Teja
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2014
- Messages
- 5,877
So, to snap out of the doom and gloom a bit. Assuming we sign Conte, let's look at some of the midfield partnerships he employs.
Chelsea 16/17
Mostly, Kante + Matic alternated with Kante + Fabregas.
Chelsea 17/18
Matic left, so he tried
Fab + Bakayoko (his default)
Fab + Bakayoko + Kante (His defensive 3-5-2 in big games. Drops an attacking mid and pushes a CM (Kante) higher up, the infamous City 0:1 game)
Kante + Bakayoko (not very successfully, Fab was pushed to LAM in these games)
(and some others rarely)
Conte 20/21 Inter
Brozovic + Barella + Vidal / Eriksen (Default 3-5-2)
Translating that to our squad:
(Not a CF thread, so I haven't put a lot of thought into which CFs play, how we press etc..)
(Could be McT / Fred in all cases below.)
3-5-2 (The preferred Inter formation):
Two of the forwards in our current 4-2-4 were sacrificed - one for a CB, one for a DM.
---------------- CF ---- CF -------------------
------------ Pogba -- McT -----------------
---WB --------- Matic ------------WB-----
---------CB ---- CB ----- CB ----------------
3-5-1-1 (Minor variation with one AM instead of two CFs)
--------------------- CF ---------------------------
------------------ Bruno ------------------------
------------ Pogba -- McT ------------------
---WB ---------- Matic -------------WB-----
---------CB ------- CB ----- CB --------------
3-4-3 Chelsea style (The 16/17 Chelsea Default)
---------------------- CF -------------------------
- Sancho / Bruno -- Greenwood ---
------------ Fred -- Matic -------------------
---WB -------------------- ------------WB-----
---------CB ---- CB ----- CB ----------------
EDITs from comments below
Ultimately all his formations employed a sitting playmaker / #6 (which we don't really have beyond Matic). You could shoehorn Pogba / Fred into that role (Ole tried this as well) but hasn't come off.
Regardless Pogba's going to leave as well, so we need a Matic type player in the side (and not a pure DM like Gueye). One of the CM spots can be rotated between Fred / McT depending on how much attacking thrust we need.
Chelsea 16/17
Mostly, Kante + Matic alternated with Kante + Fabregas.
Chelsea 17/18
Matic left, so he tried
Fab + Bakayoko (his default)
Fab + Bakayoko + Kante (His defensive 3-5-2 in big games. Drops an attacking mid and pushes a CM (Kante) higher up, the infamous City 0:1 game)
Kante + Bakayoko (not very successfully, Fab was pushed to LAM in these games)
(and some others rarely)
Conte 20/21 Inter
Brozovic + Barella + Vidal / Eriksen (Default 3-5-2)
Translating that to our squad:
(Not a CF thread, so I haven't put a lot of thought into which CFs play, how we press etc..)
(Could be McT / Fred in all cases below.)
3-5-2 (The preferred Inter formation):
Two of the forwards in our current 4-2-4 were sacrificed - one for a CB, one for a DM.
---------------- CF ---- CF -------------------
------------ Pogba -- McT -----------------
---WB --------- Matic ------------WB-----
---------CB ---- CB ----- CB ----------------
3-5-1-1 (Minor variation with one AM instead of two CFs)
--------------------- CF ---------------------------
------------------ Bruno ------------------------
------------ Pogba -- McT ------------------
---WB ---------- Matic -------------WB-----
---------CB ------- CB ----- CB --------------
3-4-3 Chelsea style (The 16/17 Chelsea Default)
---------------------- CF -------------------------
- Sancho / Bruno -- Greenwood ---
------------ Fred -- Matic -------------------
---WB -------------------- ------------WB-----
---------CB ---- CB ----- CB ----------------
EDITs from comments below
Ultimately all his formations employed a sitting playmaker / #6 (which we don't really have beyond Matic). You could shoehorn Pogba / Fred into that role (Ole tried this as well) but hasn't come off.
Regardless Pogba's going to leave as well, so we need a Matic type player in the side (and not a pure DM like Gueye). One of the CM spots can be rotated between Fred / McT depending on how much attacking thrust we need.
Last edited: