McGrathsipan
Dawn’s less famous husband
Fantastic AgentAnd don`t forget mate that Chelsea bought him AFTER we saw how limited he was for us in the PL.
Fantastic AgentAnd don`t forget mate that Chelsea bought him AFTER we saw how limited he was for us in the PL.
And bad scouting department for ChelseaFantastic Agent
And you signed him after he showed how limited he was at Everton (despite a decent goal record against shit teams he did feck all against opponents of note) and how he ran away from fighting a rubbish Torres and an ageing Eto'o for a place in the Chelsea team.And don`t forget mate that Chelsea bought him AFTER we saw how limited he was for us in the PL.
He looked better in Everton to be fair, they played to his strenghts with alot of crosses into the box and they were a weaker team so he had more room to run in behind opposition teams.And you signed him after he showed how limited he was at Everton (despite a decent goal record against shit teams he did feck all against opponents of note) and how he ran away from fighting a rubbish Torres and an ageing Eto'o for a place in the Chelsea team.
He's basically a good PL level scorer who PR'd his way to chances at top teams defences.
I'll be the first to admit I get more wrong than I do right but this chancer? Saw through him as early as his first debut for us.
I think it helped that at Everton they hadn't exactly had any top strikers for years before Lukaku and since he left either. If you are comparing him to the likes of Jelavic and Yakubu, its a bit different to historically what he was up against at Chelsea and United.He looked better in Everton to be fair, they played to his strenghts with alot of crosses into the box and they were a weaker team so he had more room to run in behind opposition teams.
At United he showed that he could not be involved in the buildup much because of lack of first touch and technique. And this is when i think Chelsea should know that he is not the kind of player a bigger club needs who wants the striker to be part of the buildup.
And at Everton zero pressure.I think it helped that at Everton they hadn't exactly had any top strikers for years before Lukaku and since he left either. If you are comparing him to the likes of Jelavic and Yakubu, its a bit different to historically what he was up against at Chelsea and United.
When he rejoined Chelsea, he just had a season for Inter in which he was praised for how much he improved his first touch. I remember reports how Conte had him go through training drills to work on that aspect of his game. So I think one can't really blame Chelsea for thinking that this weakness was gone or at least not as prevalent anymore.He looked better in Everton to be fair, they played to his strenghts with alot of crosses into the box and they were a weaker team so he had more room to run in behind opposition teams.
At United he showed that he could not be involved in the buildup much because of lack of first touch and technique. And this is when i think Chelsea should know that he is not the kind of player a bigger club needs who wants the striker to be part of the buildup.
For the amount of money they spent on him, you would think there would be a better option out there, a more complete player.When he rejoined Chelsea, he just had a season for Inter in which he was praised for how much he improved his first touch. I remember reports how Conte had him go through training drills to work on that aspect of his game. So I think one can't really blame Chelsea for thinking that this weakness was gone or at least not as prevalent anymore.
Still think it was a very dumb decision to bring him in. They had something that worked with Havertz and Werner up front. Havertz profited from a mobile striker so he could ghost into the spaces Werner left vacant when he made his supporting runs to the wings and with Lukaku it all looked static. Werner also got lots and lots of chances, so I would either have hoped he'd improve his conversion rate or replaced him with a similar striker instead of a completely different type. With hindsight, the Lukaku signing was probably the beginning of the end of Tuchel's time there that initially was very, very promising.
I'd rather a half-injured Martial over Lukuku!Who are your current striking alternatives at the moment? It's Martial, maybe he-who-shall-not-be-named or someone else out of position.
Obviously you're not going to be signing Lukaku but if he was in your squad, he'd get getting some game time.
I appreciate you'd rather sign almost anyone else of course but that's not what Unam333 said.
You've just flogged one of your reject to them as well.The Saudi’s will bail them out yet again.
Defiently agree with that, to add him to a team that won the UCL playing high pressing and positionally fluid football was utterly moronic.At United he showed that he could not be involved in the buildup much because of lack of first touch and technique. And this is when i think Chelsea should know that he is not the kind of player a bigger club needs who wants the striker to be part of the buildup.
Inter would have already bought him on a permanent deal if he wasn't being such a cnut. A transfer fee was just about to be agreed between the clubs before Lukaku again started causing unnecessary headache for everyone involved.The Saudi’s will bail them out yet again.
Nooooooooooooooooo - just nail Lukaku's ass to the bench until he accepts the Saudi moneyTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I can accept this if it means we get free of Lukaku. Vlahovic would be on less money and there’s no toxicity around him, but I hate that we’re the ones adding money on top of Lukaku and we already have Jackson.Nooooooooooooooooo - just nail Lukaku's ass to the bench until he accepts the Saudi money
Vlahovic is on €11m salary. He walks in as our 3rd highest earner. Poch said he wants a striker with a different profile. Jackson and Vlahovic are very different. Not sure where this will leave Broja? I doubt he wants to be the third option.I can accept this if it means we get free of Lukaku. Vlahovic would be on less money and there’s no toxicity around him, but I hate that we’re one adding money on top of Lukaku and we already have Jackson.
That’s what, £174k a week? Lukaku is on double that here.Vlahovic is on €11m salary. He walks in as our 3rd highest earner. Poch said he wants a striker with a different profile. Jackson and Vlahovic are very different. Not sure where this will leave Broja? I doubt he wants to be the third option.
More about it. It is £10m on this one. As clubs do not need to disclose salary, we never truly know.That’s what, £174k a week? Lukaku is on double that here.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He was never a star, his PR team was.Can't sell him for love nor money. How his star has fallen.
Huh?Chelsea hung onto him for too long I reckon - should have sold him to Inter or whoever a season earlier.
He wasn't going to play for you and you kind of knew he wasn't any good so you should have sold to other clubs or at least loaned with an agreement that they'd buy. He still had value at the time as well. Your only hope now is Saudi and if they don't come in I don't know what you'll do.Huh?
We hung onto him for exactly one season. And during that season Lukaku professed his love towards Inter about three months in and it was all fecked after that.
Last summer we let him go on loan because Inter, being the broke feckers they've been for a long time now, were refusing to even consider a permanent deal and Lukaku himself made it very clear Inter were the only destination he accepted.
So aside from us never buying him in the first place, what do you reckon the club should have done differently to avoid the situation we now find ourselves in with this guy?
Easier said than done though.He wasn't going to play for you and you kind of knew he wasn't any good so you should have sold to other clubs or at least loaned with an agreement that they'd buy. He still had value at the time as well. Your only hope now is Saudi and if they don't come in I don't know what you'll do.
That's the exact problem, all it took was basic due dillengence into his lack of character and it would have been enough to run a mile.So aside from us never buying him in the first place, what do you reckon the club should have done differently to avoid the situation we now find ourselves in with this guy?
Well yeah it's hard to disagree with any of that but now that he was already on our books I don't see what we could have done any differently either last summer or this year to make it easier to cut ties with him.That's the exact problem, all it took was basic due dillengence into his lack of character and it would have been enough to run a mile.
I was delighted when we sold him and even more delighted when United were even more stupid than us in 2017. As soon as I started to relax thinking the window of opportunity for a Lukaku return passed we fecking signed him, unbelievable.
While he laughs at your bank accountLukaku should stay in Europe so we can continue laughing at him.
Smart for who? surely not Juventus.Smart move.
Proves his point. Smart move for Chelsea.Smart for who? surely not Juventus.
Juventus all it need to do is wait till mid august.
Chelsea has a big problem and we can totally turn this deal into a loan with option to buy.
So Chelsea can have one more year deprecation and sell it for 30m next summer.
I would never trade Vlahovic for Lukaku. Even if Vlahovic has pubalgia
The one acting like a clown gets laughed at.While he laughs at your bank account
We sold him at the top, for sure. For all the bad things Solskjaer did, he knew that Lukaku wasn't an elite striker from day one, moved him out to the wing and then sold him when he threw his toys out of the pram. Did us a huge favour or he would still be here, but on loan somewhere else.Was just watching the CL final replay. That open header he missed was a sitter. Chelsea hung onto him for too long I reckon - should have sold him to Inter or whoever a season earlier.
If the deal was acceptable to Chelsea as a loan with an option to buy, don't you think it would have happened ages ago with Inter already?Juventus all it need to do is wait till mid august. Chelsea has a big problem and we can totally turn this deal into a loan with option to buy.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
well we're not exactly obnious to get rid of Vlahovic 23yrs old to get a fatter 31yrs old on higher wages.If the deal was acceptable to Chelsea as a loan with an option to buy, don't you think it would have happened ages ago with Inter already?
Lukaku himself will be getting a bit anxious too if this drags on. No matter how much of a wanker he is I doubt he's the kind of footballer who would be happy just training with the reserves to pick up his pay check. If Juve don't pay up the Saudi Arabia option is still on the table and it's likely that option will continue to be on the table till their transfer window shuts in late September, weeks after the window closes in Europe.