Plant0x84
Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
At that point the Levy tax is applied and we pay for the loan 10x over.So in the unlikely scenario he turns out to be amazing for us, we won’t have an option to buy him?
At that point the Levy tax is applied and we pay for the loan 10x over.So in the unlikely scenario he turns out to be amazing for us, we won’t have an option to buy him?
What’s with these stinking posts. 1st choice and 2nd choice LB injured and ETH doesn’t trust one of the recent academy prospects so we’ve gone out and loaned someone half decent for a paltry amount of money. Genuinely what’s there to moan about on this one?We are a joke of a club. Its fecking depressing. And massive shame.
Perhaps log off for a bit if it is having such an impact on you.We are a joke of a club. Its fecking depressing. And massive shame.
If the new LB is not at Roberto Carlos peak levels then I dont want him.What’s with these stinking posts. 1st choice and 2nd choice LB injured and ETH doesn’t trust one of the recent academy prospects so we’ve gone out and loaned someone half decent for a paltry amount of money. Genuinely what’s there to moan about on this one?
Not sure if serious!If it means less chance of seeing Dalot on the pitch then I’m all for it.
We’ll have the same option that always exists.So in the unlikely scenario he turns out to be amazing for us, we won’t have an option to buy him?
Do they use a special kind of radio for this?This is disgraceful. The Glazers have tuned the biggest club in the world into a side show.
By loaning a premier league standard player in a position where we have no fit player?This is disgraceful. The Glazers have tuned the biggest club in the world into a side show.
We got the wrong one. Surprise surprise, we went for the cheapest option again, thats whats wrong. Stinking post.. start of your reply with an insult, typical of posters like you.What’s with these stinking posts. 1st choice and 2nd choice LB injured and ETH doesn’t trust one of the recent academy prospects so we’ve gone out and loaned someone half decent for a paltry amount of money. Genuinely what’s there to moan about on this one?
WhT??? A football club ??? Signed a football player??? In a position they need to cover???? The very cheek of it!!! Outrage!!! Disgrace!!!!This is disgraceful. The Glazers have tuned the biggest club in the world into a side show.
No I’m fine thanks. But you can log off if you can’t take criticising of our clubs wrong decisions.Perhaps log off for a bit if it is having such an impact on you.
Chelsea played him yesterday and we clearly wanted a break clause which wouldn’t work now. Money wasn’t the issueWe got the wrong one. Surprise surprise, we went for the cheapest option again, thats whats wrong. Stinking post.. start of your reply with an insult, typical of posters like you.
I get what he’s saying though. All seems a bit desperate.WhT??? A football club ??? Signed a football player??? In a position they need to cover???? The very cheek of it!!! Outrage!!! Disgrace!!!!
Unexpected long-term injuries will do that for you. Frankly we’re lucky it happened during the window.I get what he’s saying though. All seems a bit desperate.
As in stinking the place up, it’s hardly an insult. I don’t get why you seem so angry we’re loaning an LB when we have two out injured. We’re not, as the media made up to rile the fan base, signing Ryan Bertrand, paying stupid money for Cucurella or trying to coax Irwin out of retirement…it’s quite a sensible and low cost short term option.We got the wrong one. Surprise surprise, we went for the cheapest option again, thats whats wrong. Stinking post.. start of your reply with an insult, typical of posters like you.
You joke but…If the new LB is not at Roberto Carlos peak levels then I dont want him.
Why did we HAVE to send the player back in January though? Luke isn’t exactly on fire now and Malacia has missed pre season. Why not get the better left back on loan for the whole season, if it’s not a money issue?Chelsea played him yesterday and we clearly wanted a break clause which wouldn’t work now. Money wasn’t the issue
Its Reguilon mate he’s crap and this is the sort of transfer that makes us look like fecking amateursWhT??? A football club ??? Signed a football player??? In a position they need to cover???? The very cheek of it!!! Outrage!!! Disgrace!!!!
Shit man if you don’t see it you’re one of the lucky ones.Unexpected long-term injuries will do that for you. Frankly we’re lucky it happened during the window.
Agreed. Dalot has a poor injury record. Being a natural left wing back, Reguilon slots right in there. He is decent going forward, and has a great delivery from crosses. Conte wanted his old pal Perisic instead, and he lost his place. He was a decent player 2 seasons ago, and we even tried to sign him. At 26 he is coming to his peak and has something to prove. I really hope he smashes it. It’s a six month loan option, so it looks like Shaw might be back by then. This is a smart move all round. We’re not taking a gamble on an academy kid who can get their arse handed to them in the champions league against Leroy Sane, we’re getting someone who can handle it, and take it to the opposition.We will rotate him with Dalot for few months. Good enough player for that. We actually scouted him before he went to Spurs. Zero loan fee and low wage makes him decent option for next few months
On the contrary it makes us look sensible as this is a sound move. We need cover at LB whilst Shaw and Malacia are both out injured.Its Reguilon mate he’s crap and this is the sort of transfer that makes us look like fecking amateurs
Stinking post is an insult. Why are you so worried about how much money the Glazers spend on Cucurella? Put the money aside and make an honest answer.As in stinking the place up, it’s hardly an insult. I don’t get why you seem so angry we’re loaning an LB when we have two out injured. We’re not, as the media made up to rile the fan base, signing Ryan Bertrand, paying stupid money for Cucurella or trying to coax Irwin out of retirement…it’s quite a sensible and low cost short term option.
The break clause was money-related though. We didn't want to pay a player wages for the whole season that we may only need until January, so instead we went with our cheaper backup option.Chelsea played him yesterday and we clearly wanted a break clause which wouldn’t work now. Money wasn’t the issue
That makes zero sense as a reply but glad to see you’re fine as your posts suggested otherwise.No I’m fine thanks. But you can log off if you can’t take criticising of our clubs wrong decisions.
Play one of our highest rated youth players who’s just back from a good loan and been on the pre season tour? Fernandez will probably be sold tomorrow for peanuts making this move even more ridiculous/hilariousOn the contrary it makes us look sensible as this is a sound move. We need cover at LB whilst Shaw and Malacia are both out injured.
We are only obligated to keep him for 6 months. What would you rather us do sign a player long term, saddle us with a player who's not required?
Regulion isn't a world beater but he will do a job until our players get fit. Stfu with the moaning because we haven't signed Roberto Carlos.
Too bad.That makes zero sense as a reply but glad to see you’re fine as your posts suggested otherwise.
Well it had a certain pong to it.Stinking post is an insult. Why are you so worried about how much money the Glazers spend on Cucurella? Put the money aside and make an honest answer.
What would be the better option for ETH , Cucurella for the whole season or Requilon up until January?
Nah he’s decent. He’s had to put up with Jose and Conte as coaches, that’s enough to stifle anyone’s career. He’ll be ok, just give him a chance.Its Reguilon mate he’s crap and this is the sort of transfer that makes us look like fecking amateurs
Deadly fecking serious.Not sure if serious!
Naive. He’s our number 1 LB until at least the new year.he’s not great, but really just a depth option behind shaw, malacia, and probably even dalot. dont think he’ll play many minutes.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
i dont think shaw and malacia will be out that long, and i think dalot will still be picked in front of him. i could be wrong but lets see.Naive. He’s our number 1 LB until at least the new year.
I don’t think Malacia will be picked ahead of him, let alone Dalot who is a RB. He starts on Sunday, guaranteed.i dont think shaw and malacia will be out that long, and i think dalot will still be picked in front of him. i could be wrong but lets see.