He's still in prison for other things. Suspect he won't see the light of day for some time.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If it wasn't admissible, it's a pretty big feck up to allow it. He's still serving 16 years isn't he?Hard to argue with the decision, even if it's something we don't like to see. Typically that type of testimony isn't admissible.
He'll go on trial again and if the relevant evidence is sound will be convicted. And he's in jail already.
For now.If it wasn't admissible, it's a pretty big feck up to allow it. He's still serving 16 years isn't he?
That's what happens when the court allows public opinion to influence it's actions. For no other crime is unrelated testimony admissable in court.If it wasn't admissible, it's a pretty big feck up to allow it. He's still serving 16 years isn't he?
For sure. He's serving 16 years for another case in California.If it wasn't admissible, it's a pretty big feck up to allow it. He's still serving 16 years isn't he?
Cynical me says he’ll come out of Bellvue still with the Zimmer frame but he’ll be doing cartwheels in no time.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date