croadyman
Prepare for despair
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 41,438
What's the reliability of the sourcePlease be true..
What's the reliability of the sourcePlease be true..
Thought Mastantuono wasn't moving until 2026, if Cherki had similar level of output from wide area as Mbeumo I wouldn't be concerned about lack of goals. Mind you he doesn't play as a centre forward in quite the same way so understandable that's the case.Can we have both Cherki and Franco Mastantuono?
Cherki on the right side to compete with Amad and Mastantuono to be a backup of Bruno.
Thought Mastantuono wasn't moving until 2026
Le Progrès is a local paper in Lyon and historically they are reliable with Lyon.What's the reliability of the source
here's the thing....if we purchase Cunha, i don't see amorim going for another 10 as he could play Mount(who we know he likes for some odd reason), bruno or Amad there so is cherki a luxury buy?
seen mention of Amad playing RWB which is mental....he doesn't have the defensive disposition to play that role so he has to play one of the two 10's
I still could if he is obtainable for reasonable feehere's the thing....if we purchase Cunha, i don't see amorim going for another 10 as he could play Mount(who we know he likes for some odd reason), bruno or Amad there so is cherki a luxury buy?
seen mention of Amad playing RWB which is mental....he doesn't have the defensive disposition to play that role so he has to play one of the two 10's
He's tended to do quite well at RWB so I don't mind him there for next season, because we're on a somewhat tight budget and probably won't get a proper RWB yet. Long term I agree, his skillset is much more suited to the R10 position.here's the thing....if we purchase Cunha, i don't see amorim going for another 10 as he could play Mount(who we know he likes for some odd reason), bruno or Amad there so is cherki a luxury buy?
seen mention of Amad playing RWB which is mental....he doesn't have the defensive disposition to play that role so he has to play one of the two 10's
Le Progrès is no longer to be trusted when it comes to transfers. They don't have their entries now with the new ownership. The reliable source is Guillemet from L'Equipe as you said.Le Progrès is a local paper in Lyon and historically they are reliable with Lyon.
Nevertheless, I think that for Cherki, except the likes of Whitell, Romano and Ornstein, we have to follow Hugo Guillemet from L'Equipe, who is close to Lyon's board.
So I suppose that we have to wait for one of these 4 to provide an update on Cherki.
Finnaly, Lyon needs to sell for 40M€ until end of June to be compliant with French's DNCG (with is the French PSR), so maybe we'll have something on Cherki later next month
true...u may get 15 games a season with himAgree with you but, what if Cunha becomes your sole striker (imagine we don't have money to buy a striker and Cunha is placed here over Rachmuch), then you would only have Bruno and Amad, with Mount always injured.
And also, what if one of the two gets injured, suspended etc... So it's maybe a backup solution.
To be honest, knowing that neither Cuhna or Ryan are big workers, we would have issues in terms of pressing and continuity so I am not sure, but in another hand, 30m€ for him s a bargain.
croady is probably right for a reasonable fee but would he be an immediate starter? would that 30m quid be better served somewhere else that might be a starting XI type of player?I still could if he is obtainable for reasonable fee
he can get away with it against some teams in the premier league that are going to sit back and defend but he can't play that role against the teams that will attack us bc he just doesn't have the defensive instincts or mindset to track effectivelyHe's tended to do quite well at RWB so I don't mind him there for next season, because we're on a somewhat tight budget and probably won't get a proper RWB yet. Long term I agree, his skillset is much more suited to the R10 position.
Erm, Bruno, cough coughI need this. United need players that excite and currently we only have Amad - and the odd Zirkzee silky touch
I disagree with the commentary on Amad's ability to play RWB. For a start, Amorim inherently plays a somewhat unbalanced system with a more defensive option on one side, and pretty much a winger on the other (preferably inverted). It's how he creates the overload with four attacking players instead of three. With Dorgu on the left, we should see the right side as being much closer to a winger than a defender. Whenever Amad has played there he has done very well, he's also very good at receiving the ball under pressure, turning, and progressing the play, which enormously helps our ability to progress the ball from the back. At Sporting he played Quenda as the RWB, who has the same sort of profile to Amad.here's the thing....if we purchase Cunha, i don't see amorim going for another 10 as he could play Mount(who we know he likes for some odd reason), bruno or Amad there so is cherki a luxury buy?
seen mention of Amad playing RWB which is mental....he doesn't have the defensive disposition to play that role so he has to play one of the two 10's
I disagree with the inside right 10 being tailor made for Amad. His natural inclination is to go wide, and he's most effective when cutting in from the byline.I disagree with the commentary on Amad's ability to play RWB. For a start, Amorim inherently plays a somewhat unbalanced system with a more defensive option on one side, and pretty much a winger on the other (preferably inverted). It's how he creates the overload with four attacking players instead of three. With Dorgu on the left, we should see the right side as being much closer to a winger than a defender. Whenever Amad has played there he has done very well, he's also very good at receiving the ball under pressure, turning, and progressing the play, which enormously helps our ability to progress the ball from the back. At Sporting he played Quenda as the RWB, who has the same sort of profile to Amad.
My disinclination to playing Amad at RWB has nothing to do with his ability to be great at the role, and everything to do with how perfect of a fit he is as the right sided 10. Ultimately I primarily want him in the attacking areas of the pitch almost all the time, and that inside right 10 role is tailor made for him. Not least because he has shown he can go inside or outside, which hugely increases our threat. His pressing is world class, which really helps our defending from the front.
So while I agree that I would rather have Amad as a 10, it is certainly not "mental" by any metric to hypothesize about line ups with Amad on the right.
Firstly, I think you need at the bare minimum 2 players per position to really compete across multiple competitions. Usually a blend of experienced, peak age, and developing players. So that would make 4. I would also then have a fifth to deal with injuries crises, radical dips in form and fixture congestion. Of the names you listed, Zirkzee can cover two positions, 9 and 10. Bruno will be used as an 8 plenty of times, and might even become his first choice position - especially as he ages - then from that list you only have 3 dedicated 10s, one of whom has had debilitating injuries for the last two years.Zirkzee, Amad, Bruno, Mount, Cunha
How many 10s do we need?
Would love to think this was possible, gives us a threat on both sides and through middle as wellDelap + Cunha + Cherki + Gyokeres. Would be a nice start to the rebuild.
Erm, Bruno, cough cough
What a positive postCherki has the same shortcomings as Antony and Sancho i.e. they all lack athleticism required in the PL. Would just be another Sancho mistake.
"..Cherki isn’t exactly blessed with a compact frame, so he’s not the most explosive on the ball. This, paired with his less-athletic physique (which I’ll touch upon later), means that Cherki’s ball-carrying isn’t his best trait. He has shown glimpses of it, but his lack of running power and physicality hold him back from genuinely unlocking the best of his ball-carrying.."
"...Earlier on, Cherki was an effective two-way dribbler, but post-injury there seems to be a noticeable decline in pace, meaning the ability isn’t the same..."
"...Cherki’s physique looks unimpressive at first glance. There’s a sense of complacency, almost, a feeling that he is not fit.
Cherki often struggles in duels. On the ground, it can be quite easy to dispossess him. his back to goal play, when having to rely on his physical abilities, is poor. He gets shoved off the ball quite easily unless he uses his technique. It is an area to improve upon..."
"..Cherki is not an intense pressure, and does not show any willingness to track back in settled possession when the ball is in his own half. While there have been complaints of a lack of motivation and commitment, I think this might also be down to the fitness issues that have been heavily discussed before.
https://medium.com/@the.near.posts/rayan-cherki-the-last-of-a-dying-breed-an-analysis-10bfe18b3855
What a positive post
Care to throw a name forward for this jet heeled winger?
I think it's a case for me of being fed up with utd signing wingers/playmakers who don't have the physically, the acceleration and pace to beat a man and whip in a cross, for example. We have seen it with antony, seen it with Sancho. Cherki obviously has a higher potential ceiling than both but has the same physical limitations.
It's why I'm dubious about these reports of our interest. It would be buying the french Sancho.
Anyway that's my opinion. I'd much rather have a jet heeled winger who can torch the opposition fullback for fun, it's been a long while since we bought one of those.
Whoever wrote all that is either terrible at football analysis or barely watched him play I'm afraid.Cherki has the same shortcomings as Antony and Sancho i.e. they all lack athleticism required in the PL. Would just be another Sancho mistake.
"..Cherki isn’t exactly blessed with a compact frame, so he’s not the most explosive on the ball. This, paired with his less-athletic physique (which I’ll touch upon later), means that Cherki’s ball-carrying isn’t his best trait. He has shown glimpses of it, but his lack of running power and physicality hold him back from genuinely unlocking the best of his ball-carrying.."
"...Earlier on, Cherki was an effective two-way dribbler, but post-injury there seems to be a noticeable decline in pace, meaning the ability isn’t the same..."
"...Cherki’s physique looks unimpressive at first glance. There’s a sense of complacency, almost, a feeling that he is not fit.
Cherki often struggles in duels. On the ground, it can be quite easy to dispossess him. his back to goal play, when having to rely on his physical abilities, is poor. He gets shoved off the ball quite easily unless he uses his technique. It is an area to improve upon..."
"..Cherki is not an intense pressure, and does not show any willingness to track back in settled possession when the ball is in his own half. While there have been complaints of a lack of motivation and commitment, I think this might also be down to the fitness issues that have been heavily discussed before.
https://medium.com/@the.near.posts/rayan-cherki-the-last-of-a-dying-breed-an-analysis-10bfe18b3855
Cherki has the same shortcomings as Antony and Sancho i.e. they all lack athleticism required in the PL. Would just be another Sancho mistake.
"..Cherki isn’t exactly blessed with a compact frame, so he’s not the most explosive on the ball. This, paired with his less-athletic physique (which I’ll touch upon later), means that Cherki’s ball-carrying isn’t his best trait. He has shown glimpses of it, but his lack of running power and physicality hold him back from genuinely unlocking the best of his ball-carrying.."
"...Earlier on, Cherki was an effective two-way dribbler, but post-injury there seems to be a noticeable decline in pace, meaning the ability isn’t the same..."
"...Cherki’s physique looks unimpressive at first glance. There’s a sense of complacency, almost, a feeling that he is not fit.
Cherki often struggles in duels. On the ground, it can be quite easy to dispossess him. his back to goal play, when having to rely on his physical abilities, is poor. He gets shoved off the ball quite easily unless he uses his technique. It is an area to improve upon..."
"..Cherki is not an intense pressure, and does not show any willingness to track back in settled possession when the ball is in his own half. While there have been complaints of a lack of motivation and commitment, I think this might also be down to the fitness issues that have been heavily discussed before.
https://medium.com/@the.near.posts/rayan-cherki-the-last-of-a-dying-breed-an-analysis-10bfe18b3855
I'd argue that Sancho and Cherki are not nearly similar enough to simply call Cherki the 'French Sancho'.
I think it's a case for me of being fed up with utd signing wingers/playmakers who don't have the physically, the acceleration and pace to beat a man and whip in a cross, for example. We have seen it with antony, seen it with Sancho. Cherki obviously has a higher potential ceiling than both but has the same physical limitations.
It's why I'm dubious about these reports of our interest. It would be buying the french Sancho.
Anyway that's my opinion. I'd much rather have a jet heeled winger who can torch the opposition fullback for fun, it's been a long while since we bought one of those.
The article is nearly two years old? He is definitely a different player since then.Cherki has the same shortcomings as Antony and Sancho i.e. they all lack athleticism required in the PL. Would just be another Sancho mistake.
"..Cherki isn’t exactly blessed with a compact frame, so he’s not the most explosive on the ball. This, paired with his less-athletic physique (which I’ll touch upon later), means that Cherki’s ball-carrying isn’t his best trait. He has shown glimpses of it, but his lack of running power and physicality hold him back from genuinely unlocking the best of his ball-carrying.."
"...Earlier on, Cherki was an effective two-way dribbler, but post-injury there seems to be a noticeable decline in pace, meaning the ability isn’t the same..."
"...Cherki’s physique looks unimpressive at first glance. There’s a sense of complacency, almost, a feeling that he is not fit.
Cherki often struggles in duels. On the ground, it can be quite easy to dispossess him. his back to goal play, when having to rely on his physical abilities, is poor. He gets shoved off the ball quite easily unless he uses his technique. It is an area to improve upon..."
"..Cherki is not an intense pressure, and does not show any willingness to track back in settled possession when the ball is in his own half. While there have been complaints of a lack of motivation and commitment, I think this might also be down to the fitness issues that have been heavily discussed before.
https://medium.com/@the.near.posts/rayan-cherki-the-last-of-a-dying-breed-an-analysis-10bfe18b3855
Then we should look to ruthlessly clear them before adding more numbers. Don't see the point in adding Cherki while so many options are already present.Mount and zirkzee are just bodies, we need players that actually contribute.
Thought Mastantuono wasn't moving until 2026, if Cherki had similar level of output from wide area as Mbeumo I wouldn't be concerned about lack of goals. Mind you he doesn't play as a centre forward in quite the same way so understandable that's the case.
Amad has played some of his best football as a RWB this season, he also fits the type of player Amorim likes to play there. More of a winger who has the capability to run up and down the pitch rather than a traditional full back.here's the thing....if we purchase Cunha, i don't see amorim going for another 10 as he could play Mount(who we know he likes for some odd reason), bruno or Amad there so is cherki a luxury buy?
seen mention of Amad playing RWB which is mental....he doesn't have the defensive disposition to play that role so he has to play one of the two 10's
Bruno has played plenty of games as a 8 this season and I think that will be his primary position next year. If we are able to move Hojlund, then Zirkzee will be the backup 9 ( I don't think we will get both Delap and Gyokeres, it'll be one or the other).Zirkzee, Amad, Bruno, Mount, Cunha
How many 10s do we need?
Firstly, I think you need at the bare minimum 2 players per position to really compete across multiple competitions. Usually a blend of experienced, peak age, and developing players. So that would make 4. I would also then have a fifth to deal with injuries crises, radical dips in form and fixture congestion. Of the names you listed, Zirkzee can cover two positions, 9 and 10. Bruno will be used as an 8 plenty of times, and might even become his first choice position - especially as he ages - then from that list you only have 3 dedicated 10s, one of whom has had debilitating injuries for the last two years.
Frankly I would want 4 CMs all good enough to start, and 4 #10s all good enough to start. I would then want one utility CM who is versatile, and one utility AM/FW who is versatile (Zirkzee) to give us a deep enough squad to compete. When doing squad planning calculations for next season, I am counting Bruno as one of the CMs as opposed to one of the 10s. I think his workrate and passing from deep makes us a better team, and we need more pace in the 10 positions than he offers us. He still has an enormous goal threat from the #8 position. I would fully expect us to go into the season with Cunha and Amad as the first choice 10s, and Bruno plus one as the CM options. That would give us Garnacho and Mount as the rotational options.
I'd imagine Mainoo as Bruno's understudy and eventual successor, and Casemiro and Ugarte as rotating the other position. With a proper preseason all together, I am expecting a big leap forward from Ugarte next season. A player who has been hit or miss this season but is a high potential player with a pretty ideal skillset for the role. His main weakness has been receiving the ball under the press in the much higher octane PL. But after a season to acclimate and a proper group preseason, I am hoping for a very positive performance trajectory.
I think of much greater concern is that we need a proper RWB, who is closer to a winger than a defender, and another versatile WB who can play on other side and offer proper options going forwards. Out of Shaw, Amass, Mazroui (who is see as a third CB now) and Dalot, all our options after Dorgu are far too defensive to make this system work properly. After that a reliable keeper, a proper striker, and a ball playing CB would be my preference. I am also all for a peak age midfielder, who can play the defensive side of the game but also has the legs and physicality to bring it forwards and progress play (An Ederson type), but for that to happen I think there has to be at least one major outgoing in midfield from the existing options of Bruno, Casemiro, Mainoo, Ugarte and Collyer (who wouldn't really count as a major outgoing). Of that list, Casemiro, due to his age, is the only one who would really make sense to let go at this point, unless we got a 100m plus offer for Bruno. Which while painful to sanction, might make sense in the long term.
Zirkzees not really a 10, amad has played his best games at rwb, Bruno has playing his best stuff in cm and mount is never fit. So that leaves cunhaZirkzee, Amad, Bruno, Mount, Cunha
How many 10s do we need?
Well how many will be fit at the same time?Zirkzee, Amad, Bruno, Mount, Cunha
How many 10s do we need?