It is really silly to repeat the same thing after every game but why not?
I don't agree with this "long term plan" because i do think that biggest clubs must have some kind of long term plans but short term plans( current season) must always be main focus. You can build a squad which will be title challenger in two years but not on way to sacrifice results completely. CL spot must be minimum in short term planning.
Also while you are doing that long term plan you must have progress on the pitch. After 12 months in charge it is totally unacceptable that you play 50-50 games with low table and midtable clubs. Nobody demanded from Ole to challenge for title but winning against weaker clubs and having good general play should have been a bare minimum.
And how the hell some people can't understand that we still have far far better squad than at least 10-12 clubs in league. Basically on every position. So that excuse of having shit team is really boring. Do Watford, Newcastle or Burnley have any player who would walk in our starting 11( except Longstaff
)? No, they don't. Our backup players would be their starters ffs.
Ole is totally out of depth and it is obvious for everyone that he must go. And not to mention that he was backed more than any other manager since Fergie. He had 100% control on transfer market. Ed sold players that Ole didn't want and bought to him exact players that he wanted. Maybe Ole wanted one or two more players but no manager in the bloody world doesn't get all players. He had better conditions to work than Jose, Moyes and Lvg.