Ole Gunnar Solskjær | 2021/22 Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

The_Order

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
1,907
Jose wanted to sell Martial for Perisic

and wanted to bring in Willian among other 30+ year old players who could give him a season of glory before declining.

I believe we are in much better hands for the long term.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,817
I am really having people argue that if it was Pep instead of Ole the same amount of people would want him out too :houllier:.
Some people would have even less patience with Guardiola, actually, as he's not a cherished club legend.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,268
Location
Tool shed
Some people would have even less patience with Guardiola, actually, as he's not a cherished club legend.
If anything, the idea that people wouldn't be out of patience with Guardiola if he won 3 games in 15 is the fecking mental one. Imagine a manager with his track record coming here and doing that shit? People would be calling him a has been and saying he's falling behind the t... heeeey that sounds familiar!
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
Is the season over? No. we have played just 4 games. Not sure what's the point of checking how many mins youngsters like Greenwood, Gomes played.

Also focusing on youth doesn't just mean promoting players from academy. We have reduced the age in so many positions including the bench. That's what focusing on youth means, not just promoting academy players. We have also done that. They are promoted to squad positions for now, if they play well, they will be first team players.

Again, it's just 4 games, silly to go on and on about how many are promoted or how many mins they played.
Focus on youth is more than just bringing in academy players your right. But focus on youth means actually developing them. So when you have a gaping whole at number 10 and you refuse to use your talented academy player who you was happy to talk up when you didn’t get a CM. Maybe your not as youth focused as you claim. Plus 4 games in but 20 games in with Rashford and he’s getting Worse!!!
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,772
Focus on youth is more than just bringing in academy players your right. But focus on youth means actually developing them. So when you have a gaping whole at number 10 and you refuse to use your talented academy player who you was happy to talk up when you didn’t get a CM. Maybe your not as youth focused as you claim. Plus 4 games in but 20 games in with Rashford and he’s getting Worse!!!
He is developing them by giving them more responsibility. Like I said, 4 games is too small sample size to worry about number of mins. We have already trimmed the squad, logical leap is the young players are promoted to first team to fill those positions, so they will be getting games once Europa league and league cup starts.

Btw, it's funny when someone use what Ole said in PC against him. What do you expect? Play down the players we have? He also praised Lukaku, Sanchez and others before they left. What he says in media means nothing, he just keeps everything in the dressing room.
 

Matst1

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 13, 2016
Messages
553
People who want Ole out already are just impatient children who want instant success and cant cope with the success of Liverpool and City. Ole needs at least 3 more transfer windows. Even if we finished 10th this season I'd still back him. He needs the players he wants and that will take time.
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Where's your evidence?

Where's your past examples of managers who fit your argument?

Come on, I've asked you multiple times now, where exactly is your fecking proof?
What do you mean evidence? We are specifically talking about Ole's run. You really do have to be special to think the same amount of people would for example want SAF out if he went on the same run as Ole.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,268
Location
Tool shed
What do you mean evidence? We are specifically talking about Ole's run. You really do have to be special to think the same amount of people would for example want SAF out if he went on the same run as Ole.
:lol: So you can't provide a single example of where a scenario like you're claiming happened before?
 

Garebo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 25, 2019
Messages
67
Unlucky results combined with mistakes from certain players and you are calling the manager out. Get rid of 10 players, buy 5-6 new and then judge him. We have a weak squad and it's not only up to the manager to fix it. Jose said, one of his biggest achievements was the second place with United and i don't think he is a hypocrite like Klopp.
 

Fussball13251

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
525
Absolutely. Jesus even the guys who normally very critical of Ole are trying to point it out for you.
But that would never happen under Pep. United under the helm of Pep United would play some beautiful inventive attacking football. Nobody wanted Pep out after failing to win the league on his first attempt.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,559
People who want Ole out already are just impatient children who want instant success and cant cope with the success of Liverpool and City. Ole needs at least 3 more transfer windows. Even if we finished 10th this season I'd still back him. He needs the players he wants and that will take time.
There is impatient and understanding the game. If we finished 10th with the squad we have he needs to go. We need to be ruthless. He would have been in the job for 18th months with no progress.

I feel his job is only safe if we achieve top 4. Yes we cannot cope with our biggest rivals competing for titles whilst we are in an ever transition period.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,268
Location
Tool shed
We are talking about Ole's specific scenario you Massive Spanner.
But in this specific scenario all you are naming are hypothetical situations and calling anyone with a different opinion to you "special" and "deluded". How can you so matter of factly state that you're right when you haven't got a shred of evidence to go on?

If there's zero evidence to back up your claim and plenty of past examples of managers who have this "pedigree" you talk about getting sacked as soon as they feck things up then please, please tell me how are we the deluded ones?
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
But in this specific scenario all you are naming are hypothetical situations and calling anyone with a different opinion to you "special" and "deluded". How can you so matter of factly state that you're right when you haven't got a shred of evidence to go on?

If there's zero evidence to back up your claim and plenty of past examples of managers who have this "pedigree" you talk about getting sacked as soon as they feck things up then please, please tell me how are we the deluded ones?
Because it is common sense that less people would want someone like SAF out if he went on the same run as Ole.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,268
Location
Tool shed
If you think that proves your point then ok. You genuinely think if the greatest manager of all time, SAF went on the same run as Ole, the same amount of people would want him out :lol:.
I think if it was apparent that he was failing here and wasn't going to turn things around then yes.

but that's only what I think, we don't know. What we do know is that numerous great managers have been sacked in the past when they failed despite producing trophies even just the season before. You seem to be ignoring that.

This is pointless anyway, keep living in your little imaginary world where facts don't matter and your brain is the only thing worth listening to.
 

vanderstar

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Messages
27
Well i'm repeating myself but i feel that i feel that the fact that we have 2 more points from these 4 fixtures compared to last year is something that shouldn't be overlooked.
This while the play is far from perfect and we have some injury problems. I pulled some stats as well showing that we are shooting more but not hitting goal as much 38% vs. 28%
(in these 4 games). We are also better at shutting down the oppositions options to attack. If we look at the three last games we had 2, 3 and 2 shots on goal.
Sick that we have conceded 4 out of 7 shots on goal the last three games.
A positive thing is that we have scored in every game this season.

I still feel it's hard to understand why Ole is the worst manager that we possibly could have according to some people. A squad of young players playing together on the big stage without much
backup need all the backing they can get and i think Ole is right for this.

The big disappointment in my book is that we lost against palace at home. Wolves and Southampton away are tricky games and i think i read somewhere after last season that
people predicted we would have 0 points after the first four games and Ole would be out the door before september.

I think Ole should be backed until he at least have a chance to replace the deadwood he has shipped. And I have a suspicion that we will be positively surprised by results this season.
And hopefully some of the young guns will prove that we don't need to replace as many players as we think at the moment.

2018/2019 Shots (on goal) Manutd figures first

Chelsea at home 1-1 1 point 7-16 (5-3)
Wolverhampton away 1-2 0 points 18-9 (4-2)
Crystal Palace at home 0-0 1 point 12-13 (5-2)
Southampton away 2-2 1 points 16-11 (6-5)

Sum 2018/19 3 points 53-58 (20-12)

2019/2020 Shots (on goal) Manutd figures first
Chelsea at home 4-0 3 points 11-18 (5-7)
Wolverhampton away 1-1 1 point 9-6 (2-2)
Crystal Palace at home 1-2 0 points 22-5 (3-3)
Southampton away 1-1 1 point 21-10 (8-2)

Sum 2019/20 5 points 63-39 (18-14)

Mourinho coached us vs. Southampton and Crystal Palace, Ole vs Chelsea and Wolves.
 
Last edited:

SilverPaper on the Breeze

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 31, 2019
Messages
59
During the 90s, the club embarked on a pioneering path and understood the way the game was going better than most, appreciating that globalisation was coming and commercialisation was the way to monetise the “brand”. We were the first to have a third kit, the first to flog tat to fans thousands of miles away. We did this whilst aggressively expanding our stadium to being the biggest in the country.
Following this, the club had a huge financial advantage over everyone (til Roman arrived) and had arguably the greatest manager of all time at the helm that had a unique ability to adapt and rebuild sides in the face of a changing game.
When any institution has achieved massive success through a particular model, it becomes inevitable that complacency will set in over time, with a dogmatic belief that what has worked previously will always work and this is what has happened in the last decade. Old Trafford is now pretty shabby in comparison to rival grounds, for instance.
As such, we’ve stopped innovating, stopped being ahead of the curve and fallen behind our contemporaries in the process. This rot had begun prior to Sir retiring, with the departure of Ronaldo probably the first sign of the decline. We carried on winning trophies, because Fergie was that good and our rivals were nothing special, but his final seasons were spent wringing the last out of his final great team, the 08 champions league winners.
When he finally departed, we had an ageing squad that desperately required major surgery. Rio and Vidic were finished, as were Scholes and Giggs, and Rooney and RVP didn’t have much left to give either. A prolonged lack of investment and Fergie softening to the extent that the likes of Anderson were still kicking around meant we were in poor shape.
We all know what happens next; Moyes, Van Gaal and Jose, 3 completely different types of managers all trying to get to the root of the problem, but that kind of deep malaise takes a while to fix and requires patience which given our previous success was understandably in short supply.
This brings us to where we are now and hopefully the early stages of a rebuild. Do I think Ole is the man to lead us long term? Almost certainly not, but there’s not a chance we’re winning the title no matter who is in the dugout. Pep and Klopp are probably the finest managers currently working and they’re deep into their respective projects. They’ll take some toppling. As such, a long term view is the sensible option and I think Ole is a reasonable shout to manage us through the start of the rebuild. The squad has been purged this season. Sure, we could do with one or two more, but as Liverpool have shown, it’s better to buy the right players than any old players.
If we can rebuild a team spirit, something that has been sadly lacking, and blood some youngsters, work out which ones will make it, then we’ll wind up with a lean, young, hungry squad.
The 3 managers before Ole all inherited a mess, I think Ole’s job is to clean everything up and ensure the manager that follows him (which I think will be Poch next summer) inherits something much better. A young, motivated squad, a trimmed wage bill and a handsome transfer kitty to build towards a title challenge. Realistically, we’re not going to challenge for the league until 21/22 at the earliest; what we’re doing now seems to me to be laying the foundations for that. Ole is not a title winning manager, he’s a transitional one and I for accept that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roonster09

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,559
Lets all be optimistic. I can see us going on a 10-12 game winning streak soon :)
 

ArjenIsM3

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
5,645
Location
Netherlands
There is impatient and understanding the game. If we finished 10th with the squad we have he needs to go. We need to be ruthless. He would have been in the job for 18th months with no progress.

I feel his job is only safe if we achieve top 4. Yes we cannot cope with our biggest rivals competing for titles whilst we are in an ever transition period.
Yeah we should finish top four even though there's 5 teams who have better squads than us.
 

Revaulx

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
6,046
Location
Saddleworth
I am starting to think that the main reason Ole signs just british players is because he doesn't know the continental market and therefore doesn't have the pull to attract players from there.
Why in that case do we have an extensive scouting network?
 

Revaulx

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
6,046
Location
Saddleworth
You make many valid points and I wish I saw the light the same way you seems to do.

When I’m not comfortable with something/someone I try to go back to basic. What where my expectations. What did I see in the first place.

In his (OGS) first couple of games as interim manager we started to play with quick movements, one or two touch passes, high pressing line with all players involved. I saw commitment, passion and for the first time in many many years I saw the light in the tunnel.

I saw Pogba in his best position and suddenly we started to look like a team. Eleven players who worked together with one goal in their mind. It was so refreshing. I was literally sold on Ole Gunnar’s ability to turn this around.

Then something happened. The rest we all know.

My question is what happens between these first four five game to now. Why did we stop to use that initial formula that worked so well in the beginning. How can our performances quality drop so dramatically with almost the same players?

This season we started well but against Palace we lost our momentum when Pogba missed that penalty and from there our results has been way below expectations.

I can’t understand why we continue to use Pogba in a 4231 formation when we struggle so hard to create chances in the final third. Why? I heard you. Matic! But in my world that’s not an excuse on this level. We must have more then two quality midfielders otherwise Ole Gunnar’s comments about he’s happy with his squad is a lie.

Why can’t we go back to more movements, a better passing game, better organization, more synchronized? I refuse to believe it’s that hard. Either our players are stupid or our management can’t communicate. Take your pick. If they could do all this things in Ole Gunnar’s first couple of games why can’t they do it now?

That’s my question.
And it’s a good one, and much more relevant to the discussion than most of the posts on here, which are just people with entrenched positions trying to get one up on their rivals.

On an even more granular level, I can’t understand why our set pieces are still so terrible, and why our defence still looks disorganised despite upgrading the personnel. And why De Gea is still taking those God-awful long punts.

I’d have far more confidence in Ole’s overall strategy if I could see any improvement in the little details.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
He is developing them by giving them more responsibility. Like I said, 4 games is too small sample size to worry about number of mins. We have already trimmed the squad, logical leap is the young players are promoted to first team to fill those positions, so they will be getting games once Europa league and league cup starts.

Btw, it's funny when someone use what Ole said in PC against him. What do you expect? Play down the players we have? He also praised Lukaku, Sanchez and others before they left. What he says in media means nothing, he just keeps everything in the dressing room.
It’s not 4 games it’s nearly a full year. Where he’s been more bad than good. With sporadic introduction of the youth and like i pointed out still no individual improvement from the first team 11.
 

hocane

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
277
Location
USA, San Francisco
I think it's absurd he is given a free pass just because he's played for the club.
If he never played for us and had the same CV he would get hammered. We always talk about ruthlessness. Well, as fans it's time to get ruthless as well.
If we are not top 6 by Christmas, Ole has to go.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,559
Yeah we should finish top four even though there's 5 teams who have better squads than us.
There is only actually 2. Liverpool and City.

If you compare the rest of them, we should compete with them.

Spurs - Thin squad
Arsenal - No midfield or defence
Chelsea - Had a transfer ban and lost their best player.

So again, how are 5 teams with better squad than us?
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
But that would never happen under Pep. United under the helm of Pep United would play some beautiful inventive attacking football. Nobody wanted Pep out after failing to win the league on his first attempt.
We don't know that. Maybe we'd be playing beautiful football but results would still suffer.
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
I think it's absurd he is given a free pass just because he's played for the club.
If he never played for us and had the same CV he would get hammered. We always talk about ruthlessness. Well, as fans it's time to get ruthless as well.
If we are not top 6 by Christmas, Ole has to go.
Top 6 by Christmas, that's a strange margin.
 

Luffy

Gomu Gomu
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
1,843
Location
Mauritius
During the 90s, the club embarked on a pioneering path and understood the way the game was going better than most, appreciating that globalisation was coming and commercialisation was the way to monetise the “brand”. We were the first to have a third kit, the first to flog tat to fans thousands of miles away. We did this whilst aggressively expanding our stadium to being the biggest in the country.
Following this, the club had a huge financial advantage over everyone (til Roman arrived) and had arguably the greatest manager of all time at the helm that had a unique ability to adapt and rebuild sides in the face of a changing game.
When any institution has achieved massive success through a particular model, it becomes inevitable that complacency will set in over time, with a dogmatic belief that what has worked previously will always work and this is what has happened in the last decade. Old Trafford is now pretty shabby in comparison to rival grounds, for instance.
As such, we’ve stopped innovating, stopped being ahead of the curve and fallen behind our contemporaries in the process. This rot had begun prior to Sir retiring, with the departure of Ronaldo probably the first sign of the decline. We carried on winning trophies, because Fergie was that good and our rivals were nothing special, but his final seasons were spent wringing the last out of his final great team, the 08 champions league winners.
When he finally departed, we had an ageing squad that desperately required major surgery. Rio and Vidic were finished, as were Scholes and Giggs, and Rooney and RVP didn’t have much left to give either. A prolonged lack of investment and Fergie softening to the extent that the likes of Anderson were still kicking around meant we were in poor shape.
We all know what happens next; Moyes, Van Gaal and Jose, 3 completely different types of managers all trying to get to the root of the problem, but that kind of deep malaise takes a while to fix and requires patience which given our previous success was understandably in short supply.
This brings us to where we are now and hopefully the early stages of a rebuild. Do I think Ole is the man to lead us long term? Almost certainly not, but there’s not a chance we’re winning the title no matter who is in the dugout. Pep and Klopp are probably the finest managers currently working and they’re deep into their respective projects. They’ll take some toppling. As such, a long term view is the sensible option and I think Ole is a reasonable shout to manage us through the start of the rebuild. The squad has been purged this season. Sure, we could do with one or two more, but as Liverpool have shown, it’s better to buy the right players than any old players.
If we can rebuild a team spirit, something that has been sadly lacking, and blood some youngsters, work out which ones will make it, then we’ll wind up with a lean, young, hungry squad.
The 3 managers before Ole all inherited a mess, I think Ole’s job is to clean everything up and ensure the manager that follows him (which I think will be Poch next summer) inherits something much better. A young, motivated squad, a trimmed wage bill and a handsome transfer kitty to build towards a title challenge. Realistically, we’re not going to challenge for the league until 21/22 at the earliest; what we’re doing now seems to me to be laying the foundations for that. Ole is not a title winning manager, he’s a transitional one and I for accept that.
My thoughts quasi exactly. I'm far from a stalwart here, but recently the New members have been contributing a lot, so maybe this is a norm, I don't know.
 

LS17

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
488
I think the fact that the three signings he made have been our best players suggests he knows the sort of players and characters he wants at the club. Just not sure he'll get the time to make the required changes to the squad and I do question some of his tactical stuff (subs, not being able to break down low blocks).
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,559
I think the fact that the three signings he made have been our best players suggests he knows the sort of players and characters he wants at the club. Just not sure he'll get the time to make the required changes to the squad and I do question some of his tactical stuff (subs, not being able to break down low blocks).

I think fans are getting too carried away with the low block. Against Palace and Southampton we had chances to go ahead and equalise. It is obviously harder to break teams down when they are holding on a result.
Even City and Liverpool would struggle (be it not as bad as us) if palace were 1-0 up or Southampton playing 1-1 with 10 men.

If we took our chances earlier in the game, like City and Pool do we can control games and hit teams on the break after 70 mins when they are looking for an equaliser / winner.
 

ash_86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
6,339
During the 90s, the club embarked on a pioneering path and understood the way the game was going better than most, appreciating that globalisation was coming and commercialisation was the way to monetise the “brand”. We were the first to have a third kit, the first to flog tat to fans thousands of miles away. We did this whilst aggressively expanding our stadium to being the biggest in the country.
Following this, the club had a huge financial advantage over everyone (til Roman arrived) and had arguably the greatest manager of all time at the helm that had a unique ability to adapt and rebuild sides in the face of a changing game.
When any institution has achieved massive success through a particular model, it becomes inevitable that complacency will set in over time, with a dogmatic belief that what has worked previously will always work and this is what has happened in the last decade. Old Trafford is now pretty shabby in comparison to rival grounds, for instance.
As such, we’ve stopped innovating, stopped being ahead of the curve and fallen behind our contemporaries in the process. This rot had begun prior to Sir retiring, with the departure of Ronaldo probably the first sign of the decline. We carried on winning trophies, because Fergie was that good and our rivals were nothing special, but his final seasons were spent wringing the last out of his final great team, the 08 champions league winners.
When he finally departed, we had an ageing squad that desperately required major surgery. Rio and Vidic were finished, as were Scholes and Giggs, and Rooney and RVP didn’t have much left to give either. A prolonged lack of investment and Fergie softening to the extent that the likes of Anderson were still kicking around meant we were in poor shape.
We all know what happens next; Moyes, Van Gaal and Jose, 3 completely different types of managers all trying to get to the root of the problem, but that kind of deep malaise takes a while to fix and requires patience which given our previous success was understandably in short supply.
This brings us to where we are now and hopefully the early stages of a rebuild. Do I think Ole is the man to lead us long term? Almost certainly not, but there’s not a chance we’re winning the title no matter who is in the dugout. Pep and Klopp are probably the finest managers currently working and they’re deep into their respective projects. They’ll take some toppling. As such, a long term view is the sensible option and I think Ole is a reasonable shout to manage us through the start of the rebuild. The squad has been purged this season. Sure, we could do with one or two more, but as Liverpool have shown, it’s better to buy the right players than any old players.
If we can rebuild a team spirit, something that has been sadly lacking, and blood some youngsters, work out which ones will make it, then we’ll wind up with a lean, young, hungry squad.
The 3 managers before Ole all inherited a mess, I think Ole’s job is to clean everything up and ensure the manager that follows him (which I think will be Poch next summer) inherits something much better. A young, motivated squad, a trimmed wage bill and a handsome transfer kitty to build towards a title challenge. Realistically, we’re not going to challenge for the league until 21/22 at the earliest; what we’re doing now seems to me to be laying the foundations for that. Ole is not a title winning manager, he’s a transitional one and I for accept that.
Brilliant post. I mentioned the same things the other day. Ole need not travel with us like SAF did but his upsides are better than downsides at this point in time. We have invested figures closer to billion pounds since the big man is gone and we still have a very poor squad to show for. We need to sort out this mess before we can be on the upward trajectory and that's exactly what Ole is doing. In 5 years when we start to look back on where things have started to go right, then ole will get his due credits if not now.
 

arthurka

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
18,752
Location
Rectum
During the 90s, the club embarked on a pioneering path and understood the way the game was going better than most, appreciating that globalisation was coming and commercialisation was the way to monetise the “brand”. We were the first to have a third kit, the first to flog tat to fans thousands of miles away. We did this whilst aggressively expanding our stadium to being the biggest in the country.
Following this, the club had a huge financial advantage over everyone (til Roman arrived) and had arguably the greatest manager of all time at the helm that had a unique ability to adapt and rebuild sides in the face of a changing game.
When any institution has achieved massive success through a particular model, it becomes inevitable that complacency will set in over time, with a dogmatic belief that what has worked previously will always work and this is what has happened in the last decade. Old Trafford is now pretty shabby in comparison to rival grounds, for instance.
As such, we’ve stopped innovating, stopped being ahead of the curve and fallen behind our contemporaries in the process. This rot had begun prior to Sir retiring, with the departure of Ronaldo probably the first sign of the decline. We carried on winning trophies, because Fergie was that good and our rivals were nothing special, but his final seasons were spent wringing the last out of his final great team, the 08 champions league winners.
When he finally departed, we had an ageing squad that desperately required major surgery. Rio and Vidic were finished, as were Scholes and Giggs, and Rooney and RVP didn’t have much left to give either. A prolonged lack of investment and Fergie softening to the extent that the likes of Anderson were still kicking around meant we were in poor shape.
We all know what happens next; Moyes, Van Gaal and Jose, 3 completely different types of managers all trying to get to the root of the problem, but that kind of deep malaise takes a while to fix and requires patience which given our previous success was understandably in short supply.
This brings us to where we are now and hopefully the early stages of a rebuild. Do I think Ole is the man to lead us long term? Almost certainly not, but there’s not a chance we’re winning the title no matter who is in the dugout. Pep and Klopp are probably the finest managers currently working and they’re deep into their respective projects. They’ll take some toppling. As such, a long term view is the sensible option and I think Ole is a reasonable shout to manage us through the start of the rebuild. The squad has been purged this season. Sure, we could do with one or two more, but as Liverpool have shown, it’s better to buy the right players than any old players.
If we can rebuild a team spirit, something that has been sadly lacking, and blood some youngsters, work out which ones will make it, then we’ll wind up with a lean, young, hungry squad.
The 3 managers before Ole all inherited a mess, I think Ole’s job is to clean everything up and ensure the manager that follows him (which I think will be Poch next summer) inherits something much better. A young, motivated squad, a trimmed wage bill and a handsome transfer kitty to build towards a title challenge. Realistically, we’re not going to challenge for the league until 21/22 at the earliest; what we’re doing now seems to me to be laying the foundations for that. Ole is not a title winning manager, he’s a transitional one and I for accept that.
Very good post this.
This is exactly how I see this, Ole´s job is to get us back to the root and is for another manager to take us further.
 

NK86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
10,411
How exactly, how do you call the squad out, tell how shit they are and face the in training tomorrow?
It's crazy, when Jose was doing it it was throwing the players under the bus, now Ole us positive in front of the press he should take his steps and shit on the team.
There are a million steps between what Jose says and how Ole is talking. Poch doesn't talk down his squad but puts pressure on Levi by constantly reminding him the need to sign top talents. The players also want to see the team getting refreshed. It's not like you either throw the squad under the bus or coddle them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.