FootballHQ
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2017
- Messages
- 18,305
- Supports
- Aston Villa
Pretty much correct. Forgot Scholes had that eye injury that keeped him out for pretty much a year.The Keane-Scholes debate is a product of Scholes’s post-2006 career. Before then there was little or no debate. Our play went through Keane for the most part, Scholes was not considered a controlling midfield-maestro, and his best season came playing as a supporting forward behind RVN. His attacking instincts contributed to the tactical problems we had in Europe after 1999.
After his return in 2006 he settled into that deeper role, but he wasn’t a first choice after 2008.
In a way Scholes and Xavi are similar in that they only became truly revered coming up to 30. I can't remember in 2006 anyone saying Xavi was one of greatest midfielders to play the game even when Barca were winning the CL (that was the Ronaldinho show).
Only after Spain euro 2008 win and him having a magnificent tournament did the narrative grow.