Kind of, although there's been some VAR decisions that overrule the ref, or sometimes non-decisions by VAR that agree with him that were bollocks too.So what this shows, in short, is that referees make a lot of terrible on field calls that severely influence the way the table is shaped, and with these terrible calls being corrected, things are different? What a revelation.
There have been, but again, VAR doesn't make the decisions, referees do. VAR is just a tool. By and large VAR has been a net positive, in terms of correcting things that the on field referees miss.Kind of, although there's been some VAR decisions or sometimes non-decisions by VAR that were bollocks too.
It is what it is.It’s a flawed analysis because decisions are made differently with VAR. I.e refs are less likely to make decisions that are covered by VAR than they used to.