Jesus Christ. You’re absolutely determined not to back down on this stupid 4231/433 thing. I’m glad someone finally posted a heat map for the 3 CM’s because they fully back up what Mourinho said. Matic was the deepest CM, both Pogba and Lingard played with more freedom to get higher up the pitch. There’s basically feck all difference between them. Pogba clearly had as much freedom to roam as a CM could possibly ask for. He absolutely wasn’t expected to sit deep and hold, alongside Matic. That couldn’t be more obvious.
The manager has come out and said exactly what formation his team played. A formation that Gary Neville identified during the game (and whatever you think about his skill as a manager, he was in the fecking stadium and it’s MUCH easier to judge a team’s shape when you’re at a game than it is watching on telly)
But hey, redcafe poster knows best. They’re both lying, for some strange reason. Righto. Makes sense.
So you don't find it odd that Matic, Pogba and Lingard have basically been the blueprint for a 4231 for a while now and suddenly post Spurs and Newcastle criticism we are now being told it was a 433 all along despite it being like no other three man midfield in Europe and certainly no three man midfield Paul Pogba has ever been accustomed to.
LINGARD V HUDDERSFIELD
LINGARD V SPURS
Funnily enough Lingard has more touches in his own half, when we were playing 4-2-3-1 when compared to his supposed new move to being a third midfielder in Mourinho's new found 4-3-3 being used against Newcastle.
Also make your minds up, it started off Pogba needs to man up and get used to being the CM in a 2 man midfield post Newcastle game and now because the manager has said it was a three, suddenly he can't hack it in a three either - both conclusions reached by the same group posters based on the same game - where is the consistency in your narratives?
Thirdly the heat maps certainly do not indicate that this was a 433 designed to free up Pogba from any defensive duties because if it did, it would show Lingard playing more defensively than Pogba.. thus giving him a proper licence to roam knowing he has enough cover behind him.
Furthermore it clearly shows that Pogba has double the touches that Lingard does in his own half, in fact as stated above, Lingard had even less touches in his own half in the three man midfield than he did in 4-2-3-1 thus clearly demonstrating one was deeper lying than the other and if the other midfielder is attacking to the such an extent - how can Pogba attack with the same freedom without totally compromising the balance of our midfield. Guess what it showed in the performance too - we looked a mess.
In essence a 4231 does indeed have a three man midfield, just that it's an upwards triangle compared to a 433 which is a downwards triangle. In a way you're right that the way both guys attacked makes it look like it was a upwards triangle, but the complete lack of balance made it look more like a 4141 if anything with just Matic holding. To me it looked like Pogba just completely abandoned his post and went walkabout because I don't see anything massively different in Lingards position against Spurs/Huddersfield vs his position in Newcastle. Therefore I don't buy this narrative that suddenly Jose came up with this 433 strategy where Lingard patrols the right and Pogba patrols the left because the heat maps show they were both all over the place and Lingard barely featured in his own half which is hardly evidence he played as a centre mid in the Newcastle game.
It also fits what we saw, that Pogba went against instructions and was abdicating his space like Mourinho was expecting, otherwise why give him a rollicking on the sidelines, why take him off. Also we could all see Pogba was just doing what he wanted, and his body language looked awful. It didn't look like a guy whose been told before the game, look son I'm building this team around you, today you can roam as much as you want.. we've got you covered. In fact, it looks like he went rogue if anything.
Mourinho the master manipulator of the media - has no previous for lying or covering his own back? I don't buy that narrative either.