Agreed, we overpaid but that's not the players fault. I don't watch Chelsea on a regular basis but he's always looked tidy enough when I've seen him. We need to give him some time and space. I think he'll come good for us.
You've really got to try to ignore some of the tossers we have on this site. He was only trying to appear smart whilst being a total dipstick with no knowledge of the game.
Wait. It was you responded, no?
Just because I responded doesn't mean I gave you the warning.
Who asked you to tip-toe around?
I sent a message to moderators, of which I have received no response.
Insinuation that there is a separation and divide between ordinary members and staff; and repercussions accordingly. What’s the difference between staff and ordinary posters? Outside of the ability to arbitrarily (incorrectly) hand out ‘warnings’, or wield the mighty ban stick.
Martial can't or Mctom?
McTom. It seems like a tempting idea because he is physical and has scored a few goals but he can’t do the things required of a CF in general play. I don’t want to appear like I have great insight or am revealing an unknown secret because it’s mostly agreed what his strengths and weaknesses are.
You started slinging insults about intelligence. I just pointed out its not very intelligent be insulting the people who could help you sort out any issues you had. There is only a practical difference between posters and staff.
Riddle me this:
Much love.
Oh, I don't think he's a solution at all.
More movement in that GIF then Martial has shown so far this season!The thought of a cross going in, the keeper comes, a defender jumps for it.
ETH shouts ‘now’ and Van de Garg pushes the inflate button and suddenly amongst the players this monstrosity balloons up and heads it in.
We've been playing a sort of 3-6-1 almost
God yes out of the 2 would keep McT, Martial is not worth the cost of getting his name printed on his shirt
True that, never lived up the expectations. The lad has no backbone. Too soft, lazy ...
I usually do but I'm willing to make exceptions when the need arises.
It's a horrific turn of phrase whether it's in the dictionary or not. There's absolutely no need to use that level of imagery to describe a player's performance imo.
I mean, sure. If you lack maturity and cannot differentiate the definitions, I can see how this may offend. Additionally, it was used to describe the transfer - not his performance. It wouldn’t make sense if used to describe his performance from a contextual standpoint. But carry on.
Using half-arsed dictionary definitions to defend the use of that word in that context is the mature move, I see.
You’re talking absolute nonsense to try to justify your view. Is there some sort of scale that I’m not privy to, that determines what the “main usage” of a word is? Or is that determined by, I dunno, you? Stupid argument.
It's not because I can't seperate the definition. It's literally the same word, that's been informally used out of context often enough that it's now in the dictionary. If you look words up in a dictionary rather than google, some well have "informal" or "slang" beside the definition and they're ordered by most common to least commonly used.
Is it offensive to you, if someone was to say:
Ok Shapiro, but that's exactly my point those are fomal usages which don't have the same connotation at all.
And yet we keep playing him there.
