Penalty are unfairs, what if you have poeple grade the performance?

[fontaine]

team A x team B

one team attack ,attacks the other is negative

what if people online or like judges grade at the end of 120 minutos (like in snowdiving and skating etc)

"hey man this team kicked on goal 15 times, the other 3 times lets give them a superior grade" .. the team with most superior grades wins..

so if there are 10 judges .. you add the grades for team A by judge 1, judge 2, judge 3, judge 4, judge 5, judge 6, jdughe 7, judge 8, jude 9, judge 10 and divide by 10. do the same for team b. whoever has a higher grade goes through

or do you prefer online voting? but you have to exclude IPs from the countries that are playticipating int the game...

penalty is worse idea than that

 

[129104946]

Online voting: Liverpool wins the World Cup

 

[LouisDanGaal]

I will never understand what happens inside your head for the few minutes just before you click post.

 

[Brown Toothpick]

You should be banned for this.

 

[Rado_N]

What if one goal was voted 7 times better than another?

 

[Lennon7]

I'd love to meet you in real life, mate

 

[horsechoker]

team A x team B

one team attack ,attacks the other is negative

what if people online or like judges grade at the end of 120 minutos (like in snowdiving and skating etc)

"hey man this team kicked on goal 15 times, the other 3 times lets give them a superior grade" .. the team with most superior grades wins..

so if there are 10 judges .. you add the grades for team A by judge 1, judge 2, judge 3, judge 4, judge 5, judge 6, jdughe 7, judge 8, jude 9, judge 10 and divide by 10. do the same for team b. whoever has a higher grade goes through

or do you prefer online voting? but you have to exclude IPs from the countries that are playticipating int the game...

penalty is worse idea than that

No, just no, I'm not having Liverpool or 4chan decide football matches.

What if one goal was voted 7 times better than another?

What if a goal wins by a slim majority but many people regret voting for that goal and demand a second referendum vote?

 

[Ish]

Football compromises of both defence and offense.

I know fans love to see goals, all out attack, tiki taka etc, but defence and defensive organization is part of football. Love it or hate it.

 

[JrRed]

This is actually brilliant.

 

[iammemphis]

You should be banned for this.

 

[DWelbz19]

You should be banned for this.

At the very least banished to the seventh circle of hell

 

[jungledrums]

Terrible idea, would turn into a popularity contest. Even if it didn't, it's an appalling idea.

 

[Giggs86]

The team that has more hot women goes through.

There should be an automated camera that takes a photo of every woman entering the stadium.

At the end they do a vote and the team with more babes at the attendance goes through.

Fair?

 

[Raw]

If after 90 minutes it's still a draw, both teams have to surrender one player to make it 10 v 10. If after 10 minutes it's still a draw, then it becomes 9 v 9. If one team was already a man down then it becomes 10 v 9, 9 v 8 and so on.

Continue until there's a winner. If, for some crazy reason, it's still a draw after 1v1 then I dunno, flip a coin or something.

 

[harms]

 

[fontaine]

irs saturday relax

ok its a bad idea, move on

 

[LazyBones]

Smokin crack?

 

[DWelbz19]

What the feck? The whole game is on YouTube?

 

[ChaddyP]

nothing like a Fontaine OP, never change

 

[2ndTouch]

team A x team B

one team attack ,attacks the other is negative

what if people online or like judges grade at the end of 120 minutos (like in snowdiving and skating etc)

"hey man this team kicked on goal 15 times, the other 3 times lets give them a superior grade" .. the team with most superior grades wins..

so if there are 10 judges .. you add the grades for team A by judge 1, judge 2, judge 3, judge 4, judge 5, judge 6, jdughe 7, judge 8, jude 9, judge 10 and divide by 10. do the same for team b. whoever has a higher grade goes through

or do you prefer online voting? but you have to exclude IPs from the countries that are playticipating int the game...

penalty is worse idea than that

I think there is a 7:1 chance the judges here at the caf will regard your *idea* as one of the stupidest things ever proposed on this forum

 

[Giggs86]

If after 90 minutes it's still a draw, both teams have to surrender one player to make it 10 v 10. If after 10 minutes it's still a draw, then it becomes 9 v 9. If one team was already a man down then it becomes 10 v 9, 9 v 8 and so on.

Continue until there's a winner. If, for some crazy reason, it's still a draw after 1v1 then I dunno, flip a coin or something.

That is actually a good idea. Would make it exciting to see which player each team sacrifice and which players each team fancy to do well on say 5v5 situations.
Only concern is that it would stretch for too long, make it 5 minutes before an additional players needs to surrender.

 

[fontaine]

If after 90 minutes it's still a draw, both teams have to surrender one player to make it 10 v 10. If after 10 minutes it's still a draw, then it becomes 9 v 9. If one team was already a man down then it becomes 10 v 9, 9 v 8 and so on.

Continue until there's a winner. If, for some crazy reason, it's still a draw after 1v1 then I dunno, flip a coin or something.

thats good. but its the opposing manager who decides the player the other team sacrifices

except he cannot pick the goalkeeper .. if he does pick the goalkeeper the coach's team gets dealt 3 pts in damage and loses mana

 

[Earthquake]

This is one of the worst things I've ever read on RedCafe.

Actually impressively awful. Well done, I guess.

 

[Americano]

I fear for the future of our way of life.

 

[fontaine]

This is one of the worst things I've ever read on RedCafe.

Actually impressively awful. Well done, I guess.

you're worst lol hahaha

 

[TheNewEra]

My brain broke

 

[Earthquake]

you're worst lol hahaha

Aye, I'm terrible, to be fair.

 

[Scorpy]

I still remember his "pong" paint drawing. Oh man, the memories are overwhelming.

 

[one340]

How was this guy promoted?

 

[Piratesoup]

How was this guy promoted?

You don't talk like that about the magnificent Ful Ful Full Member

 

[nobby the legend]

Both of our players didn't score. Is that the reason for this post?

 

[Irrational.]

I think I lost a few brain cells reading that.

 

[ChaddyP]

we should have a forum just for his threads. would be the best forum on the site

 

[Offside]

What did I just read

 

[TheNewEra]

we should have a forum just for his threads. would be the best forum on the site

I actually thought of this too a few minutes ago, but I think it could somehow be harnessed and used for evil.

 

[ChaddyP]

I actually thought of this too a few minutes ago, but I think it could somehow be harnessed and used for evil.

 

[Big Ben Foster]

Online voting: Liverpool wins the World Cup

You should be banned for this.

 

[JazzG]

You just need to read some of the rubbish on here and Twitter to see why this would be a bad idea!

 

[Vato]

Are you Uncle Dolan?

 

[podurban2]

team A x team B

one team attack ,attacks the other is negative

what if people online or like judges grade at the end of 120 minutos (like in snowdiving and skating etc)

"hey man this team kicked on goal 15 times, the other 3 times lets give them a superior grade" .. the team with most superior grades wins..

so if there are 10 judges .. you add the grades for team A by judge 1, judge 2, judge 3, judge 4, judge 5, judge 6, jdughe 7, judge 8, jude 9, judge 10 and divide by 10. do the same for team b. whoever has a higher grade goes through

or do you prefer online voting? but you have to exclude IPs from the countries that are playticipating int the game...

penalty is worse idea than that

For some reason I read this in a hoarse Latin American accent.