Player rumblings against Fergie

Adebisi's Hat

Full Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
748
Location
Out Wesht
Supports
who do you feckin think ?
My take is to stick with ETH and (alleged) rumblings from players just make me more firm on this.

This got me thinking though and have a couple of questions for those around during the late 80s. Did with the horrible results at that time and with all the 'Tra Fergie ' stuff, did any of the players ever come out against Fergie or were there even media rumours of such at the time? Also at 3 to 4 years into the Fergie era did it feel like he was a dead man walking or was there a confidence among at least some fans that he would turn it around ?
 

Kinky Melinky

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2000
Messages
27,142
Location
Sligo
ETH needs to be given time. There are assuredly things he has done that have caused me to question him, but sacking a manager before Jim enters the mix would really only create more chaos than its worth.
 

Velvet Revolver

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2010
Messages
1,354
Location
Inside Scholes's Brain
I have two questions
1- when has a journalist ever been right about their predictions ( not talking about obvious writing on the wall stuff)
2- When has a journalist ever helped a good cause, or gone against the grain and provided positivity when there is gloom and doom
 

Adebisi's Hat

Full Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
748
Location
Out Wesht
Supports
who do you feckin think ?
I have two questions
1- when has a journalist ever been right about their predictions ( not talking about obvious writing on the wall stuff)
2- When has a journalist ever helped a good cause, or gone against the grain and provided positivity when there is gloom and doom
Its even worse now i think with so much clickbait , and Utd are clickbait central of the football and even the sporting world. Yes the day we take Chris Sutton seriously will be a bad time although i must say Romano is a good step above the rest, i have heard him even come out to refute BS stories from other journalists which is probably not usually the done thing.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,530
its amazing how the quip 'nothing is new under the sun' is so true. This letter and quote could 100% be applier to todays situation.
Dzięki for this bro.
Well, no - it couldn't.

If we, as supporters had any sort of faith in the hierarchy above ETH, I think many of us would happily be patient.

As it stands, though - no. It isn't comparable. It works as a general reminder that football fans are frequently ridiculously impatient, but it really doesn't apply to this particular situation.
 

Adebisi's Hat

Full Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
748
Location
Out Wesht
Supports
who do you feckin think ?
Well, no - it couldn't.

If we, as supporters had any sort of faith in the hierarchy above ETH, I think many of us would happily be patient.

As it stands, though - no. It isn't comparable. It works as a general reminder that football fans are frequently ridiculously impatient, but it really doesn't apply to this particular situation.
Fair enough, did supporters have big faith in the owners at that time though ?
 

Gavinb33

Full Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
2,738
Location
Watching the TV or is it watching me
Well, no - it couldn't.

If we, as supporters had any sort of faith in the hierarchy above ETH, I think many of us would happily be patient.

As it stands, though - no. It isn't comparable. It works as a general reminder that football fans are frequently ridiculously impatient, but it really doesn't apply to this particular situation.
The fans in the 80's hated the board Edwards specifically
 

Puskas_007

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2011
Messages
1,367
The fans in the 80's hated the board Edwards specifically
Exactly, as it has always been, the narrative around the executive and the manager and the players all falls down to on-pitch performance - the noise is just more constant these days with social media and clickbait...
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,530
The fans in the 80's hated the board Edwards specifically
Yes, fine.

That was poorly worded on my part.

Of course, nobody loved and trusted the owners back then either.

But the point is that you can't possibly - unless you're insanely naive - think that ETH can do anything like Fergie did back then given the current premise.

So, preaching "patience" is exactly what it was under Moyes, LVG, José, Ole and Ralf - no?

Patience if you believe something fundamental has changed? Sure, sign me up.

Patience with yet another "manager" under the same, non-existent "structure"? No, why?
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,530
Fair enough, did supporters have big faith in the owners at that time though ?
As I said above, no they didn't.

But that isn't really the point. It was a very different world. Before the PL, for one thing.

The idea that one man could transform a sleeping giant was much more plausible back then. It isn't plausible at all now.
 

Adebisi's Hat

Full Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
748
Location
Out Wesht
Supports
who do you feckin think ?
As I said above, no they didn't.

But that isn't really the point. It was a very different world. Before the PL, for one thing.

The idea that one man could transform a sleeping giant was much more plausible back then. It isn't plausible at all now.
i agree in that i think no manager can make a proper go of it under the current Glazernomics system, but at least now with the Jimster coming in there maybe a chance of the 'fundamental change' you allude to actually happening. I have doubts of how far Jim can go with Joel Glazer looking over his shoulder but it still should herald the biggest structural change at the sporting side of the club for years. It really is a case of wait and see though for the moment.
 

Rhyme Animal

Thinks Di Zerbi is better than Pep.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
11,193
Location
Nonchalantly scoring the winner...
There were many players in the late 80s that went against SAF, but there was VERY LITTLE player power.

Many of those players didn’t even have agents… let alone super agents guiding their careers and so on.

The above point can’t really be overstated.

There was also far less football media to exploit and no direct statement outlets as is now the case with social media.

And then the fact that SAF was utterly ruthless to the point of perhaps being a very high functioning psychopath (please note - not saying he was a bad person), and thus anyone who directly crossed him was obliterated, humiliated and made an example of.
 

simonhch

Horrible boss
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
14,485
Location
Seventh Heaven
Supports
Urban Combat Preparedness
It’s hard to call. So much wrong with the club. I’ve firmly been ETH in, but Wednesdays game pushed me more to the out camp mainly because of a lot of his quotes recently. He was hired because of the football he played at Ajax and now he claims to be building a completely different type of team. Having spent so much money, that is in itself somewhat alarming and I don’t know what to make of it. Whether this is a misguided direction from above or what.

The sensible thing is to wait for Jim to come in and see what structure they put in place. I think it’s fair to say that no manager will succeed here under the current structure. Yet…… getting the basics right anyone should be able to do, and we aren’t, so that is very alarming.

We’ve seen this cycle many times before and the one common denominator is the Glazers. So maybe we start with the sporting structure and then make a decision on the manager. Frankly I’m at a loss at this point.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
Oh look, the Ferguson excuse. How novel. I have only seen it 1000 times during the previous 11 years. Managers perform like shit : Give him time as Fergie needed 5 years to become good.
 

sparx99

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
3,946
Yes, fine.

That was poorly worded on my part.

Of course, nobody loved and trusted the owners back then either.

But the point is that you can't possibly - unless you're insanely naive - think that ETH can do anything like Fergie did back then given the current premise.

So, preaching "patience" is exactly what it was under Moyes, LVG, José, Ole and Ralf - no?

Patience if you believe something fundamental has changed? Sure, sign me up.

Patience with yet another "manager" under the same, non-existent "structure"? No, why?
I guess the answer lies in figuring out if

1. Would Moyes, Mourinho, LVG, Ole or now ETH have eventually figured out how best to work with the Glazers and then been more successful in the long term?

2. If any of those managers had a longer timeframe with which to squad-build would they have made better transfer decisions? For example, would ETH have said no to Casemiro and gone for Caicedo or Rice a year later knowing he’s building for the long term not to keep his job right now.

The problem with a lack of patience such as it is is that you never can know what might have been. It’s a mystery box. Maybe Mourinho or Moyes or LVG needed more time. Maybe we keep cutting ourselves off at the knees because progress didn’t happen as fast or as linearly as we wanted it to.
 

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,866
I don't think things were allowed to simmer with Fergie. If there were issues with him it was bought out in the open between the parties concerned.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,530
It really is a case of wait and see though for the moment.
Yes.

I don't know what to think with regard to Ratcliffe.

But if he actually gains control over "the football side", the very first thing he needs to do is to discard the idea of any "manager" figure resembling Alex Ferguson.

We need a proper structure, not a genius "manager".
 

Big Ben Foster

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
12,796
Location
BR -> MI -> TX
Supports
Also support Vasco da Gama
Oh look, the Ferguson excuse. How novel. I have only seen it 1000 times during the previous 11 years. Managers perform like shit : Give him time as Fergie needed 5 years to become good.
It's incredible. Posters have been using the same excuse since 2013 and yet every time someone uses it they think it's an "eureka!" moment they've stumbled upon.
 

Still ill

Fantasy Football Champ 2018
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
8,190
Location
Ireland
My memory of those days were that it was a very different kind of depression. I was deeply unhappy with United under Fergie in the early years, he'd jettisoned McGrath and Whiteside, players I loved, without improving anything. We never threatened top spot under big Ron, not really, not in the run in to the title and there wasn't even the craic that came with cup runs in his early days. But it wasn't real anger for me anyway because I'd known nothing else. We'd always been shite in the league. No Internet meant no rumblings of discontent unless you mean amongst your mates and that's always there, isn't it? But yeah, it looked like he was a goner and few tears would have been shed. The lesson I took from it, and I'll never forget it, is that I have zero clue what's really going on. That's a good lesson.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,530
I guess the answer lies in figuring out if

1. Would Moyes, Mourinho, LVG, Ole or now ETH have eventually figured out how best to work with the Glazers and then been more successful in the long term?

2. If any of those managers had a longer timeframe with which to squad-build would they have made better transfer decisions? For example, would ETH have said no to Casemiro and gone for Caicedo or Rice a year later knowing he’s building for the long term not to keep his job right now.

The problem with a lack of patience such as it is is that you never can know what might have been. It’s a mystery box. Maybe Mourinho or Moyes or LVG needed more time. Maybe we keep cutting ourselves off at the knees because progress didn’t happen as fast or as linearly as we wanted it to.
Maybe. But no.

(For me: no. I don't think any of those "managers" would have/will eventually gotten/get it right as a solo figure/saviour type. It ain't gonna happen. Sorry. I have said for nearly a decade now that we need someone above the "manager" to - potentially, at least - save us. I stand by that.)
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,616
Location
DownUnder
My take is to stick with ETH and (alleged) rumblings from players just make me more firm on this.

This got me thinking though and have a couple of questions for those around during the late 80s. Did with the horrible results at that time and with all the 'Tra Fergie ' stuff, did any of the players ever come out against Fergie or were there even media rumours of such at the time? Also at 3 to 4 years into the Fergie era did it feel like he was a dead man walking or was there a confidence among at least some fans that he would turn it around ?
United didn't have shite hawks like Goldbridge etc peddling shite on social media. Fergie took out Whiteside, McGrath and a few others for their drinking culture, so pretty sure he'd have made himself unpopular in the dressing room. But he came out the other side with authority and anyone he signed knew they'd lose. He was ruthless when he needed to be, as should all managers be.
 

sparx99

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
3,946
Maybe. But no.

(For me: no. I don't think any of those "managers" would have/will eventually gotten/get it right as a solo figure/saviour type. It ain't gonna happen. Sorry. I have said for nearly a decade now that we need someone above the "manager" to - potentially, at least - save us. I stand by that.)
We have literally put a DOF in place though and people still want ETH sacked and I’ve seen very few calling for John Murtough to be fired.

I imagine because Murtough hasn’t actually been in charge long enough to have turned it around. We have made massive cuts to the wage bill, released the likes of Jones and Bailly. Cut adrift fringe youth players.

There is a possibility we are in fact trying to change the culture and what we are seeing is growing pains. This could actually be a ‘transition’ period.
 

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,866
Oh look, the Ferguson excuse. How novel. I have only seen it 1000 times during the previous 11 years. Managers perform like shit : Give him time as Fergie needed 5 years to become good.

I find it really insulting to Fergie as it's basically saying he only came good because of time and it had little to do with his own managerial ability
 

Cerberus

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
181
To the people comparing our managers being given time with Fergie, what manager of ours in the last 10 years has left this club and had massive success elsewhere? If our main issue is not giving managers time, then we should see the likes of Mourinho, Ole and LVG winning top honours right now.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,218
My take is to stick with ETH and (alleged) rumblings from players just make me more firm on this.

This got me thinking though and have a couple of questions for those around during the late 80s. Did with the horrible results at that time and with all the 'Tra Fergie ' stuff, did any of the players ever come out against Fergie or were there even media rumours of such at the time? Also at 3 to 4 years into the Fergie era did it feel like he was a dead man walking or was there a confidence among at least some fans that he would turn it around ?
You're trying to draw a comparison to the media rumblings against SAF in his early days to what we are hearing coming out against ETH. Good luck to you getting any reasonable responses. You'll just be accused of comparing ETH to SAF etc etc..

The usual ETH out bellends don't even read the post. What they see is, "ETH can be the new SAF, he just needs another 26 years." So they'll just post the same nonsense in here as they have everywhere else.

Like this crap.

What parallels are there between the squad Fergie inherited and the one Ten Hag has with 12 of his own players in it?
Oh look, the Ferguson excuse. How novel. I have only seen it 1000 times during the previous 11 years. Managers perform like shit : Give him time as Fergie needed 5 years to become good.
 
Last edited:

red_de_pologne

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
3,628
Location
Warsaw, Poland
To the people comparing our managers being given time with Fergie, what manager of ours in the last 10 years has left this club and had massive success elsewhere? If our main issue is not giving managers time, then we should see the likes of Mourinho, Ole and LVG winning top honours right now.
You could argue that LVG did very well with dutch NT, and Jose had success with Roma (relevant to the club's size), then you have Moyes who is doing pretty well for West Ham
 

Still ill

Fantasy Football Champ 2018
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
8,190
Location
Ireland
I find it really insulting to Fergie as it's basically saying he only came good because of time and it had little to do with his own managerial ability
Please. I don't think you need to get insulted on Fergie's behalf. I'd give one of my testicles to seehow most of you guys would have reacted to us slipping 7 places to 11th in the table in his first year in charge. Never mind your reaction to us plummeting to 12th 3rd season in. Followed by 13th??!!! All this pious shit in relation to Fergie makes me want to kick people. Like we all knew it was coming. Such shite. He would have been massacred on here if it was nowadays. And I love the man. Obviously.
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,232
Location
Not Moskva
I don’t recall press speculation about the dressing room being unhappy back then. There was surprise and some dismay among fans when SAF binned McGrath and Whiteside but I can’t remember reading “sources close to Bryan Robson claim the United captain is surprised and disappointed by the departure of the only two players who can go round for round with him…….”
 

Cerberus

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
181
You could argue that LVG did very well with dutch NT, and Jose had success with Roma (relevant to the club's size), then you have Moyes who is doing pretty well for West Ham
That's fair. Although, I still think Mou is a spent force at the top level and Roma is essentially a mid-table side. The only manager I think calls for more time were somewhat justified for was LVG. Not to be revisionist about his time here because the football was very dire especially in the second season, but he's the only manager who actually implemented a style of play.
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,232
Location
Not Moskva
Please. I don't think you need to get insulted on Fergie's behalf. I'd give one of my testicles to seehow most of you guys would have reacted to us slipping 7 places to 11th in the table in his first year in charge. Never mind your reaction to us plummeting to 12th 3rd season in. Followed by 13th??!!! All this pious shit in relation to Fergie makes me want to kick people. Like we all knew it was coming. Such shite. He would have been massacred on here if it was nowadays. And I love the man. Obviously.
Well said. I have to admit that I had lost faith by 1989. I have probably posted this before but I always remember being in a pub somewhere near Wembley full of United fans heading back north after the 1990 cup final with Palace (the 3-3 game) and a lot of United fans were chanting (to the tune of “Alex Ferguson’s Red and White Army”) “Alex Ferguson’s UB40“ (a UB40 is the name of the form you get when you are made redundant for non-UK posters, as well as a crap Brummie reggie band). None of us knew how things would turn out and United fans loved a moan back then as well.