Bocca9978
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2014
- Messages
- 2,115
We all moaned about him at the time.
But no, not worst ever.
He was shit though.
But no, not worst ever.
He was shit though.
We all moaned about him at the time.That's not the discussion here.
He isn't the worst, and not even close to being in the discussion about our worst transfer ever.
Not true, he looked good in his first match, and wasn't as bad in the second as some fans or the press would have you believe.William Prunier (loan, 95-96) looked very out of his depth in the 2 games he played for us
The Karel Poborsky transfer was basically just based on Euro 96.
Oberton and Bebe were pointless.
But, I do think the knock-on effect of the Sanchez transfer might well have the worst effect on the club in recent years. I'm sure it has caused a huge amount of discontent within the squad.
Really?1. Alexis
2. Di Maria
.
.
.
3. Young
4. Valencia
What was an adult in then, a quid thirty? So it took 380 odd adult fans to pay Birtles a week's wages. Today, at the 31 pound ticket rate...Sanchez's 300k per week (let's say) works out at TEN THOUSAND feckING SUPPORTERS THROUGH THE GATE PAYING THIS cnut'S WEEKLY BASIC WAGE. I'd say Sanchez has been poorer value for money.Yep and was paid Sanchez type wages at the time - £500 a week in 1980!