Europe's Eight Biggest Spenders Over the Past Decade

Discussion in 'Football Forum' started by GM K, May 2, 2018.

  1. May 2, 2018
    #1

    GM K Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2017
    Messages:
    4,577
    I stumbled upon an interesting list of the top 8 transfer spending clubs in Europe in the last 10 years.
    Does the amount spent on transfers by clubs explain their achievements?

    Here's the list in the order of the lowest spender of the 8 to the highest spender:


    8. Juventus - 811 million pounds

    7. Liverpool - 820 million pounds

    6. Real Madrid - 862 million pounds

    5. Manchester United - 898 million pounds

    4. Chelsea - 1 billion pounds

    3. PSG - 1.01 billion pounds

    2. Barcelona - 1.015 billion pounds

    1. Manchester City - 1.4 billion pounds


    https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/f...ade-clubs-teams-Premier-League-sportgalleries
    Last edited: May 2, 2018
  2. May 2, 2018
    #2

    Coxy Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,357
    Location:
    Derby
    The last decade doesn't really say much though - who you bought 10 years ago might have moved on by now - so it doesn't give an indication about 'current' achievements for me. Just who has spent the most.

    The last 5 years is better - as all the players should still be playing with you etc.
  3. May 2, 2018
    #3

    OldSchoolManc Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,217
    Just goes to emphasise what an empty, plastic club City are.
    Nothing without the oil money. All their titles are hollow victories.
  4. May 2, 2018
    #4

    RoyH1 Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2014
    Messages:
    2,207
    Location:
    DKNY
    Is it net spend?

    Interesting to see Barcelona up there. For all it's vaunted and celebrated football academy, they are avid shoppers of talent.

    Juventus and Bayern get a lot of bang for their buck
  5. May 2, 2018
    #5

    Liver_bird Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2015
    Messages:
    5,019
    Location:
    England
    Supports:
    Liverpool
    These stats are pretty pointless without net spend.
  6. May 2, 2018
    #6

    ClaytonBlackmoorLeftPeg Full Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2017
    Messages:
    2,668
    Net spend would give a more complete picture. How much have Barcelona spent in the last 12 months? I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the same as the previous 5-6 together, but only because they got £200m for Neymar.
  7. May 2, 2018
    #7

    ashfritz New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2018
    Messages:
    69
    Supports:
    Liverpool
    Not sure it's a valid argument, net spending is much more indicative. It puts Liverpool at no.7, yet we have sold some big names in their prime along the way (Torres, Suarez, Sterling, Coutinho, Alonso for roughly £350m, plus some of the fees recouped on Carroll, Benteke, Sakho).

    Of course we have had more than our fair share of duds along the way, but I doubt we have been anywhere near PSG, City, Madrid in terms of net spending, which is a ranking I would be very interested to see.

    Googled this:

    https://talksport.com/football/ever...pend-over-last-five-seasons-170902252966?p=31

    Interactive shows all 32 UCL clubs net spend, while Liverpool are still 8th, we are at a fraction of the top 5 teams, and our net spend has since decreased with the sale of Coutinho.
  8. May 2, 2018
    #8

    redman5 Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,793
    Location:
    In a world of my own. People know me here.
  9. May 2, 2018
    #9

    JohnnyKills Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2016
    Messages:
    4,929
    United are quite far down this list because we didn't spend much in comparison to other big clubs for the first half of this 10-year period.

    If you looked at the last five years we'd be pushing for the no.1 spot.

    City's spending is ridiculous though. 300 million more than anyone else! They should have won far more than their three PL titles.
  10. May 2, 2018
    #10

    Blackwidow Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,153
    Try it with this - seasons 08/09 to 17/18

    https://www.transfermarkt.com/statistik/einnahmenausgaben

    # Club Expenditures - Income - Balance
    1 Manchester City 1,59 Bill. € - 408,91 Mill. € - -1.183,74 Mill. €
    2 Paris Saint-Germain 970,05 Mill. € - 254,00 Mill. € - -716,05 Mill. €
    3 Manchester United 1,02 Bill. € - 366,39 Mill. € - -652,20 Mill. €
    4 FC Barcelona 1,15 Bill. € - 594,59 Mill. € - -558,45 Mill. €
    5 Chelsea FC 1,14 Bill. € - 741,47 Mill. € - -395,83 Mill. €
    6 Real Madrid 977,70 Mill. € - 616,15 Mill. € - -361,55 Mill. €
    7 Bayern Munich 605,00 Mill. € - 251,90 Mill. € - -353,10 Mill. €
    8 Juventus FC 922,44 Mill. € - 609,96 Mill. € - -312,48 Mill. €
    9 AC Milan 616,12 Mill. € - 375,93 Mill. € - -240,19 Mill. €
    10 SSC Napoli 549,34 Mill. € - 323,00 Mill. € - -226,34 Mill. €
    11 Liverpool FC 932,46 Mill. € - 706,62 Mill. € - -225,84 Mill. €
    12 Inter Milan 751,46 Mill. € - 526,98 Mill. € - -224,48 Mill. €
    13 Arsenal FC 617,25 Mill. € - 402,24 Mill. € - -215,01 Mill. €
    14 Stoke City 288,28 Mill. € - 82,61 Mill. € - -205,67 Mill. €
    15 Zenit St. Petersburg 414,20 Mill. € - 209,97 Mill. € - -204,23 Mill. €
    16 Hebei China Fortune 169,27 Mill. € - -0 - -169,27 Mill. €
    17 Crystal Palace 249,66 Mill. € - 88,63 Mill. € - -161,03 Mill. €
    18 Shanghai SIPG 168,35 Mill. € - 10,08 Mill. € - -158,27 Mill. €
    19 RB Leipzig 183,71 Mill. € - 26,54 Mill. € - -157,17 Mill. €
    20 Fenerbahce SK 244,41 Mill. € - 92,96 Mill. € - -151,45 Mill. €
    21 Everton FC 488,67 Mill. € - 339,57 Mill. € - -149,10 Mill. €
    22 Leicester City 285,19 Mill. € - 138,23 Mill. € - -146,96 Mill. €
    23 West Bromwich Albion 229,74 Mill. € - 87,40 Mill. € - -142,34 Mill. €
    24 Jiangsu Suning 168,10 Mill. € - 27,56 Mill. € - -140,54 Mill. €
    25 Aston Villa 375,51 Mill. € - 239,06 Mill. € - -136,45 Mill. €
  11. May 2, 2018
    #11

    FlawlessThaw most 'know it all' poster

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    Messages:
    27,390
    Doesn't have to be about 'current' achievements, could also be about output over the past 10 years.
  12. May 2, 2018
    #12

    donkeyfish Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Messages:
    7,869
    Location:
    Plumbus - Uncompromising and Innovative
    820 million pounds for the League Cup and the Premier League Asia trophy. Pretty good.
  13. May 2, 2018
    #13

    Sassy Colin Death or the gladioli!

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2010
    Messages:
    50,703
    Location:
    Aliens are in control of my tagline & location
    Going on about net spend again :lol:
  14. May 2, 2018
    #14

    VeevaVee despite the protests, wears Ugg boots Scout

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    32,688
    Net spend is bullshit. Just because you bought someone before the market went nuts then sold them for a ridiculous fee.
  15. May 2, 2018
    #15

    VeevaVee despite the protests, wears Ugg boots Scout

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    32,688
    Also, the likes of Chelsea, City and PSG have meant everyone else's spending has needed to skyrocket too because they fecked the market and made it even more necessary to keep up.
  16. May 2, 2018
    #16

    P-Nut fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2015
    Messages:
    15,501
    Location:
    Oldham, Greater Manchester
    Shock a thread about spending has been took over by the Liverpool net spend boys. You'll always have the net spend trophy guys don't worry.
  17. May 2, 2018
    #17

    Fingeredmouse Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2014
    Messages:
    2,297
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Stoke 14th on that list above. Oh my word.
  18. May 2, 2018
    #18

    Member 90678 Guest

    Net spend scousers:lol:
    Buy talented young players, coach them and sell them in their prime or just before they get the best years from them!
    Fail to win domestic trophies, rinse and repeat.
    Would really cheese me off but hey they are net spend champions!
  19. May 2, 2018
    #19

    esmufc07 Won the Grand National Sweepstake once Scout

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    34,000
    I'm surprised Barcelona are so high. I honestly can't think of that many signings? I remember Ibra and Chrgynsky being around £90m or so. And Neymar obviously. Struggling to remember many other signings
  20. May 2, 2018
    #20

    Eboue nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    53,744
    Location:
    Hillary Clinton has been my friend for a decade
    Supports:
    Arsenal
    Shock a supporter of a club rich enough to not have to sell doesn't understand what most other clubs have to deal with.
  21. May 2, 2018
    #21

    Aurell New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2018
    Messages:
    90
    Supports:
    Football
    Oh ok so it's bullshit because they managed to sell with a good price Coutinho. Well Martial, Shaw and Lindelof didn't cost that much. So now that the market became nuts, you could easily go down of 3/4 places with the money you're going to have

    Plus, the clubs bought Carroll for ~40M, Coutinho and Dembele for ~ 250, Higuain for 90 while in the same time Lvp, FCB and Juventus were selling Torres, Neymar and Pogba.
    That's simply a commercial logic

    Even for Pobga it's not relevant. Because when juve took him he's really worth nothing and took some value by his own.


    And when you say everyone spends more because of Chelsea and PSG or City
    You mean that it's because PSG bought Verratti (15M) and Pastore (- 40M) plus Krychowiak and everyone else that 2 years ago MU bought Pogba 90 or that one season dude Martial +50 M

    Thanksfully after that some players like Coman, Bernardo and Sané were still available for a reasonable amount...
    And Actually if we count bonus, Martial would be the record arrival for Chelsea. Like Angel, Lukaku and Pogba. There was also Mata and Matic who were pretty expensive. The only club which is spending more seems to be MU (not the case for real, Bayern, Juve...)
    Last edited: May 4, 2018
  22. May 2, 2018
    #22

    Dolf Full Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2016
    Messages:
    2,217
    Location:
    Amsterdam
  23. May 2, 2018
    #23

    VeevaVee despite the protests, wears Ugg boots Scout

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    32,688
    What the feck are you talking about?
  24. May 2, 2018
    #24

    ivaldo Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    22,354
    Oh... What?
  25. May 2, 2018
    #25

    Jeffthered Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,261

    If this is accurate, then you have to really take your hat off for Spurs and Daniel Levy. They are about to move into a new stadium too.
  26. May 3, 2018
    #26

    P-Nut fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2015
    Messages:
    15,501
    Location:
    Oldham, Greater Manchester
    I fully understand it just enjoy laughing at scousers.
  27. May 3, 2018
    #27

    trafford1980 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2013
    Messages:
    213
    Gibberish.
  28. May 3, 2018
    #28

    Avocado Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2014
    Messages:
    2,746
    Supports:
    FCPorto
    Sorry I didn't get who Lvp is? Louis Van Paaul, perhaps?
  29. May 3, 2018
    #29

    Cezzine New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2014
    Messages:
    127
    Supports:
    Real Madrid
    Of course Liverpool is not anywhere near Real Madrid.

    According to the link you posted Liverpool is 8th with 150.5 millions vs Madrid's 66 millions.

    And that is after you sold Coutinho for a ridiculous amount of money, and Madrid has not sold James Rodriguez.

    Madrid hasn't spend anything the last years. In fact, since the WC in 2014 that they bought James for 80 million euros, they have recieved more money for sold players than what they have spent buying.