Football phrases that grinds your gears

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,815
Winning the league requires a lot more than just points. There is a lot more pressure when you are on top. Sustaining that and not bottling it to actually win the league is a big difference than just finishing second with the same amount of points. That's exactly why I think it's stupid.

A team that gets more points but finishes 5th is not the same as a team that finished top 4 with less points.
I think progress has to be measured in things that are actually within your own control. League position is a very flawed way of looking at things because in large part it depends on the teams around you. Was Solskjaer's 19/20 United team just as good as Pep's 16/17 City side? Was it better than Klopp's 17/18 Liverpool? I don't think so, even though it finished third.

It's perfectly possible to improve massively without actually improving your league position. And vice versa. I think United went backwards from 2009/10 to 2010/11 but improved its league position because Chelsea were nowhere near as good as the previous season.
 

Daydreamer

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
1,337
Supports
Arsenal
Yeah, that makes more sense, as it shows that something is being affected by a happening yet is not disturbed by it quite as much.

Thanks.
Resistance is rarely absolute, it's almost always relative. Try typing "relative resistance" into Google (the quotation marks ensure that it is an exact phrase match). My search a moment ago delivered over 770,000 matches.
 

Daydreamer

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
1,337
Supports
Arsenal
There are clearly degrees of resistance, I'm sure we can all agree.
Indeed it is. That's why you can measure resistance. If the only definition of resistance was absolute, this wouldn't be the case.
 

Peelhead

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 25, 2022
Messages
96
Heard it last night and have never understood where it came from.

"He didn't get enough purchase on it?".
This is a good one imo. I know where it comes from, it's the Force imparted by using a lever to loosen something but why that has anything to do with the beautiful game.

Sounds like someone is just trying to absolutely lump it into orbit. Hardly tippy-tappy tiki-taka.
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
Resistance is rarely absolute, it's almost always relative. Try typing "relative resistance" into Google (the quotation marks ensure that it is an exact phrase match). My search a moment ago delivered over 770,000 matches.
It's absolute when used as such, like 'that player is press resistant'
That's an absolute.
'that player is press resilient ' is a far better option and means far more.
 

Daydreamer

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
1,337
Supports
Arsenal
It's absolute when used as such, like 'that player is press resistant'
That's an absolute.
'that player is press resilient ' is a far better option and means far more.
You’re engaging in circular reasoning. The point being made by several people is that the phrase “press resistant” is not absolute because the word “resistant” is rarely absolute. You seem to be arguing that it is absolute… because it is.

Almost all references to resistance are relative. Heat resistance, air resistance, electrical resistance, toxin resistance. A thing can be more or less resistant than another thing. That’s the very definition of relative and the opposite of an absolute.

Humour me; Google “relative resistance”. Have a read of one of the thousands of papers and articles containing the phrase. I think you’ll find it interesting.
 

Oscar Bonavena

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2022
Messages
1,281
Location
Ireland
I'm sure it's come up somewhere in the 29 pages and I couldn't be arsed looking for it, but I despise the term "bragging rights".
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
You’re engaging in circular reasoning. The point being made by several people is that the phrase “press resistant” is not absolute because the word “resistant” is rarely absolute. You seem to be arguing that it is absolute… because it is.

Almost all references to resistance are relative. Heat resistance, air resistance, electrical resistance, toxin resistance. A thing can be more or less resistant than another thing. That’s the very definition of relative and the opposite of an absolute.

Humour me; Google “relative resistance”. Have a read of one of the thousands of papers and articles containing the phrase. I think you’ll find it interesting.
To use resistant implies that person is not affected by press.
Yet they are.
They have to amend their play, their outcomes and choices based on the press. Hence they are affected by it.
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
Another phrase I've seen today in here:

'First phase midfielder'

That is complete hogwash to me.
I can understand phases of play, but a 'first phase' player simply does not exist, if it did then that midfielder is only doing part of their job.
 

ElCuddlos

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
65
The use of "at the double" whenever someone scores two goals. It's so overused in football journalism but is almost never used in real life as it is so antiquated. Do young people even know what it refers to any more?
 

LDUred

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
1,856
A lot of these cliches state the obvious and one that springs to mind is, 'he won't be happy when he watches that back in the dressing room...' Like first of all it's totally obvious that he 'won't be happy' and secondly do players ever watch themselves missing chances, getting sent off unless the coach forces them to in training? It's not exactly the first thing they'll do.
 
Last edited:

AdamColeBebe

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
1,064
Supports
Man Utd
The use of "at the double" whenever someone scores two goals. It's so overused in football journalism but is almost never used in real life as it is so antiquated. Do young people even know what it refers to any more?
Tell us Grandad
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,160
The use of "at the double" whenever someone scores two goals. It's so overused in football journalism but is almost never used in real life as it is so antiquated. Do young people even know what it refers to any more?
Is that phrase ever used?
 

Bertie Wooster

Full Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
2,944
A "honest player" is a description that I don't really like.

In theory, it should be a huge compliment - implying the player has more scruples or ethics than others, and plays fairly by the rules unlike 'dishonest' ones.

In reality, what it's actually used for is to describe a player with limited abilities but whose main attribute is to run around a lot, or 'put themselves about' physically as a pretty rough player.

You're not going to hear it near the top of the list of attributes of many Ballon d'Or candidates, as you start with far more impressive ones before working down to that as almost a last resort. It's the equivalent of those trophies they give to pretty poor but enthusiastic players at club level like 'clubman of the year'.
 
Last edited:

Swearing Budgie

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
1,044
When a commentator says “he needs to be putting that between the goals” or “he’s got his back to his own goals”.

Andy Townsend was a serial offender.
 

sean9988

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 26, 2018
Messages
22
im sure its been mentioned already, but I cant stand describing a player as a "rolls royce". always seems to be about van dijk!
 

tenpoless

No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
16,329
Location
Ole's ipad
Supports
4-4-2 classic
"Last goal win the game" said at the 90th+ minute with no team currently winning. Shut the feck up.
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,421
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
A "honest player" is a description that I don't really like.

In theory, it should be a huge compliment - implying the player has more scruples or ethics than others, and plays fairly by the rules unlike 'dishonest' ones.

In reality, what it's actually used for is to describe a player with limited abilities but whose main attribute is to run around a lot, or 'put themselves about' physically as a pretty rough player.

You're not going to hear it near the top of the list of attributes of many Ballon d'Or candidates, as you start with far more impressive ones before working down to that as almost a last resort. It's the equivalent of those trophies they give to pretty poor but enthusiastic players at club level like 'clubman of the year'.
I'm glad that's not just me. You get it in other sports too, say when someone is getting battered at snooker or darts but keeps trying their best, 'keeping their opponent honest'. Not sure why it's not 'honest' to beat an opponent who has capitulated because you've battered them into submission.

It's generally used by the same calibre of pundit who says 'stonewall' penalty, demonstrating they have a loose grasp of the definitions of words of more than one syllable.