ETH on United philosophy: “Built a side to play direct football”… “Impossible to play like Ajax”

Lemon Moon

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
713
Location
Manchester
But he is very shite at it isn't it? With all these money spent on "direct football", he can't even get our players moving into opponents box.
Why have you put direct football in quotation marks? I agree though we haven't been very successful at playing direct this season so far. I'm not panicking though. I back him to turn things around.
 

Shakesy

WW Head of Recruiting
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
9,981
Location
Directly under the sun... NOW!
I thought Ole ball was terrible for the most part, but I'll always have fond memories of two periods of his time here.

First being his initial winning run. We weren't playing ground breaking stuff or anything, but we were pressing, playing fast, showing signs of link-up patterns, passing it out from the back with intent, etc. We weren't perfect at any of these aspects by any means, but it was refreshing to see signs of us implementing all of that into our play.

Second being that period of MMM. I thought those three linking up with Martial as a false 9 and Rashford and Greenwood as wide forwards provided some of the best football we produced post Fergie. It was no coincidence that, with those three, we had that period of winning penalty after penalty as they were a menace for defences. We finally had an attack that was fast, energetic, could dribble, could hold the ball under pressure which allowed us to pin teams back instead of constantly losing the ball in tight spaces, had periods of them interchanging, etc.
:(
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,659
No such thing as the United way. It was Sir Matt Busby and Sir Alex Ferguson’s way. Maybe Ten Hag should have the balls the play his way and if players don’t fit that style get rid. No player should be deemed indispensable. Look at Spurs now they got rid of Kane. The club has to stop pandering to players, there is far too much player power and it’s the same culprits time after time.
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
The problem is our players are much worse relative to our Premier League opponents than his players at Ajax were relative to theirs.
 

erikcred

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2022
Messages
1,729
No such thing as the United way. It was Sir Matt Busby and Sir Alex Ferguson’s way. Maybe Ten Hag should have the balls the play his way and if players don’t fit that style get rid. No player should be deemed indispensable. Look at Spurs now they got rid of Kane. The club has to stop pandering to players, there is far too much player power and it’s the same culprits time after time.
And there's the problem. No one knows what "his" way is. Even he doesn't seem to know which players fit and which don't. That's how a Dalot gets a new contract.
 

PeteRae

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 30, 2023
Messages
42
Explains it pretty well here. Doesn't want to go for a long ball counter attack and also talks about the players available. Hints at results being the priority too.
Rangnick was told this as well. Scrap the style of play and concentrate on winning.
 

Abraxas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
6,062
I think the issue he has with this line of argument is he has spent significant sums of money, some of which were at his behest rather than what looked like a more objective or collaborative process that trusted staff members in recruitment.

Now, that's fine, but then when you start coming out with the tools at your disposal as reasons it doesn't have the same credibility as it would if you walked into a mess (which we were) and had a bunch of players thrown at you Todd Boehly style. To be honest, I don't even have much sympathy for managers in that situation because that is quite literally the main aspect of your job - coach and improve players so irrespective of who the players are, a top coach should get more, demand more, coach and improve players.

Which comes to the next point. So you aren't happy that you don't have the tools to play your exact brand of football. Then okay, but surely you have to be able to see some kind of movement towards it. You are not going to go from shit to playing the ideal football immediately, especially if the players are a big problem as indicated. But you must be seeing a direction. That's under question in the current season.

It looks to me more like he had a decent season last year, some progress but not altogether convincing on the footballing side, but he has hit a complete brick wall with this summer's signings and injuries.
 

Lemon Moon

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
713
Location
Manchester
He doesn't coach possession football?
Could anyone with the likes of Maguire & McTominay ... ? We all know the players he's wanted to bring in and the players the club have been able to bring in. Your tag line is well suited (sorry couldn't help myself) Bar Antony the first team players we've signed permanently under him are decent but the majority of the team are not suited to possession based football which is the point I think he was trying to make with the Ajax comment. I also think that he wants/will move in the direction of more possession based football as he's able to properly assemble the squad he needs.
 

giggs-beckham

Clueless
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
6,965
Could anyone with the likes of Maguire & McTominay ... ? We all know the players he's wanted to bring in and the players the club have been able to bring in. Your tag line is well suited (sorry couldn't help myself) Bar Antony the first team players we've signed permanently under him are decent but the majority of the team are not suited to possession based football which is the point I think he was trying to make with the Ajax comment. I also think that he wants/will move in the direction of more possession based football as he's able to properly assemble the squad he needs.
He's signed many players and we don't look any better in possession than 18 months ago. Hardly clueless because you disagree.
 

Lemon Moon

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
713
Location
Manchester
He's signed many players and we don't look any better in possession than 18 months ago. Hardly clueless because you disagree.
Haha sorry couldn't help the tag line jibe.
I feel its more on the players not able to take on the coaching than the coach not able to coach. Same core of players different manager, SAME STORY!
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
6,787
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
I think the issue he has with this line of argument is he has spent significant sums of money, some of which were at his behest rather than what looked like a more objective or collaborative process that trusted staff members in recruitment.

Now, that's fine, but then when you start coming out with the tools at your disposal as reasons it doesn't have the same credibility as it would if you walked into a mess (which we were) and had a bunch of players thrown at you Todd Boehly style. To be honest, I don't even have much sympathy for managers in that situation because that is quite literally the main aspect of your job - coach and improve players so irrespective of who the players are, a top coach should get more, demand more, coach and improve players.

Which comes to the next point. So you aren't happy that you don't have the tools to play your exact brand of football. Then okay, but surely you have to be able to see some kind of movement towards it. You are not going to go from shit to playing the ideal football immediately, especially if the players are a big problem as indicated. But you must be seeing a direction. That's under question in the current season.

It looks to me more like he had a decent season last year, some progress but not altogether convincing on the footballing side, but he has hit a complete brick wall with this summer's signings and injuries.
It’s just so backwards. If we wanted someone to come in to play more direct/transition football we would have hired a manager that thrives in that style, not the guy that played Pep stylen expansive modern possession style with Ajax. And unless he’s strictly being told he’s not allowed to sell certain players, it’s completely on him.
 

Lemon Moon

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
713
Location
Manchester
It’s just so backwards. If we wanted someone to come in to play more direct/transition football we would have hired a manager that thrives in that style, not the guy that played Pep stylen expansive modern possession style with Ajax. And unless he’s strictly being told he’s not allowed to sell certain players, it’s completely on him.
This would make sense if he'd been in the job for a few seasons. Everyone expecting a miracle over night. So Chelsea esk...
He's been here 18 months.
 

Winrar

Full Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
12,840
Location
Maryland
I would be more sympathetic if this was his first season, but he’s making excuses already.

1. He’s had 3 transfer windows to address this.
2. He should be able to coach most of the existing players to address this. Again, he’s had 3 transfer windows to get rid of those that couldn’t be coached to play how he wants. Is 16 months not enough time to drill the players to play how you want?
 
Last edited:

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,659
And there's the problem. No one knows what "his" way is. Even he doesn't seem to know which players fit and which don't. That's how a Dalot gets a new contract.
We do. It’s 4-3-3 Dutch total football. The problem is we had a squad of players that didn’t suit his style. It’s a bad appointment yet again by the board. You either have to get rid of an entire squad to fit the managers style or get in a manager that can use some base of the squad.
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,761
Location
US
Ajax never played a possession style of football in that sense like LvG, they just happened to have most possession from the way they played. It was very much based on vertical passing, not sideways boring passing like LVG. LvG vs EtH was very different styles which both ended up with the majority of possession.
Every team plays sideways and vertical passes. Except for Carrick and Blind, LvG had no players to play through the lines. Therefore, too many safe passes.

Just like how Ten Hag can’t play Ajax footy with MU. We can’t even play out of the back right now, despite Onana.