Bubz27
No I won’t change your tag line
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
- Messages
- 21,590
Right decision not to start him. Hopefully he can make a difference if he gets on the pitch.
50%. The other 50% is on poch for not pulling him off.How much blame do you put on Kane? He is clearly putting personal glory and ego ahead of the team by playing in this. He is clearly not fit.
This post didn’t age well . He’s been awful, as predicted.Yep. He'll provide all kinds of threats to Liverpool:
* Ariel threats from corners, other set pieces and crosses.
* Shots from either foot from any angle or range - he can't be shepherded to his weaker side because he doesn't have one.
* Worldie-passes to Son or Eriksen or whoever as we break on the counter.
* Excellent record of one-on-one goals - running at a defender or their keeper if he receives a worldie-pass from Eriksen or whoever as we break on the counter
* Terrific record with penalty kicks should we get one.
* A physical presence up front to keep their CBs occupied.
* Tireless pressing up front.
Then there is the psychological boost to the team from seeing his name in the starting line-up.
And whilst some Liverpool fans and players may claim that they don't care whether he starts or not, it'll be a different story inside their heads if they see his name on the starting team-sheet.
Of course he did.How much blame do you put on Kane? He is clearly putting personal glory and ego ahead of the team by playing in this. He is clearly not fit.
Spurs were a completely different side when he came on. He should be absolutely livid.Moura must be fuming.
Can't blame him. I thought it was really bad of Poch not to start him, considering his goals got them to the final. It's just not fair. It says to the team, no matter what you do, Kane is always more important.Moura must be fuming.
Indeed.Indulging the selfish golden boy has proved costly. Just like the WC semifinal against Croatia when he should have looked to pass but selfishly went for glory. How he lasted the whole game is ridiculous.
Pretty much this yeah. Bad signal to the team IMO.Can't blame him. I thought it was really bad of Poch not to start him, considering his goals got them to the final. It's just not fair. It says to the team, no matter what you do, Kane is always more important.
Yep. Awful management.Can't blame him. I thought it was really bad of Poch not to start him, considering his goals got them to the final. It's just not fair. It says to the team, no matter what you do, Kane is always more important.
It's just a general thing in football in my opinion - you can't play a traditional number 9 with everyone attempting to assist the lad because that football is way too easy to defend against.Might have to start agreeing with the critics that he makes Tottenham play worse now. Scoring goals against big teams in the league now and again is what you'd expect. The guy has been poor in a few of the biggest games of his career now (the later stages WC games and tonight)
LegendMost of us could see how it'll pan out as early as the teams went out. I guess he's just too big a legend not to play in their biggest game ever. Game changed when Moura went in.
You could argue that they play better without him. Son in particular.Wasn’t Kane’s fault, the front 4 of spurs were piss poor and so was Lucas when he came on.
Son, Deli, Erikson and Kane just couldn’t get going.
You reckon he's not their legend? Good luck mate.Legend
That's because with Kane upfront they don't play as a front 4 - they play largely like midfielders trying to get the ball in to the centre of the box or just purely letting Kane decide where the ball goes next.Wasn’t Kane’s fault, the front 4 of spurs were piss poor and so was Lucas when he came on.
Son, Deli, Erikson and Kane just couldn’t get going.
You could argue that they play better without him. Son in particular.
Hardly. Plenty of us raised this issue when the teamsheets were out.I think he was right to start Kane, and all this feels very result oriented.
That's because with Kane upfront they don't play as a front 4 - they play largely like midfielders trying to get the ball in to the centre of the box or just purely letting Kane decide where the ball goes next.
It isn't. As one of the opponents of yours - I can tell you that when Kane is playing you as a team become lopsided, playing one dimensional football which relies on crosses.I think he was right to start Kane, and all this feels very result oriented.
Again thars because of Pochettino's reliance on tradional strikers like osvaldo, Lambert, Kane & Llorente - its a vital aspect to his tactica as much as it was for Jose. Makes the attack heavily one dimensional.Nah
They’ve barely won a game since he’s been injured. A couple of lucky CL results with Lucas and Llorente being hero’s doesn’t change that.
It isn't. As one of the opponents of yours - I can tell you that when Kane is playing you as a team become lopsided, playing one dimensional football which relies on crosses.
When son & Lucas play they get the feet on the ball and play quick short pass football in between the opponent defence & midfield which causes heavily imbalance to the opposition.
All Liverpool had to do today was keep Kane in the pocket & nothing happened because every player bar Son - all they did was to try to supply Kane from trippie to rose to Alli or Kane.
Kane isn't a bad player - it's more the way Pochettino uses him as this central man to your attack rather than one of many forwards in a fluid line of an attack.
And was Kane any worse than for example Firminho? I think Kane had a decent game, but for some reason it feels like some already decided that unless he scored he shouldn't have played.Hardly. Plenty of us raised this issue when the teamsheets were out.