstances.
We’ve been dealt a rotten hand this season by the club’s ownership and all the unfortunate off the field issues. This is a time to weather the storm and be patient. Look at Newcastle in the immediate pre and post takeover, basically the same group of players but they went from relegation fodder to solid mid table in a few months, and while Eddie Howe is a good manager, he wasn’t solely responsible for all that.
Isn't this the same thing that happened with Mourinho and Ole?Manchester United staff express concerns about growing involvement of Erik ten Hag’s agent Kees Vos in transfers
https://manutdnews.com/manchester-u...of-erik-ten-hags-agent-kees-vos-in-transfers/
Rasmus Hojlund joined SEG before he moved to Man United from Atalanta in the summer, while the agency also acted for the club during the negotiations over the loan signing of Morocco international midfielder Sofyan Amrabat from Fiorentina.
Zidane Iqbal also joined them some weeks before the Red Devils sold him to Utrecht, and the growing influence of Vos’ firm has left other agents unhappy as they reckon it would make them lose out on potential deals due to his strong relationship with Ten Hag.
In what way?Isn't this the same thing that happened with Mourinho and Ole?
Yeah. Under Mourinho a lot of players were in some way connected with Jorge Mendes, and under Ole it was Jim Solbakken if I recall correctly.In what way?
edit
Actually, I remember Ole signing loads of players from jim solbakken
Over the course of a season, sure. Other teams that don't have similar issues will eventually outperform us in the table.That's an incredibly reductive way of looking at it. We lost this game because both the squad composition and mindset of the players is not right. Both these things are affected by the uncertainty of the ownership. The former because no-one at senior level knowing what the financial situation will be over the next 5 years means that decisions have to be made moment to moment in a piecemeal fashion rather than with a long term view.
And the latter because these players know that half the senior management team might not even be there in 6 months time, making it hard to know what their future will be either. Bear in mind this is an insanely competitive world, which I suspect is unlike your (or my) workplace. For me, I could easily get by just putting in 80% effort for a few months and no-one could really tell. But in football even if you're giving less than maximum effort in training and recovery, it shows up in games.
The takeover is not the only factor, that's for sure. But uncertainty in any organisation is disruptive, and in a field where such fine margins make a tangible difference on the pitch, it certainly is detrimental.
I think that's just giving them excuses. The takeover barely makes the news there has been so little happening. It will have no effect on day to day training at the club.I think people are completely overlooking how big of a negative impact the takeover talk is having over the club. Just think of your own job, it’s inevitable that the focus and effort level, as well as the mood in the workplace would fluctuate or even plummet with mooted change of ownership. Despite how much they earn and how professional they are supposed to be, players are human at the end of day and they will be consciously or subconsciously affected by all the chatters and uncertainty surrounding the club, and I dare say that it’s quite impossible for any coach to get 100% of the response he wants in those circumstances.
We’ve been dealt a rotten hand this season by the club’s ownership and all the unfortunate off the field issues. This is a time to weather the storm and be patient. Look at Newcastle in the immediate pre and post takeover, basically the same group of players but they went from relegation fodder to solid mid table in a few months, and while Eddie Howe is a good manager, he wasn’t solely responsible for all that.
Manchester United staff (DoF and other titles for the sake of it) are expressing concerns about not doing their jobManchester United staff express concerns about growing involvement of Erik ten Hag’s agent Kees Vos in transfers
https://manutdnews.com/manchester-u...of-erik-ten-hags-agent-kees-vos-in-transfers/
Rasmus Hojlund joined SEG before he moved to Man United from Atalanta in the summer, while the agency also acted for the club during the negotiations over the loan signing of Morocco international midfielder Sofyan Amrabat from Fiorentina.
Zidane Iqbal also joined them some weeks before the Red Devils sold him to Utrecht, and the growing influence of Vos’ firm has left other agents unhappy as they reckon it would make them lose out on potential deals due to his strong relationship with Ten Hag.
The most sensible post I've seen on this forum in recent weeks.I think people are completely overlooking how big of a negative impact the takeover talk is having over the club. Just think of your own job, it’s inevitable that the focus and effort level, as well as the mood in the workplace would fluctuate or even plummet with mooted change of ownership. Despite how much they earn and how professional they are supposed to be, players are human at the end of day and they will be consciously or subconsciously affected by all the chatters and uncertainty surrounding the club, and I dare say that it’s quite impossible for any coach to get 100% of the response he wants in those circumstances.
We’ve been dealt a rotten hand this season by the club’s ownership and all the unfortunate off the field issues. This is a time to weather the storm and be patient. Look at Newcastle in the immediate pre and post takeover, basically the same group of players but they went from relegation fodder to solid mid table in a few months, and while Eddie Howe is a good manager, he wasn’t solely responsible for all that.
I think it's totally obvious that everyone except the manager is doing absolutely nothing within their role that might cause them any accountability and ultimately cost them their job. The DOF is now allowing managers to find, scout and sign his own players while he joins in for the negotiation phase. Just mental really.Manchester United staff (DoF and other titles for the sake of it) are expressing concerns about not doing their job![]()
This is the same reductive argument again. What happens on match day is a direct consequence of everything that goes before it. This isn't about just willing it to happen. If you aren't at your physical and mental peak, you underperform. I don't even think this is debatable. Like, what do people think the purpose of training actually is if it makes no difference to your performance? They're not just running laps to stay fit.Over the course of a season, sure. Other teams that don't have similar issues will eventually outperform us in the table.
But within any given game? I think you're being too easy on them. When a player has to go close down someone, they're not thinking about senior management. When Rashford is trying to make a decision whether to pass or shoot, he's not thinking about takeover talks. Actually the worry is he's not thinking at all. When ETH saw that his diamond formation was being overrun in the last game and did nothing to fix it, he was not being weighed down by the lack of a sporting director.
Even as a fan, I will be grumbling right until the whistle. Once the whistle goes at Old Trafford and we start to go forward, I'm excited. I forget all this rubbish. I'm sure professional players are capable of a decent amount of compartmentalisation too in those 90-100 minutes. At least they should be. If not, then it's on ETH for selecting them. He could've easily played a full B-team against Brighton and only been slightly worse off. Besides fecking off Ronaldo, I don't see much of this "bringing high standards" back that he's claimed to be doing.
Nagelsmann signs for the DFB now, he will be available again after the Euro next summer.Sack ETH, hire the german with the skateboard, watch him grind out a couple of wins, maybe win a cup or make a good CL run.
They do a bit of PR and that's about it.I think it's totally obvious that everyone except the manager is doing absolutely nothing within their role that might cause them any accountability and ultimately cost them their job. The DOF is now allowing managers to find, scout and sign his own players while he joins in for the negotiation phase. Just mental really.
Then ETH should say that none of them are training to their max potential because of these reasons, yet he chose to play them, and that too in a suboptimal formation. He should also front up about why he didn't want to work with Rangnick.This is the same reductive argument again. What happens on match day is a direct consequence of everything that goes before it. This isn't about just willing it to happen. If you aren't at your physical and mental peak, you underperform. I don't even think this is debatable. Like, what do people think the purpose of training actually is if it makes no difference to your performance? They're not just running laps to stay fit.
Sadly we will never get to find out why he didn't want to work with Rangnick. Especially frustrating when you look at the quality of players he suggested to us as well.Then ETH should say that none of them are training to their max potential because of these reasons, yet he chose to play them, and that too in a suboptimal formation. He should also front up about why he didn't want to work with Rangnick.
Instead, here he is, talking about VAR camera angles, or saying that Brighton also spend money, as if it's comparable in any way to us.
Is there any expectation for ETH you have that can't be dismissed by pointing at the club hierarchy and these issues? Would you say that regardless of the crap above the team, ETH should be finishing at least top-5? Top-8? Top-17? What is the bar for you below which these excuses about senior management just won't wash? I'm curious because it seems you can use it to excuse any outcome for however long you want.
I hardly think that stoking the fires of hate against the powers that be would help ETH get the job done, no matter what he may think privately.Then ETH should say that none of them are training to their max potential because of these reasons, yet he chose to play them, and that too in a suboptimal formation.
What has this got to do with anything we're talking about?He should also front up about why he didn't want to work with Rangnick.
I said right in my first post its not the only factor, so I don't know what you're going on about here.Is there any expectation for ETH you have that can't be dismissed by pointing at the club hierarchy and these issues? Would you say that regardless of the crap above the team, ETH should be finishing at least top-5? Top-8? Top-17? What is the bar for you below which these excuses about senior management just won't wash? I'm curious because it seems you can use it to excuse any outcome for however long you want.
Sancho, Maguire and Jones triple team.Sancho would be an interesting pick.
I tried explaining the idea of a player-manager to my 11yo, he looked at me like I was making it all up.Get rid now before he does more damage.
There's plenty of very good people available, Zidane, Conte, Lampard or even have a player manager, there's not.been one of those for a while. Sancho would be an interesting pick.
That is simply not true. He has some good sources that provide really good information.No - correct. That account has been dining out on a piece of information they got about a sleeve sponsorship deal five years ago. Every other bit of info they've received has not come to fruition unless they've jumped on the bandwagon of another journalist.
Why would a guy who lives in America who does youtube videos in his bedroom have inside info on United. It doesn't add up.
I believe that is the most acute problem at the club right now. It is why our squad has not improved since last summer.That's an incredibly reductive way of looking at it. We lost this game because both the squad composition and mindset of the players is not right. Both these things are affected by the uncertainty of the ownership. The former because no-one at senior level knowing what the financial situation will be over the next 5 years means that decisions have to be made moment to moment in a piecemeal fashion rather than with a long term view.
And the latter because these players know that half the senior management team might not even be there in 6 months time, making it hard to know what their future will be either. Bear in mind this is an insanely competitive world, which I suspect is unlike your (or my) workplace. For me, I could easily get by just putting in 80% effort for a few months and no-one could really tell. But in football even if you're giving less than maximum effort in training and recovery, it shows up in games.
The takeover is not the only factor, that's for sure. But uncertainty in any organisation is disruptive, and in a field where such fine margins make a tangible difference on the pitch, it certainly is detrimental.
The glazers have started their media machine in order to prepare the ground for ETH sacking.Manchester United staff express concerns about growing involvement of Erik ten Hag’s agent Kees Vos in transfers
https://manutdnews.com/manchester-u...of-erik-ten-hags-agent-kees-vos-in-transfers/
Rasmus Hojlund joined SEG before he moved to Man United from Atalanta in the summer, while the agency also acted for the club during the negotiations over the loan signing of Morocco international midfielder Sofyan Amrabat from Fiorentina.
Zidane Iqbal also joined them some weeks before the Red Devils sold him to Utrecht, and the growing influence of Vos’ firm has left other agents unhappy as they reckon it would make them lose out on potential deals due to his strong relationship with Ten Hag.
Spot on. All coming from the Glazers.This club and the people who work for it care more about their public image than our success. It's been like that since Woodward and it seems Arnold and Murtough are exactly the same and just as incompetent.
Get rid now before he does more damage.
There's plenty of very good people available, Zidane, Conte, Lampard or even have a player manager, there's not.been one of those for a while. Sancho would be an interesting pick.
Not a bad shout...but how about we save a few million and just promote Phil Jones to first team coach with Eni Aluko as the new dof.Get rid now before he does more damage.
There's plenty of very good people available, Zidane, Conte, Lampard or even have a player manager, there's not.been one of those for a while. Sancho would be an interesting pick.
Too early to tell since Mount, Höjlund and Amrabat have mostly been injured so far, but Höjlund aside I would be surprised if they improve our XI massively.I believe that is the most acute problem at the club right now. It is why our squad has not improved since last summer.