Anchoring the midfield is the legendary Argentine Rossi - who played the exact same role for La Máquina's total football pioneers, as well as Millonarios' infamous Ballet Azul, Argentina in the late 50s and early 60s, and River Plate again with Omar Sívori. Apart from being a defensive monster, Rossi was relatively comfortable on the ball, and adept at sniffing out quick, simple passing opportunities - which will definitely benefit Gérson.He was a team player who never tried to seek personal glory. He turned simplicity into an art form. - Walter Winterbottom
On the contrary I think 3 central midfielders will do him better, as he'll have more service, otherwise in the formation above against a 3 central midfielders on the other side Modric and Cerezo will have a lot to do which might either burden him with more defensive work, going deeper to get the ball or isolated up front.Love the 4-4-2 attempt and it's a much better use of the Kaka-Modric teaming than @Enigma_87 used in the last draft imo. Cerezo-Modric seem like a great CM duo for the 4-4-2 here.
And to yougood luck @Physiocrat
You are forgetting Zagallo. He was the player that made Pele, Didi and Garrincha work in the Brazil '58 team. He also played more of a centralish role in '62 so will provide a lot of aid in midfield.On the contrary I think 3 central midfielders will do him better, as he'll have more service, otherwise in the formation above against a 3 central midfielders on the other side Modric and Cerezo will have a lot to do which might either burden him with more defensive work, going deeper to get the ball or isolated up front.
VJ is known for his admiration of a good 4-4-2On the contrary I think 3 central midfielders will do him better, as he'll have more service, otherwise in the formation above against a 3 central midfielders on the other side Modric and Cerezo will have a lot to do which might either burden him with more defensive work, going deeper to get the ball or isolated up front.
He is not just a lumpen target man. If you see the '57 FA Cup Final you'll see his short passing and overall movement is excellent. Also Di Stefano called him "Magnifico". With the service he'll get here he will score.A strong, selfless player who had the stamina to spend 90 minutes at full stretch, Tommy was often at his best when drifting wide to the right, pulling defenders with him and interchanging positions with Johnny Berry. Such a ploy produced Johnny's unforgettable winner against Atletico Bilbao in the quarter-final of the 1956/57 European Cup.
I like Hassler's role here, adding some dynamism and ball-carrying to a midfield that might otherwise be a bit static and deep-lying.Can't get my head around both teams. Nestor Rossi - Gerson would have been a fantastic duo, but how will Hassler add to the dynamic. I don't think Gerson is good in this role here. Even in 70, he had Rivellino drifting in and Pele dropping back ahead of him in the middle.
Not sure on Kaka's role here too. With just 1 striker, Kaka will be facing Rossi directly and how effective will that be?
To be fair, I'd rather not indulge in this type of a comparison. Kanchelkis may have given Maldini some problems, but it wasn't indicative of his overall stature (just like Nani being a problem for Cole didn't stop the latter from taming Ronaldo on several occasions, or Evra being molested by freaking Lennon shouldn't be used as a broader argument) - which is something we have alluded to in the writeup. What Kanchelkis did or didn't do to Maldini in some isolated match shouldn't have a bearing here, in terms of projection.How good is Marinho defensively? From what I've seen he's handy going forward but Kanchelskis was a really handful at his peak and terrorised even Maldini.
Conversely, Kaltz was a better defender than Evra, who'll be up against Julinho - one of the greatest wingers in football history (who also had good workrate up and down the flank, might I add), apart from Kaltz himself when he bombs up, and Häßler - who will complete the triangle on the right - given his free role. Fair to say, Patrice might have more to worry about here, than his counterpart on the other end.Also Katlz is quality but having a trio of Kaka, Zagallo and Evra in the left and inside left channel. This would be a severe task for anyone.
Didn't specify that KHF will gobble Taylor - the key word was 'favorable' - for our team in a 1v1 matchup sense. KHF was the top, top European stopper at his peak - who was regularly voted German defender of the Year, and was voted in two successive EURO All-Star teams from the early to mid '80s (don't think many will argue with that), and I'd daresay he's even a tad overqualified for the role given that he tasked with marking the likes of Platini on the international stage.Also Forster won't just gobble up Taylor.
It's fairly simple to be honest - Rossi breaks down plays, and sets things up for Gérson on a platter, and Häßler is the third wheel who opens up the field with his dynamic style of play, ventures forward, and even chips in with his extensive workrate. Rossi and Gérson would've been excellent from a qualitative sense, but Häßler brings invaluable effervescence to that part of the pitch. In some ways, because of his multi functionality - Häßler can act a link from Gérson to Riva; and also - Orsi operated on both - the inside and outside channels - so in a positional sense, his role isn't too different from Rivelino, though admittedly he was more of a dribbler than a playmaker like Rivelino. The overarching point is that given that these are fantasy drafts, we should be allowed certain flexibilities based on skillset, rather than regurgitating historical setups - because that wouldn't be fun, at all.Nestor Rossi - Gerson would have been a fantastic duo, but how will Hassler add to the dynamic. I don't think Gerson is good in this role here. Even in 70, he had Rivellino drifting in and Pele dropping back ahead of him in the middle.
That he's slightly more cautious than Marinho in his defensive duties. We wanted to relay this description in graphic form (without fudging up his overall attacking output on the other end on the pitch):What does the backwards arrow on Kaltz is supposed to represent? @Šjor Bepo @Invictus
Minor functional difference, but we thought it merited an extra arrow just to make thing clear.Manfred Kaltz - Rightback - Support
Marinho Chagas - Left Wingback - Support
Then I'm surprised tbf. I imagined that you would want Kaltz to be the more attacking one of the two, especially with Riva in the box.That he's slightly more cautious than Marinho in his defensive duties. We wanted to relay this description in graphic form (without fudging up his overall attacking output on the other end on the pitch):
Minor functional difference, but we thought it merited an extra arrow just to make thing clear.
Kaltz will still contribute heavily in the build up but he will be more cautious in his movement as he is against attacking fullback and a better winger then Chagas is facing. Chagas is facing only Kanchelskis as Neville is ordered to stay in defensive line so he will have much more freedom in going up + Kaltz has Julinho in front who can easily do the job without any support, not that he wont have one.Then I'm surprised tbf. I imagined that you would want Kaltz to be the more attacking one of the two, especially with Riva in the box.
Don't know much about Chagas - is he worth it? You're essentially shifting attacking balance to the left (I hope that this thought is understandable, my English is particularly poor today)
Just to echo Bepo's thoughts - They're both attacking, we aren't shackling Kaltz down or anything. But, since Kaltz was the better defender of the two, we thought we'd signify that, and acknowledge the fact that he'll be up against a good wide player in Zagallo. Plus, Marinho might be a smaller name, but very important for the attacking balance of the left flank - especially given Neville's defensive function, and also - in terms of being a bridge to Gérson because he attacked with his right foot and came into the inside channels quite frequently:Then I'm surprised tbf. I imagined that you would want Kaltz to be the more attacking one of the two, especially with Riva in the box.
Don't know much about Chagas - is he worth it? You're essentially shifting attacking balance to the left (I hope that this thought is understandable, my English is particularly poor today)
That's fair. I just thought the out of place comment on Kanchelskis was somehwat harsh.To be fair, I'd rather not indulge in this type of a comparison. Kanchelkis may have given Maldini some problems, but it wasn't indicative of his overall stature (just like Nani being a problem for Cole didn't stop the latter from taming Ronaldo on several occasions, or Evra being molested by freaking Lennon shouldn't be used as a broader argument) - which is something we have alluded to in the writeup. What Kanchelkis did or didn't do to Maldini in some isolated match shouldn't have a bearing here, in terms of projection.
Well Julinho may well have good work rate but Zagallo was reknowned for his balance he brought to the '58 side and will dovetail perfectly with Evra like he did with N.Santos. Also I think Evra's defensive ability is underated because he got lazy towards his Utd career and didn't run back much and was out of position. In his younger days this positional issue simply did not exist since he got back.Conversely, Kaltz was a better defender than Evra, who'll be up against Julinho - one of the greatest wingers in football history (who also had good workrate up and down the flank, might I add), apart from Kaltz himself when he bombs up, and Häßler - who will complete the triangle on the right - given his free role. Fair to say, Patrice might have more to worry about here, than his counterpart on the other end.
I misread your OP, I thought it said Forster will mark Taylor out of the game. Also I've been in situations before which people argue big striker vs big defender, defender wins. So I'm trying to point out Taylor is much more than Chris Sutton.Didn't specify that KHF will gobble Taylor - the key word was 'favorable' - for our team in a 1v1 matchup sense. KHF was the top, top European stopper at his peak - who was regularly voted German defender of the Year, and was voted in two successive EURO All-Star teams from the early to mid '80s (don't think many will argue with that), and I'd daresay he's even a tad overqualified for the role given that he tasked with marking the likes of Platini on the international stage.
As even Bepo admits Kaka will need to be stopped by an entire team effort not just by Rossi. Kaka is to be a creative second-striker. Pick up the ball in central areas and dribble at pace. Then either play in Kancheslkis, Zagallo or Taylor or shoot. It's quite similar to when he played off Shevchenko at Milan. When Crespo left he played further forward. In fact in this team Kaka actually has more options than his later Milan team.Not sure on Kaka's role here too. With just 1 striker, Kaka will be facing Rossi directly and how effective will that be?
I think Zagallo will have a work load on the left both offensively and defensively with Hassler running into that space and Julinho there as well, restricting a bit his effect centrally.You are forgetting Zagallo. He was the player that made Pele, Didi and Garrincha work in the Brazil '58 team. He also played more of a centralish role in '62 so will provide a lot of aid in midfield.
Also given the fact Sjor is playing quite vertically I don't expect him to have much more possesion than me, so the 3 vs 2 won't be a huge issue.
Aye, there weren't many better than Evra at balancing defensive responsibility with providing a relentless outlet on the overlap. Apart from an underwhelming final pass at times, he was incredible at his peak. It saddens me a bit in these drafts when Ashley Cole is (fairly) viewed as an excellent pick at left back, and then Evra is nowhere to be seen.Also I think Evra's defensive ability is underated because he got lazy towards his Utd career and didn't run back much and was out of position. In his younger days this positional issue simply did not exist since he got back.
Our CF during the Busby Babes era. Was killed in Munich. Has a good reputation of being a complete CF. Hard to rate him in an all time context. Based on minimal stuff I know about him, I'd put him as a traditional CF, presence in box, hold up and able to bring others into play.@Physiocrat Who is that Taylor guy, where do you think he stands in football all time history, what's his playstyle and what exactly will he bring to your team beside goals? (sorry I'm not all that versed in MUFC history)
Hard to deny that.VJ is known for his admiration of a good 4-4-2
What I mean is that I believe Modric-Cerezo as a midfield duo with Kaka in a 4-4-1-1 with the duo as the CM pair, is better use of Modric and Kaka tbf than in the diamond you had(can't seem to remember who were the other two). Modric in a 4-4-2 with a strong defensive CM like Cerezo could be excellent, Modric has the abilities to single-handedly dominate midfields, and with Kaka linking up with him in the final third and the good wing players, I can see him thriving. The problem with the 4-4-2 diamond was the lack of space Modric had to operate in central areas and the big defensive duty you had for him - there would be a huge difference between the movement Kaka will do behind a single striker or behind two strikers, and the way I see it Modric's natural movements will work better with Kaka when he's in a more advanced role.On the contrary I think 3 central midfielders will do him better, as he'll have more service, otherwise in the formation above against a 3 central midfielders on the other side Modric and Cerezo will have a lot to do which might either burden him with more defensive work, going deeper to get the ball or isolated up front.
To be fair I don't think 3-5-2(or 5-3-2 for that matter), 4-3-3 or 4-4-2(4-4-1-1) would make a difference for Modric. With two attacking full backs/wing backs in 4-3-3/5-3-2 you pretty much have the same options for him on the wing as you would with a conventional 4-4-2 especially with the ball.Hard to deny that.
What I mean is that I believe Modric-Cerezo as a midfield duo with Kaka in a 4-4-1-1 with the duo as the CM pair, is better use of Modric and Kaka tbf than in the diamond you had(can't seem to remember who were the other two). Modric in a 4-4-2 with a strong defensive CM like Cerezo could be excellent, Modric has the abilities to single-handedly dominate midfields, and with Kaka linking up with him in the final third and the good wing players, I can see him thriving. The problem with the 4-4-2 diamond was the lack of space Modric had to operate in central areas and the big defensive duty you had for him - there would be a huge difference between the movement Kaka will do behind a single striker or behind two strikers, and the way I see it Modric's natural movements will work better with Kaka when he's in a more advanced role.
Anyway, I think you had a great team mate just not the best use of Modric, but that's just the annoying Modric fanboy speaking
He was a target man style player who was excellent in the air but was also pretty mobile, he could drift left and right and also link up play very well, he had a good short pass on him. For a more modern comparison he's similar to Christian Vieri. Unfortunately the only good lot of footage which gives an all rounf view is the '57 FA Cup Final vs Villa.@Physiocrat Who is that Taylor guy, where do you think he stands in football all time history, what's his playstyle and what exactly will he bring to your team beside goals? (sorry I'm not all that versed in MUFC history)
Yeah of course, no team was perfect, but I still think that if you wanted the best of either of Modric or Kaka you'd be better off with someone like Hierro as DM, Davids as LCM, B2B as RCM(Seedorf or anyone in that style). At the beginning, and correct me if I'm mistaken, you had a DM who wasn't a creative type in the Pirlo vibe, and the LCM was Schneider who was also pretty adventurous, with Modric & Kaka. That is very far off getting the best of either. The Hierro-Davids-Modric-Kaka theme yeah it works for Kaka very well, but not as well for Modric who isn't the type for a diamond.Sure in the last draft it needed some tuning up until the final, but at the end Hierro as DM, Davids as LCM, Modric as RCM and Kaka as AM behind 2 strikers in Villa/Sheva and 2 attacking full backs in Cafu/Alaba makes it as optimal as you can get for Kaka to shine
Our CF during the Busby Babes era. Was killed in Munich. Has a good reputation of being a complete CF. Hard to rate him in an all time context. Based on minimal stuff I know about him, I'd put him as a traditional CF, presence in box, hold up and able to bring others into play.
Thanks.He was a target man style player who was excellent in the air but was also pretty mobile, he could drift left and right and also link up play very well, he had a good short pass on him. For a more modern comparison he's similar to Christian Vieri. Unfortunately the only good lot of footage which gives an all rounf view is the '57 FA Cup Final vs Villa.
I think its being made to little, perspectives eh?I think too much is being made of the 2 vs 3 in midfield again especially since it's only really Hassler who will provide much energy in there. Modric and Cerezo are both complete mobile midfielders, along with Zagallo helping out they will have space to work.
Kaka will be in congested midfield area marked mainly by Rossi and if and when he cuts loose and escapes the shackles of our midfield he will have the great Billy Wright sweeping behind.He can pick out Kaka in the inside left channel who can use his exceptional acceleration to glide past Wright/ Forster (neither of whom were the quickest). Lest we forget how good Kaka was at Milan see this: his dribbling from deepish positions is exactly what I'm asking of him during attacks.
Chagas is right footed so that helps a lot when defending the inside channel.In addition if Modric glides the ball inside the full-back Kanchelskis can really cause problems:
We agree but also think we have much bigger threat on the other side.I really think the pace of Kanchelskis (when he cuts in) and Kaka could be a real problem for his two CBs and DM.
Well, it's not a criticism, just stating the fact here)Hard to deny that
My thoughts entirely. The DM and CBs aren't the quickest. Kaka could make all the difference.Sjor and Invictus look pretty tidy as well: my only question would be to what extent will that very rigorous central defensive trio have the pace to deal with a bursting Kaka? I can see how they match up well to Tommy, but Kaka's athleticism would be a different beast entirely.
If Rossi was more mobile I think you'd have a great midfield three. The lack of all mobility allows Cerezo and Modric more space than they'd otherwise which is a problem with quick direct options literally left, right and centre.I think its being made to little, perspectives eh?
They are against 3 top class midfielders that suit each other very well in our opinion. Zagallo will be occupied with ever present Kaltz so if he goes inside Kaltz will have time and space to volchure forwards and send in his famous bananenflanken for Riva who is fantastic in the air.
Another even match-up. It's hard to pick a winner here. Tactically both look sound. I've got no issues with Physio's 4-4-1-1: it's solid, sensible with wide players used to operating in that kind of set-up and central players suited to holding positionally rather than careering forward. Sjor and Invictus look pretty tidy as well: my only question would be to what extent will that very rigorous central defensive trio have the pace to deal with a bursting Kaka? I can see how they match up well to Tommy, but Kaka's athleticism would be a different beast entirely.
from our OP said:Kaká possesses the pace to rip apart any defensive midfielder in this pool, so marking him in man would admittedly be futile. The plan is to squeeze the pitch as much possible in the middle, and clog up the area - in a way that limits time and space on the ball for him. Rossi was a legendary destroyer, and he will form a bank in front of Kaká, with two defensive juggernauts acting as the next level of containment.
@PhysiocratKaka will be in congested midfield area marked mainly by Rossi and if and when he cuts loose and escapes the shackles of our midfield he will have the great Billy Wright sweeping behind.
He isnt Gattuso type player that he will run around the pitch like an idiot and try to tackle Kaka. He will use his head(positioning, clever movement) and his presence to stop Kaka with the help of his teammates. Pace as such isnt really important as our plan to stop Kaka is to make the pitch the smallest as it can be and use our numerical advantage in midfield to give him as little space and time as possible with Rossi being his main guardian."Strength, temperament, management, skill, presence, transmission, influence.Everything had Pipo. It is permanent. What no discussion. The sum of all attributes. Of all shades. And incorruptible fidelity to the well played ball. And an insult to the guy who hits it up, which takes it out long and far, which does not make it roll on the floor. " This was defined in 1965 Figure in a note that was titled Now they call No. 5, before they said Pipo. Rossi had all that and more, because it was a giant in an age of giants a central midfielder centrojás or old school with its panoramic vision to move ahead and drew revenue from its good punch.