Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Spider man can just copy into the spider verse and it will be all good
No and no, if films come out as scheduled, itll actually be the 4th film of the next phase, and there isn't currently an Avengers film in the phase.
Ah I see, thanks
What's this about then? Are you referring to the Pattinson Batman movie?
I really hope we don't. We don't need to be reminded of the awful Spider-man films Andrew Garfield was in, for one thing. For another it seems old hat already. Let the multiple spider-men stick to the animated films, please. I'm already worried about what they are going to do with the confirmed returning characters from the non-MCU films. Foxx's Electro was terrible, but he's a decent actor and has said he won't be in the blue makeup this time around, so presumably it'll be a different take on it.
Fine just have Tobey in it then
Sorry I meant the up coming Flash movie, I have edited my original post.
Haha I googled and was equally confused!
The next phase truly begins with Wandavision I believe.
Thank you, I'm not really clued up on the Mavel stuff.
Yeah it's quite good, they've experimented and it's worked IMO. Leads right into the next Doctor Strange movie too.
Tom Holland's Spiderman films are brilliant IMO.
Because there's 6 Spiderman films previous that have followed that exact formula. It's not like they're changing too much, the last spiderman followed that formula except was set in London/Europe. It's good to change it up a bit, multiverse is exciting.
Nah, it’s not proper Spider-Man to me. You’d never see a Batman film set anywhere besides Gotham, seeing Spider-Man in space is stupid. Can live with him being in other cities perhaps but feck the space stuff and fighting alongside other marvel characters.
What do you consider "proper" Spiderman?
You've been given a dedicated Spiderman film every two and a half years for the last two decades, nearly all of which fall under that description. How many times do you want to see the same film?
Spolier that shit, ffs.
But only after the villain gets one over on him first and knocks his confidence.
Thanks mat,e, I'll give it a watch.
That's important - he'll learn his inner strength is just as important as his outer strength.
Might even defeat 6 of them!
but at what cost ?
That is Spider-Man (2002) and Spider-Man 2 (2004).
I want to see that so much! I hope they dont make their own separate movie about them.
only if they are sinister.
Oh? Interested to know why. Not a fan of the actor or the Spidey character?
Good question
That makes sense, spiderman is completely opposite with the trash talking and witty comments whilst fighting villainsGood question
I actually liked previous Spider-Man movies and I don’t have an issue with the character (or actor) at all. Holland is very talented. I think you and I briefly touched on it during a prior conversation and it just boils down to preference. I like the more serious, darker/broodier hero/action type movies. If that makes sense?
Nah, it makes 100% sense. Don't get me wrong, i don't hate him or dislike him, actually. Just i.t.o. the MCU, he is my least favorite avenger (and obviously the Hulk - post getting his ass whipped by ThanosThat makes sense, spiderman is completely opposite with the trash talking and witty comments whilst fighting villains
He is basically the MCU in a nutshell
Spiderman is one of my favourites and I think thats where we differ in opinion. Aside from him having the best villains (like Batman), I think his stories are normally my favourite to read / watch
Funny thing is I see parallels with him and Batman in terms of gallery of the best villains, more down to earth (although one is radioactivily gifted), and all the gadgets available that are badass.
If that makes sense
). Sort of like having a kid around the business of grown ups. Sounds silly, I know. 