You are not serious surely?Absolute joke. Having to quit his job because a couple of women can't accept criticism and being left out of the team. No wonder England football teams are never successful.
Fixed that for you.Absolute joke. Having to quit his job because a couple of women can't accept racism and being left out of the team. No wonder England football teams are never successful.
Or maybe those players have no issue with Sampson and suspect that Aluko's, as yet unproven, allegations are bullshit.The celebration of England's players with him against Russia was shameful, glad he's had to step down.
How do you know he is guilty?Fixed that for you.
Unless you have inside information that the rest of us are not privy to, why are you so adamant that the allegations are false?Or maybe those players have no issue with Sampson and suspect that Aluko's, as yet unproven, allegations are bullshit.
accusing your relatives of having ebola and asking how many times you get/have been arrested because of skin colour is criticism ?Absolute joke. Having to quit his job because a couple of women can't accept criticism and being left out of the team. No wonder England football teams are never successful.
Please be SouthgateTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I'm not really caught up on this case, why should they not have celebrated with him? Because it looks fake? Or What?The players should not have celebrated like that last night, was awful.
You're having a laugh mate! This smacked of the Suarez solidarity movement by Liverpool! Can't accept criticism?? Feck me !Absolute joke. Having to quit his job because a couple of women can't accept criticism and being left out of the team. No wonder England football teams are never successful.
That's racist.This is what happens when you white wash an investigation involving a player who is a qualified lawyer.
The situation is sensitive. There was no need to celebrate like that for the world to see. Celebrate after everything is cleared up.I'm not really caught up on this case, why should they not have celebrated with him? Because it looks fake? Or What?
How old are you??That's racist.
Not really read much about it but maybe because they support his version of event?And it was beyond me why the players leapt (literally) to his defence last night.
I'm as confident as I can be. The whole investigation screams of a cover-up. If there was nothing to hide, they'd have investigated properly. Clearly, the FA was worried about something, and Sampson was not going to resign unless it was becoming clear his position was fecked i.e. there's actually going to be an investigation that investigates the allegations. There are plenty of issues with the investigations thus far e.g. FA claiming to not know the identity of a player as the excuse for not questioning her when it has now been proven they knew without any doubt who the player in question was, Sampson publicly contradicting himself over ever having discussed the Ebola virus in any context with Aluko, the FA refusing to provide Aluko with the tape of the meeting that allegedly does not corroborate her version of events. Why on earth would she accuse him of making a remark in a room full of witnesses and which was recorded if she knew it to be demonstrably untrue? Clearly, unless she's incredibly dumb, and she has got a fellow professional to confirm her fabricated version of events, then Sampson is guilty.How do you know he is guilty?
Which would raise more questions about why it is other players haven't come forward (or been asked to give evidence) to contradict Aluko or Spence' allegations.Not really read much about it but maybe because they support his version of event?
Conviction by keyboard warrior - always the best kind of justice.I'm as confident as I can be. The whole investigation screams of a cover-up. If there was nothing to hide, they'd have investigated properly. Clearly, the FA was worried about something, and Sampson was not going to resign unless it was becoming clear his position was fecked i.e. there's actually going to be an investigation that investigates the allegations. There are plenty of issues with the investigations thus far e.g. FA claiming to not know the identity of a player as the excuse for not questioning her when it has now been proven they knew without any doubt who the player in question was, Sampson publicly contradicting himself over ever having discussed the Ebola virus in any context with Aluko, the FA refusing to provide Aluko with the tape of the meeting that allegedly does not corroborate her version of events. Why on earth would she accuse him of making a remark in a room full of witnesses and which was recorded if she knew it to be demonstrably untrue? Clearly, unless she's incredibly dumb, and she has got a fellow professional to confirm her fabricated version of events, then Sampson is guilty.
I think it was alleged that he said to the player involved that he hoped the if the players family we in attendance that they wouldn't be bringing ebola to the gameWhat were the racism allegations?
Roughly translated as 'I'm going to blindly defend this person against racist allegations in spite of the overwhelming evidence against him'.Conviction by keyboard warrior - always the best kind of justice.
What does her job have to do with anything?This is what happens when you white wash an investigation involving a player who is a qualified lawyer.
I hear your points. It looks suspicious from what you say. Who were the other witnesses in the room?I'm as confident as I can be. The whole investigation screams of a cover-up. If there was nothing to hide, they'd have investigated properly. Clearly, the FA was worried about something, and Sampson was not going to resign unless it was becoming clear his position was fecked i.e. there's actually going to be an investigation that investigates the allegations. There are plenty of issues with the investigations thus far e.g. FA claiming to not know the identity of a player as the excuse for not questioning her when it has now been proven they knew without any doubt who the player in question was, Sampson publicly contradicting himself over ever having discussed the Ebola virus in any context with Aluko, the FA refusing to provide Aluko with the tape of the meeting that allegedly does not corroborate her version of events. Why on earth would she accuse him of making a remark in a room full of witnesses and which was recorded if she knew it to be demonstrably untrue? Clearly, unless she's incredibly dumb, and she has got a fellow professional to confirm her fabricated version of events, then Sampson is guilty.
Blimey.Conviction by keyboard warrior - always the best kind of justice.
Why do you think Aluko didn't make in racism allegations against Sampson in her initial compliant about him?Roughly translated as 'I'm going to blindly defend this person against racist allegations in spite of the overwhelming evidence against him'.
He means they shouldn't mess with a lawyer because she knows the law and will win the case.Not sure I follow, tbh.