Pat vs Downcast/MJJ/Arbitrium - Tactical Draft

Who created a better environment for their star player to shine?


  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .

SirMattBugsby

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2016
Messages
1,537
Location
In the house!
Do you mean in the initial writeup or throughout the thread? I'm a big fan of videos during the thread, although they should be spoilered which I've failed to do myself in fairness. As far as the initial write up goes, I agree that they should be kept somewhat brief.
Yeah I meant the initial write-up. Videos and other info during the thread are usually posted as part of discussion, so absolutely no problem with that.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,534
There needs to be a serious limit on the amount of posting by OPs. It's not difficult to stick to the format given, is it?

Additional information can be given as and when asked by the voters. I'm one of the new posters but I find the tons of videos quite distracting, especially when I can find a lot of them myself or when they are of United legends.
Agreed.

Ideally, what you want is 100% relevant (to the particular points discussed) footage posted.

E.g. Someone asks «what was X like?», «did he cut in frequently?», «would he struggle in a high pace environment?», etc. - and then the manager posts a vid in (direct) response.

There's too much general material posted, managers get carried away. If you come across a great compilation, post it in the main thread (and post a link in the match thread, if you feel like it).
 

Ecstatic

Cutie patootie!
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
13,787
Supports
PsG
I've deleted all my posts including videos but can't update the OP.

Up to @Šjor Bepo to make the necessary.

:lol::confused::lol: this has to be the most random writeup tidbit in the history of drafting.
As far as I'm concerned, I'm not interested in denigrating team Pat.

Now, if you want me to explain the analogy with the Pyramid (no pure wingers) and my personal understanding I'd say:

1. Raul is extremely versatile (SS, #10 or any role)
2. What is his strength #1? His ability to score and break any defensive line in any circumstances.
3. A 4-4-2 means Raul would spend a part of his time to make the bridge the central midfielders and the CF: he would do it with success but I would have wanted him to spend 100% of his time trying to combine with the CF and create very near of the penalty area
4. An example would be a player like Del Piero/Trezeguet shone with a 3-5-2 system but above all with a strong central support (2 CM+ Zidane)
5. In concrete terms, I would have probably tried a tactical system (be it 4-3-3 or 3-5-2) with a front 3:

----------------- Trezeguet/Crespo
--------------Raul
-------------- Deco/Hassler

Now, in terms of style of play, Raul is a player with superior technical skills. If you make a 4-4-2 with Zidane on the left and when we know that Raul tends to be attracted by the left side, you understand why Raul was also successful in a 4-4-2 system with Zidane on the left. Here Hassler is on the right and Raul who likes to combine in tight spaces would have to do so with Barnes/Giles.

Could it work? Yes
Is it the best environment to get the most out of Raul? I don't think so but it's just my opinion.
 
Last edited:

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,185
Location
Montevideo
That was one of many formations Raul played in for Real so it was pretty tough to come up with anything new for him. He wasn't particularly suited to a 4-3-3 with wingers, nor did I really fancy him as a false 9, although he could have done that well enough.

The Barnes/Raul connection is actually one of my favourite parts of the team. I think I just rate Barnes higher than most but I see them having a similar dynamic to Barnes/Beardsley, with Raul offering more thrust and goal threat than the Geordie. Barnes seems to be pigeonholed at times as a head down, rush for the byline type of winger which does him an injustice. In fact, England trying to deploy him in that way is one of the big factors in his inconsistency for the national team. His vision, awareness and short passing game was brilliant.

I've posted this video before but its always worth a rewatch


Even in the first little segment:

https://streamable.com/1r5rg
For me Raul would lap up those flicks and quick give and gos, and thrive in the space Barnes creates.

Insofar as I really had any concept for the team beyond creating something I liked that suited Raul, it was the thought that Raul would have torn the Premier League up had we somehow been able to sign him in 1997 as Cantona's replacement. That got me thinking of British/Irish players that could operate on Raul's level in terms of speed of thought and technique, and that's why Barnes and Giles were on my wish list so early.

Watching some of that Liverpool 1988 team (feel dirty saying this) and the 1970s Leeds team does make me think that as agricultural as the British game was in general, there was still some fantastic and underrated quality there at times.

A wee bit on Giles from this fantastic article:
I rate Barnes. We didn't get much English football in Uruguay but he scored against us in a friendly we won 2-1 at Wembley before the 1990 WC. It was the sort of performance that made me sit up, take notice and lap up any opportunities I had to watch him thereafter.

The reason I suggested a 3-5-2 was that not having a wide forward/winger would allow Raúl to roam into that outside left channel where he was superb in his early years. No slight on Barnes, very much the opposite.

Good stuff on Giles, I do automatically associate him with dirty Leeds so no doubt don't give him the credit he deserves.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,185
Location
Montevideo
I've deleted all my posts including videos but can't update the OP.

Up to @Šjor Bepo to make the necessary.



As far as I'm concerned, I'm not interested in denigrating team Pat.

Now, if you want me to explain the analogy with the Pyramid (no pure wingers) and my personal understanding I'd say:

1. Raul is extremely versatile (SS, #10 or any role)
2. What is his strength #1? His ability to score and break any defensive line in any circumstances.
3. A 4-4-2 means Raul would spend a part of his time to make the bridge the central midfielders and the CF: he would do it with success but I would have wanted him to spend 100% of his time trying to combine with the CF and create very near of the penalty area
4. An example would be a player like Del Piero/Trezeguet shone with a 3-5-2 system but above all with a strong central support (2 CM+ Zidane)
5. In concrete terms, I would have probably tried a tactical system (be it 4-3-3 or 3-5-2) with a front 3:

----------------- Trezeguet/Crespo
--------------Raul
-------------- Deco/Hassler

Now, in terms of style of play, Raul is a player with superior technical skills. If you make a 4-4-2 with Zidane on the left and when we know that Raul tends to be attracted by the left side, you understand why Raul was also successful in a 4-4-2 system with Zidane on the left. Here Hassler is on the right and Raul who likes to combine in tight spaces would have to do so with Barnes/Giles.

Could it work? Yes
Is it the best environment to get the most out of Raul? I don't think so but it's just my opinion.
I understood the pyramid thing, I was talking about the psychodelic analogies and the planet with revolving satellites in particular.
 

Annahnomoss

Full Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2012
Messages
10,101
Hard to separate the teams, I like them both. The two of them rarely get a proper run so great idea for a draft. Would love to see these sides face of in reality, United bias sort of makes you want to think that Cantona would outperform Raul. Not going to vote though.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,214
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
I rate Barnes. We didn't get much English football in Uruguay but he scored against us in a friendly we won 2-1 at Wembley before the 1990 WC. It was the sort of performance that made me sit up, take notice and lap up any opportunities I had to watch him thereafter.

The reason I suggested a 3-5-2 was that not having a wide forward/winger would allow Raúl to roam into that outside left channel where he was superb in his early years. No slight on Barnes, very much the opposite.

Good stuff on Giles, I do automatically associate him with dirty Leeds so no doubt don't give him the credit he deserves.
Didn't want to post until poll finished but I never 'got' Barnes the way some did (maybe a United/Liverpool bias from me?).

Clearly very good at club level (though surrounded by some great players?) but never saw him do it on the big stage, though tbf the lack of European football obviously took away an opportunity? I'm sure I read once that he never scored for England at a tournament so interesting you mention a friendly goal.... his goal v Brazil (friendly) tends to he shown whenever the media talk about him as some sort of English/Brazilian hybrid.

Like I say, very good at club level but I'll remember him for one thing..... in the last minute of Liverpool Arsenal 89 (the title decider), he had the ball down the right wing and instead of going to the corner flag, he tried to go for goal, lost the ball and 20 second later, Thomas scores and yours truly wins his £10 7-1 bet on Arsenal :cool:.

Good times.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,534
I think Barnes suffered somewhat from not being an ideal fit for the system(s) normally favoured by England managers.

He was comparable to someone like Figo, I'd say, in terms of being extremely influential/dominant from a wide position, whereas England (still) wanted more of a line hugger (and less of a truly dominant presence).

Comparable to Scholes too - in the sense that he was underwhelming, overall, for the NT, but mostly because the system clearly didn't suit him all that well.

He was the best, most important player for a Liverpool side that were - clearly - among the best in Europe (but never got to go up against the likes of PSV and Milan for obvious reasons).
 

Raees

Pythagoras in Boots
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
29,469
I think Barnes suffered somewhat from not being an ideal fit for the system(s) normally favoured by England managers.

He was comparable to someone like Figo, I'd say, in terms of being extremely influential/dominant from a wide position, whereas England (still) wanted more of a line hugger (and less of a truly dominant presence).

Comparable to Scholes too - in the sense that he was underwhelming, overall, for the NT, but mostly because the system clearly didn't suit him all that well.

He was the best, most important player for a Liverpool side that were - clearly - among the best in Europe (but never got to go up against the likes of PSV and Milan for obvious reasons).
Good analysis, a wideman who had traditional winger/modern day wingforward qualities but also had the brain of a playmaker and very astute decision making on the ball, with fearsome shot and elite crossing.

Very rare type of wingers to have in a side, and tbh I think many England players from the 80's were basically playing for the wrong country and therefore no one got the best out of them tactically.

Barnes would be an international legend had he played for any other major nation.
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
Raul as the team captain goes first, panenka down the middle while fan favorite Neville Southall goes to the left.....1:0 for Pat!
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
downcast and the rest of the sun gang were to busy with their tactics for penalties that they forgot to give the list of shooters, Butragueno decided to go first....shooting down the middle while Pfaff goes to the left, replica of the first penalty of the shoutout - 1:1

 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
Next up is John Barnes, full power down the middle while Southall goes to the left again...2:1 Pat
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,341
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers
That was one of many formations Raul played in for Real so it was pretty tough to come up with anything new for him. He wasn't particularly suited to a 4-3-3 with wingers, nor did I really fancy him as a false 9, although he could have done that well enough.

The Barnes/Raul connection is actually one of my favourite parts of the team. I think I just rate Barnes higher than most but I see them having a similar dynamic to Barnes/Beardsley, with Raul offering more thrust and goal threat than the Geordie. Barnes seems to be pigeonholed at times as a head down, rush for the byline type of winger which does him an injustice. In fact, England trying to deploy him in that way is one of the big factors in his inconsistency for the national team. His vision, awareness and short passing game was brilliant.

I've posted this video before but its always worth a rewatch


Even in the first little segment:

https://streamable.com/1r5rg
For me Raul would lap up those flicks and quick give and gos, and thrive in the space Barnes creates.

Insofar as I really had any concept for the team beyond creating something I liked that suited Raul, it was the thought that Raul would have torn the Premier League up had we somehow been able to sign him in 1997 as Cantona's replacement. That got me thinking of British/Irish players that could operate on Raul's level in terms of speed of thought and technique, and that's why Barnes and Giles were on my wish list so early.

Watching some of that Liverpool 1988 team (feel dirty saying this) and the 1970s Leeds team does make me think that as agricultural as the British game was in general, there was still some fantastic and underrated quality there at times.

A wee bit on Giles from this fantastic article:
Good post.
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
It looks like it started snowing so all the players are going back to the dressing rooms, game will be continued in 30-60 minutes depending on weather.
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
and we are back, Michel shoots right.....
...Pfaff goes left, 2:2
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
There goes Giles for team Pat, shoots down the left...
...and sends Southall to the wrong side, 3:2 Pat. Poor old Neville cant believe he conceded 3 in a row, first time in his career....
 

Joga Bonito

The Art of Football
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
8,243
Love the Hassler-Barnes duo.

Hassler in particular is a great fit for the wide playmaker role. Lovely little player who was excellent on the flanks.

 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
from one angry man to another, there goes Bremner. Looks pissed for some reason, runs up and.....
feck me, another panenka but this time to the left side while Pfaff went to the right....you thought he cant top that but to celebrate he dived into the biggest puddle of mud and snow you could find on the pitch, what a man. 3:3
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
Gemmell shoots to the left....
Southall goes to the right, he is almost in tears...on the other hand Gemmell so happy he decided to left the pitch and celebrate his goal with his family. 4:3 Pat
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
And here it is, captain Cantona takes the ball and shoots down the middle....
sends gk to the wrong side, 4:4
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
Koeman doesnt like fancy shenanigans, full power bottom right....
Southall is so depressed that he didnt even bother to make the save, just stayed in the middle. 5:4 Pat
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
Stuart Pearce takes the ball , arbitrium going ballistic on the sidelines...Psycho shoots to the left.....
Pfaff just like Southall decided to stay in the middle, 5:5. Refs are bored with this crap so the match will be decided with flip of the coin.
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,668
Downcast picks heads....


Congrats pat!
 

Pat_Mustard

I'm so gorgeous they want to put me under arrest!
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
13,811
Location
A never-nude? I thought he just liked cut-offs.
I rate Barnes. We didn't get much English football in Uruguay but he scored against us in a friendly we won 2-1 at Wembley before the 1990 WC. It was the sort of performance that made me sit up, take notice and lap up any opportunities I had to watch him thereafter.

The reason I suggested a 3-5-2 was that not having a wide forward/winger would allow Raúl to roam into that outside left channel where he was superb in his early years. No slight on Barnes, very much the opposite.

Good stuff on Giles, I do automatically associate him with dirty Leeds so no doubt don't give him the credit he deserves.
Good post.
Love the Hassler-Barnes duo.

Hassler in particular is a great fit for the wide playmaker role. Lovely little player who was excellent on the flanks.

Cheers lads. Anto, the end of England vs Argentina 1986 when Barnes comes on around the 75 minute mark is worth a watch. Brilliant cameo. They only managed to get him on the ball 3 or 4 times, and he came up with a brilliant assist, set up anoher great chance on a platter, and generally looked freaky dangerous every time he touched the ball. Here's the assist:


I love Hassler Joga. There's matches where he looks almost like a pure winger, then you see him elsewhere playing infield and spraying some incredible passes around.
 

Pat_Mustard

I'm so gorgeous they want to put me under arrest!
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
13,811
Location
A never-nude? I thought he just liked cut-offs.
Didn't want to post until poll finished but I never 'got' Barnes the way some did (maybe a United/Liverpool bias from me?).

Clearly very good at club level (though surrounded by some great players?) but never saw him do it on the big stage, though tbf the lack of European football obviously took away an opportunity? I'm sure I read once that he never scored for England at a tournament so interesting you mention a friendly goal.... his goal v Brazil (friendly) tends to he shown whenever the media talk about him as some sort of English/Brazilian hybrid.

Like I say, very good at club level but I'll remember him for one thing..... in the last minute of Liverpool Arsenal 89 (the title decider), he had the ball down the right wing and instead of going to the corner flag, he tried to go for goal, lost the ball and 20 second later, Thomas scores and yours truly wins his £10 7-1 bet on Arsenal :cool:.

Good times.
I've become almost evangelical about him, weirdly, but I agree that his inconsistency at international level, and the unfortunate fact that he never got the opportunity to play in Europe at his peak, obviously hurt his overall standing. I agree with @Chesterlestreet and @Raees that he was particularly well-rounded, with his late career reinvention as a central midfielder emphasising the fact, and in spurts at least he showed what he could do at the highest level even in a sub-par set up.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,185
Location
Montevideo
Didn't want to post until poll finished but I never 'got' Barnes the way some did (maybe a United/Liverpool bias from me?).

Clearly very good at club level (though surrounded by some great players?) but never saw him do it on the big stage, though tbf the lack of European football obviously took away an opportunity? I'm sure I read once that he never scored for England at a tournament so interesting you mention a friendly goal.... his goal v Brazil (friendly) tends to he shown whenever the media talk about him as some sort of English/Brazilian hybrid.

Like I say, very good at club level but I'll remember him for one thing..... in the last minute of Liverpool Arsenal 89 (the title decider), he had the ball down the right wing and instead of going to the corner flag, he tried to go for goal, lost the ball and 20 second later, Thomas scores and yours truly wins his £10 7-1 bet on Arsenal :cool:.

Good times.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,185
Location
Montevideo
I think Barnes suffered somewhat from not being an ideal fit for the system(s) normally favoured by England managers.

He was comparable to someone like Figo, I'd say, in terms of being extremely influential/dominant from a wide position, whereas England (still) wanted more of a line hugger (and less of a truly dominant presence).

Comparable to Scholes too - in the sense that he was underwhelming, overall, for the NT, but mostly because the system clearly didn't suit him all that well.

He was the best, most important player for a Liverpool side that were - clearly - among the best in Europe (but never got to go up against the likes of PSV and Milan for obvious reasons).
That's exactly why I initially found him odd next to Raúl, so much more than a winger, he was quite clearly the most complete forward England had and I'm not sure they've had any better since.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,036
Location
Moscow
Always found Barnes surprisingly likable - considering that I actively dislike most of the Liverpool players (bar Alonso, Litmanen, Barnes and maybe a few others, Busby aside). Fantastic player