padr81
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Messages
- 11,971
- Supports
- Man City
Brighton have gifted us two of the goals with comedy defending.
If any United player did that VAR 100% would have disallowed the goal.That was an awful from Kyle Walker going in 2 footed on the keeper, he should have at least been booked
They analysed every frame of the derby, pulling back a random set piece 2 minutes later to punish Hojlund for feck all. Yet apparently var here is powerless to intervene…Why do city keep getting all these decisions?! An absolute joke. They’d give that against us. Paying the refs now
It’s such a pointless technicality: we have to agree with the original on field decision. Why? It literally defeats the entire fecking object it was intended for.They need to ask themselves if the ref would have give that would they have overturned it? If the answer is No then it’s a pen! Simple
We need a Forest style rant from the Brighton Twitter admin after the game.Piss take, absolute piss take. That’s 2 maybe 3 clear pens not given in one game
I'm not sure if this is a joke, but I'll say it anyway. Their owners literally are paying referees. This is a known fact.Yup. The corruption is so blatant. I wouldn’t be surprised if it turns out that they’ve been paying referees like Barcelona.
I’m gonna sound paranoid as feck, but we’ve had some absolute shockers go against us this season. Both PL and Europe.that fecking Rodri/Hojlund penalty looks even more ridiculous
Clear trip on his legs. For me thats a pen. This place is a bit crazy with the 2-3 pens but that one is stonewall. Clearly runs into him from the wrong side and takes his footing. Stonewall.I think it's a pen because of the little jump that Gvardiol makes into the legs. Don't think it's a pen if he doesn't do that. Don't like it when players get a pen for jumping in front of defenders and going down but this was more than that.
It has to come out one day. Doping, backhanders…there’s some shady shit going on other than all the shit we do know about.I'm not sure if this is a joke, but I'll say it anyway. Their owners literally are paying referees. This is a known fact.
There’s just no competing against a bunch of cheats.It’s such a pointless technicality: we have to agree with the original on field decision. Why? It literally defeats the entire fecking object it was intended for.
They need to add an extra charge. Should be 116. Bribing referees!City get away with everything.
Foden’s freekick which wasn’t even a foul, Brighton denied a penalty, and now Walker allowed to tackle into the keeper’s hands to score
This whole not overruling the ref thing is ridiculous for something brought to fix refs mistakes. Now you just have mates judging their mates work.They need to ask themselves if the ref would have give that would they have overturned it? If the answer is No then it’s a pen! Simple
They can rule goals out due to the tiniest of pixels, but won’t look at obvious shit. I get they don’t want to re-ref the game in its entirety, but there’s got to be a way that’s better than thisVAR continues to baffle me. Why can they disallow goals due to fouls and offsides in the build up but not one scored from a free kick that wasnt a free kick?
Are the Premier league afraid of using the actual rules of the game when Man City are in action?City get away with everything.
Foden’s freekick which wasn’t even a foul, Brighton denied a penalty, and now Walker allowed to tackle into the keeper’s hands to score
They used to say ‘the big teams get all the decisions’. Well the big teams get all the VAR decisions now instead. They still get tonnes wrong with VAR as well - it just needs to be binned off into room 101. Why cant VAR say to the ref ‘no one touched Foden and you’ve awarded them a free kick in a goalscoring position for a slip’They can rule goals out due to the tiniest of pixels, but won’t look at obvious shit. I get they don’t want to re-ref the game in its entirety, but there’s got to be a way that’s better than this
It's completely arbitrary what they will and won't over-rule. Getting to the correct decision is not in their rationale.They can rule goals out due to the tiniest of pixels, but won’t look at obvious shit. I get they don’t want to re-ref the game in its entirety, but there’s got to be a way that’s better than this