Scoring goals is the most important thing

rocks13

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,472
Location
Belfast
Our success has always been tied to scoring goals:

SAF: Lots of goals, okay defense -> Trophies galore
Moyes: Few goals, okay defense -> Sacked
LVG: Few goals, good defense -> Sacked
Mourinho: Few goals, great defense -> Outside top 4

You can see the correlation here. Football style and tactics are irrelevant, if you score goals fans will be happy and you will win games. Zlatan and Pogba have had more than 50% of our scoring chances and have a 13% and 5% conversion rate. You won't win the title, let alone make the top 4 if you can't score goals.

What should Mourinho do differently? I personally think he should be challenging the team to score 3+ goals every game against a weaker side and consider anything else a failure. No more, "every match is difficult and we only need to score 1 more than the other team" BS.
I really wouldn't say that our defence is great.
 

GBBQ

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
4,811
Location
Ireland
I really wouldn't say that our defence is great.
3rd best in the league this season and I would imagine the best defense for the past 17 games. It wasn't that long since teams used to waltz through us at will and we'd shit our pants.
 

rocks13

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,472
Location
Belfast
3rd best in the league this season and I would imagine the best defense for the past 17 games. It wasn't that long since teams used to waltz through us at will and we'd shit our pants.
Surely you would need to be the best in the league before we start using the word 'great'. It's no better than under Van Gaal which the OP described as 'good'.
 

GazTheLegend

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
3,658
Didn't people used to complain when Rooney "only scored goals"? Or Hernandez?

I think that a lot of fans forget how hard it actually is to put the ball in to the net
 

GBBQ

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
4,811
Location
Ireland
Surely you would need to be the best in the league before we start using the word 'great'. It's no better than under Van Gaal which the OP described as 'good'.
Which is why i had the addendum that for the last 17 games we've most likely been the best, that's consistent form in our defense since Mourinho has had time to settle in.
 

rocks13

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,472
Location
Belfast
Which is why i had the addendum that for the last 17 games we've most likely been the best, that's consistent form in our defense since Mourinho has had time to settle in.
Or you've conveniently chosen a spell where we haven't played many top sides.
 

kidbob

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
8,082
Location
Ireland
We don't have the same level of quality, directness and pace as back in Fergie's day. Players like Rooney, Ronaldo, Giggs, Nani etc who could beat players for fun, play fast tempo football and also produce consistent moments of magic to win us games. Lack a Hernandez figure who could be depended on to get you goals consistently. We also lack at full backs. Shaw has a long way to go to match Evra's importance in games.

Edit: most importantly our delivery from set pieces is bloody awful compared to Fergie's sides. For a team with players like Pogba and Ibra in it we should be scoring a lot more from corners.
 

rocks13

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,472
Location
Belfast
We played City (league cup), Spurs, Arsenal, Liverpool and Everton and conceded 3 goals.
So if we discount playing City's reserves we've kept one clean sheet in four games against decent opposition - again I'd hardly define that as great.
 

GBBQ

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
4,811
Location
Ireland
So if we discount playing City's reserves we've kept one clean sheet in four games against decent opposition - again I'd hardly define that as great.
Some fans will never be happy. Less than a goal a game and unbeaten in 4 months in the league and still refusing to give the defense credit.
 

rocks13

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,472
Location
Belfast
Some fans will never be happy. Less than a goal a game and unbeaten in 4 months in the league and still refusing to give the defense credit.
You must have missed our final against Southampton last week. If you think that's a great defence you have really low standards.
 

rocks13

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,472
Location
Belfast
Which is why i had the addendum that for the last 17 games we've most likely been the best, that's consistent form in our defense since Mourinho has had time to settle in.
We didn't concede in our first 3 league games. Is that a sign that our defence has regressed under Mourinho?
 

sosolid4u09

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
1,493
In the same way that good attacks will go on barren runs, good defences will leak goals. It's all about the relative strength of each.

For example Real Madrid, have a worse defence than us. 4 more goals conceded in 1 less game. Yet they are at the top. Why? Because having Ronaldo, Bale, Benzema, Isco, James Rodriguez and Morata gets you shitloads of goals (almost double our total), that's why.

If you have that level of quality up front, you don't need the best defence in the world. It's all relative, it's not rocket science.
Comparing cross leagues like that is very fishy.

Also i totally disagree that good defences go on spells where they ship goals. Maybe one or two games at most but a great defence is solid and consistent for months on end. Look at Liverpool they have arguably the best attack in the league. During January February when they crashed and burned, if they had a solid defence they would have got through that period.

If you're in spain and have the likes of front 6 barca or real have then of course nothing will stop you.
 

GBBQ

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
4,811
Location
Ireland
You must have missed our final against Southampton last week. If you think that's a great defence you have really low standards.
So your 1 game sample is now a more accurate sample than 4 months of play. its a final, anything can happen when 2 teams are playing for a cup. Overall our numbers have been excellent. Even the great combination of VDS Rio and Vidic were prone to letting in 3 or 4 goals from time to time.

We didn't concede in our first 3 league games. Is that a sign that our defence has regressed under Mourinho?
So you're just basically resorting to nonsense now?
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
We didn't concede in our first 3 league games. Is that a sign that our defence has regressed under Mourinho?
OK. Our defense s crap.

As for OP, revolutionary stuff, someone should inform Jose about this. :D
 

rocks13

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,472
Location
Belfast
So your 1 game sample is now a more accurate sample than 4 months of play. its a final, anything can happen when 2 teams are playing for a cup. Overall our numbers have been excellent. Even the great combination of VDS Rio and Vidic were prone to letting in 3 or 4 goals from time to time.


So you're just basically resorting to nonsense now?
Just calling out your nonsense. Our defence is ok - we don't concede much against poorer teams but look unconvincing against better teams.

If you want to keep calling that 'great' then fine.
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,846
Did you also know "scoring more than the opposition wins you the game"
Unfortunately, a lot of fans don't understand this concept.
They'd rather see a player doing a few dribbles and not scoring than someone who actually scores (ugly) goals.
 

diarm

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
16,808
I was watching a compilation of Van Nistelrooys United goals there (inspired by the penalty thread) and what struck me was the quality of the attacking play and crossing from fullbacks like Silvestre who you'd look back at and think were pretty limited.

They are so much better than our current and recent fullbacks it isn't even funny. I've just watched 150 Ruud goals and the amount of times I listened to a commentator say: "and Sil-VESTRE for Van NISTELROOOOOY" is staggering. The quality of his crossing and other defenders/wide players like O'Shea, Evra, Park and Giggs is simply lightyears beyond what we've seen over the last few seasons.

Something I've thought for a while that Martial and Rashford really need to work on, is learning when not to take a man on but instead to bend a low cross around a retreating defence to find the man at the back post. Zlatan attacks that post well but nobody ever finds him in the way that a player like Giggs would do regularly. Watching these old videos it isn't only our wide attackers who should be working on this though - the fullbacks and central midfielders need to step up too.
 

ThomasEmil

Invisible Herrera Watcher
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
5,435
Location
Denmark
Fergie cared tremendously about his defence. In his first biography he even states that the defence is the foundation of attack - and without security and leadership at the back, you would have difficulty getting goals. So to say he was mostly about getting goals is incorrect.
 

JmRssll555

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
3,011
Location
Scotland
In his first season back at Chelsea, Jose had a problem with a lack of goals. He recognised the issue and purchased Costa and Fabregas, early in the transfer window and they went on to win the league the following season. We have a very obvious problem with goalscoring, but Jose will be fully aware of it and I also expect him to have a solution in mind already.
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,846
"Occasionally in sport you have to actually achieve the object of the game. The object of this game is to score by getting the ball into the opposing goal."
Footyislife 2017
I've stated this in many threads. Unfortunately many fans disagree. They'd much rather a player do some dribbles with no end product than actually score an ugly goal (without any dribbles).
 

ManUArfa

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
1,466
Location
....and Solskjaer has won it!
We used to have a counter-attacking style where we hit teams hard and quick. Haven't had that for many years including SAF's last few. Now it's all about keeping the ball and scoring a perfect goal befitting of our players with big egos.
 

Mike09

New Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
3,035
Our success has always been tied to scoring goals:

SAF: Lots of goals, okay defense -> Trophies galore
Moyes: Few goals, okay defense -> Sacked
LVG: Few goals, good defense -> Sacked
Mourinho: Few goals, great defense -> Outside top 4

You can see the correlation here. Football style and tactics are irrelevant, if you score goals fans will be happy and you will win games. Zlatan and Pogba have had more than 50% of our scoring chances and have a 13% and 5% conversion rate. You won't win the title, let alone make the top 4 if you can't score goals.

What should Mourinho do differently? I personally think he should be challenging the team to score 3+ goals every game against a weaker side and consider anything else a failure. No more, "every match is difficult and we only need to score 1 more than the other team" BS.


Rio, Vidic and Evra were crazy solid back then not just okay. We got a lot of clean sheets during their era. In fact we started winning EPL again ever since we signed Vidic. We even sold Ruud van nisterooy in the same year. I think having a solid defense is also as important as having clinical finisher too.
 

sunama

Baghdad Bob
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
16,846
Rio, Vidic and Evra were crazy solid back then not just okay. We got a lot of clean sheets during their era. In fact we started winning EPL again ever since we signed Vidic. We even sold Ruud van nisterooy in the same year. I think having a solid defense is also as important as having clinical finisher too.
True.
But don't forget that throughout the years, MUFC have been a team known for scoring lots of goals. We have never been a team known for winning games 1-0.
 

Mike09

New Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
3,035
True.
But don't forget that throughout the years, MUFC have been a team known for scoring lots of goals. We have never been a team known for winning games 1-0.
Remember in 2011/2012 when Sir Alex said "I prefer win 1-0 and keep clean sheet than winning 5-4". Lol.

If we had the same defense Vidic, VDS, Evra Against Real in 2002/2003, we won't conceded a lot of goals easily.

I know Sir Alex had been playing an attacking football but I think having solid defend is also important. We might be able to change the result of final CL 2010/2011 if Sir Alex was willing to play more defensive formation like 451 instead of 442. Sometime it depends on who we are facing as well.
 

Footyislife

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Messages
978
Just calling out your nonsense. Our defence is ok - we don't concede much against poorer teams but look unconvincing against better teams.

If you want to keep calling that 'great' then fine.
Nonsense is judging our defense as "okay" because we are 3rd best, rather than the fact that we have conceded only 2 more goals than the best defense. You can count on one hand the amount of games we've given up more than 1 goal. I'd say that is impressive for a new manager when we are also creating the most chances in the league. He's not parking the bus, or playing boring posession football to do this. It's just good defensive organization. When we had Rio, Vidic, and Evra at their peak we had a ridiculous defense, but that was more due to individual talent. But it was only for a few seasons out of SAF's career at United. It's early, but Mourinho's teams are generally organized better and rely less on individual talent for defense.