Is a striker enough to make us an 80+ league goal team?

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,839
I don't like the idea of buying Kane but given we are desperate for goals and he is a proven striker in the EPL, I think the money should be spent on him.
....and writing that hurts like hell, because I don't believe he'll make a huge difference to us, but there are not many EPL-proven strikers available for less.
I also think that we must ship out the deadwood or just pay out their contracts.
Players like Martial, Bailly, DVD Beek are next to useless and we should at least get some money for this deadood.
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,839
I always thought the same about Aguero and he hung around like a bad smell.
Hahah. Yeah, Haaland will stay for a few years before moving to a club like Madrid. I don't see why he would want to move, as long as he is winning trebles and is at the best team in the World.
 

Devil You Know

New Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2023
Messages
1,225
Location
bed
Adding a 30 goal striker won't necessarily increase our total goal output by 30 goals.

So I don't think we need a someone to make up the difference on his own. What we need is someone who can bring out the best in what we've already got, while scoring the bare minimum that Wout/Martial failed to achieve.

I think a target man who can bring Rashford and Bruno into play will be the most productive option. Let's not forget that Bruno is one of the most prolific midfielders in Europe when he's properly unleashed. Rashford is a 30 goal per season player at his best. Mount can get 10+. Antony, Garnacho and Amad are all dangerous around the edge of the box when there's a CF pulling defenders around. Casemiro is a threat at corners if there's a big man next to him bullying opposition markers.

Even someone like Welbeck would transform this team into 70+ goal scorers. Only a slightly better forward would be enough to tip us over into 80+. We need a Firmino type player more than an Osimhen type player imo.
 

Oh_Dear

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 28, 2023
Messages
34
If the aim is to win a cup, then splunk the money on a striker. If the aim is to build towards challenging for the Premier, then I'd rather see us continuing to invest in getting a balanced squad with real depth (2 decent options for each position) as it's such a long season.

For me, bringing in 2 midfielders to replace 2 out of VDB and McFred; 1 CB to replace Maguire, and 1 GK to replace De Gea are higher priorities.
 

032Devil

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2004
Messages
22,146
A striker, a modern goalie comfortable playing out from the back and a CM and then maybe
We need more than 'a' striker - at least two to start with. All players have drop off form or injuries. To suggest Rashford + another is not enough.
 

fergiewherearethou

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2022
Messages
1,602
Location
Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubuna
Supports
Erik ten Hag
If the aim is to win a cup, then splunk the money on a striker. If the aim is to build towards challenging for the Premier, then I'd rather see us continuing to invest in getting a balanced squad with real depth (2 decent options for each position) as it's such a long season.

For me, bringing in 2 midfielders to replace 2 out of VDB and McFred; 1 CB to replace Maguire, and 1 GK to replace De Gea are higher priorities.
What about the ST position? We have 0 decent options there. Where is the balance in that?
 

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,200
No we don't play good enough football because our midfield isn't good enough. We need someone in there beside case and Bruno that elevates our play. Improving a GK and RB would also help.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,026
League goals only:
  • Striker - 15-25
  • Rashford - 15-20
  • Bruno - 10
  • Antony - 5-10
  • Sancho/Garnacho - 10 combined
  • Deep midfielders - 5-10 combined
  • Defenders - 5 combined
So that's a range of 65 - 90 goals I'd guess from our group with a good striker next season. Average of 77.5. I wouldn't say any of these are aggressive estimates either.

Another (math) way to look at things - we had 71.9 league xG last season. Arsenal had 76.5. Arsenal scored 88 (15% overperformance), United scored 58 (19% underperformance). Add a competent striker to pump us up 5-10 xG more than what Ronaldo/Weghorst/Martial combined for (11.69 xG) while accepting Rashford loses a bit as he's not the sole focus (he was at 18.76, drop him down by 4 or so for a net increase of 7-8 xG) brings us basically right to 80xG for next season.

Even if it's not spread out quite the same, I'm pretty confident in us getting around 80xG next season as long as we sign a striker who is capable of doing 15+ xG (which literally Martial was halfway there by playing 1/3 of the minutes of Rashford and Bruno, and being pretty mediocre). Then it's on putting away your chances more often which I'd say is more just vibes.
Forgot Amad - 17
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
29,974
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
We need more than 'a' striker - at least two to start with. All players have drop off form or injuries. To suggest Rashford + another is not enough.
Well obviously in an ideal world we would need cover there because Rashford isn't a CF and we don't have any CF's we can rely on but someone like Kane can play 50 games a season and would play most weeks in the PL.

However, another CF is much lower on the list of priorities for me.
 

miked99

Full Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2016
Messages
862
No chance. Not without a sharp improvement in our creativity. We struggle to create good chances in games.

How many times do you see this scenario? We arrive on the corner of the oppositions box, player A has got the ball. There's not really much on, so he gives a half-hearted two foot sideways or backwards pass to player B who looks around for a second and then just knocks it straight back to player A again, who clearly didn't want it back. You can almost see the mental shrugging. Player A then passes it 15 yards backwards to the centre half and in the meantime the opposition are set in position with their cigars out. This has been a 'feature' of our play for years and until we get better we aren't going to suddenly become free scoring no matter who is up front. A good striker would help to a degree, but this idea that'll we suddenly transform beyond recognition seems fanciful to say the least.

That said, maybe we don't need bucket loads of extra goals. 58 goals is a dismal tally, yet we still came third. How many times did we come unstuck for the want of a single goal? Even in games we won, we couldn't kill teams off and so couldn't relax, we couldn't take players off, couldn't play in second or third gear like city do and it takes it's toll. Even just a decent improvement in goals scored would help immensely.
 

AndySmith1990

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
6,206
Other than Rashford and the potential of Garnacho I don't think our attack has much quality. Martial and Sancho are hopeless, and Antony is too one dimensional and too one footed to be very effective. They're all quite thick, too, and often make terrible decisions that mess up decent chances.

A world class striker will help us score more goals, but it won't be enough to score enough to win the league. I think we need an upgrade on the right wing too
 

gerdm07

Thinks we should have kept Pereira
Joined
Aug 8, 2011
Messages
2,751
We still need a better midfield even with a top striker. Secondly, we need a more attacking RB.
 

Banana Republic

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 16, 2018
Messages
1,376
We’re not going to be seriously challenging to win the EPL or UCL anytime soon, without a major upgrade to our midfield and an improvement to our wide attacking play.
We will struggle to even retain a top 4 finishing spot, without goal scoring strikers.
If Martial is offloaded…and it’s long overdue…we have 0 players for the CF position.
One new striker/CF won’t be enough.

.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
For me Kane is a creator and a goal scorer.

So it’s more about if a goalscoring RW returns to our first team.

Rashford-Kane-GS RW​

is an 80 goal team.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,891
Location
England
The teams that score the most goals are also the teams who are best in build up, which allows them to commit their entire team in the opponent's half. You can bring in a striker but if the build up is weak then the more proactive teams will throw a spanner in the works with their proactive pressing. And in the season just gone, the strategy for the opponent was simple, press the outfield players and make them play the ball back to De Gea who will then give it away.

We've scored 70+ goals in the league with Lukaku in the team. But imo we can potentially score 90+ if we can improve our build up play and setup in a compact high block where the high press also becomes very threatening for the opponent. That's what we need to develop and that's what I believe EtH is working towards.

Gk, CM, Striker for the system to develop.
 

Oh_Dear

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 28, 2023
Messages
34
What about the ST position? We have 0 decent options there. Where is the balance in that?
That's my point. ETH took over a squad that was horribly unbalanced and lacking depth. It's unrealistic to expect us to fix all the issues in 2 transfer windows so whatever we do will leave us with weaknesses in the squad somewhere. We could spend everything we have this window on just fixing the striker position (given the prices being suggested to get a Kane, Osimhen or whatever), but I'd rather use this window to fix a series of other positions. That's all.
 

TheRedHearted

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
2,668
Location
New York, NY
80 league goals should always be the minimum goal for a manchester united team. It's a total we haven't hit since Fergie retired - it's a total, he himself seldom failed to hit.

Would signing a striker be enough to make us score 80+ league goals, in your opinion? If not, where else do we need the goals coming from?
I think it’s important to see how the potential strikers score their goals- are the assist similar to assist we are currently creating, can create etc? Our main creator is Bruno, couldn’t even tell you who our second is. Seems like our striker needs to be a creator as well, feeding rashford and Bruno
 

Kopral Jono

Full Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
3,418
A world class striker in the mould of Kane will (in the short term) paper over the cracks we have elsewhere and make us a competitive, 80+ league goal team instantly, no doubt. This is why getting a top quality striker should ideally be prioritised over replacing De Gea or even signing a midfielder if we are serious on winning any kind of silverware next season.
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,279
Location
NYC
A new GK probably will allow us score at least 15 more goals. With a new striker and a new midfielder. It can be day and night improvement further.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
13,976
Kane = +30
Pretty simple, isn’t it?

Even if you discount by 7 the goals that Martial (permacrock), Ronaldo (gone, but let’s play along) and Wout (soon to be gone), Kane significantly improves everyone around him.

Yes of course we would like to upgrade on 5 or 6 positions, and perhaps we will, but we will remain stuck in second gear scraping top four at best, if we don’t upgrade at 9.
 

jm99

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
4,667
No chance. Not without a sharp improvement in our creativity. We struggle to create good chances in games.

How many times do you see this scenario? We arrive on the corner of the oppositions box, player A has got the ball. There's not really much on, so he gives a half-hearted two foot sideways or backwards pass to player B who looks around for a second and then just knocks it straight back to player A again, who clearly didn't want it back. You can almost see the mental shrugging. Player A then passes it 15 yards backwards to the centre half and in the meantime the opposition are set in position with their cigars out. This has been a 'feature' of our play for years and until we get better we aren't going to suddenly become free scoring no matter who is up front. A good striker would help to a degree, but this idea that'll we suddenly transform beyond recognition seems fanciful to say the least.

That said, maybe we don't need bucket loads of extra goals. 58 goals is a dismal tally, yet we still came third. How many times did we come unstuck for the want of a single goal? Even in games we won, we couldn't kill teams off and so couldn't relax, we couldn't take players off, couldn't play in second or third gear like city do and it takes it's toll. Even just a decent improvement in goals scored would help immensely.
It depends though, kane would certainly improve creativity as well for us. We had an xG of 71.9 as well so you have to think a proper finisher would take us about 70
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,093
No chance. Not without a sharp improvement in our creativity. We struggle to create good chances in games.

How many times do you see this scenario? We arrive on the corner of the oppositions box, player A has got the ball. There's not really much on, so he gives a half-hearted two foot sideways or backwards pass to player B who looks around for a second and then just knocks it straight back to player A again, who clearly didn't want it back. You can almost see the mental shrugging. Player A then passes it 15 yards backwards to the centre half and in the meantime the opposition are set in position with their cigars out. This has been a 'feature' of our play for years and until we get better we aren't going to suddenly become free scoring no matter who is up front. A good striker would help to a degree, but this idea that'll we suddenly transform beyond recognition seems fanciful to say the least.

That said, maybe we don't need bucket loads of extra goals. 58 goals is a dismal tally, yet we still came third. How many times did we come unstuck for the want of a single goal? Even in games we won, we couldn't kill teams off and so couldn't relax, we couldn't take players off, couldn't play in second or third gear like city do and it takes it's toll. Even just a decent improvement in goals scored would help immensely.
We do if we want to make football an enjoyable experience to watch for fans. Manchester United used to be the team you tuned into to watch a few goals every week - moreso than any other team in the country.

We're one of the most boring clubs to watch now in the top 3rd of the table.
 

NicolaSacco

Full Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2016
Messages
2,321
Supports
Ipswich
We do if we want to make football an enjoyable experience to watch for fans. Manchester United used to be the team you tuned into to watch a few goals every week - moreso than any other team in the country.

We're one of the most boring clubs to watch now in the top 3rd of the table.
I'd say Newcastle matched you in the boring stakes for a large part of this season, but yeah the 'old' Utd style of always looking to get the ball forward, create chances etc hasn't really been seen much in the last decade
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,093
I'd say Newcastle matched you in the boring stakes for a large part of this season, but yeah the 'old' Utd style of always looking to get the ball forward, create chances etc hasn't really been seen much in the last decade
Newcastle still outscored us. We can talk all we want about pretty/good football, but the biggest buzz you get as a football fan (outside of celebrating a win at 90 minutes) is when your team scores a goal - and our goal totals for the last decade have been nothing short of pathetic. There's feck all to celebrate during games, forget the end of games or at the end of seasons.
 

NicolaSacco

Full Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2016
Messages
2,321
Supports
Ipswich
Newcastle still outscored us. We can talk all we want about pretty/good football, but the biggest buzz you get as a football fan (outside of celebrating a win at 90 minutes) is when your team scores a goal - and our goal totals for the last decade have been nothing short of pathetic. There's feck all to celebrate during games, forget the end of games or at the end of seasons.
Yeah fair point. I'm surprised Newcastle outscored you, that's not a particularly great fact.

Just looking at the detail of that, your 8 most played defenders; Wan Bisakka, (0) Dalot (1), Maguire (0), Martinez (1), Lindelof (0), Varane (0), Shaw (1) and Malacia (0) scored a grand total of 3 league goals last season. I know it's not their primary responsibility but you'd expect quite a few more than that I'd say.
 

donrogersmoustache

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 12, 2023
Messages
52
Supports
Swindon
A striker, a modern goalie comfortable playing out from the back and a CM and then maybe
It’s not just a keeper comfortable playing out from the back. The defenders need to be able to receive a pass whilst under pressure, something Maguire isn’t capable of. City under pep made lots of mistakes in their first couple of seasons and even Swindon struggle with it at times:-)
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
29,974
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
It’s not just a keeper comfortable playing out from the back. The defenders need to be able to receive a pass whilst under pressure, something Maguire isn’t capable of. City under pep made lots of mistakes in their first couple of seasons and even Swindon struggle with it at times:-)
Maguire will be gone hopefully. He played feck all games last year so I'm not even considering him as part of the squad.
 

Red Shorts

Forrest Gimp
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
12,424
Location
Location, Location
Out of our current lot, Bruno & Rashford should be getting around 35-40 combined. Kane would be 25-30 on top of that, whereas I would expect a player new to the prem anywhere between 15-25, depending on their quality (ie Osimhen vs Muani).

Sprinkle a few goals amongst the rest (Antony, Garnacho being the next highest) and it is entirely feasible to reach 80.
 

Woziak

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
3,606
The more I think about this subject the more you realise that the way the team is set up and plays determines just how attacking you can be and therefore how many goalscoring opportunities the team produces. Let’s look at sone Facts ;

1. Historical
City aside, only really Liverpool and Arsenal last season have really scored 80 goals plus a season, Leicester and Chelsea have both won recent leagues with Less than 75 goals.

2. Change in game and formation
The key change to City was when pep bought Ederson after failing with other goalkeepers to play his high line, Liverpool did the same with Allison and now Arsenal with their new GK.
The GK pushing up, pushes the defence up where the 6 literally with inverted full backs now participate in 1-2-3-4-1 formation the goal keeper tries to occupy the space the CB’s and the whole back 4 did before, it means you dominate the ball, create intricate patterns of play and eventually over run your opposition. But you have to have two roaming number 8/10 hybrids behind your front three with inverted wide strikers. Your basically making sure you have 10 players to play in these 5 attacking positions. City have Haaland, C Palmer, P Fodden, I Gundogan, B Silva, KDB, Alvaro, Grealish, S Gomez and R Mahrez.

3. Team Goals responsibility, Even the defenders at City contribute because they are much higher up the pitch and spend more time attacking the opposition.

4. united would need 10 players to fill those front 5 positions of equal ability - Right now we have ; Martial, Rashford, Garnaucho, Antony, Sancho, Bruno, Ericsen, Pellistri, Mctominay, Elanga. You might say that you can carry a couple but that means if we keep Rashford, Bruno, Ericsen, Sancho, Garnaucho, Amad and Antony we are 3 top players from being 50% as good as City and maybe as good as Liverpool or Arsenal. If you add Mount, Kaine and R Hojlund and spend £200m you probably still only get 74-79 PL Goals.
 

donrogersmoustache

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 12, 2023
Messages
52
Supports
Swindon
Out of our current lot, Bruno & Rashford should be getting around 35-40 combined. Kane would be 25-30 on top of that, whereas I would expect a player new to the prem anywhere between 15-25, depending on their quality (ie Osimhen vs Muani).

Sprinkle a few goals amongst the rest (Antony, Garnacho being the next highest) and it is entirely feasible to reach 80.
I wouldn’t guarantee Fernandes or Rashford getting 20 goals a season unless you are hoping to get a lot of penalties next season