Lack of urgency

G-manc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
955
Why are we so allergic to actually running or playing with any sort of urgency? This seems to have been a thing with every manager post-Fergie.

Even the mid to lower table teams seem to have an ability to play some one touch football and zip it about a bit and contest 50/50’s whereas we only play with urgency in small spells when either chasing a goal or for maybe 5-10 minutes at the start of a game. I can’t remember the last time one of our players came out the right side of an evenly contested tackle.

Surely no one is told to move the ball slowly? if we actually had press resistant players who could string more than 2 passes together without giving the ball away cheaply, then I could sort of understand it, but all it does is 2 main things -encourages the opposition to attack us and allows them all the time in the world to organise themselves against our toothless attack.

We are bottom of nearly every stat whether it’s distance covered or attacking stats. How is this not identified and rectified given how many analysts etc. are involved in top level sport nowadays?
 

Blood Mage

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
6,005
It's low fitness levels combined with a physically weak squad. Thrown in a bunch of weak mentalities and it's a perfect recipe for disaster.

The fact that Bruno is our captain says it all. The guy is weak, slow and crumbles in the face of adversity so often.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,349
It's low fitness levels combined with a physically weak squad. Thrown in a bunch of weak mentalities and it's a perfect recipe for disaster.

The fact that Bruno is our captain says it all. The guy is weak, slow and crumbles in the face of adversity so often.
In a thread about the lack of running you've picked up on Bruno?
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,616
Location
DownUnder
It's low fitness levels combined with a physically weak squad. Thrown in a bunch of weak mentalities and it's a perfect recipe for disaster.

The fact that Bruno is our captain says it all. The guy is weak, slow and crumbles in the face of adversity so often.
Do you have access to their fitness reports?
I'd say it was a mental issue, as our players can run as much as anyone in the league when want/decide to. I actually think Bruno tops the running charts currently.
 

clarkydaz

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2013
Messages
13,442
Location
manchester
Not a new thing is it. Remember when Ole came he said you expect united players to be the fittest in the land
 

astracrazy

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
1,335
It's the thing that pisses me off the most. Anytime we do have high urgency we play our best.
 

Himannv

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Messages
5,812
Location
Somewhere in the draft forum
This is probably the biggest problem with our play. We move the ball so slowly that we are easy to defend against. There's hardly any off the ball movement to help either so it's not just the ball carrier's fault.
 

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
20,076
Location
England
Hasn’t fitness been an issue for some time now? The players can’t sustain their fitness. We are physically beaten by every team
 

68cob

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2022
Messages
659
Been the same for a number of years, where passes are attempted and our lads look confused when an oppo player has the audacity to take the ball before it gets close to the intended recipient. They genuinely look unaware that they are in a competitive game.
 

Lost bear

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 10, 2019
Messages
1,298
It's the thing that pisses me off the most. Anytime we do have high urgency we play our best.
Yes. When we played Aston Villa there was an actual sense of urgency and as a result it was the best we’d played all season. The players played like they meant it. Usually they play like they don’t ( really mean it). Why? That has to be the key question about Utd at this point. It drives us crazy: why the feck doesn’t it drive THEM crazy? Why don’t they play like they mean it, why this sense of just going through the motions? It is unacceptable and has to be the first thing that Ineos gets to grip with.
 

UpWithRivers

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
3,662
Every manager bar Van Gaal played some form of counter attack. We hold on to the ball waiting for our forwards to make runs then try and hit them. Thats why Maguire is slated for holding on to the ball forever and now Onana. They are just waiting for runs. Its just crap football.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,615
Location
Manc
So called Top teams get beat fairly regularly nowadays. The outcome of matches relies heavily on which team has the most energy.

United only get going once they are 1 or 2 goals down, but coaching them to start with some energy and urgency seems impossible post SAF.
 

LuckyScout78

Full Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
998
I agree here:

The urgency of United legend from the 90's a totally on a different and more top level.

Top level of urgency, intensity and fighting spirit.

When they get the ball. It is like = "Attack attack, scoring goals and scoring goals focus" I just don't feel it. The energy, urgency, top guts and play on full speed and speed pedal at the bottom.

A bit slower and more side and back passes.

The only team who is playing with that urgency is. The top of the table team. Liverpool. Special against Newcastle. It is just like attack attack. Liverpool just had that top urgency and guts.

No top guts = no glory = simple as that. Football is simple. No need rocket science to figure it out.

All Klopp and his team is thinking and focus = attack attack, scoring goals scoring goals boys. Biggest reasons why i think Liverpool are at the top of the table.
 

The Irish Connection

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
2,348
Agree. It’s a problem. I would suggest weeding out the players who are the biggest culprits.
Martial, Rashford, sometimes Shaw and Mctominay for a start.

I would suggest Olise who has been linked has a bit of that style in him, hence I would be cautious unless the fee was reasonable.

The likes of Joao Neves from Benfica looks to have good energy and urgency in his game, but might be crazy money.
 

AlexUTD

Full Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
3,936
Location
Norway, smashing the F5 button. LUHG
Agree. It’s a problem. I would suggest weeding out the players who are the biggest culprits.
Martial, Rashford, sometimes Shaw and Mctominay for a start.

I would suggest Olise who has been linked has a bit of that style in him, hence I would be cautious unless the fee was reasonable.

The likes of Joao Neves from Benfica looks to have good energy and urgency in his game, but might be crazy money.
Olise? We have the mighty Antony out on RW wich also is left footed!
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,376
Location
Flagg
Just an assumption/guess but I feel like its mostly down to a lack of confidence/belief.

It doesn't entirely excuse it but I think you see this from a lot of teams. Players seem to magically become twice as sharp and be able to cover twice the distance as soon as there is some motivation to do so and belief that it will get them somewhere.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,465
Location
Manchester
It's low fitness levels combined with a physically weak squad. Thrown in a bunch of weak mentalities and it's a perfect recipe for disaster.

The fact that Bruno is our captain says it all. The guy is weak, slow and crumbles in the face of adversity so often.
In a thread about the lack of running you've picked up on Bruno?
I’m equally as baffled as to why Bruno would be highlighted here.
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,675
Location
The rainbow's end
I believe it's the inability on an individual level to make things happen off the dribble within the context of systems that, more or less, rely on moments of quality to get the job done. We utilize the left flank a lot to generate attacks, we often look adequate to move the ball up-field with pace and purpose to create isos for either Rashford or Garnacho. But neither of them is a natural dribbler, so most plays are dead on the water when the ball arrives at their feet.

Another thing is that United, throughout the last decade, seem allergic to "pass and move" players, while they seem very fond of the "catch and shoot" ones. Good movement and good vision are prerequisites of one-touch football. We often get the ball in good positions and in favourable situations in the final third, but will screw it up because we ditch the "checkmate in three moves" looking for the shortcut. And no, this isn't something you can teach. As Klopp, Pep and Tuchel have often said in various moments, the manager's job is to make sure that the ball gets in good positions in the final third. Once that task is accomplished, it's up to the players to justify their wages.

Thirdly, the few times we manage to maintain possession and circulate the ball in the final third with any sense of rhythm to our passing, the players from the second line of attack burdened with the responsibility to create chances are, in one word, crap at their jobs. When you rely on players like AWB, Dalot, Shaw to time their runs to perfection and execute a pass/cross with precision, you'll be struggling most of the time. Again, they'll offer you moments within games, but never a consistent threat to worry the opposition. The same goes with trying to mix it up by turning Garnacho/Rashford into creators or waiting for Antony to beat his man.

Finally, there's a fine line between urgency and hastiness, one that some of our better players don't seem to comprehend entirely. I'll leave it at that.

All the above create a conundrum where the system can't make the most of the width of the pitch in the attacking half, the players closest to the final third are forcing things (because that's what they know to do best) and get desperate and the players from the deeper lines are ever reluctant to commit themselves because they believe that they will either be ignored or -worse- they'll find themselves running back and chasing the ball like headless chickens.

You want to believe it's a "Dutch thing", but this cumbersome passing when the spaces aren't there, the lack of intricacy around the box and that focus on the left side to create attacks has been here since Mourinho, and it was fully embraced by Solskjaer. It makes you wonder...
 

Red71

Full Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2013
Messages
478
I believe it's the inability on an individual level to make things happen off the dribble within the context of systems that, more or less, rely on moments of quality to get the job done. We utilize the left flank a lot to generate attacks, we often look adequate to move the ball up-field with pace and purpose to create isos for either Rashford or Garnacho. But neither of them is a natural dribbler, so most plays are dead on the water when the ball arrives at their feet.

Another thing is that United, throughout the last decade, seem allergic to "pass and move" players, while they seem very fond of the "catch and shoot" ones. Good movement and good vision are prerequisites of one-touch football. We often get the ball in good positions and in favourable situations in the final third, but will screw it up because we ditch the "checkmate in three moves" looking for the shortcut. And no, this isn't something you can teach. As Klopp, Pep and Tuchel have often said in various moments, the manager's job is to make sure that the ball gets in good positions in the final third. Once that task is accomplished, it's up to the players to justify their wages.

Thirdly, the few times we manage to maintain possession and circulate the ball in the final third with any sense of rhythm to our passing, the players from the second line of attack burdened with the responsibility to create chances are, in one word, crap at their jobs. When you rely on players like AWB, Dalot, Shaw to time their runs to perfection and execute a pass/cross with precision, you'll be struggling most of the time. Again, they'll offer you moments within games, but never a consistent threat to worry the opposition. The same goes with trying to mix it up by turning Garnacho/Rashford into creators or waiting for Antony to beat his man.

Finally, there's a fine line between urgency and hastiness, one that some of our better players don't seem to comprehend entirely. I'll leave it at that.

All the above create a conundrum where the system can't make the most of the width of the pitch in the attacking half, the players closest to the final third are forcing things (because that's what they know to do best) and get desperate and the players from the deeper lines are ever reluctant to commit themselves because they believe that they will either be ignored or -worse- they'll find themselves running back and chasing the ball like headless chickens.

You want to believe it's a "Dutch thing", but this cumbersome passing when the spaces aren't there, the lack of intricacy around the box and that focus on the left side to create attacks has been here since Mourinho, and it was fully embraced by Solskjaer. It makes you wonder...
A very interesting take on the problem…depressing, in that in that it reads like we’re further away than ever from seeing a successful United again, but interesting all the same…cheers!
 

Ollie Derbyshire

Full Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2016
Messages
2,280
I agree here:

The urgency of United legend from the 90's a totally on a different and more top level.

Top level of urgency, intensity and fighting spirit.

When they get the ball. It is like = "Attack attack, scoring goals and scoring goals focus" I just don't feel it. The energy, urgency, top guts and play on full speed and speed pedal at the bottom.

A bit slower and more side and back passes.

The only team who is playing with that urgency is. The top of the table team. Liverpool. Special against Newcastle. It is just like attack attack. Liverpool just had that top urgency and guts.

No top guts = no glory = simple as that. Football is simple. No need rocket science to figure it out.

All Klopp and his team is thinking and focus = attack attack, scoring goals scoring goals boys. Biggest reasons why i think Liverpool are at the top of the table.
I 100% agree with this, Liverpool's style of play is to get the ball from back to front as quickly as possible and get a shot on goal, they do this by having high energy levels, quick players and everyone understands what's expected. Villa is having success this season with the same approach, Newcastle at the start of the season, etc.

We should be able to implement that style very quickly IF the manager and players want to. We might not be as successful as we don't have as good players in my opinion as Liverpool but it's the easiest style of play to adopt and sign players for.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,349
It's what made Fergie so good. That balance of urgency, gettimg the ball up the pitch, whilst still playing good stuff. He nailed it.
 

Stuu

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 24, 2023
Messages
35
The whole "transition football" Ten Hag talked about in pre-season falls apart when you can't score the first goal. Probably 70-80% of the teams we play look to hit us on the counter from a low block. Erikson and Bruno would be ripping teams apart if every team played with a nice high line for us to run in behind. Until they figure out how to break teams down the losses will keep coming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rood